Buy-It Now: One Dollar Auction Attractive?

References

• Anderson, L.K., Taylor, J.R. and Holloway, R.J. “The Consumer and His Alternatives: An Experimental Approach,” Journal of Marketing Research (3:1), 1966, 62–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., Friedman, D., Milam, G. and Singh, N. Buy It Now: A Hybrid Internet Market Institution, Santa Cruz Department of Economics, Working Paper Series 1023, Department of Economics, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Assael, H. Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action, South-Western College Publishing, Cincinnati, OH, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Ba, S., Kalakota, R. and Whinston, A. B. “Using Client-Broker-Server Architecture for Intranet Decision Support,” Decision Support Systems (19), 1997, 171–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bapna, R., Goes, P. and Gupta, A. “Analysis and Design of Business-to-Consumer Online Auctions,” Management Science (49), 2003a, 85–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bapna, R., Goes, P. and Gupta, A. “Replicating Online Yankee Auctions to Analyze Auctioneers' and Bidders' Strategies,” Information Systems Research (14:3), 2003b, 244–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bapna, R., Jank, W. and Shmueli, G. “Price formation and Its Dynamics in Online Auctions,” Decision Support Systems (44:3), 2008, 641–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baty, J.B. II and Lee, R.M. “Internship: Enhancing the Vendor/Customer Dialectic in Electronic Shopping,” Journal of Management Information System (11:4), 1995, 9–31.
   Google Scholar
• Beale, R. and Wood, A. “Agent-Based Interaction,” Proceedings of the HCI'94 Conference on People and Computers IX, August, Glasgow, UK, 1994, 239–245.
   Google Scholar
• Bhargava, H.K. and Sundaresan, S. “Computing as Utility: Managing Availability, Commitment, and Pricing Through Contingent Bid Auctions,” Journal of Management Information Systems (21:2), 2004, 201–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch, A. and Sunder, S. “Tracking the Invisible Hand: Convergence of Double Auctions to Competitive Equilibrium,” Computational Economics (16:3), 2000, 257–284.
   Google Scholar
• Caldentey, R. and Vulcano, G. “Online Auction and List Price Revenue Management,” Management Science (53:5), 2007, 795–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, S.M. “Note on Online Auctions with Costly Bid Evaluation,” Management Science (49), 2003, 1521–1528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, E.H. “An Experimental Imperfect Market,” Journal of Political Economy (LVI), 1948, 95–108.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, T.Y., Kadiyali, V. and Park, Y.H. “Willingness to Pay and Competition in Online Auctions,” Journal of Marketing Research (44:2), 2007, 324–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb-Walgren, C.J., Ruble, C.A. and Donthu, N. “Brand Equity, Brand Preference, and Purchase Intent,” Journal of Advertising (24:3), 1995, 25–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, M., Eliashberg, J., Huber, J. and Saini, R. “Emotional Bidders — An Analytical and Experimental Examination of Consumers' Behavior in Priceline-Like Reverse Auctions,” Management Science (51:3), 2005, 352–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easley, R. F. and Tenorio, R. “Jump Bidding Strategies in Internet Auctions,” Management Science (50), 2004, 1407–1419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R., Haruvy, E. and Katok, E. “A Comparison of Buyer-Determined and Price-Based Multiattribute Mechanisms,” Marketing Science (26:5), 2007, 629–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallien, J. and Gupta, S. “Temporary and Permanent Buyout Prices in Online Auctions,” Management Science (53), 2007, 814–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gneezy, U. “Step-level Reasoning and Bidding in Auctions,” Management Science (51:11), 2005, 1633–1642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gode, D. K. and Sunder, S. “What Makes Markets Allocationally Efficient?,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics (112:2), 1997, 603–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gode, D. K. and Sunder, S. “Allocative Efficiency of Markets with Zero Intelligence (ZI) Traders: Market as a Partial Substitute for Individual Rationality.” Journal of Political Economy (101:1), 1993, 119–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gode, D.K., Spear, S.E. and Sunder, S. Convergence of Double Auctions to Pareto Optimal Allocations in the Edgeworth Box, Yale ICF Working Paper No. 04-30, June 7, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, S. Online Auction, Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Operations Research Center, Cambridge, MA, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hidvegi, Z., Wang, W. and Whinston, A. B. “Buy-Price English Auction,” Journal of Economic Theory (129:1), 2006, 31–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, R.K. The Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis: Techniques for Experimental Design, Measurement, Simulation, and Modeling, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. L., Easley, R. F. and Koehler, G. J. “Market Segmentation within Consolidated E-Markets: A Generalized Combinatorial Auction Approach,” Journal of Management Information Systems (23:1), 2006, 161–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, R. J. and Wang, B. “New Buyers' Arrival under Dynamic Pricing Market Microstructure: The Case of Group-Buying Discounts on the Internet,” Journal of Management Information Systems (18:2), 2001, 157–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keindl, B. A. Strategic Electronic Marketing in Managing E-Business, 2nd Edition, Thomson/South-Western, Cleveland, OH, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkegaard, R. and Overgaard, P. B. Buy-Out Prices in Online Auctions: Multi-Unit Demand, University of Aarhus Economics Working Paper No. 2003-4, Department of Economics, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Klemperer, P. Auctions: Theory and Practice, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Kocas, C. “A Model of Internet Pricing under Price-Comparison Shopping,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce (10:1), 2005, 111–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. F., Liu, L., Wu, L. H. and Zhang Z. “Predicting the Final Prices of Online Auction Items,” Expert Systems with Applications (31:3), 2006, 542–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucking-Reiley, D. “Auctions on the Internet: What's Being Auctioned, and How?,” Journal of Industrial Economics (48:3), 2000, 227–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucking-Reiley, D. “Using Field Experiments to Test Equivalence Between Auction Formats: Magic on the Internet,” American Economic Review (89:5), 1999, 1063–1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. “Econometric Analysis of Qualitative Response Models”, in: Z. Griliches, M. D. Intriligator (Eds.), Handbook of Econometrics (2), Amsterdam, North Holland, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Ravi, B., Paulo, G. and Alok, G. “Pricing and Allocation for Quality-Differentiated Online Services,” Management Science (51:7), 2005, 1141–1150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Swanson, J. and Lockwood, K. “The Value of Reputation on eBay: A Controlled Experiment,” Experimental Economics (9:2), 2006, 79–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, A. E. and Ockenfels, A. “Last-Minute Bidding and the Rules for Ending Second-Price Auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon Auctions on the Internet,” The American Economic Review (92:4), 2002, 1093-1103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segev, A., Wan, D. and Beam, C. Designing Electronic Catalogs for Business Value: Results of the Commerce Net Pilot, The Fisher Center for Information Technology and Management, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1995, 6–15.
   Google Scholar
• Shmueli, G., Russo, R.P. and Jank, W. The BARISTA: A Model for Bid Arrivals in Online Auctions, Technical Report, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, M. R. and Stern, B. “Consumer Bidding Behavior on Internet Auction Sites,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce (7:1), 2002, 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turocy, T.L. “Auction Choice for Ambiguity-Averse Sellers Facing Strategic Uncertainty.” Games and Economic Behavior (62:1), 2008, 155–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waehrer, K., Harstad, R. and Rothkopf, M. “Auction form Preferences of Risk Averse Bid Takers,” RAND Journal of Economics (29:1), 1988, 179–192.
   Google Scholar
• Walley, M.J.C. and Fortin, D.R. “Behavioral Outcomes from Online Auctions: Reserve Price, Reserve Disclosure, and Initial Bidding Influences in the Decision Process,” Journal of Business Research (58:9), 2005, 1409–1418.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. and Li, H. Z. “Factors Affecting Payment Choices in Online Auctions: A Study of eBay Traders,” Decision Support Systems (42:2), 2006, 1076–1088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar