Modeling Use Continuance Behavior in Microblogging Services: The Case of Twitter

References

• Assogba, Y., and Donath, J., “Mycrocosm: Visual micro-blogging,” Proceedings of the 42rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI, January 5-8, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R.P., and Warshaw, P.R., “Trying to consume,” Journal of Consumer Research (17:2), 1990, 127–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S.J., Böhringer, M., Kurze, C., and Stietzel, J., “Towards an understanding of social software: The case of Arinia,” Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Koloa, HI, January 5-8, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee, A., “Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model,” MIS Quarterly (25:3), 2001, 351–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D., Golder, S., and Lotan, G., “Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter,” Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Koloa, HI, January 5-8, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Böhringer, M., and Richter, A., “Adopting social software to the intranet: A case study on enterprise microblogging,” in Proceedings of the People and Computer Conference, Oldenbourg Verlag, Munich, 2009, 293–302.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, W.W., “The partial least squares approach for structural equation modelling,” in: Marcoulides, G.A. (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1998, 295–336.
   Google Scholar
• Compeau, D.R., and Higgins, C.A., “Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills,” Information Systems Research (6:2), 1991, 118–143.
   Google Scholar
• Crunchbase, “Twitter company profile,” retrieved on November 13, 2008, from: http://www.crunchbase.com/company/twitter.
   Google Scholar
• Dabolkar, P.A., Shepard, C.D., and Thorpe, D.I., “A comprehensive framework for service quality: an investigation of critical conceptual and measurement issues through a longitudinal study,” Journal of Retailing (76:2), 139–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D., “User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies (38:3), 1993, 475–487.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., and Warshaw, P.R., “User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models,” Management Science (35:8), 1989, 983–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, I., “The translucence of Twitter,” Proceedings of the Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference, Copenhagen, October 15-18, 2008, 58–72.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., and Buchner, A. “G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences,” Behavior Research Methods (39:2), 2007, 175–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and Larcker, F.D., “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” Journal of Marketing Research (18:1), 1981, 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartner, “Gartner Highlights 27 Technologies in the 2008 Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies,” retrieved on November 13, 2008, from: http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=739613.
   Google Scholar
• Günther, O., Krasnova, H., Riehle, D., and Schönberg, V., “Modeling micro-blogging adoption in the enterprise,” Proceedings of the Fifteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, San Francisco, CA, August 609. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, C., and Herring, S.C. “Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter,” Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Koloa, HI, January 5-8, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• B.A. Huberman, D.M. Romero, F. Wu, “Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope,” First Monday (14:1), 2009. retrieved on October 4, 2010, from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2317/2063.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, B., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., and Chowdury, A. “Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (60:11), 2009, 2169–2188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., and Tseng, B., “Why we twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities,” Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis, San Jose, CA, August 12, 2007, 56–65.
   Google Scholar
• Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., and Chervany, N.L. “Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs,” MIS Quarterly (23:2), 1999, 183–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy, B., Gill, P., and Arlitt, M., “A few chirps about Twitter,” Proceedings of the first workshop on Online Social Networks, Seattle, WA, August 18, 2008, 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., and Moon, S., “What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?” Proceedings of the 19th World-Wide Web (WWW) Conference, Raleigh, NC, April 26-30, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Legris, P., Ingham, J., and Collerette, P., “Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model,” Information and Management (40:3), 2003, 191–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limayem, M., Hirt, S.G., and Cheung, C.M.K., “How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance,” MIS Quarterly (31:4), 2007, 705–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, H., Luo, W., and Strong, D., “Perceived critical mass effect on groupware acceptance,” European Journal of Information Systems (9:2), 2000, 91–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, M.L., “Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice,” Organization Science (5:4), 1994, 502–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, G., Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, R.L., “Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response,” Journal of Consumer Research (20:3), 1993, 418–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orbell, S., Blair, C., Sherlock, K., and Conner, M., “The theory of planned behavior and ecstasy use: Roles for habit and perceived control over taking versus obtaining substances,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology (31:1), 2001, 31–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passant, A., Hastrup, T., Bojars, U., and Breslin, J., “Microblogging: A semantic web and distributed approach,” Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Scripting for the Semantic Web, Tenerife, June 2, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• ReadWriteWeb, “Just the Facts: Statistics from Twitter Chirp,” retrieved on September 24, 2010, from: http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/just_the_facts_statistics_from_twitter_chirp.php.
   Google Scholar
• Riemer, K., Richter, A., and Seltsikas, P., “Enterprise microblogging: Procrastination or productive use?” Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems, Lima, Peru, August 12-15, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., and Will, A., “SmartPLS 2.0 (beta), 2005,” retrieved January 11, 2008, from: http://www.smartpls.de.
   Google Scholar
• Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., and Will, A., “Finite mixture partial least squares analysis: methodology and numerical examples,” in: Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., and Wang, H., (Eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications in Marketing and Related Fields, Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics, Springer-Verlag, Santa Clara CA, 2010, 195–218.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of Innovations, The Free Press, New York, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, D.R., and Wallach, D.S., “Birds of a FETHR: Open, Decentralized Micropublishing,” Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems (IPTPS '09), Boston, MA, April 21, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Straub, D., and Carlson, C.L, “Validating instruments in MIS research,” MIS Quarterly (13:2), 1989, 147–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Slyke, C., Ilie, V., Lou, H., and Stafford, T., “Perceived critical mass and the adoption of a communication technology,” European Journal of Information Systems (16:3), 2007, 270–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, D., and Rosson, M.B., “How and why people Twitter: The role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work,” Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, FL, May 10-13, 2009, 243–252.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Qu, Y., Cody, J., and Wu, Y., “A case study of micro-blogging in the enterprise,” Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA, April 10-15, 2010.
   Google Scholar