E-Learning Courseware Usability: Building a Theoretical Model

References

• Arbaugh, J. B. “Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with internet-based MBA courses.” Journal of Management Education, (24:1), 2000, pp. 32–54.
   Google Scholar
• Ardito, C, Costabile, M. F., De Marsico, M., Lanzilotti, R., Levialdi, S., Roselli, T., & Rossano, V. “An approach to usability evaluation of e-learning applications.” Universal Access in the Information Society, (4:3), 2006, pp. 270–283.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, B., Avolio, B., Jung, D., & Berson Y. “Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership.” Journal of Applied Psychology, (88:2), 2003, pp. 207–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouhnik, D., & Marcus, T. “Interaction in distance-learning courses.” Journal of the American Society Information Science and Technology, (57:3), 2006, pp. 299–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. “The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling.” In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research, 1998, pp. 295–336. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. “A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach For Measuring Interaction Effects: Results From A Monte Carlo Simulation Study And Electronic Mail Emotion/Adoption Study.” Information Systems Research, (14:2), 2003, pp. 189–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costabile, M. F., De Marsico, M., Lanzilotti, R., Plantamura, V. L., & Roselli, T. “On the usability evaluation of e-learning applications. In System Sciences, 2005. HICSS'05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Czerniewicz, L., & Brown, C. “A study of the relationship between institutional policy, organisational culture and e-learning use in four South African universities.” Computers & Education, (53:1), 2009, pp. 121–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. “The Delone and Mclean model of information systems success: A ten-year update.” Journal of Management Information Systems, (19:4), 2003, pp. 9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, J., & Redish J. A practical guide to usability testing, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Eklund, J., & Sinclair, K. “An empirical appraisal of the effectiveness of adaptive interfaces for instructional systems.” Educational Technology & Society, (3:4), 2000, pp. 165–177.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, R. & Miller, N. A Primer for Soft Modeling. Akron, OH: University of Akron Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.” Journal of Marketing Research, (18:1), 1981, pp. 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, J. D., & Lewis, C. “Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think.” Communications of the ACM, (28:3), 1985, pp. 300–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemette, R.A. “Usability in computer documentation design: Conceptual and methodological considerations.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, (32), 1989, pp. 217–228.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C, & Sinkovics, R. “The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing.” Advances in International Marketing, (20:1), 2009, pp. 277–320.
   Google Scholar
• Holms, M. Web usability & navigation, New York: McGraw Hill, 2002
   Google Scholar
• Hulland, J. “Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies.” Strategic Management Journal, (20:2), 1999, pp. 195–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEEE Std. 1061. IEEE standard for a software quality metrics methodology, New York, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO/IEC) 9126. Software product evaluation - Quality characteristics and guidelines for their use, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9241-11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) – Part 11 guidance on usability. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Keinonen, T. One-dimensional usability – Influence of usability on consumers' product preference, Saarijärvi, Finland: Gummerus, 1998, p. 62.
   Google Scholar
• Koohang A., Du Plessis, J. “Architecting Usability Properties in the E-Learning Instructional Design Process.” International Journal on E-Learning, July-September, (3:3), 2004, pp. 38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Koohang, A. “A study of users' perceptions toward e-learning courseware usability.” International Journal on E-Learning, (3:2), 2004, pp. 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Koohang, A. & Paliszkiewicz, J. “Knowledge construction in e-learning: An empirical validation of an active learning model.” The Journal of Computer Information Systems, (53:3), 2013, pp. 109–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koohang, A. & Paliszkiewicz, J. “Empirical validation of an learning courseware usability model.” Issues in Information Systems, (15:2), 2014, pp. 270–275.
   Google Scholar
• Koohang, A. & Paliszkiewicz, J. “Expanding the E-learning Courseware Usability Components.” Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Innovation & Management, 2014, pp. 1055–1057.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, T. J., Sorebo, A. M., & Sorebo, O. “The role of task-technology fit as users' motivation to continue information system use.” Computers in Human Behavior, (25:3), 2009, pp. 778–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., Cheung, C., & Chen, Z. “Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation.” Information & Management, (42:8), 2005, pp. 1095–1104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. R. “Psychometric evaluation of the PSSUQ using data from five years of usability studies.” International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, (14:3&4), 2002, pp. 463–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaw, S., & Huang, H. “Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments.” Computers & Education, (60:1), 2013, pp. 14–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motiwalla, L. F. “Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation.” Computers & Education, (49:3), 2007, pp. 581–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen J. Usability engineering. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen J. Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity, Indianapolis, IN: New Riders, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Pituch, K. & Lee, Y. “The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use.” Computers & Education, (47:2), 2006, pp. 222–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roca, J. C., Chiu, C. M., & Martínez, F. J. “Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the technology acceptance model.” International Journal of Human – Computer Studies, (64:8), 2006, pp. 683–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, S. “Usability evaluation vs. usability testing: When and why?” IEEE Transactions of Professional Communication, (32:4), 1989, pp. 210–216.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin J. Handbook of usability testing. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, G. “Flying not flapping: A strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions.” ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, (13:3), 2005, pp. 201–218.
   Google Scholar
• Shackel B. “Usability – context, framework, design and evaluation.” In B. Shackel & S. Richardson (eds.), Human factors for informatics usability, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991, pp. 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Shee, D., & Wang, Y. H. “Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: A methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications.” Computers & Education, (50:3), 2008, pp. 894–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Piovoso, M. J. “Silver bullet or voodoo statistics? A primer for using the partial least squares data analytic technique in group and organization research.” Emerald Management Reviews: Group & Organization Management, (34:1), 2009, pp. 5–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumak, B., Hericko, M., & Pusnik, M. “A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types.” Computers in Human Behavior, (27:6), 2011, pp. 2067–2077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. “What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction.” Computers & Education, (50:4), 2008, pp. 1183–1202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virvou, M., & Katsionis, G. “On the usability and likeability of virtual reality games for education: The case of VR-ENGAGE.” Computers & Education, (50), 2008, pp. 154–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T. H. Developing web-based assessment strategies for facilitating junior high school students to perform self-regulated learning in an e-Learning environment. Computers & Education, (57:2), 2011, pp. 1801–1812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar