330
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Tablet Adoption with Smart School Website Technology

, &

REFERENCES

  • Aladwani AM. 2003. A deeper look at the attitude-behavior consistency assumption in information systems satisfaction research. J Comput Inf Syst. 44:57–63.
  • Bekkering E, Hutchison D. 2009. A follow-up study of using remote desktop applications in education. Inf Syst Educ J. 7:3–13.
  • Bekkering E, Johnston AC, Warkentin M, Schmidt MB. 2009. An empirical assessment of perceptions of tablet PC attractiveness. Inf Resour Manage J. 22:23–44.
  • Birch A, Irvine V. 2009. Preservice teachers’ acceptance of ICT integration in the classroom: Applying the UTAUT model. Educ Media Int. 46:295–315.
  • Brown RD, Krager LA. 1985. Ethical issues in graduate education: Faculty and student responsibilities. J Higher Educ. 56:403–418.
  • Chen B. Colleges dream of paperless, iPad-centric education. 2012. Available from: http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/04/iPad-textbooks/.
  • Chin W. 1998. Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Q. 22:7–16.
  • Cronan TP, Douglas DE. 2012. A student ERP simulation game: a longitudinal study. J Comput Inf Syst. 53:3–13.
  • Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA, Siguaw JA. 2000. Introducing LISREL: a guide for the uninitiated.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Drenoyianni H, Selwood ID. 1998. Conceptions or misconceptions? Primary teachers’ perceptions and use of computers in the classroom. Educ Inf Technol. 3:87–99.
  • Earp J, Ott M, Pozzi F. 2013. Facilitating educators’ knowledge sharing with dedicated information systems. Comput Hum Behav. 29:445–455.
  • Ertmer PA. 2005. Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educ Technol Res Dev. 53:25–39.
  • Fishbein M, Ajzen I. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.
  • Fornell C, Larcker DF. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Marketing Res. 48:39–50.
  • Goodhue DL, Thompson RL. 1995. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q. 19:213–236.
  • Hou H, Sung Y, Chang K. 2009. Exploring the behavioral patterns of an online knowledge-sharing discussion activity among teachers with problem-solving strategy. Teach Teach Educ. 25:101–108.
  • Hu W. More schools embrace the iPad as a learning tool. 2012. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/05/education/05tablets.html?_r=1.
  • Ifenthaler D, Schweinbenz V. 2013. The acceptance of tablet-PCs in classroom instruction: The teachers’ perspectives. Comput Hum Behav. 29:525–534.
  • Jarvenpaa SL, Dickson GW, DeSanctis G. 1985. Methodological issues in experimental IS research: experiences and recommendations. MIS Q. 9:141–156.
  • Judge S, Puckett K, Bell SM. 2006. Closing the digital divide: Update from the early childhood longitudinal study. J Educ Res. 100:52–60.
  • Keiser KA, Schulte LE. 2007. The development and validation of the elementary school ethical climate index. Sch Community J. 17:73–88.
  • Kitchener KS. 1984. Intuition, critical evaluation and ethical principles: The foundation for ethical decisions in counseling psychology. Counseling Psychologist 12:43–55.
  • Kitchener KS. 1985. Ethical principles and ethical decisions in student affairs. New Directions Stud Serv. 30:17–29.
  • Klein KJ, Kozlowski SW. 2000. From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Res Methods 3:211–236.
  • Koohang AA. 1989. A study of attitudes toward computers: Anxiety, confidence, liking, and perception of usefulness. J Res Comput Educ. 22:137–150.
  • Kreft I, De Leeuw J. 1998. Introducing multilevel modeling.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kukulska-Hulme A, Shield L. 2008. An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to support collaboration and interaction. ReCALL 20:271–289.
  • Lapointe L, Rivard S. 2005. A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Q. 29:461–491.
  • Lee JS. 2008. Status of business process courses in AACSB-accredited undergraduate programs of business. J Comput Inf Syst. 49:10–16.
  • Liu IF, Chen MC, Sun YS, Wible D, Kuo CH. 2010. Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect intention to use an online learning community. Comput Educ. 54:600–610.
  • Luo XR, Warkentin M, Li H. 2013. Understanding technology adoption trade-offs: A conjoint analysis approach. J Comput Inf Syst 53:65–74.
  • Makkonen M, Halttunen V, Frank L. 2011. Exploring the acquisition and consumption behaviour of modern recorded music consumers: Findings from a Finnish interview study. Int J Comput Inf Syst Ind Manage Appl. 3:894–904.
  • Marchewka JT, Kostiwa K. 2014. An application of the UTAUT model for understanding student perceptions using course management software. Commun IIMA. 7:93–104.
  • McFarland D, Hamilton D. 2005. Factors affecting student performance and satisfaction: Online versus traditional course delivery. J Comput Inf Syst. 46:25–32.
  • Moore GC, Benbasat I. 1995. Integrating diffusion of innovations and theory of reasoned action models to predict utilization of information technology by end-users. Proceedings of the First IFIP WG 8.6 Working Conference on the Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology. Norway: Oslo, pp. 132–146.
  • Moran M, Hawkes M, El-Gayar, O. 2010. Tablet personal computer integration in higher education: Applying the unified theory of acceptance and use technology model to understanding supporting factors. Educ Comput Res. 42:79–101
  • Muthén LK, Muthén BO. 1998. Mplus user’s guide. 6th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Netemeyer RG, Bearden WO, Sharma S. 2003. Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Nunnally J. 1978. Psychometric methods. New York, NY: McGraw.
  • Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 88:879–903.
  • Schreiber JB, Nora A, Stage FK, Barlow EA, King J. 2006. Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. J Educ Res. 99:323–338.
  • Schulte LE, Thompson F, Talbott J, Luthur A, Garcia M, Blanchard S, Mueller M. 2002. The development and validation of the ethical climate index for middle and high schools. Sch Community J. 12:117–132.
  • Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. 2010. A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling 3rd ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Sulčič V, Lesjak D. 2009. E-learning and study effectiveness. J Comput Inf Syst. 49:40–47.
  • Thompson RL, Higgins CA, Howell JM. 1991. Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Q. 15:125–143.
  • Twining P, Evans D. 2005. Should there be a future for Tablet PCs in schools?” J Interact Media Educ. 20:1–18.
  • Venkatesh V, Davis FD. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci. 45:186–204.
  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27:425–478.
  • White T. Will iPad transform Stanford’s med school? 2012. Available from: http://med.stanford.edu/ism/2010/september/iPads-0913.html.
  • Wu D, Reychav I, Glezer, H. The effects of school website design and usability on knowledge sharing and user satisfaction. International Conference on Informatics Education, 10th AIS SIG-EDIAIM - Research, Shanghai, China, December 2–4, 2011.
  • Zviran M, Glezer C, Avni I. 2006. User satisfaction from commercial web sites: The effect of design and use. Inf Manage. 43:157–178.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.