273
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Using Serious Games in Data Communications and Networking Management Course

, &

References

  • Abenza PPG, Olivo AG, Latorre BL. 2008. VisualJVM: A visual tool for teaching Java technology. IEEE Trans Edu 51(1):86–92.
  • Agarwal R, Karahanna E. 2000. Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Q 665–694.
  • Amory A, Naicker K, Vincent J, Adams C. 1999. The use of computer games as an educational tool: Identification of appropriate game types and game elements. Br J Edu Technol 30(4):311–321.
  • Aydin N, Yilmaz A. 2010. The effect of constructivist approach in chemistry education on students’ higher order cognitive skills. Hacettepe Univ J Edu 39:57–68.
  • Bagarukayo E, Weide T, Mbarika V, Kim M. 2012. The impact of learning driven constructs on the perceived higher order cognitive skills improvement: Multimedia vs. text. Int J Edu Dev Using Inf Commun Technol 8(2):120–130.
  • Beard D, Schwieger D, Surendran K. 2008. Integrating soft skills assessment through university, college, and programmatic efforts at an AACSB accredited institution. J Inf Syst Edu 19(2):229–240.
  • Bhattacherjee A, Premkumar G. 2004. Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Q 229–254.
  • Bobbitt LM, Inks SA, Kemp KJ, Mayo DT. 2000. Integrating marketing courses to enhance team-based experiential learning. J Marketing Edu 22(1):15–24.
  • Bolino MC, Turnley WH, Bloodgood JM. 2002. Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations. Acad Manage Rev 27(4):505–522.
  • Bond J, Wang Y, Sankar CS, Raju PK, Le Q. 2014. Female and minority students benefit from use of multimedia case studies. Int J Eng Edu 30(2):343–359.
  • Boyle Elizabeth A, et al. 2016. An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games. Comput Edu 94:178–192.
  • Bradley RV, Sankar CS, Clayton HR, Mbarika VW, Raju PK. 2007. A study on the impact of GPA on perceived improvement of higher-order cognitive skills. Decis Sci J Innovative Edu 5(1):151–168.
  • Bullen CV, Abraham T, Gallagher K, Simon JC, Zwieg P. 2009. IT workforce trends: Implications for curriculum and hiring. Commun Assoc Inf Syst (24):129–140, article 9.
  • Charsky D. 2010. From edutainment to serious games: A change in the use of game characteristics. Games Culture. doi: 10.1177/1555412009354727
  • Connolly TM, Boyle EA, MacArthur E, Hainey T, Boyle JM. 2012. A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Comput Edu 59(2):661–686.
  • Davis FD. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 319–340.
  • Deci EL, Ryan RM. 2000. The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq 11(4):227–268.
  • Downey JP, McMurtrey ME, Zeltmann SM. 2008. Mapping the MIS curriculum based on critical skills of new graduates: An empirical examination of IT professionals. J Inf Syst Edu 19(3):351–363.
  • Ebner M, Holzinger A. 2007. Successful implementation of user-centered game based learning in higher education: An example from civil engineering. Comput Edu 49(3):873–890.
  • Ehie IC. 2002. Developing a management information systems (MIS) curriculum: perspectives from MIS practitioners. J Edu Bus 77(3):151–158.
  • Erhel S, Jamet E. 2013. Digital game-based learning: impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness. Comput Edu 67:156–167.
  • Fornell C, Bookstein FL. 1982. Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. J Marketing Res 440–452.
  • Fornell C, Larcker DF. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Marketing Res 39–50.
  • Fu F-L, Su R-C, Yu S-C. 2009. E-Game flow: A scale to measure learners’ enjoyment of E-learning games. Comput Edu 52(1):101–112.
  • Gee JP. 2003. What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Comput Entertainment (CIE) 1(1):20–20.
  • Ghani JA, Supnick R, Rooney P. 1991. The experience of flow in computer-mediated and in face-to-face groups, presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 1991, December 16–18, 1991, New York, NY, USA.
  • Gill TG, Hu Q. 1999. The evolving undergraduate information systems education: A survey of US institutions. J Edu Bus 74(5):289–295.
  • Gomez EA, Wu D, Passerini K. 2010. Computer-supported team-based learning: The impact of motivation, enjoyment and team contributions on learning outcomes. Comput Edu 55(1):378–390.
  • Guo YM, Klein BD. 2009. Beyond the test of the four channel model of flow in the context of online shopping. Commun Assoc Inf Syst (24):837–856.
  • Hainey T, Westera W, Connolly TM, Boyle L, Baxter G, Beeby RB, Soflano M. 2013. Students’ attitudes toward playing games and using games in education: Comparing Scotland and the Netherlands. Comput Edu 69:474–484.
  • Hingorani K, Sankar CS, Kramer SW. 1998. Teaching project management through an information technology-based method. Proj Manag J 29(1):10–21.
  • Hsu C-L, Lu H-P. 2004. Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Inf Manage 41(7):853–868.
  • Jarvenpaa SL, Todd PA. 1996. Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the world wide web. Int J Electronic Commerce 59–88.
  • Johnson WL, Vilhjálmsson HH, Marsella S. 2005. Serious games for language learning: How much game, how much AI? In: Looi C-K, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning Through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology, The Netherlands: IOS Press, pp. 306–313.
  • Kiili K. 2005. Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. Internet Higher Edu 8(1):13–24.
  • Koufaris M. 2002. Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Inf Syst Res 13(2):205–223.
  • Kung M, Yang SC, Zhang Y. 2006. The changing information systems (IS) curriculum: A survey of undergraduate programs in the United States. J Edu Bus 81(6):291–300
  • Lee M-C. 2010. Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward E-learning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model. Comput Edu 54(2):506–516.
  • Lepper MR, Henderlong J. 2000. Turning ‘Play’ into ‘Work’ and ‘Work’ into ‘Play’: 25 Years of research on intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation. In: Sansone C, Harackiewicz JM, (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 257–307.
  • Liu D, Li X, Santhanam R. 2013. Digital games and beyond: What happens when players compete. MIS Q 37(1):111–124.
  • Liu S-H, Liao H-L, Peng C-J. 2005. Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online E-learning users’ acceptance behavior. E-learning 4(H6):H8.
  • Lowry PB, Gaskin J, Twyman N, Hammer B, Roberts T. 2012. Taking ‘Fun and Games’ seriously: Proposing the hedonic-motivation system adoption model (HMSAM). J Assoc Inf Syst 14(11):617–671.
  • Lu Y, Zhou T, Wang B. 2009. Exploring Chinese users’ acceptance of instant messaging using the theory of planned behavior, the technology acceptance model, and the flow theory. Comput Hum Behav 25(1):29–39.
  • Malone TW, Lepper MR. 1987. Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. Aptitude, Learning, Instruction 3:223–253.
  • Mbarika V, Bagarukayo E, Hingorani V, Stokes S, Kourouma M, Sankar C. 2010. A multi-experimental study on the use of multimedia instructional materials to teach technical subjects. J STEM Edu Innovations Res 24–37.
  • Mbarika VW, Sankar CS, Raju PK. 2003. Perceived role of multimedia instructional materials on multicriteria technology and engineering decisions. Decis Sci J Innovative Edu 1(2):225–257.
  • Michael DR, Chen SL. 2005. Serious games: Games that educate, train, and inform: Muska & Lipman/Premier-Trade.
  • Muratet M, Torguet P, Jessel J-P, Viallet F. 2009. Towards a serious game to help students learn computer programming. Int J Comput Games Technol article 3.
  • Nadkarni S. 2003. Instructional methods and mental models of students: An empirical investigation. Acad Manage Learning Edu 2(4):335–351.
  • Nadolski RJ, Hummel HG, Van Den Brink HJ, Hoefakker RE, Slootmaker A, HJ Kurvers Storm J. 2008. EMERGO: A methodology and toolkit for developing serious games in higher education. Simul Gaming 39(3):338–352.
  • Novak TP, Hoffman DL, Yung Y-F. 1998. Modeling the structure of the flow experience among web users. Presented at the INFORMS Marketing Science and the Internet Mini-Conference, MIT, March 1998.
  • Pardos ZA, Baker RS, San Pedro MO, Gowda SM, Gowda SM. 2013. Affective states and state tests: Investigating how affect throughout the school year predicts end of year learning outcomes. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 117–124.
  • Pavlas D, Bedwell W, Wooten SR, Heyne K, Salas E. 2009. Investigating the attributes in serious games that contribute to learning. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 1999–2003.
  • Rice M. 1997. What makes users revisit a web site. Marketing News 31(6):12–13.
  • Rienzo T, Han B. 2011. Does ERP hands-on experience help students learning business process concepts? Decis Sci J Innovative Edu 9(2):177–207.
  • Romero Margarida, Mireia Usart, Michela Ott. 2015. Can serious games contribute to developing and sustaining 21st century skills? GamesCulture 10(2):148–177.
  • Roussou M. 2004. Learning by doing and learning through play: An exploration of interactivity in virtual environments for children. Comput Entertainment (CIE) 2(1):10–10.
  • Saadé R, Bahli B. 2005. The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Inf Manage 42(2):317–327.
  • Sánchez J, Canto SD, Farias G, Dormido S. 2011. Understanding automatic control concepts by playing games. Int J Eng Edu 27(3):528–534.
  • Shernoff DJ, Csikszentmihalyi M, Shneider B, Shernoff ES. 2003. Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. Sch Psychol Q 18(2):158–176.
  • Teo TSH, Lim VKG, Lai RYC. 1999. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in internet usage. Omega 27(1):25–37.
  • Van der Heijden H. 2004. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Q 695–704.
  • Van Schaik P, Ling J. 2011. An integrated model of interaction experience for information retrieval in a web-based encyclopaedia. Interacting Comput 23(1):18–32.
  • Venkatesh V. 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inf Syst Res 11(4):342–365.
  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG. 2000. Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Q 115–139.
  • Vogel JJ, Vogel DS, JAN Cannon-Bowers, Bowers CA, Muse K, Wright M. 2006. Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: A meta-analysis. J Edu Comput Res 34(3):229–243.
  • Wang Y, Rajan P, Sankar CS, Raju PK. 2014. Relationships between goal clarity, concentration and learning effectiveness when playing serious games. Presented at the Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Savannah, GA.
  • Wasko M, Teigland R, Leidner D, Jarvenpaa S. 2011. Stepping into the internet: New ventures in virtual worlds. MIS Q 35(3):645–652.
  • Webster J, Ho H. 1997. Audience engagement in multimedia presentations. ACM SIGMIS Database 28(2):63–77.
  • Webster J, Trevino LK, Ryan L. 1994. The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Comput Hum Behav 9(4):411–426.
  • Wouters P, Van Nimwegen C, Van Oostendorp H, Van Der Spek ED. 2013. A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. J Edu Psychol 105(2):249–265.
  • Zoller U. 1993. Are lecture and learning compatible? Maybe for LOCS: Unlikely for HOCS. J Chem Edu 70(3):195–197.
  • Zoller U. 2002. Algorithmic, LOCS and HOCS (Chemistry) exam questions: Performance and attitudes of college students. Int J Sci Edu 24(2):185–203.
  • Zoller U, Pushkin D. 2007. Matching higher-order cognitive skills (HOCS) promotion goals with problem-based laboratory practice in a freshman organic chemistry course. Chem Edu Res Practice 8(2):153–171.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.