The Contribution of ICT Adoption to the Sustainable Information Society

References

• Aguilar-Zambrano JJ, Gardoni M. An information system to support problems definition based on technological frames and organizational routines. Int J Manufact Technol Manage. 2012;22(3):219–232.
   Google Scholar
• Audet AM, Squires D, Doty MM. Where are we on the diffusion curve? Trends and drivers of primary care physicians’ use of health information technology. Health Service Res. 2014;49(1pt2):347–360.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Avgerou C. Discourses on ICT and development. Inf Technol Int Dev. 2010;6(3):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bazhenova E, Taratukhin V, Becker J. Impact of information and communication technologies on business process management on small and medium enterprises in the emerging countries. Ceur-Ws.Org. 2012;9(63):1–10. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-963/paper6.pdf, ( accessed 12th December 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Bell D. The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Berleur J, Hercheui MD, Hilty LM. What kind of information society? Governance, virtuality, surveillance, sustainability, resilience. In: Proceedings of 9th IFIP TC 9 International Conference, HCC9, and 1st IFIP TC 11 International Conference, Brisbane September 20–23, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso I, Caldeira M. Users’ commitment in information system implementation: the role of technological frames. Lect Notes Bus Inf Process. 2012;(129):254–266.
   Google Scholar
• Carmeli A, Sternberg A, Elizur D. Organizational culture, creative behavior, and information and communication technology (ICT) usage: a facet analysis. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;(11):175–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castells M. The information age: economy, society and culture. The rise of network society. Vol. 2.; Oxford: Blackwell Publishers; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Chatzoglou P, Chatzoudes D, Fragidis L, Symeonidis S. Examining the critical success factors for ERP implementation: an explanatory study conducted in SMEs. Lect Notes Bus Inf Process. 2017;(277):179–201.
   Google Scholar
• Chen H-G, Chang J. Exploring affecting factors on green IT adoption. Lect Notes Bus Inf Process. 2014;(185):205–218.
   Google Scholar
• Collis J, Hussey R. Business research. A practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students; New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Curry E, Donnellan B. Understanding the maturity of sustainable ICT. In: Vom Brocke J, Seidel S, Recker J, editors. Green business process management – Towards the sustainable enterprise. Berlin: Springer; 2012; 203–216.
   Google Scholar
• Denolf JM, Trienekens JH, Wognum PM, Van Der Vorst GAJ, Omta SWF. Towards a framework of critical success factors for implementing supply chain information systems. Comput Ind. 2015;(68):16–26.
   Google Scholar
• Donnellan B, Sheridan C, Curry E. A capability maturity framework for sustainable information and communication technology. IT Professional. 2011;13(1):33–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker PF. Post-capitalist society; New York: Harper Business; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Echeverri M, Abels EG. Opportunities and obstacles to narrow the digital divide: sharing scientific knowledge on the Internet. In:Bolisani E, editor. Building the knowledge society on the Internet. Sharing and exchanging knowledge in networked environments; Hershey: IGI Global; 2008; 146–171.
   Google Scholar
• Erdal BM. Evaluation of human development index and ICT development index, comparative analysis of the OECD and the European members and Turkey. Int J Bus Res. 2012;12(2):126–136.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development, https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/policies/european-development-policy/2030-agenda-sustainable-development_en, ( accessed 12th January 2017).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Digital Agenda for Europe. A Europe 2020 Initiative, COM(2010)245, European Commission, Brussels, 2010, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52010DC0245R%2801%29&from=ENn, ( accessed: 17th December 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Evans JD. Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences; Pacific Grove: Brooks/ColePublishing; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Falk RF, Miller NB. A primer for soft modeling; Akron: The University of Akron Press; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Field A. Discovering statistics. Reusing SPSS; London: Sage Publications; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs C. Sustainability and the information society. In: Berleur T, Numinen MI, Impagliazzo T, editors. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, 223, Social informatics: an information society for all? In remembrance of Rob Kling; Boston: Springer; 2006; 219–230.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs C. Sustainable information society as ideology (part I). Inf Tarsadalom. 2009;9(2):7–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs C. Sustainable information society as ideology (part II). Inf Tarsadalom. 2009;9(3):27–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs C. The implications of new information and communication technologies for sustainability. Environ Dev Sustainability. 2008;10(3):291–309.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs C. Theoretical foundations of defining the participatory, co-operative, sustainable information society. Commun Soc. 2010;13(1):23–47.
   Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Straub D. A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: tutorial and annotated example. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 2005;16(5):91–109.
   Google Scholar
• Ghobakhloo M, Hong TS, Sabouri MS, Zulkifli N. Strategies for successful information technology adoption in small and medium-sized enterprises. Information. 2012;3(1):36–67.
   Google Scholar
• Gries T, Grundmann R, Palnau I, Redlion M. Innovations, growth and participation in advanced economies - a review of major concepts and findings. International Economics and Economic Policy. 2017;14:293–351.
   Google Scholar
• Guillemette MG, Paré G. Toward a new theory of the contribution of the IT function in organizations. Mis Q. 2012;36(2):529–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemette MG, Paré G. Transformation of the information technology function in organizations: a Case Study in the manufacturing sector. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences. 2012;(29):177–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameed T. ICT as an enabler of socio-economic development; Daejeon: Information & Communications University; 2015. http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/digitalbridges/materials/hameed-paper.pdf. accessed: 12th June 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hilty LM. Information technology and sustainability: Essays on the relationship between information technology and sustainable development; Norderstedt: Empa; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hilty LM, Aebischer B. ICT for sustainability: an emerging research field. Advances in Intelligent Syst Comput. 2015;(310):1–34
   Google Scholar
• Hilty LM, Hercheui MD. ICT and sustainable development, What kind of information society? In: Berleur J, Hercheui MD, Hilty LM, editors. What kind of information society? Governance, virtuality, surveillance, sustainability, resilience, Proceedings of 9th IFIP TC 9 International Conference, HCC9, and 1st IFIP TC 11 International Conference; Brisbane; September 20–23 2010; 227–235.
   Google Scholar
• Hinton PR, Brownlow C, McMurvay I, Cozens B. SPSS Explained; East Sussex: Routledge; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton JW. ICT and the environment in developing countries: A Review of Opportunities and Developments. In: Berleur J, Hercheui MD, Hilty LM, editors. What kind of information society? Governance, virtuality, surveillance, sustainability, resilience,” Proceedings of 9th IFIP TC 9 International Conference, HCC9, and 1st IFIP TC 11 International Conference; Brisbane; September 20–23, 2010; 236–247.
   Google Scholar
• Huang AH. A model for environmentally sustainable information systems development. J Comput Info Syst. 2009;49(4):114–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulland J. Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strategic Manage J. 1999;20(2):195–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Telecommunication Union. Measuring the information society. Report 2014, International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/publications/mis2014/MIS2014_without_Annex_4.pdf, ( accessed: 12th June 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Johnston P. Towards a knowledge society and sustainable development: deconstructing the WSIS in the European policy context. In: Servaes J, Carpentier N, editors. Towards a sustainable information society. Deconstructing WSIS; Portland: Intellect; 2006; 203–206.
   Google Scholar
• Jones CM, Cline M, Ryan S. Exploring knowledge sharing in ERP implementation: an organizational culture framework. Decis Support Syst. 2006;(41):411–434.
   Google Scholar
• Jones RA, Jimmieson NL, Griffiths A. The impact of organizational culture and reshaping capabilities on change implementation success: the mediating role of readiness for change. J Manage Stu. 2005;(42):361–386.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrica. 1974;(39):31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;(20):141–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF, Rice J. Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educ Psychol Meas. 1974;34(1):111–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karvalics LZ. Information society – what is it exactly. In: Pintér R, editor. Information Society. From theory to political practice; Budapest: Network for Teaching Information Society; 2008; 29–46.
   Google Scholar
• Khan R. How frugal innovation promotes social sustainability. Sustainability. 2016;8(10):1034. doi: 10.3390/su8101034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Mueller C. Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues; Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Knahl MH. Application of IT management frameworks in higher education institutions. Lect Notes Bus Inf Process. 2013;(148):124–133.
   Google Scholar
• Kunstová R. Process support of business and IT management in Czech companies. Lect Notes Bus Inf Process. 2012;(105):168–181
   Google Scholar
• Leyh C, Sander P. Critical success factors for ERP system implementation projects: an update of literature reviews. Lect Notes Bus Inf Process. 2015;(198):45–67.
   Google Scholar
• MAC. Strategy of efficient state 2020; Warsaw: Ministry of Administration and Digitization; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell R, Wehn U, editors. Knowledge societies: Information technology for sustainable development; Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Miles J, Shevlin M. Applying regression & correlation. A quide for students and researchers; London: Sage Publication; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Miller B, Atkinson RD. Raising European productivity growth through ICT; The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation; 2014 June; 1–43. https://itif.org/publications/2014/06/02/raising-european-productivity-growth-through-ict, (accessed: 14th January 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Missimer M, Robèrt KH, Broman G. A strategic approach to social sustainability-part 2: a principle-based definitions. J Clean Prod. 2017;149(1):42–52.
   Google Scholar
• Moldan B, Janoušková S, Hák T. How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: indicators and targets. Ecol Indic. 2012;(17):4–13.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Internet Economy. Outlook 2012, OECD Publishing, http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/science-and-technology/oecd-internet-economy-outlook-2012_9789264086463-en#page3, ( accessed: 12th June 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Olatokun WM. Integration of policies and regulatory frameworks for the convergent ict industry in Nigeria. In: Adomi EE, editor. Handbook of research on information communication technology policy: trends, issues and advancements; Hershey: IGI Global; 2011; 449–467.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Gash DC. Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Trans Inf Syst. 1994;12(2):174–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostasius E, Petraviciute Z. Applying e-service model in assessment and comparison of services. IFIP Adv Inf Commun Technol. 2010;(336):475–482.
   Google Scholar
• Pernici B, Aiello M, Vom Brocke J, Donnellan B, Gelenbe E, Kretsis M. What IS can do for environmental sustainability: A Report from CAiSE’11 Panel on Green and Sustainable IS. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2012;30(18). http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol30/iss1/18, ( accessed: 24th November 2016)
   Google Scholar
• Raban DR, Gordon A, Geifman D. The information society. The development of a scientific specialty. Inf Commun Soc. 2011;14(3):375–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reardon J, Miller C, Vida I, Kim I. The effects of ethnocentrism and economic development on the formation of brand and ad attitudes in transitional economies. Eur J Market. 2005;39(7/8):737–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross JW, Vitale MR. The ERP revolution: surviving vs thriving. Inf Syst Front. 2000;2(2):233–241.
   Google Scholar
• Ruppel PC, Harrington JS. Sharing knowledge through intranets: a study of organizational culture and intranet implementation. IEEE Trans Prof Commun. 2001;44(1):37–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhanam R, Hartono E. Common factors among management support systems’ success, Proceedings of AMCIS 2003, http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2003/307/, ( accessed: 24th February 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Schauer T. The sustainable information society – vision and risks; Vienna: The Club of Rome – European Support Centre; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Schreyer P. The contribution of information and communication technology to output growth: A study of the G7 countries, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers (02), OECD Publishing, Paris, 2000, doi:10.1787/151634666253, ( accessed: 24th February 2017).
   Google Scholar
• ŚCSI. Strategy for information society development – Silesian province 2020+, Śląskie Centrum Społeczeństwa Informacyjnego, Katowice, http://www.e-slask.pl/article/strategia_rozwoju_spoleczenstwa_informacyjnego_wojewodztwa_slaskiego_2020, ( accessed: 12th December 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Seidel S, Recker J, Vom Brocke J. Sensemaking and sustainable practicing: functional affordances of information systems in green transformations. Mis Q. 2013;37(4):1275–1299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servaes J, Carpentier N, editors. Towards a sustainable information society. Deconstructing WSIS; Portland: Intellect; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Soja P, Paliwoda-Pękosz G. Impediments to enterprise system implementation across the system lifecycle: understanding the role of country economic development. Lect Notes Bus Inf Process. 2015;(198):68–84.
   Google Scholar
• Themistocleous M, Soja P, Cunha PR. The same, but different: enterprise systems adoption lifecycles in transition economies. Inf Syst Manage. 2011;28(3):223–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toffler A. The third wave; New York: Bantam Books; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Tomczyk Ł. Cyberbullying in 2010 and 2015: a perspective on the changes in the phenomenon amon. Children Youth Serv Rev. 2017;(75):50–60.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP. 2014. Sustaining human progress: reducing vulnerabilities and resilience, United Nations Development Programme, New York, 2014, http://www.arabstates.undp.org/content/dam/rbas/report/HDR-2014-English.pdf, ( accessed: 24th November 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Watson RT, Boudreau MC, Chen AJ, Huber M. Green. IS: building sustainable business practices. In Watson RT, editor. Information systems; Athens: Global Text Project; 2008; 247–261.
   Google Scholar
• Webster F. Theories of the information society; New York: Routledge; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Weiser P, Scheider S, Bucher D, Kiefer P, Raubal M. Towards sustainable mobility behavior: research challenges for location-aware information and communication technology. GeoInformatica. 2016;20(2):213–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WSIS. WSIS Stocktaking success stories 2014; Geneva: International Telecommunication Union; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ziemba E. Concept and challenges of the sustainable information society. In: Ziemba E, editor. Towards a sustainable information society: People, business and public administration perspectives; Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2016; 72–89.
   Google Scholar
• Ziemba E. Examining critical success factors for sustainable information society – Lessons learned from Poland. In: Proceedings of Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems ECIS, Münster, Germany, May 27–29, 2015, http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2015_cr/213/, ( accessed: 24th November 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Ziemba E. The holistic and systems approach to a sustainable information society. J Comput Inf Syst. 2013;54(1):106–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziemba E, editor. Towards a sustainable information society: People, business and public administration perspectives; Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2016.
   Google Scholar