Knowledge Sharing Analytics: The Case of IT Workers

References

• Sauer C, Reich BH. Rethinking IT project management: evidence of a new mindset and its implications. Int J Project Manag. 2009;27(2):182–93. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks N. Understanding IT outsourcing and its potential effects on IT workers and their environment. J Comput Inf Syst. 2006;46(4):46–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Bharadwaj A. An empirical analysis of contract structures in IT outsourcing. Inf Syst Res. 2009;20(4):484–506. doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat N, Gelbard R. Knowledge sharing motivation among IT personnel: integrated model and implications of employment contracts. Int J Inf Manage. 2014;34(5):577–91. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Computer Economics. IT outsourcing statistics 2008/2009. 2008. http://www.computereconomics.com/
   Google Scholar
• Computer Economics. IT outsourcing statistics 2012/2013. 2012. http://www.computereconomics.com/
   Google Scholar
• Reed KK, Lubatkin M, Srinivasan N. Proposing and testing an intellectual capital-based view of the firm. J Manag Stud. 2006;43(4):867–93. doi:10.1111/joms.2006.43.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeli A, Gelbard R, Goldriech R. Linking perceived external prestige and collective identification to collaborative behaviors in R&D teams. Expert Syst Appl. 2011;38(7):8199–207. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelbard R, Carmeli A. The interactive effect of team dynamics and organizational support on ICT project success. Int J Project Manag. 2009;27(5):464–70. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman JR. The design of work teams. In: Handbook of organizational behavior. Vol. 129. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1987. p. 315–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hackman JR. Groups that work (and those that don’t): creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Hoegl M, Gemuenden HG. Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: a theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organ Sci. 2001;12(4):435–49. doi:10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loo R. Assessing “team climate” in project teams. Int J Project Manag. 2003;21(7):511–17. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00058-3.
   Google Scholar
• Koriat N, Gelbard R. Insourcing of IT workers: a win-win strategy - economic analysis of it units in Israeli governmental offices. In: Wolf R, Issa T, Thiel M, Eds. Empowering organizations through corporate social responsibility. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2015. p. 241–54
   Google Scholar
• Binney D. The knowledge management spectrum–understanding the KM landscape. J Knowledge Manag. 2001;5(1):33–42. doi:10.1108/13673270110384383.
   Google Scholar
• Choi B, Lee H. An empirical investigation of KM styles and their effect on corporate performance. Inf Manag. 2003;40(5):403–17. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00060-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manage. 1991;17(1):99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney JB, Clark DN. Resource-based theory: creating and sustaining competitive advantage. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press on Demand; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Manag J. 1997;18(7):509–33. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright PM, Gardner TM, Moynihan LM. The impact of HR practices on the performance of business units. Hum Resource Manag J. 2003;13(3):21–36. doi:10.1111/hrmj.2003.13.issue-3.
   Google Scholar
• Okoli C, Oh W. Investigating recognition-based performance in an open content community: a social capital perspective. Inf Manag. 2007;44(3):240–52. doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeli A, Gelbard R, Reiter-Palmon R. Leadership, creative problem-solving capacity, and creative performance: the importance of knowledge sharing. Hum Resour Manage. 2013;52(1):95–121. doi:10.1002/hrm.v52.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith TL, Sawyer JE. Supporting technologies and organizational practices for the transfer of knowledge in virtual environments. Group Decision Negotiat. 2006;15(4):407–23. doi:10.1007/s10726-006-9048-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panahi S, Watson J, Partridge H. Towards tacit knowledge sharing over social web tools. J Knowledge Manag. 2013;17(3):379–97. doi:10.1108/JKM-11-2012-0364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng S-M, Huang J-S. The correlation between wikipedia and knowledge sharing on job performance. Expert Syst Appl. 2011;38(5):6118–24. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger E, McDermott RA, Snyder W. Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte DL, Snyder NT. Mastering virtual teams: strategies, tools, and techniques that succeed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Yassine A, Kim K-C, Roemer T, Holweg M. Investigating the role of IT in customized product design. Product Plan & Cont. 2004;15(4):422–34. doi:10.1080/0953728042000238782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Lengel RH. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manage Sci. 1986;32(5):554–71. doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport TO. Human capital: what it is and why people invest it. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc Pub; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Fitz J. The roi of human capital: measuring the economic value of employee performance (first). New York, NY, USA: Amacom; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Aryee S, Law KS. High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: a relational perspective. Acad Manag J. 2007;50(3):558–77. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.25525821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker BE, Huselid MA, Ulrich D. The HR scorecard: linking people, strategy, and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• O’Boyle E, Harter J (2013). State of the American workplace: employee engagement insights for US business leaders. Gallup. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Brutus S, Aguinis H, Wassmer U. Self-reported limitations and future directions in scholarly reports analysis and recommendations. J Manage. 2013;39(1):48–75. doi:10.1177/0149206312455245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brutus S, Gill H, Duniewicz K. State of science in industrial and organizational psychology: a review of self-reported limitations. Pers Psychol. 2010;63(4):907–36. doi:10.1111/peps.2010.63.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:539–69. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhary K, Subramanian KS, Sinha V, Bhattacharya S. The contemporary framework on social media analytics as an emerging tool for behavior informatics, HR analytics and business process. Manag-J Contemp Manag Issues. 2012;17/2:65–84.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport TH, Harris J, Shapiro J. Competing on talent analytics. Harv Bus Rev. 2010;88(10):52–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich BL, Plachy EC, Norton MF. Analytics across the enterprise: how ibm realizes business value from big data and analytics. Boston, MA: IBM Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan J. How google is using people analytics to completely reinvent HR. TLNT: the Business of HR; 2013. 26. https://www.tlnt.com/how-google-is-using-people-analytics-to-completely-reinvent-hr/
   Google Scholar
• Monge PM, McSween C, Wyer J (1989). A profile of meetings in corporate america: results of the 3m meeting effectiveness study. CEO Publication. Los Angeles, CA: Annenberg School of Communications, University of Southern California.
   Google Scholar
• Allen JA, Beck T, Scott C, Rogelberg SG. Understanding workplace meetings: a qualitative taxonomy of meeting purposes. Manag Res Rev. 2014;37(9):791–814. doi:10.1108/MRR-03-2013-0067.
   Google Scholar
• Allen JA, Sands SJ, Mueller SL, Frear KA, Mudd M, Rogelberg SG. Employees’ feelings about more meetings: an overt analysis and recommendations for improving meetings. Manag Res Rev. 2012;35(5):405–18. doi:10.1108/01409171211222331.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly CE, Kevin Kelloway E. Predictors of employees’ perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2003;24(5):294–301. doi:10.1108/01437730310485815.
   Google Scholar
• Widén-Wulff G, Ginman M. Explaining knowledge sharing in organizations through the dimensions of social capital. J Inf Sci. 2004;30(5):448–58. doi:10.1177/0165551504046997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neches R, Fikes RE, Finin T, Gruber T, Patil R, Senator T, Swartout WR. Enabling technology for knowledge sharing. AI Magazine. 1991;12(3):36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• To P-L, Liao C, Chiang JC, Shih M-L, Chang C-Y. An empirical investigation of the factors affecting the adoption of instant messaging in organizations. Comput Stand Interfaces. 2008;30(3):148–56. doi:10.1016/j.csi.2007.08.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Bardhan I, Asdemir O. Understanding the impact of collaboration software on product design and development. Inf Syst Res. 2006;17(4):352–73. doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamic LA, Zhang J, Bakshy E, Ackerman MS (2008). Knowledge sharing and yahoo answers: everyone knows something. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 665–74).
   Google Scholar
• Sowe SK, Stamelos I, Angelis L. Understanding knowledge sharing activities in free/open source software projects: an empirical study. J Syst Software. 2008;81(3):431–46. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2007.03.086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynekoop JL, Walz DB. Revisiting the perennial question : are is people different? ACM SIGMIS Database. 1998;29(2):62–72. doi:10.1145/298752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore JE. One road to turnover: an examination of work exhaustion in technology professionals. Manag Inf Syst Q. 2000;24(1):141–68. doi:10.2307/3250982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shropshire J, Kadlec C. I’m leaving the it field: the impact of stress, job insecurity, and burnout on it professionals. Int J Inf Commun Technol Res. 2012;2(1). http://esjournals.org/journaloftechnology/archive/vol2no1/vol2no1_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• George E, Chattopadhyay P. One foot in each camp: the dual identification of contract workers. Adm Sci Q. 2005;50(1):68–99. doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang CL-H. The study of the turnover of MIS professionals: the gap between Taiwanese and US societies. Int J Inf Manage. 2010;30(4):301–14. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph D, Ng K-Y, Koh C, Ang S. Turnover of information technology professionals: a narrative review, meta-analytic structural equation modeling, and model development. Mis Q. 2007;31(3):547–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington T. Outsourcing and contracting out of it products and services. Aust Comput Society, 1997; 1(6).
   Google Scholar
• González R, Gascó J, Llopis J. Information systems outsourcing reasons and risks: review and evolution. J Global Inf Technol Manag. 2016;19(4):223–49. doi:10.1080/1097198X.2016.1246932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson N, Ngwenyama O. Structuring IS outsourcing contracts for mutual gain: an approach to analyzing performance incentive schemes. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2000;1(November):1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Earl MJ. The risks of outsourcing IT. Sloan Manage Rev. 1996;37:26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Sabherwal R. The evolution of coordination in outsourced software development projects: a comparison of client and vendor perspectives. Inf Organ. 2003;13(3):153–202. doi:10.1016/S1471-7727(02)00026-X.
   Google Scholar
• Fitoussi D, Gurbaxani V. IT outsourcing contracts and performance measurement. Inf Syst Res. 2012;23(1):129–43. doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C, Pervan G, McDermid D. Issues and recommendations in evaluating and managing the benefits of public sector IS/IT outsourcing. Inf Technol People. 2007;20:161–83. doi:10.1108/09593840710758068.
   Google Scholar
• Ang S, Straub DW. Production and transaction economies and IS outsourcing: a study of the US banking industry. Mis Q. 1998;535–52. doi:10.2307/249554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan C, Sia SK. Managing flexibility in outsourcing. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2006;7(4):179–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MB, Forsythe AB. Robust tests for the equality of variances. J Am Stat Assoc. 1974;69(346):364–67. doi:10.1080/01621459.1974.10482955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordstokke DW, Zumbo BD. A new nonparametric levene test for equal variances. Psicologica. 2010;31:401–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombs WT, Algina J, Oltman DO. Univariate and multivariate omnibus hypothesis tests selected to control type I error rates when population variances are not necessarily equal. Rev Educ Res. 1996;66(2):137–79. doi:10.3102/00346543066002137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar