Factors Affecting Web Disclosure Adoption in the Nonprofit Sector

References

• Arrillaga-Andreessen L. Disruption for good. Stanford Soc Innovation Rev. 2015;13(2):34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Hackler D, Saxton GD. The strategic use of information technology by nonprofit organizations: increasing capacity and untapped potential. Public Adm Rev. 2007;67(3):474–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuideStar. The effect of the economy on the nonprofit sector, March–May 2009. 2009 July 30 [ accessed 2010 Jan 18]. http://publications.guidestar.org/blog/2009/07/30/np-economic-report-part-2/.
   Google Scholar
• Lee RL, Joseph RC. An examination of web disclosure and organizational transparency. Comput Human Behav. 2013;29(6):2218–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee RL, Bhattacherjee A. A theoretical framework for strategic use of the web among nonprofit organizations. Southern Association for Information Systems Conference; 2011 Mar 25-26; Atlanta, Georgia. Association of Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter B, Fine AH. The networked nonprofit: Connecting with social media to drive change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Saxton GD, Guo C. Accountability online: understanding the web-based accountability practices of nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Voluntary Sect Q. 2011;40(2):270–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blouin MC, Lee RL. Does web disclosure of financials change their impact on donations to nonprofits. ARNOVA Conference, Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action; 2012 Nov 15-17; Indianapolis, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Saxton GD, Neely D, Guo C. Web disclosure and the market for charitable contributions. J Accounting Public Policy. 2014;23(2):127–44.
   Google Scholar
• Saxton GD, Kuo J-S, Ho Y-C. The determinants of voluntary financial disclosure by nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Voluntary Sect Q. 2012;41(6):1051–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee RL, Blouin MC. Exploring the factors associated with online financial and performance disclosure in nonprofits. J South Assoc Inf Syst. 2015 3(1).
   Google Scholar
• Gandía J. Internet disclosure by nonprofit organizations: empirical evidence of nongovernmental organizations for development in Spain. Nonprofit Voluntary Sect Q. 2011;40(1):57–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay-Boire J, Prakash A. Accountability.Org: online disclosure by nonprofits. Voluntas. 2015;16(2):693–719.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk K, Abrahams A, Ractham P. E-progression of nonprofit organizaton websites: U.S. Versus Thai charities. J Comput Inf Syst. 2016;56(3):244–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermu´dez-Edo M, Hurtado-Torres N, Arago´n-Correa J. The importance of trusting beliefs linked to the corporate website for diffusion of recruiting-related online innovations. Inf Technol Manag. 2010;11(4):177–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker PF. The age of social transformation. Atlantic Mon. 1994;274(5):53–80.
   Google Scholar
• McKeever BS, Pettijohn SL. The nonprofit sector in brief 2014: public charities, giving, and volunteering. 2014 [ accessed 2015 June 24]. http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/alfresco/publication-pdfs/412923-The-Nonprofit-Sector-in-Brief-Public-Charities-Giving-and-Volunteering-.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics USDoL. The economics daily. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Gutierrez O, Mathieson K. Information systems research in the nonprofit context: challenges and opportunities. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 2010;27(1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Iacovou C, Benbasat I, Dexter A. Electronic data interchange and small organizations: adoption and impact of technology. Mis Q. 1995;19(4):465–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrtens J, Cragg PB, Mills AM. A model of internet adoption by smes. Inf Manag. 2001;39(3):165–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay N, Parent M, Gemino A. A model of electronic commerce adoption by small voluntary organizations. Eur J Inf Syst. 2004;13:147–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimberly J, Evanisko M. Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Acad Manag J. 1981;24(4):689–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York, New York: Free Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Thong JYL. An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. J Manag Inf Syst. 1999;15(4):187–214.
   Google Scholar
• Tornatzky L, Klein K. Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: a meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 1982;29(1):28–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montazemi AR, Qahri-Saremi H. Factors affecting adoption of online banking: a meta-analytic structural equation modeling study. Inf Manag. 2015;52(2):210–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prescott MB, Conger SA. Information technology innovations: a classification by it locus of impact and research approach. Database Adv Inf Syst. 1995;26(2–3):20–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford M, Florin J. Examining the role of innovation diffusion factors on the implementation success of enterprise resource planning systems. Int J Accounting Inf Syst. 2003;4(3):205–25.
   Google Scholar
• Senate US. Exempt status reform: staff discussion draft. 2004 [ accessed 2012 May 18]. 1–19. http://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/062204stfdis.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• GuideStar. The state of nonprofit transparency, 2008: voluntary disclosure practices. 2009 Mar 17 [ accessed 2010 Jan 18]. http://publications.guidestar.org/blog/2009/03/17/transparency/.
   Google Scholar
• IRS. Governance and related topics - 501(c)(3) organizations. 2008 [ accessed 2012 May 14]. http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/governance_practices.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Panel on the Nonprofit Sector. Principles for good governance and ethical practice: a guide for charities and foundations. 2007 [ accessed 2012 May 12]. http://www.nonprofitpanel.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Kang S, Norton H. Nonprofit organizations’ use of the World Wide Web: are they sufficiently fulfilling organizational goals? Public Relat Rev. 2004;30(3):279–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blouin MC, Lee RL. A signaling theory approach to nonprofit web disclosure. J Acad Business Econ. 2015;15(1):7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Thong JYL, Yap CS. Ceo characteristics, organizational characteristics and information technology adoption in small businesses. Omega. 1995;23(4):429–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Mis Q. 1989;13(3):319–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn F, Maher JK, Forster J. Indicators of information and communication technology adoption in the nonprofit sector: changes between 2000 and 2004. Nonprofit Manag Leadersh. 2006;16(3):277–95.
   Google Scholar
• Berlinger LR, Te’eni D. Leaders’ attitudes and computer use in religious congregations. Nonprofit Manag Leadersh. 1999;9(4):399–412.
   Google Scholar
• Burt E, Taylor JA. Information and communication technologies: reshaping voluntary organizations? Nonprofit Manag Leadersh. 2000;11(2):131–43.
   Google Scholar
• Piccoli G, Ives B. It-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: a review and synthesis of the literature. Mis Q. 2005;29(4):747–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manag Rev. 1997;22(4):853–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbie ER. Survey research methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub. Co; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2014.
   Google Scholar