ERP Simulation Effects on Knowledge and Attitudes of Experienced Users

References

• Pearlson KE, Saunders CS, Galletta DF. Managing and Using Information Systems, Binder Ready Version: A Strategic Approach. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Adeosun O, Adeosun T, Adetunde I, Adagunodo E. Strategic application of information and communication technology for effective service delivery in banking industry. In Xie Y, Li W, Zhou J, editors. the Proceedings of Computer and Electrical Engineering, 2008. ICCEE 2008. International Conference on (2008). Phuket, Thailand: IEEE Computer Society; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Jabar MA, Sidi F, Selamat MH, Ghani AAA, Ibrahim H, Baharom S. Capturing tacit knowledge for assessing employees’ competency and productivity. Am J Econ Business Adm. 2011;3(2):358–62. doi:10.3844/ajebasp.2011.358.362.
   Google Scholar
• Bersin J “Spending on Corporate Training Soars: employee Capabilities Now A Priority.” Forbes. February 2, 2014. https://www.forbes.com/sites/joshbersin/2014/02/04/the-recovery-arrives-corporate-training-spend-skyrockets/#7e5ece8fc5a7
   Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Qi Z, De Pablos PO. Enhancing enterprise training performance: perspectives from knowledge transfer and integration. Comput Human Behav. 2014 January;30:567–73. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuppusamy M, Pahlavani M, Saleh AS. Fostering ICT development for growth: measuring the payoffs for Australia and the Asean-5 countries. Am J Appl Sci. 2008;5(12):1676–85. doi:10.3844/ajassp.2008.1676.1685.
   Google Scholar
• Hatem MS, Ramadan HA, Neagu DC. E-learning based on context oriented semantic web. J Comput Sci. 2005;1(4):500–04. doi:10.3844/jcssp.2005.500.504.
   Google Scholar
• Asprey L. Information strategies: Are we aligning the business case with enterprise planning?. Records Manag J. 2004;14(1):7–13. doi:10.1108/09565690410528893.
   Google Scholar
• Sor R. Information technology and organisational structure: vindicating theories from the past. Manag Decis. 2004;42(2):316–29. doi:10.1108/00251740410513854.
   Google Scholar
• Bagayogo FF, Lapointe L, Bassellier G. Enhanced use of IT: A new perspective on post-adoption. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2014;15(7):361–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awais Bhatti M, Kaur S. The role of individual and training design factors on training transfer. J Eur Ind Train. 2010;34(7):656–72. doi:10.1108/03090591011070770.
   Google Scholar
• Marnewick C, Labuschagne L. A conceptual model for enterprise resource planning (ERP). Inform Manag Comput Secur. 2005;13(2):144–55. doi:10.1108/09685220510589325.
   Google Scholar
• Magal SR, Word J. Essentials of business processes and information systems. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Publishing; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Léger P-M. Using a simulation game approach to teach ERP concepts. Published: Montréal: HEC Montréal, Groupe de recherche en systèmes d’information; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Cronan TP, Douglas DE, Alnuaimi O, Schmidt PJ. “ERP simulation game: learning and attitudes toward SAP samples company “First times hires”.” Information Technology Reserach Institute - Working Paper Series no. (2009): 24. Published by the Sam M. Walton College of Business Information Technology Research Institute at the University of Arkansas.
   Google Scholar
• Cronan TP, Douglas DE, Alnuaimi O, Schmidt PJ. “Evaluating the Impact of an ERP simulation game on student knowledge, skills and attitudes.” Information Technology Research Institute - Working Paper Series no. (2009): 25. Published by the Sam M. Walton College of Business Information Technology Research Institute at the University of Arkansas.
   Google Scholar
• Ramesh V, Gerth AB. Design of an integrated information systems master’s core curriculum: A case study. Communications Assoc Inf Syst. 2015;36(1):16.
   Google Scholar
• Jæger B, Rudra A, Aitken A, Chang V, Helgheim BI. Bridging the knowing-doing gap in global supply chain education. Communications Assoc Inf Syst. 2015;36(1):21.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer M, Champy J. Reengineering the Corporation. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Wang S, Noe RA. Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Hum Resource Manag Rev. 2010;20(2):115–31. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damodaran L, Olphert W. Barriers and facilitators to the use of knowledge management systems. Behav Inf Technol. 2000;19(6):405–13. doi:10.1080/014492900750052660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport TH, Prusak L. Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Spender JC, Grant RM. Knowledge and the firm: overview. Strategic Manage J. 1996;17(S2):5–9. doi:10.1002/smj.4250171103.
   Google Scholar
• Seethamraju R. Enhancing student learning of enterprise integration and business process orientation through an ERP business simulation game. J Inf Syst Educ. 2011;22(1):19.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon DM, Klein HA, Koste LL, Magal SR. Curriculum integration using enterprise resource planning: An integrative case approach. J Educ Business. 2004;80(2):93–101. doi:10.3200/JOEB.80.2.93-101.
   Google Scholar
• Léger P-M, Charland P, Feldstein H, Robert J, Babin G, Lyle D. Business simulation training in information technology education: guidelines for new approaches in IT training. J Inf Technol Education: Res. 2011;10(1):39–53.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod A, Simkin MG, Week J. Toward a user committment continuum: establishing the importance of realization. Int J Learn Technol. 2016;11(2):132–55. doi:10.1504/IJLT.2016.077521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Renshaw A, Van Alstyne M. The matrix of change. Sloan Manage Rev. 1997;38(2):37–54.
   Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Bhattacherjee A, Ma Q. Extending technology usage to work settings: the role of perceived work compatibility in ERP implementation. Inf Manag. 2009;46(6):351–56. doi:10.1016/j.im.2009.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajan CA, Baral R. Adoption of ERP system: An empirical study of factors influencing the usage of ERP and its impact on end user. IIMB Manag Rev. 2015;27(2):105–17. doi:10.1016/j.iimb.2015.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galletta DF, Ahuja MK, Hartman A, Peace AG, Teo T. Social influence and end-user training. Commun ACM. 1995;38(7):70–79. doi:10.1145/213859.214800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Manag Inf Syst Q. 1989;13(3):319–40. doi:10.2307/249008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. 1977. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Karahanna E. Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. Mis Quarterly No. 2000;24(4):665–694. doi:10.2307/3250951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Mis Quarterly No. 2003;27(3):425–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Browne G, Chau P. An empirical investigation of web site use using a commitment based model. Decis Sci. 2006;37(3):427–44. doi:10.1111/deci.2006.37.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halawi LA, Aronson JE, McCarthy RV. Resource-based view of knowledge management for competitive advantage. Ejkm. 2005;3(2):75.
   Google Scholar
• Haines MN, Goodhue DL. Implementation partner involvement and knowledge transfer in the context of ERP implementations. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2003;16(1):23–38. doi:10.1207/S15327590IJHC1601_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetsch DL, Davis SB. Quality management for organizational excellence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson; 2015. p. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Jun M, Cai S, Shin H. TQM practice in maquiladora: antecedents of employee satisfaction and loyalty. J Oper Manag. 2006;24(6):791–812. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katajavuori N, Lindblom-Ylänne S, Hirvonen J. The significance of practical training in linking theoretical studies with practice. Higher Educ. 2006;51(3):439–64. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6391-8.
   Google Scholar
• Sung SY, Choi JN. Do organizations spend wisely on employees? Effects of training and development investments on learning and innovation in organizations. J Organ Behav. 2014;35(3):393–412. doi:10.1002/job.1897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke L, Winch C. Apprenticeship and applied theoretical knowledge. Educ Philos Theory. 2004;36(5):509–21. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2004.087_1.x.
   Google Scholar
• Langer EJ. The power of mindful learning. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Langer EJ. Mindfulness. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelsen LK. Team learning: A comprehensive approach for harnessing the power of small groups in higher education. To Improve the Academy. 1992;11:107–22. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1248&context=podimproveacad&sei-redir=1&referer=http%3A%2F%2Fscholar.google.com%2Fscholar%3Fq%3DMichaelsen%2BLK.%2BTeam%2Blearning%253A%2BA%2Bcomprehensive%2Bapproach%2Bfor%26btnG%3D%26hl%3Den%26as_sdt%3D0%252C10#search=%22Michaelsen%20LK.%20Team%20learning%3A%20comprehensive%20approach%22
   Google Scholar
• Argote L, Ingram P, Levine JM, Moreland RL. Knowledge transfer in organizations: learning from the experience of others. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2000;82(1):1–8. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross R, Cummings JN. Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. ‎Acad Manag J. 2004;47(6):928–37. doi:10.2307/20159632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen MT. The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Adm Sci Q. 1999;44(1):82–111. doi:10.2307/2667032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reagans R, McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range. Adm Sci Q. 2003;48(2):240–67. doi:10.2307/3556658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronan TP, Douglas DE. A student ERP simulation game: A longitudinal study. J Comput Inf Syst. 2012;53(1):3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacs W, Senge P. Overcoming limits to learning in computer-based learning environments. Eur J Oper Res. 1992;59(1):183–96. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(92)90014-Z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adobor H, Daneshfar A. Management simulations: determining their effectiveness. J Manag Dev. 2006;25(2):151–68. doi:10.1108/02621710610645135.
   Google Scholar
• Salas E, Wildman JL, Piccolo RF. Using simulation-based training to enhance management education. Acad Manag Learn Educ. 2009;8(4):559–73. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2009.47785474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik SD, Howard BJ. How do we know where we’re going if we don’ t know where we have been: A review of business simulation research. Dev Business Simulation and Exp Learning. 1996;23(1):49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Marks MA, Sabella MJ, Burke CS, Zaccaro SJ. The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(1):3. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang JC, Newell S. Knowledge integration processes and dynamics within the context of cross-functional projects. Intl J Proj Manage. 2003;21(3):167–76. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00091-1.
   Google Scholar
• Woo S, Jeong S, Mok E, Xia L, Choi C, Pyeon M, Heo J. Application of WiFi-based indoor positioning system for labor tracking at construction sites: A case study in Guangzhou MTR. Automat Constr. 2011;20(1):3–13. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2010.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. The Knowledge Creating. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka L, Takeuchi H, Umemoto K. A theory of organizational knowledge creation. Int J Technol Manag. 1996;11(7–8):833–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Henri F, Pudelko B. Understanding and analysing activity and learning in virtual communities. J Comput Assist Learn. 2003;19(4):474–87. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00051.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ Science. 1991;2(1):40–57. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin DY, Chen JJ, Chen GW, Zheng WX. Organizational knowledge acquisition, knowledge integration and training: A case of Motorola. Taipei: Tamkang University; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Shahali EHM, Halim L, Rasul S, Osman K, Ikhsan Z, Rahim F. Bitara-STEM training of trainers programme: impact on trainers knowledge, beliefs, attitudes and efficacy towards integrated STEM teaching. J Baltic Sci Educ. 2015;14(1):85–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwerver F, Schellart AJ, Anema JR, Van Der Beek AJ. Changes in insurance physicians’ attitudes, self-efficacy, intention, and knowledge and skills regarding the guidelines for depression, following an implementation strategy. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(1):148–56. doi:10.1007/s10926-012-9378-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronan TP, Douglas DE, Alnuaimi O, Schmidt PJ. Decision making in an integrated business process context: learning using an ERP simulation game. Decis Sci J Innovative Educ. 2011;9(2):227–34. doi:10.1111/dsji.2011.9.issue-2.
   Google Scholar
• Saari LM, Judge TA. Employee attitudes and job satisfaction. Hum Resour Manage. 2004;43(4):395–407. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-050X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kracklauer N. In Practice: When are Simulations Useful. Chief Learning Officer. 2012;11(7):32.
   Google Scholar
• Pando-Garcia J, Periañez-Cañadillas I, Charterina J. Business simulation games with and without supervision: An analysis based on the TAM model. J Bus Res. 2016;69(5):1731–36. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEC. “Serious Playing”. Montreal. http://www.hec.ca/en/news/2010/nouv201051.html.
   Google Scholar
• Seethamraju R. Enterprise Systems (ES) Software in business school curriculum–evaluation of design and delivery. J Inf Syst Educ. 2007;18(1):69–83.
   Google Scholar
• Kang D, Santhanam R. A longitudinal field study of training practices in a collaborative application environment. J Manag Inf Syst. 2003;20(3):257–81. doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraiger K, Ford JK, Salas E. Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78(2):311. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tohidinia Z, Mosakhani M. Knowledge sharing behaviour and its predictors. Ind Manag Data Syst. 2010;110(4):611–31. doi:10.1108/02635571011039052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries RE, Van Den Hooff B, De Ridder JA. Explaining knowledge sharing: the role of team communication styles, job satisfaction, and performance beliefs. Communic Res. 2006;33(2):115–35. doi:10.1177/0093650205285366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. ‎Acad Manag J. 2001;44(5):996–1004. doi:10.2307/3069443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringle CM, Wende S, Will S. “SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta.” http://www.smartpls.de.
   Google Scholar
• Marcoulides GA, Saunders C. PLS: A Silver Bullet? MIS Quarterly. 2006;30(2):iii–ix.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Straub D. A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: tutorial and annotated example. Communications Assoc Inf Systems. 2005;16(1):5.
   Google Scholar
• Yi MY, Davis FD. Developing and validating an observational learning model of computer software training and skill acquisition. Inf Syst Res. 2003;14(2):146–69. doi:10.1287/isre.14.2.146.16016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguirre-Urreta M, Rönkkö M. Sample size determination and statistical power analysis in PLS using R: An annotated tutorial. Communications Assoc Inf Syst. 2015;36(1):3.
   Google Scholar
• “Post Hoc Statistical Power Analysis.” http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc3/.
   Google Scholar
• Xu Q, Ma Q. Determinants of ERP implementation knowledge transfer. Inf Manag. 2008;45(8):528–39. doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inkpen AC, Dinur A. Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organ Science. 1998;9(4):454–68. doi:10.1287/orsc.9.4.454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armenakis AA, Harris SG, Mossholder KW. Creating readiness for organizational change. Hum Relations. 1993;46(6):681–703. doi:10.1177/001872679304600601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar