Differential effects on assimilation stages for supply chain management information systems

References

• Frohlich MT, Westbrook R. Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies. J Operations Manag. 2001;19(2):185–200. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00055-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuschner R, Rogers DS, Charvet FF. A meta‐analysis of supply chain integration and firm performance. J Supply Chain Manag. 2013;49(2):34–57. doi:10.1111/jscm.2013.49.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robey D, Im G, Wareham JD. Theoretical foundations of empirical research on interorganizational systems: assessing past contributions and guiding future directions. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2008;2009(9):497–518.
   Google Scholar
• Yao Y, Dresner M, Palmer JW. Impact of boundary‐spanning information technology and position in chain on firm performance. J Supply Chain Manag. 2009;45(4):3–16. doi:10.1111/jscm.2009.45.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramani M. How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships? Mis Q. 2004;28(1):45–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärkkäinen M, Laukkanen S, Sarpola S, Kemppainen K. Roles of interfirm information systems in supply chain management. Int J Phys Distribution Mater Manag. 2007;37(4):264–86. doi:10.1108/09600030710752505.
   Google Scholar
• Gunasekaran A, Ngai EWT. Information systems in supply chain integration and management. Eur J Oper Res. 2004;159(2):269–95. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2003.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premkumar G, Ramamurthy K. The role of interorganizational and organizational factors on the decision mode for adoption of interorganizational systems. Decis Sci. 1995;26(3):303–36. doi:10.1111/deci.1995.26.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramamurthy K, Premkumar G, Crum MR. Organizational and interorganizational determinants of EDI diffusion and organizational performance: A causal model. J Organizational Comput Electron Commerce. 1999;9(4):253–85. doi:10.1207/S153277440904_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazen BT, Overstreet RE, Cegielski CG. Supply chain innovation diffusion: going beyond adoption. Int J Logistics Manag. 2012;23(1):119–34. doi:10.1108/09574091211226957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer AD, Goes JB. Organizational assimilation of innovations: a multilevel contextual analysis. Acad Manage J. 1988;31(4):897–923. doi:10.2307/256344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son J, Benbasat I. Organizational buyers’ adoption and use of b2b electronic marketplaces: efficiency- and Legitimacy-oriented Perspectives. J Manag Inf Syst. 2007;24(1):55–99. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222240102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu K, Kraemer KL, Xu S. The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: a technology diffusion perspective on E-business. Manage Sci. 2006;52(10):1557–76. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Prajogo D, Oke A. Supply chain technologies: linking adoption, utilization, and performance. J Supply Chain Manag. 2016;52(4):22–41. doi:10.1111/jscm.2016.52.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. Vol. xvii. 4th ed. New York: Free Press; 1995. p. 519.
   Google Scholar
• Fichman RG. The role of aggregation in the measurement of IT-related organizational innovation. Mis Q. 2001;25(4):427–55. doi:10.2307/3250990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frambach RT, Schillewaert N. Organizational innovation adoption: a multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. J Bus Res. 2002;55(2):163–76. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00152-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour F, Schneider M. Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: effects of environment, organization and top managers. Br J Manag. 2006;17(3):215–36. doi:10.1111/bjom.2006.17.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chwelos P, Benbasat I, Dexter AS. Research report: empirical test of an EDI adoption model. Inf Syst Res. 2001;12(3):304–21. doi:10.1287/isre.12.3.304.9708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iskandar BY, Kurokawa S, LeBlanc LJ. Adoption of electronic data interchange: the role of buyer-supplier relationships. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 2001;48(4):505–17. doi:10.1109/17.969427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramamurthy K, Premkumar G. Determinants and outcomes of electronic data interchange diffusion. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 1995;42(4):332–51. doi:10.1109/17.482083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Z, Janz BD, Frolick MN. A comprehensive examination of Internet-EDI Adoption. Inf Syst Manag. 2008;25(3):273–86. doi:10.1080/10580530802151228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sila I. The state of empirical research on the adoption and diffusion of business-to-business e-commerce. Int J Electron Business. 2015;12(3):258–301. doi:10.1504/IJEB.2015.071386.
   Google Scholar
• Tornatzky LG, Klein KJ. Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation - a meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 1982;29(1):28–45. doi:10.1109/TEM.1982.6447463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameed MA, Counsell S, Swift S. A meta-analysis of relationships between organizational characteristics and IT innovation adoption in organizations. Inf Manag. 2012;49(5):218–32. doi:10.1016/j.im.2012.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P, Powell WW. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev. 1983;48(2):147–60. doi:10.2307/2095101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon BN, Han KS, Lee MJ. Determining factors for the adoption of e-business: the case of SMEs in Korea. Appl Econ. 2006;38(16):1905–16. doi:10.1080/00036840500427262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo HH, Wei KK, Benbasat I. Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: an institutional perspective. Mis Q. 2003;27(1):19–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Z. Toward a deeper understanding of the adoption decision for Interorganizational Information Systems (IOS): An Investigation of Internet EDI (I-EDI). The University of Memphis; 2003. 237.
   Google Scholar
• Hart PJ, Saunders CS. Emerging electronic partnerships: antecedents and dimensions of EDI use from the supplier’s perspective. J Manag Inf Syst. 1998;14(4):87. doi:10.1080/07421222.1998.11518187.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain MA, Quaddus M, Islam N. Developing and validating a model explaining the assimilation process of RFID: an empirical study. Inf Syst Front. 2016;18(4):645–63. doi:10.1007/s10796-014-9537-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jie W, Lowry PB, Seedorf S. A stage-based model for RFID assimilation processes by supply chain participants in China. International Conference on ICT Management for Global Competitiveness and Economic Growth in Emerging Economies (ICTM 2012). 2012. Wroclaw, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Damanpour F. Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad Manag J. 1991;34(3):555–90. doi:10.2307/256406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee G, Xia W. Organizational size and IT innovation adoption. Meta-Analysis Inf Manag. 2006;43(8):975–85.
   Google Scholar
• Rai A, Tang X, Brown P, Keil M. Assimilation patterns in the use of electronic procurement innovations: A cluster analysis. Inf Manag. 2006;43(3):336–49. doi:10.1016/j.im.2005.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Thomas D, Konsynski B. Strategic and institutional perspectives in the evaluation, adoption and early integration of radio frequency identification (RFID): an empirical investigation of current and potential adopters. in Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Proceedings of the 41st Annual. 2008. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter JE, Schmidt FL. Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey MW, Wilson DB. Practical meta-analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsby TJ, Autry CW. Toward greater validation of supply chain management theory and concepts: the roles of research replication and meta‐analysis. J. Bus. Logist. 2011;32(4):324–31. doi:10.1111/jbl.2011.32.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Marucheck AS, Handfield RB. Electronic data interchange: research review and future directions. Decis Sci. 2009;40(1):121–63. doi:10.1111/deci.2009.40.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabherwal R, Jeyaraj A, Chowa C. Information system success: individual and organizational determinants. Manage Sci. 2006;52(12):1849–64. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R. The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(3):638–41. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He J, King WR. The role of user participation in information systems development: implications from a meta-analysis. J Manag Inf Syst. 2008;25(1):301–31. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222250111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanji GK. 100 statistical tests. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Wei JS, Seedorf S, Lowry PB. Investigation of radio-frequency identification assimilation process in China: a stage-based model perspective. Electron J Inf Syst Dev Ctries. 2013;57(4):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman A, Stock JR. Adoption and implementation of technological innovations within long-term relationships. J Bus Res. 2003;56(8):681–86. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00313-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmud RW. Diffusion of modern software practices - influence of centralization and formalization. Manage Sci. 1982;28(12):1421–31. doi:10.1287/mnsc.28.12.1421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delbufalo E. Outcomes of inter-organizational trust in supply chain relationships: a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Supply Chain Manage. 2012;17(4):377–402. doi:10.1108/13598541211246549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Bala H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis Sci. 2008;39(2):273–315. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, K., et al. Migration to open-standard interorganizational systems: network effects, switching costs, and path dependency. Mis Q. 2006;30(10):515–39.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport T, Prusak L. Working knowledge - how organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Ring PS, Van De Ven AH. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad Manag Rev. 1994;19(1):90–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar