Cybersecurity Awareness and Skills of Senior Citizens: A Motivation Perspective

References

• Abawajy J. User preference of cybersecurity awareness delivery methods. Behav Inf Technol. 2014;33(3):236–47. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2012.708787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Arcy J, Hovav A, Galletta D. User awareness of security countermeasures and its impact on information systems misuse: a deterrence approach. Inf Syst Res. 2009;20(1):79–98. doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purkait S, Kumar De S, Suar D. An empirical investigation of the constructs that influence Internet user’s ability to correctly identify a phishing. Inf Manage Comput Secur. 2014;22(3):194–234. doi:10.1108/IMCS-05-2013-0032. website.
   Google Scholar
• Hong J. The state of phishing attacks. Commun Assoc Comput Mach. 2012;55(1):74–81. doi:10.1145/2063176.2063197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futcher ALL. A framework to assist email users in the identification of phishing attacks. Inf Comput Secur. 2015;23:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noor MM, Hassan WH. Wireless networks: developments, threats and countermeasures. Int J Digital Inf Wirel Commun (IJDIWC). 2013;3:119–34.
   Google Scholar
• Claar CL, Johnson J. Analyzing home PC security adoption behavior. J Comput Inf Syst. 2012;52:20–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes GA, Hough MG, Mazur E, Signorella ML. Older adults’ knowledge of Internet hazards. Educ Gerontology. 2010;36(3):173–92. doi:10.1080/03601270903183065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choo -K-KR. The cyber threat landscape: challenges and future research directions. Comput Secur. 2011;30(8):719–31. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2011.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahim NHA, Hamid S, Kiah LM, Shamshirband S, Furnell S. A systematic review of approaches to assessing cybersecurity awareness. Kybernetes. 2015;44(4):606–22. doi:10.1108/K-12-2014-0283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng C. Motivation among older adults in learning computing technologies: a grounded model. Educ Gerontology. 2007;34(1):1–14. doi:10.1080/03601270701763845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shillair R, Cotten SR, Tsai H-YS, Alhabash S, LaRose R, Rifon NJ. Online safety begins with you and me: convincing Internet users to protect themselves. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;48:199–207. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kritzinger E, von Solms SH. Cybersecurity for home users: a new way of protection through awareness enforcement. Comput Secur. 2010;29(8):840–47. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2010.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer R, Eastman JK. The elderly and their attitudes toward the Internet: the impact on Internet use, purchase, and comparison shopping. J Marketing Theory Pract. 2006;14(1):57–67. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679140104.
   Google Scholar
• Perrin P, Duggan M (2015). Americans’ internet access: 2000–2015. Pew research center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/06/26/americans-internet-access-2000-2015/
   Google Scholar
• Willis DP (2015, June 15). 5 steps for seniors to avoid financial fraud. McClatchy - Tribune Business News Retrieved from http://www.app.com/story/money/business/consumer/2015/06/15/senior-financial-fraud/71264182/
   Google Scholar
• Greengard S. Facing an age-old problem. Commun Assoc Comput Mach. 2009;52(9):20–22. doi:10.1145/1562164.1562173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones TL. Protecting the elderly. Law & Order. 2001;49:102–06.
   Google Scholar
• Mensch S, Wilkie L. Information security activities of college students: an exploratory study. Acad Inf Manage Sci J. 2011;14:91–116.
   Google Scholar
• White GL. Education and prevention relationships on security incidents for home computers. J Comput Inf Syst. 2015;55(3):29–37. doi:10.1080/08874417.2015.11645769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson CL, Agarwal R. Practicing safe computing: a multimethod empirical examination of home computer user security behavioral intentions. MIS Q. 2010;34(3):613–A15. doi:10.2307/25750694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denning T, Kohno T, Levy HM. Computer security and the modern home. Commun Assoc Comput Mach. 2013;56(1):94–103. doi:10.1145/2398356.2398377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechtsen E, Hovden J. Improving information security awareness and behaviour through dialogue, participation and collective reflection. An intervention study. Comput Secur. 2010;29(4):432–45. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2009.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlton M, Levy Y (2015). Expert assessment of the top platform independent cybersecurity skills for non-IT professionals. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE SoutheastCon, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, pp.1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Boss S, Kirsch L, Angermeier I, Shingler R, Boss R. If someone is watching, I’ll do what I’m asked: mandatoriness, control, and information security. Eur J Inf Syst. 2009;18(2):151–64. doi:10.1057/ejis.2009.8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt J, Turner G. Examining risks and protective constructs of on-line identity theft. Deviant Behav. 2012;33(4):308–23. doi:10.1080/01639625.2011.584050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston AC, Warkentin M. Fear appeals and information security behaviors: an empirical study. MIS Q. 2010;34(3):549–A4. doi:10.2307/25750691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrohan KF, Engel K, Harvey JW. Influence of awareness and training on cyber security. J Int Commerce. 2010;9(1):23–41. doi:10.1080/15332861.2010.487415.
   Google Scholar
• Hall MT, Marshall JE. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation within the context of modern education. In: Railean E, Walker G, Elçi A, Jackson L, editors. Handbook of research on applied learning theory and design in modern education. Hershey (PA): IGI Global; 2016. p. 292–308.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000;25(1):54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chris Zhao Y, Zhu Q. Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on participation in crowdsourcing contest. Online Inf Rev. 2014;38(7):896–917. doi:10.1108/OIR-08-2014-0188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Deci EL. Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J Personality and Social Psychol. 1971;18(1):105–15. doi:10.1037/h0030644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng X, Fu S, Qin J. Determinants of consumers’ attitudes toward mobile advertising: the mediating roles of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;63:334–41. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MKO, Cheung CMK, Chen Z. Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Inf Manage. 2005;42(8):1095–104. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cota TT, Ishitani L, Vieira JN. Mobile game design for the elderly: a study with focus on the motivation to play. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;51(A):96–105. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee Y, Lee J, Hwang Y. Relating motivation to information and communication technology acceptance: self-determination theory perspective. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;51(Part A):418–28. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf M, Haworth D, Pietron L. Measuring an information security awareness program. Rev Bus Inf Syst. 2011;15(3):9–22. doi:10.19030/rbis.v15i3.5398.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar N, Madden H, Levy Y. Initial empirical testing of potential constructs contributing to patient use of secure medical teleconferencing. J Comput Inf Syst. 2016;57(1):89–95. doi:10.1080/08874417.2016.1181504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compeau D, Higgins C. Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Q. 1995;19(2):189–211. doi:10.2307/249688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Arcy J, Hovav A. Does one size fit all? Examining the differential effects of IS security countermeasures. J Bus Ethics. 2009;89(1):59–71. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9909-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhee H, Kim C, Ryu YU. Self-efficacy in information security: its influence on end users’ information security practice behavior. Comput Secur. 2009;28(8):816–26. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2009.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai F, Li D, Hsieh C-T. Fighting identity theft: the coping perspective. Decis Support Syst. 2012;52(2):353–63. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2011.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemati HR, Van Dyke T. Do privacy statements really work? The effect of privacy statements and fair information practices on trust and perceived risk in E-commerce. International Journal of Information Security and Privacy. 2009;3(1):45–64. doi:10.4018/IJISP.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts LD, Indermaur D, Spiranovic C. Fear of cyberidentity theft and related fraudulent activity. Psychiatry, Psychol Law. 2013;20(3):315–28. doi:10.1080/13218719.2012.672275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang H, Xue Y. Understanding security behaviors in personal computer usage: a threat avoidance perspective. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2010;11(7):394–413. doi:10.17705/1jais.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workman M, Bommer WH, Straub D. Security lapses and the omission of information security measures: a threat control model and empirical test. Comput Hum Behav. 2008;24(6):2799–816. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdipour R, Neace WP. Operationalizing a behavioral finance risk model: a theoretical and empirical framework. J Entrepreneurial Finance. 2013;16:1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner N, Hassanein K, Head M. Computer use by older adults: a multi-disciplinary review. Comput Hum Behav. 2010;26(5):870–82. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen K, Chan AH. Use or non-use of gerontechnology – a qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(10):4645–66. doi:10.3390/ijerph10104645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez A, Maria PR, Viadel V. ICT learning by older adults and their attitudes toward computer use. Current Gerontology Geriatrics Res. 2015;1–7. doi:10.1155/2015/849308.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt LI, Wahl H, Plischke H. Older adults’ performance in technology-based tasks: cognitive ability and beyond. J Gerontological Nurs. 2014;40(4):18–24. doi:10.3928/00989134-20140218-02.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inan FA, Namin AS, Pogrund RL, Jones KS. Internet use and cybersecurity concerns of individuals with visual impairments. J Educ Technol Soc. 2016;19:28–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed N, Ahmad IH. Information privacy concerns, antecedents and privacy measure use in social networking sites: evidence from Malaysia. Comput Hum Behav. 2012;28(6):2366–75. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi MS (2013). Assessing the role of user computer self-efficacy, cybersecurity countermeasures awareness, and cybersecurity skills toward computer misuses intention at government agencies ( Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. ( UMI No. 3599848).
   Google Scholar
• Rezgui Y, Marks A. Information security awareness in higher education: an exploratory study. Comput Secur. 2008;27(7–8):241–53. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2008.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlton M, Levy Y, Ramim MM. Mitigating cyber attacks through the measurement of non-IT professionals’ cybersecurity skills. Inf Comput Secur. 2019;27(x):xx–xx. forthcoming
   Google Scholar
• Adams M, Makramalla M. Cybersecurity skills training: an attacker-centric gamified approach. Technol Innovation Manage Rev. 2015;5(1):5–14. doi:10.22215/timreview/861.
   Google Scholar
• Nagarajan A, Allbeck JM, Sood A, Janssen TL (2012). Exploring game design for cybersecurity training. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Cyber Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems (CYBER), Bangkok, pp. 256–62.
   Google Scholar
• Phipps STA, Prieto LC, Ndinguri EN. Teaching an old dog new tricks: investigating how age, ability, and self-efficacy influence intentions to learn and learning among participants in adult education. Acad Educ Leadership J. 2013;17:13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Dinev T, Xu H, Smith JH, Hart P. Information privacy and correlates: an empirical attempt to bridge and distinguish privacy-related concepts. Eur J Inf Syst. 2013;22(3):295–316. doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertler C, Vannatta RA. Advanced and multivariate statistical methods. Glendale (CA): Pyrczak Publishing; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson KB. Who are the victims of identity theft? The effect of demographics. J Public Policy Marketing. 2006;25(2):160–71. doi:10.1509/jppm.25.2.160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlton M (2016). Development of a cybersecurity skills index: a scenarios-based, hands-on measure of non-IT professionals’ cybersecurity skills (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 10240271).
   Google Scholar
• Furnell SM, Bryant P, Phippen AD. Assessing the security perceptions of personal Internet users. Comput Secur. 2007;26(5):410–17. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2007.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnell S, Tsaganidi V, Phippen A. Security beliefs and barriers for novice Internet users. Comput Secur. 2008;27(7–8):235–40. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2008.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatto SL, Tak SH. Computer, Internet, and e-mail use among older adults: benefits and barriers. Edu Gerontology. 2008;34(9):800–11. doi:10.1080/03601270802243697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imgraben J, Engelbrecht A, Choo KR. Always connected, but are smart mobile users getting more security savvy? A survey of smart mobile device users. Behav Inf Technol. 2014;33(12):1347–60. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2014.934286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddison J, Jeske D. Fear and perceived likelihood of victimization in traditional and cyber settings. Int J Cyber Behav, Psychol Learn (IJCBPL). 2014;4(4):23–40. doi:10.4018/IJCBPL.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan J, Ravindran S. An examination of home Internet and mobile device use in the U.S. Interdiscip J Inf, Knowl Manage. 2014;9:1–18. doi:10.28945/1935.
   Google Scholar
• Reisig M, Pratt T, Holtfreter K. Perceived risk of Internet theft victimization: examining the effects of social vulnerability and financial impulsivity. Criminal Justice Behav. 2009;36(4):369–84. doi:10.1177/0093854808329405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Mohan K, Holowczak R. Locking the door but leaving the computer vulnerable: constructs inhibiting home users’ adoption of software firewalls. Decis Support Syst. 2008;46(1):254–64. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall JD, Palvia P, Lowry PB. Control-related motivations and information security policy compliance: the role of autonomy and efficacy. J Inf Privacy Secur. 2013;9(4):52–79. doi:10.1080/15536548.2013.10845690.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th Edition. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publication; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Straub DW. Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Q. 1989;13(2):147–69. doi:10.2307/248922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajzer M, D’Arcy J, Crowell CR, Striegel A, Bruggen DV. An exploratory investigation of message-person congruence in information security awareness campaigns. Comput Secur. 2014;43:64–76. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2014.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao AL, Hanmer-Lloyd S, Ward P, Goode MMH. Perceived risk and Chinese consumers’ internet banking services adoption. Int J Bank Marketing. 2008;26(7):505–25. doi:10.1108/02652320810913864.
   Google Scholar
• Laganá L, Oliver T, Ainsworth A, Edwards M. Enhancing computer self-efficacy and attitudes in multi-ethnic older adults: a randomized controlled study. Ageing Soc. 2011;31(6):911–33. doi:10.1017/S0144686X10001340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nausheen M. An adaptation of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for postgraduate students in Pakistan: results of an exploratory factor analysis. Bull Edu Res. 2016;38:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich PR, Smith DA, Garcia T, McKeachie WJ. Reliability and predictive validity of the motivation strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Edu Psychol Meas. 1993;53(3):801–13. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchetti DV, Shoinralter D, Tyrer PJ. The effect of number of rating scale categories on levels of interrater reliability: a Monte Carlo investigation. Appl Psychol Meas. 1985;9(1):31–36. doi:10.1177/014662168500900103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy Y. A case study of management skills comparison in online MBA programs. Int J Inf Commun Technol Edu. 2005;1(3):1–20. doi:10.4018/jicte.2005070101.
   Google Scholar
• Torkzadeh G, Lee J. Measures of perceived end-user computing skills. Inf Manage. 2003;40(7):607–15. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00090-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rea LM, Parker RA. Designing and conducting survey research: a comprehensive guide. 4th edn. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Levy Y. Assessing the value of e-learning systems. Hershey (PA): Information Science Publishing; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Hult JTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publication; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Levy Y, Danet T. Implementation success model in government agencies: a case of a centralized identification system at NASA. Int J Inf Syst Serv Sect. 2010;2(2):19–32. doi:10.4018/IJISSS.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin CL. Use of the computer and the Internet by well older adults. Act Adapt Aging. 2013;37(1):63–78. doi:10.1080/01924788.2012.729186.
   Google Scholar
• Lam JC, Lee MO. Digital inclusiveness – longitudinal study of Internet adoption by older adults. J Manage Inf Syst. 2006;22(4):177–206. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222220407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepper MR, Corpus JH, Iyengar SS. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: age differences and academic correlates. J Edu Psychol. 2005;97(2):184–96. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan B, Ali JMH. An empirical examination of a model of computer learning performance. J Comput Inf Syst. 2004;44:27–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Espinoza S. Relationships among computer-self-efficacy, attitudes toward computers, and desirability of learning computer skills. J Res Comput Edu. 1998;30(4):420–38. doi:10.1080/08886504.1998.10782236.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social foundation of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Herath T, Rao HR. Protection motivation and deterrence: a framework for security policy compliance in organizations. Eur J Inf Syst. 2009;18(2):106–25. doi:10.1057/ejis.2009.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones BH, Heinrichs LR. Do business students practice smartphone security? J Comput Inf Syst. 2012;53:22–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista. (2017). Resident population of the United States by sex and age as of July 1 (in millions). Retrieved from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/241488/population-of-the-us-by-sex-and-age/
   Google Scholar