Understanding Consumers’ Post-Adoption Behavior in Sharing Economy Services

References

• Acquier A, Daudigeos T, Pinkse J. Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: an organizing framework. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2017;125:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk R. You are what you can access: sharing and collaborative consumption online. J Bus Res. 2014;67(8):1595–600. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair J, Reischauer G. Capturing the dynamics of the sharing economy: institutional research on the plural forms and practices of sharing economy organizations. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2017;125:11–20. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zervas G, Proserpio D, Byers JW. The rise of the sharing economy: estimating the impact of airbnb on the hotel industry. J Marketing Res. 2017;54(5):687–705. doi:10.1509/jmr.15.0204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang LJ, Choi HC, Joppe M. Exploring the relationship between satisfaction, trust and switching intention, repurchase intention in the context of airbnb. Int J Hosp Manage. 2018;69:41–48. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang LJ, Choi HC, Joppe M. Understanding repurchase intention of airbnb consumers: perceived authenticity, electronic word-of-mouth, and price sensitivity. J Travel Tourism Marketing. 2018;35(1):73–89. doi:10.1080/10548408.2016.1224750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao Z, Lyu J. Why travelers use airbnb again? An integrative approach to understanding travelers’ repurchase intention. Int J Contemp Hospit Manage. 2017;29(9):2464–82. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-08-2016-0439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A. Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Q; 2001;25(3):351–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DJ, Ferrin DL, Rao HR. Trust and satisfaction, two stepping stones for successful e-commerce relationships: A longitudinal exploration. Inf Sys Res. 2009;20(2):237–57. doi:10.1287/isre.1080.0188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CS, Wu S, Tsai RJ. Integrating perceived playfulness into expectation-confirmation model for web portal context. Inf Manage. 2005;42(5):683–93. doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver RL, Burke RR. Expectation processes in satisfaction formation: A field study. J Serv Res. 1999;1(3):196–214. doi:10.1177/109467059913002.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver RL. Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. J Consum Res. 1993;20(3):418–30. doi:10.1086/jcr.1993.20.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerstrøm A, Pawar S, Sigurdsson V, Foxall GR, Yani-de-Soriano M. That personal profile image might jeopardize your rental opportunity! On the relative impact of the seller’s facial expressions upon buying behavior on airbnb™. Comput Human Behav. 2017;72:123–31. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood BN, Wattal S. Show me the way to go home: an empirical investigation of ride-sharing and alcohol related motor vehicle fatalities. Mis Q. 2017;41(1):163–87. doi:10.25300/MISQ.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamari J, Sjöklint M, Ukkonen A. The sharing economy: why people participate in collaborative consumption. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2016;67(9):2047–59. doi:10.1002/asi.2016.67.issue-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit S, Baker TL, Bolton RN, Gruber T, Kandampully J. A triadic framework for collaborative consumption (cc): motives, activities and resources & capabilities of actors. J Bus Res. 2017;79:219–27. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus Horiz. 2010;53(1):59–68. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauwens M. The political economy of peer production. Ctheory Net. 2005. http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=499.
   Google Scholar
• Bardhi F, Eckhardt GM. Access-based consumption: the case of car sharing. J Consum Res. 2012;39(4):881–98. doi:10.1086/666376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers R, Botsman R. What’s mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption. New York (NY): HarperBusiness; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Cockayne DG. Sharing and neoliberal discourse: the economic function of sharing in the digital on-demand economy. Geoforum. 2016;77:73–82. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson M, Hjalmarsson A, Avital M. Peer-to-peer service sharing platforms: driving share and share alike on a mass-scale. Thirty Fourth International Conference on Information Systems, Milan, Italy; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lamberton CP, Rose RL. When is ours better than mine? A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. J Mark. 2012;76(4):109–25. doi:10.1509/jm.10.0368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möhlmann M. Collaborative consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. J Consum Behav. 2015;14(3):193–207. doi:10.1002/cb.v14.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decrop A, Del Chiappa G, Mallargé J, Zidda P. “Couchsurfing has made me a better person and the world a better place”: the transformative power of collaborative tourism experiences. J Travel Tourism Marketing. 2018;35(1):57–72. doi:10.1080/10548408.2017.1307159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ert E, Fleischer A, Magen N. Trust and reputation in the sharing economy: the role of personal photos in airbnb. Tourism Manage. 2016;55:62–73. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2016.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes SJ, Mattsson J. Understanding collaborative consumption: test of a theoretical model. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2017;118:281–92. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May A, Ross T, Segarra G, Grebert J. User reaction to car-share and lift-share within a transport’marketplace’. IET Intel Transport Syst. 2008;2(1):47–60. doi:10.1049/iet-its:20070026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parguel B, Lunardo R, Benoit-Moreau F. Sustainability of the sharing economy in question: when second-hand peer-to-peer platforms stimulate indulgent consumption. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2017;125:48–57. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mody MA, Suess C, Lehto X. The accommodation experiencescape: A comparative assessment of hotels and airbnb. Int J Contemp Hospit Manage. 2017;29(9):2377–404. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-09-2016-0501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson PG, Johnson LW, Spreng RA. Modeling the determinants of customer satisfaction for business-to-business professional services. J Acad Marketing Sci. 1996;25(1):4–17. doi:10.1177/0092070397251002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tussyadiah IP, Zach F. Identifying salient attributes of peer-to-peer accommodation experience. J Travel Tourism Marketing. 2017;34(5):636–52. doi:10.1080/10548408.2016.1209153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valacich JS, Wang X, Jessup LM. Did i buy the wrong gadget? How the evaluability of technology features influences technology feature preferences and subsequent product choice. Mis Q. 2018;42(2):633–44. doi:10.25300/MISQ.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajli N. Social commerce constructs and consumer’s intention to buy. Int J Inf Manage. 2015;35(2):183–91. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senecal S, Nantel J. The influence of online product recommendations on consumers’ online choices. J Retailing. 2004;80(2):159–69. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter JP, Tarpey SLX. A comparative analysis of three consumer decision strategies. J Consum Res. 1975;2(1):29–37. doi:10.1086/jcr.1975.2.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Wang X, Lin X, Hajli M. Seeking and sharing health information on social media: A net valence model and cross-cultural comparison. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2018;126:28–40. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeger A, Wang X, Gewald H, Raisinghani M, Sanchez O, Grant G, Pittayachawan S. Determinants of intention to participate in corporate byod-programs: The case of digital natives. Inf Sys Front. 2015:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9857-4.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Wang X. Online social networking sites continuance intention: A model comparison approach. J Comput Inf Sys. 2017;57(2):160–68. doi:10.1080/08874417.2016.1183448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver RL. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J Marketing Res. 1980;460–69. doi:10.1177/002224378001700405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jr GA C, Surprenant C. An investigation into the determinants of customer satisfaction. J Marketing Res. 1982;19(4):491–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham MS. The major dimensions of perceived risk. In: Cox DF, editor. Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1967. p. 21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Birinci H, Berezina K, Cobanoglu C. Comparing customer perceptions of hotel and peer-to-peer accommodation advantages and disadvantages. Int J Contemp Hospit Manage. 2018;30(2):1190–210. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-09-2016-0506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin X, Featherman M, Sarker S. Understanding factors affecting users’ social networking site continuance: A gender difference perspective. Inf Manage. 2017;54(3):383–95. doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keaveney SM. Customer switching behavior in service industries: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing. 1995;59(2):71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal HS, Taylor SF, St. James Y. “Migrating” to new service providers: toward a unifying framework of consumers’ switching behaviors. J Acad Marketing Sci. 2005;33(1):96–115. doi:10.1177/0092070304267928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh G, Mitchell V-W. The effect of consumer confusion proneness on word of mouth, trust, and customer satisfaction. Eur J Mark. 2010;44(6):838–59. doi:10.1108/03090561011032739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin TC, Cheng HK, Wang FS, Chang KJ. A study of online auction sellers’ intention to switch platform: the case of yahoo! Kimo versus ruten_ebay. Decis Sci. 2012;43(2):241–72. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2011.00347.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxham III JG, Netemeyer RG. Modeling customer perceptions of complaint handling over time: the effects of perceived justice on satisfaction and intent. J Retailing. 2002;78(4):239–52. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(02)00100-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff N. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell MK, Whitney D. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86:114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringle CM, Wende S, Will A Smartpls 2.0 (beta). Hamburg; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hulland J. Use of partial least squares (pls) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Manage J. 1999;20(2):195–204. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng W-T, Dörnyei Z, Schmitt N. A new approach to assessing strategic learning: the case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Appl Ling. 2006;27(1):78–102. doi:10.1093/applin/ami046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Publications; 2014.
   Google Scholar