Factors Activating Big Data Adoption by Korean Firms

References

• Accenture. Big success with big data. 2014. Available from: https://www.accenture.com/hk-en/insight-big-data-research.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• James M, Michael C, Brad B, Jacques B. Big data: the next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute. 2011. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/big-data-the-next-frontier-for-innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Gartner. Survey analysis: big data investment grows but deployments remain scarce in 2014. 2014. Available from: https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/2841519.
   Google Scholar
• LaValle S, Lesser E, Shockley R, Hopkins MS, Kruschwitz N. Big data, analytics and the path from insights to value. MIT Sloan Management Review. 2011;52:20–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIA. Yearbook of information society statics. National Information Agency. 2018. Available from: http://eng.nia.or.kr/site/nia_eng/ex/bbs/List.do?cbIdx=31975.
   Google Scholar
• IBM. The real-world use of big data: how innovative enterprises extract value from uncertain data. 2012. https://www.ibm.com/smarterplanet/global/files/se__sv_se__intelligence__Analytics_-_The_real-world_use_of_big_data.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Alharthi A, Krotov V, Bowman M. Addressing barriers to big data. Business Horizons. 2017;60:285–92.
   Google Scholar
• Halaweh M, El Massry A. A synergetic model for implementing big data in organizations: an mpirical study. Information Resources Management Journal. 2017;30:48–64.
   Google Scholar
• Kim EY, Lee JH, Seo DW. A study on the effect of organization’s environment on acceptance intention for big data system. Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management. 2013;20(4):1–18. (In Korean).
   Google Scholar
• Kwon O, Lee N, Shin B. Data quality management, data usage experience and acquisition intention of big data analytics. International Journal of Information Management. 2014;34:387–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun S, Cegielski CG, Jia L, Hall DJ. Understanding the factors affecting the organizational adoption of big data. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 2018;58:193–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma S, Bhattacharyya SS. Perceived strategic value-based adoption of big data analytics in emerging economy: a qualitative approach for Indian firms. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 2017;30:354–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang YW, Hsu PY, Wu ZY. Exploring managers’ intention to use business intelligence: the role of motivations. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2015;34:273–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šebjan U, Bobek S, Tominc P. Factors influencing attitudes towards the use of CRM’s analytical tools in organizations. Organizacija. 2016;49:28–41.
   Google Scholar
• Tornatzky LG, Fleischer M, Chakrabarti AK. Process of technological innovation. Lexington (MA): Lexington books; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Thong JY. An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. Journal of Management Information Systems. 1999;15:187–214.
   Google Scholar
• Wang YM, Wang YS, Yang YF. Understanding the determinants of RFID adoption in the manufacturing industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2010;77:803–15.
   Google Scholar
• Lin HF, Lin SM. Determinants of e-business diffusion: a test of the technology diffusion perspective. Technovation. 2008;28:135–45.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu K, Kraemer K, Xu S. Electronic business adoption by European firms: a cross-country assessment of the facilitators and inhibitors. European Journal of Information Systems. 2003;12:251–68.
   Google Scholar
• Xu S, Zhu K, Gibbs J. Global technology, local adoption: a cross-country investigation of internet adoption by companies in the United States and China. Electronic Markets. 2004;14:13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Cao Q, Jones DR, Sheng H. Contained nomadic information environments: technology, organization, and environment influences on adoption of hospital RFID patient tracking. Information & Management. 2014;51:225–39.
   Google Scholar
• Gangwar H, Date H, Ramaswamy R. Understanding determinants of cloud computing adoption using an integrated TAM-TOE model. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 2015;28:107–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu PF, Ray S, Li-Hsieh YY. Examining cloud computing adoption intention, pricing mechanism, and deployment model. International Journal of Information Management. 2014;34:474–88.
   Google Scholar
• Lian JW, Yen DC, Wang YT. An exploratory study to understand the critical factors affecting the decision to adopt cloud computing in Taiwan hospital. International Journal of Information Management. 2014;34:28–36.
   Google Scholar
• Low C, Chen Y, Wu M. Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2011;111:1006–23.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira T, Thomas M, Espadanal M. Assessing the determinants of cloud computing adoption: an analysis of the manufacturing and services sectors. Information & Management. 2014;51:497–510.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Sun J, Zhang Y, Wang Y. Understanding SaaS adoption from the perspective of organizational users: a tripod readiness model. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015;45:254–64.
   Google Scholar
• Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science. 1989;35:982–1003.
   Google Scholar
• Iacovou CL, Benbasat I, Dexter AS. Electronic data interchange and small organizations: adoption and impact of technology. MIS Quarterly. 1995;19:465–85.
   Google Scholar
• Lin HF. Understanding the determinants of electronic supply chain management system adoption: using the technology–organization–environment framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2014;86:80–92.
   Google Scholar
• NIA. Yearbook of information society statics. National Information Agency. 2014. Available from: http://eng.nia.or.kr/site/nia_eng/ex/bbs/List.do?cbIdx=31975.
   Google Scholar
• Kshetri N. Big data’s impact on privacy, security and consumer welfare. Telecommunications Policy. 2014;38:1134–45.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs JL, Kraemer KL. A cross-country investigation of the determinants of scope of e-commerce use: an institutional approach. Electronic Markets. 2004;14:124–37.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1977;15:234–81.
   Google Scholar
• Chen MK, Wang SC. The critical factors of success for information service industry in developing international market: using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach. Expert Systems with Applications. 2010;37(1):694–704.
   Google Scholar
• Chin KS, Chan BL, Lam PK. Identifying and prioritizing critical success factors for coopetition strategy. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2008;108(4):437–454.
   Google Scholar
• Kahraman C, Demirel NC, Demirel T. Prioritization of e-Government strategies using a SWOT-AHP analysis: the case of Turkey. European Journal of Information Systems. 2007;16(3):284–298.
   Google Scholar
• Kim MK, Park JH, Paik JH. Relationship between service-related activities, service capability and market diffusion: case of WiBro. ETRI Journal. 2014;36:490–97.
   Google Scholar
• Nikou S, Mezei J. Evaluation of mobile services and substantial adoption factors with Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Telecommunications Policy. 2013;37:915–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adhiarna N, Hwang YM, Park MJ, Rho JJ. An integrated framework for RFID adoption and diffusion with a stage-scale-scope cubicle model: a case of Indonesia. International Journal of Information Management. 2013;33:378–89.
   Google Scholar
• Kim MK, Park JH. Identifying and prioritizing critical factors for promoting the implementation and usage of Big Data in healthcare sector. Information Development. 2017;33:259–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resources allocation. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Erkan I, Evans C. The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers’ purchase intentions: an extended approach to information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;61:47–55.
   Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Jang SY, Yang KH. Analysis of the determinants of software-as-a-service adoption in small businesses: risks, benefits, and organizational and environmental factors. Journal of Small Business Management. 2017;55:303–25.
   Google Scholar
• Wu JH, Wang SC. What drives mobile commerce?: an empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & Management. 2005;42:719–29.
   Google Scholar
• Chan FT, Chong AYL. Determinants of mobile supply chain management system diffusion: a structural equation analysis of manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Research. 2013;51:1196–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. New York (NY): Pearson; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 1988;16:74–94.
   Google Scholar
• Aboelmaged MG. Predicting e-readiness at firm-level: an analysis of technological, organizational and environmental (TOE) effects on e-maintenance readiness in manufacturing firms. International Journal of Information Management. 2014;34(5):639–51. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurnia S, Karnali RJ, Rahim MM. A qualitative study of business-to-business electronic commerce adoption within the Indonesian grocery industry: a multi-theory perspective. Information & Management. 2015;52:518–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations .4th ed. New York (NY): Simon and Schuster; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Chen H, Chiang RH, Storey VC. Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly. 2012;36:1165–1188.
   Google Scholar
• Wamba SF, Gunasekaran A, Akter S, Ren SJF, Dubey R, Childe SJ. Big data analytics and firm performance: effects of dynamic capabilities. Journal of Business Research. 2017;70:356–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang RM, Kauffman RJ, Kwon Y. Understanding the paradigm shift to computational social science in the presence of big data. Decision Support Systems. 2014;63:67–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandomi A, Haider M. Beyond the hype: big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management. 2015;35:137–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesdorf S, Court D, Willmott P Big data: what’s your plan. McKinsey Quarterly. 2013. http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/business_technology/big_data_whats_your_plan.
   Google Scholar
• Morabito V. Big data driven business models. In: big data and analytics, 65–80. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2015.  Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-10665-6_4.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon TH, Kwak JH, Kim K. A study on the establishment of policies for the activation of a big data industry and prioritization of policies: lessons from Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2015;96:144–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar