321
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Case Report

Auditing the Governance and Management of Green IT

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Brundtland G, Khalid M, Agnelli S, Al-Athel S, Chidzero B, Fadika L, Hauff V, Lang I, Shijun M, Marino de Botero M, et al. Our common future (“Brundtland Report”). Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 1987
  • Ericsson. Ericsson energy and carbon report: on the impact of the networked society. Stockholm (SE): Ericsson AB; 2013.
  • Calero C, Piattini M, editors. Green in software engineering. Cham (CH): Springer International Publishing AG; 2015.
  • Watson RT, Boudreau MC, Chen AJ. Information systems and environmentally sustainable development: energy informatics and new directions for the IS community. MIS Quarterly. 2010;34(1):23–38. doi:10.2307/20721413.
  • Brodkin J. Economy driving Green IT initiatives. Network World. 2008;25:16.
  • Deng Q, Ji S. Organizational Green IT adoption: concept and evidence. Sustainability. 2015;7(12):16737–55. doi:10.3390/su71215843.
  • Cazier JA, Hopkins BE. Doing the right thing for the environment just got easier with a little help from information systems. Proceedings of SIGGreen Workshop, Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems. 2011;11(10):1–7.
  • Saunila M, Nasiri M, Ukko J, Rantala T. Smart technologies and corporate sustainability: the mediation effect of corporate sustainability strategy. Computers in Industry. 2019;108:178–85. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2019.03.003.
  • Simmonds DM, Bhattacherjee A. Green IT adoption and sustainable value creation. Proceeding of the 20th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2014); 2014 Aug 7th – 10th; Savannah, USA. p. 2550–65.
  • Wimmer W, Lee KM, Quella F, Polak J. ECODESIGN. The competitive advantage. Dordrecht (NL): Springer Netherlands; 2010. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9127-7.
  • Calero C, Piattini M. Puzzling out software sustainability. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems. 2017;16:117–24. doi:10.1016/j.suscom.2017.10.011.
  • García-Mireles GA, Moraga MA, García F, Calero C, Piattini M. Interactions between environmental sustainability goals and software product quality: a mapping study. Information & Software Technology. 2018;95:108–29. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2017.10.002.
  • Patón-Romero JD, Piattini M Indicators for Green in IT audits: a systematic mapping study. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Measurement and Metrics for Green and Sustainable Software Systems (MeGSuS’16); 2016 Sept 7th; Ciudad Real, Spain. p. 4–12.
  • Patón-Romero JD, Baldassarre MT, Rodríguez M, Piattini M. Green IT governance and management based on ISO/IEC 15504. Computer Standards & Interfaces. 2018;60:26–36. doi:10.1016/j.csi.2018.04.005.
  • Weichhart G, Molina A, Chen D, Whitman LE, Vernadat F. Challenges and current developments for sensing, smart and sustainable enterprise systems. Computers in Industry. 2016;79:34–46. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2015.07.002.
  • Patón-Romero JD, Baldassarre MT, Piattini M, García Rodríguez de Guzmán I. A governance and management framework for Green IT. Sustainability. 2017;9(10):1761. doi:10.3390/su9101761.
  • ISO. ISO/IEC 15504 (Information technology — process assessment). Geneva (CH): International Organization for Standardization; 2003.
  • Patón-Romero JD, Baldassarre MT, Rodríguez M, Piattini M. A revised framework for the governance and management of Green IT. Journal of Universal Computer Science. 2019;25(13):1736–60. doi:10.3217/jucs-025-13-1736.
  • ISO. ISO/IEC 33000 (Information technology — process assessment). Geneva (CH): International Organization for Standardization; 2015.
  • Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal. 2009;26(2):91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
  • Gabriel C. Why it’s not naive to be green. Business Information Review. 2008;25(4):230–37. doi:10.1177/0266382108098865.
  • Gray GL, No WG, Miller DW. Internal auditors’ experiences and opinions regarding Green IT: assessing the gap in normative and positive perspectives. Journal of Information Systems. 2014;28(1):75–109. doi:10.2308/isys-50694.
  • Gray GL. Green IT opportunities for internal auditors. Altamonte Springs (FL): The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation (IIARF); 2011.
  • Ambtman EL Green IT Auditing [Post-graduate Thesis]. Amsterdam (NL): Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; 2011.
  • Buchalcevova A. Green ICT maturity model for Czech SMEs. Journal of Systems Integration. 2015;6(1):24–36. doi:10.20470/jsi.v6i1.220.
  • Curley M, Kenneally J, Carcary M, editors. IT capability maturity framework (IT-CMF). The body of knowledge guide, Second ed. Zaltbommel (NL): Van Haren Publishing; 2016. p. 103–18.
  • Hankel A, Oud L, Saan M, Lago P A maturity model for Green ICT: the case of the SURF Green ICT maturity model. Proceedings of the 28th EnviroInfo 2014 Conference; 2014 Sept 10th – 12th; Oldenburg, Germany. p. 33–40.
  • Yin RK. Case study research and applications: design and methods. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE; 2017.
  • Eisenhardt KM. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review. 1989;14(4):532–50. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4308385.
  • Runeson P, Höst M, Rainer A, Regnell B. Case study research in software engineering: guidelines and examples. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
  • Unhelkar B. Green IT strategies and applications: using environmental intelligence. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2011.
  • ISO. ISO 14000 (Environmental management systems). Geneva (CH): International Organization for Standardization; 2015.
  • ISACA. COBIT 5: a business framework for the governance and management of enterprise IT. Rolling Meadows (IL): ISACA; 2012.
  • Lethbridge TC, Sim SE, Singer J. Studying software engineers: data collection techniques for software field studies. Empirical Software Engineering. 2005;10(3):311–41. doi:10.1007/s10664-005-1290-x.
  • Jenkin TA, McShane L, Webster J. Green information technologies and systems: employees’ perceptions of organizational practices. Business & Society. 2011;50(2):266–314. doi:10.1177/0007650311398640.
  • Epstein MJ, Buhovac AR. Making sustainability work: best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. 2nd ed. San Francisco (CA): Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2014.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.