Sustained Participation in Open Source Software Project Communities

References

• Carillo K, Huff S, Chawner B. What makes a good contributor? Understanding contributor behavior within large Free/Open Source Software projects–A socialization perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2017.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carillo K, Okoli C. The open source movement: a revolution in software development. J Comput Inf Syst. 2008;49:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Neufeld D. Understanding sustained participation in open source software projects. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2009;25(4):9–50. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222250401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raja U, Tretter MJ. Defining and evaluating a measure of open source project survivability. IEEE Trans Softw Eng. 2012;38(1):163–74. doi:10.1109/TSE.2011.39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaikh M, Levina N. Selecting an open innovation community as an alliance partner: looking for healthy communities and ecosystems. Res Policy. 2019;48(8):103766. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Hahn J, De P. Research note—Continued participation in online innovation communities: does community response matter equally for everyone? Information Systems Research. 2013;24(4):1112–30. doi:10.1287/isre.2013.0485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart KJ, Gosain S. The impact of ideology on effectiveness in open source software development teams. In: MIS quarterly. MIS Research Center, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota; 2006. p. 291–314.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha VS, Mani S, Sinha S. Entering the circle of trust: developer initiation as committers in open-source projects. In: Proceedings of the 8th working conference on mining software repositories; May. Waikiki, Honolulu (HI); 2011. p. 133–42.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review. 1995;20(3):709–34. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York (NY): Simon and Schuster; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger E. Communities of practice and social learning systems: the career of a concept. In: Blackmore C, editor. Social learning systems and communities of practice. London (UK): Springer; 2010. p. 179–98.
   Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review. 1998;23(2):242–66. doi:10.5465/amr.1998.533225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau PM. Exchange and power in social life. New York (NY): Wiley; 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR, Von Hippel E. How open source software works: “free” user-to-user assistance. Res Policy. 2003;32(6):923–43. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00095-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg A, Berente N, Gaskin J, Lyytinen K. Coordinating interdependencies in online communities: a study of an open source software project. Information Systems Research. 2016;27(4):751–72. doi:10.1287/isre.2016.0673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’mahony S, Ferraro F. The emergence of governance in an open source community. Academy of Management Journal. 2007;50(5):1079–106. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.27169153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler JKJ. Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. J Manage. 1991;17(3):643–63. doi:10.1177/014920639101700307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra AK. Organizational responses to crisis. In: Kramer R, Tyler T, editors. Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc. p. 261–87. https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781452243610.n13
   Google Scholar
• Bolino MC, Turnley WH, Bloodgood JM. Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations. Academy of Management Review. 2002;27(4):505–22. doi:10.5465/amr.2002.7566023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, Scott BA, LePine JA. Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: a meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. The American Psychological Association; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister DJ. Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal. 1995;38:24–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng X, Gu Y, Shen J. An integrated view of particularized trust in social commerce: an empirical investigation. Int J Inf Manage. 2019;45:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter CE, Donthu N. Cultivating trust and harvesting value in virtual communities. Manage Sci. 2008;54(1):113–28. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1070.0765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa SL, Knoll K, Leidner DE. Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems. 1998;14(4):29–64. doi:10.1080/07421222.1998.11518185.
   Google Scholar
• Serva MA, Fuller MA, Mayer RC. The reciprocal nature of trust: a longitudinal study of interacting teams. J Organ Behav. 2005;26(6):625–48. doi:10.1002/job.331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. In: Biometrics. International Biometric Society; 1977. p. 159–74.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau DM, Sitkin SB, Burt RS, Camerer C. Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review. 1998;23(3):393–404. doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridings CM, Gefen D, Arinze B. Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 2002;11(3–4):271–95. doi:10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00021-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong L, Liu L. Peertrust: supporting reputation-based trust for peer-to-peer electronic communities. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2004;16(7):843–57. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2004.1318566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Cui L, Wang Y. Commtrust: computing multi-dimensional trust by mining e-commerce feedback comments. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2013;26(7):1631–43. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2013.177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitti M, Girau R, Floris A, Atzori L, 2014, May. On adding the social dimension to the internet of vehicles: friendship and middleware. In 2014 IEEE international black sea conference on communications and networking (BlackSeaCom). Chisinau (Moldova): IEEE. p. 134–38.
   Google Scholar
• Arya A, Hine M, Khataei A, 2018. User trust graph: a model to measure trustworthiness. Presented at the 3rd International Workshop on Personalization in Persuasive Technology, PPT 2018 (April 2018), Waterloo.
   Google Scholar
• Dale R. Text analytics APIs, Part 1: the bigger players. Natural Language Engineering. 2018;24(2):317–24. doi:10.1017/S1351324918000013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto HL, Rocio V, 2019, September. Combining sentiment analysis scores to improve accuracy of polarity classification in MOOC Posts. In EPIA Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 35–46). Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Satyanarayana G, Bhuvana J, Balamurugan M, 2020, January. Sentimental Analysis on voice using AWS Comprehend. In: 2020 International conference on computer communication and informatics (ICCCI). Coimbatore (India): IEEE. p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho A, Harris L. Off-the-shelf technologies for sentiment analysis of social media data: two empirical studies. AMCIS 2020 Proceedings. 2020;6. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2020/social_computing/social_computing/6.
   Google Scholar
• Anand S, Vidyarthi P, Rolnicki S. Leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behaviors: contextual effects of leader power distance and group task interdependence. Leadersh Q. 2018;29(4):489–500. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler WM, Brass DJ. Relational correlates of interpersonal citizenship behavior: a social network perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2006;91(1):70. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CP, Hung WT, Chiu CK. Being good citizens: understanding a mediating mechanism of organizational commitment and social network ties in OCBs. Journal of Business Ethics. 2008;81(3):561–78. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9528-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temizkan O, Kumar RL. Exploitation and exploration networks in open source software development: an artifact-level analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2015;32(1):116–50. doi:10.1080/07421222.2015.1029382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks C. Introductory econometrics for finance. 2nd ed. UK: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bernanke BS, Boivin J, Eliasz P. Measuring the effects of monetary policy: a factor-augmented vector autoregressive (FAVAR) approach. Q J Econ. 2005;120:387–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuaresma JC, Feldkircher M, Huber F. Forecasting with global vector autoregressive models: a Bayesian approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 2016;31(7):1371–91. doi:10.1002/jae.2504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzel JR, Kerschberg L. Developing knowledge-based systems: reorganizing the system development life cycle. Commun ACM. 1989;32(4):482–88. doi:10.1145/63334.63340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen S, Dori D, de Haan U. A software system development life cycle model for improved stakeholders’ communication and collaboration. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control. 2010;5(1):20–41. doi:10.15837/ijccc.2010.1.2462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsay RS. Multivariate time series analysis: with R and financial applications. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Craik FI. Memory changes in normal aging. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 1994;3(5):155–58. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin AJ. Chapter Eight normal age-related memory loss and its relation to frontal lobe dysfunction. Methodology of frontal and executive function. Routledge; 1997. p. 171.
   Google Scholar
• Sara SJ. Retrieval and reconsolidation: toward a neurobiology of remembering. Learning & Memory. 2000;7(2):73–84. doi:10.1101/lm.7.2.73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar