Digital Investments in Organizational Learning and Entrepreneurial Agility

References

• Felipe CM, Roldán JL, Leal-Rodríguez AL. An explanatory and predictive model for organizational agility. J Bus Res. 2016;69(10):4624–31. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallon PP, Queiroz M, Coltman T, Sharma R. Information technology and the search for organizational agility: a systematic review with future research possibilities. J. Strateg. Inf Syst. 2019;28(2):218–37. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2018.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakravarty A, Grewal R, Sambamurthy V. Information technology competencies, organizational agility, and firm performance: enabling and facilitating roles. Inf Syst Res. 2013;24(4):976–97. doi:10.1287/isre.2013.0500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yim NH, Kim SH, Kim HW, Kwahk KY. Knowledge based decision making on higher level strategic concerns: system dynamics approach. Expert Syst Appl. 2004;27(1):143–58. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2003.12.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown R, Mawson S, Rowe A, Mason C. Working the crowd: improvisational entrepreneurship and equity crowdfunding in nascent entrepreneurial ventures. Int Small Bus J. 2018;36(2):169–93. doi:10.1177/0266242617729743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V, Bharadwaj A, Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Q. 2003;27(2):237–63. doi:10.2307/30036530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou S, Qiao Z, Du Q, Wang GA, Fan W, Yan X. Measuring customer agility from online reviews using big data text analytics. J Manag Inf Syst. 2018;35(2):510–39. doi:10.1080/07421222.2018.1451956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwankpa JK, Datta P. Balancing exploration and exploitation of IT resources: the influence of digital business intensity on perceived organizational performance. Eur J Inf Syst. 2017;26(5):469–88. doi:10.1057/s41303-017-0049-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwankpa JK, Roumani Y. IT capability and digital transformation: a firm performance perspective. In: International Conference on Information Systems. Dublin, Ireland; 2016: p. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Farhadloo M, Patterson RA, Rolland E. Modeling customer satisfaction from unstructured data using a bayesian approach. Decis Support Syst. 2016;(90):1–11. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2016.06.010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martínez-Caro E, Cegarra-Navarro JG, Garcia-Perez A. Technology assimilation, absorptive capacity and organisational agility: their combined effect on firm performance, Paper presented at: The European Conference on Knowledge Management. Pedua, Italy; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hajli M, Sims JM, Ibragimov V. Information technology (IT) productivity paradox in the 21st century. Int J Product Perform Manag. 2015;64(4):457–78. doi:10.1108/IJPPM-12-2012-0129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baptista J, Newell S, Currie W. Paradoxical effects of institutionalization on the strategic awareness of technology in organizations. J. Strateg. Inf Syst. 2010;19(3):171–83. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2010.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyris C, Schön DA. Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Reis. 1997;77/78:345. doi:10.2307/40183951.
   Google Scholar
• Zohreh HR, Valliere D, Faghih N, Hejazi R, Dehkordi A. Entrepreneurial alertness: a systematic literature review. J Small Bus Entrep. 2021;33(2):123–52. doi:10.1080/08276331.2020.1764736.
   Google Scholar
• Sherehiy B, Karwowski W, Layer JK. A review of enterprise agility: concepts, frameworks, and attributes. Int J Ind Ergon. 2007;37(5):445–60. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2007.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Wang Y, Nevo S, Jin J, Wang L, Chow WS, Capability IT. Organizational performance: the roles of business process agility and environmental factors. Eur J Inf Syst. 2014;23(3):326–42. doi:10.1057/ejis.2013.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts N, Grover V. Leveraging information technology infrastructure to facilitate a firm’s customer agility and competitive activity: an empirical investigation. J Manag Inf Syst. 2012;28(4):231–70. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222280409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaglio CM, Katz JA. The psychological basis of opportunity identification: entrepreneurial alertness. Small Bus Econ. 2001;16:95–111. doi:10.1023/A:1011132102464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang J, Kacmar KM, Busenitz L. Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. J Bus Ventur. 2021;27(1):77–94. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.07.001.
   Google Scholar
• Roundy PT, Harrison DA, Khavul S, Pérez-Nordtvedt L, McGee JE. Entrepreneurial alertness as a pathway to strategic decisions and organizational performance. Strateg Organ. 2018;16(2):192–226. doi:10.1177/1476127017693970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Y, Wang P, Liang Y. Influence of entrepreneurial experience, alertness, and prior knowledge on opportunity recognition. Soc Behav Pers. 2015;43(9):1575–83. doi:10.2224/sbp.2015.43.9.1575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Chiang R, Storey VC. Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. Mis Q. 2012;36(4):1165-1188. doi:10.2307/41703503.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao W, Yang T, Hughes KD, Li Y. Entrepreneurial alertness and business model innovation: the role of entrepreneurial learning and risk perception. Int Entrep Manag J. 2021;(17):839–64. doi:10.1007/s11365-020-00637-2.
   Google Scholar
• Li Z. Entrepreneurial alertness: an exploration study. Beijing, P.R. China: Heidelberg; New York: Tsinghua University Press; Springer; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Lumpkin GT, Gregory DG. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Acad Manage Rev. 1996;21(39):135–72. doi:10.2307/258632.
   Google Scholar
• Wiklund J. The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation performance relationship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice. 1999;24(1):37–48. doi:10.1177/104225879902400103.
   Google Scholar
• Wiklund J, Shepherd D. Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strateg Manag J. 2003;24(13):1307–14. doi:10.1002/smj.360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mole KF, Adomako S. Entrepreneurial alertness and entrepreneurial orientation: a realist view. Paper presented at: Academy of Management Proceedings; Vol. 10510. Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management; 2017. p. 13042.
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth M, Mukhopadhyay T, Argote L. Information technology and organizational learning: an empirical analysis. Paper presented at: The International Conference on Information Systems. Washington DC, USA: AIS Electronic Library; 2004. p. 13.
   Google Scholar
• Basten D, Haamann T. Approaches for organizational learning: a literature review. SAGE Open. 2018;8(3):1–20. doi:10.1177/2158244018794224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvin DA, Edmondson AC, Gino F. Is yours a learning organization? Harv Bus Rev. 2008;86:109–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom B. Innovation and diffusion in small firms: theory and evidence. Small Bus Econ. 1994;6:327–47. doi:10.1007/BF01065137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghobadian A, Gallear D. Total quality management in SMEs. Omega. 1996;24(1):83–106. doi:10.1016/0305-0483(95)00055-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooney D. Openness and digital innovation. Paris: OECD Observer; 2017. doi:10.1787/7d39e4b1-en.
   Google Scholar
• Aral S, Dellarocas C, Godes D. Introduction to the special issue —social media and business transformation: a framework for research. Inf Syst Res. 2013;24(1):3–13. doi:10.1287/isre.1120.0470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basco R, Hernández-Perlines F, Rodríguez-García G. The effect of entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance: a multigroup analysis comparing China, Mexico, and Spain. J Bus Res. 2020;113(113):409–42. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.020.
   Google Scholar
• Di Gangi PM, Wasko MM, Hooker RE. Getting customers’ ideas to work for you: learning from dell how to succeed with online user innovation communities. MIS Q Executive. 2010;9:213–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu CM, Liang TP, Turban E. What can crowdsourcing do for decision support? Decis Support Syst. 2014;65:40–49. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2014.05.010.
   Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B, Resource-based A. View of the firm. Strateg Manag J. 1984;5(2):171–80. doi:10.1002/smj.4250050207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade M, Hulland J. Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Q. 2004;28(1):107–42. doi:10.2307/25148626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, Sapienza HJ, Davidsson P. Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research Agenda. J Manag Stud. 2006;43(4):917–55. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece D. Dynamic capabilities: routines versus entrepreneurial action. J Manag Stud. 2012 December;49(8):1395–401. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01080.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makadok R. Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strateg Manag J. 2001;22(5):387–401. doi:10.1002/smj.158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler G. The economics of information. J Polit Econ. 1961;69(3):213–25. doi:10.1086/258464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim WL, Xavier SR. Opportunity recognition framework: exploring the technology entrepreneurs. Am J Econ. 2015;5:105–11.
   Google Scholar
• Valliere D. Towards a schematic theory of entrepreneurial alertness. J Bus Ventur. 2013;28(3):430–42. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simsek MH, Veiga JF, Dino RN. The role of an entrepreneurially alert information system in promoting corporate entrepreneurship. J Bus Res. 2009;62(8):810–17. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumpkin GT, Dess G. Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. J Bus Ventur. 2001;16(5):429–51. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00048-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravichandran T, Lertwongsatien C. Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: a resource-based perspective. J Manag Inf Syst. 2005;21(4):237–76. doi:10.1080/07421222.2005.11045820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SM, Lim S, Pathak RD. Culture and entrepreneurial orientation: a multi-country study. Int Entrep Manag J. 2011;7(1):1–15. doi:10.1007/s11365-009-0117-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaish S, Gilad B. Characteristics of opportunities search of entrepreneurs versus executives: sources, interests, general alertness. J Bus Ventur. 1991;6(1):45–61. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(91)90005-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullen J, Shepherd D. Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Acad Manage Rev. 2006;31(1):132–52. doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron RA. Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: how entrepreneurs “connect the dots” to identify new business opportunities. Acad Manag Perspect. 2006;20(1):104–19. doi:10.5465/amp.2006.19873412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angst CM, Wowak KD, Handley SM, Kelley K. Antecedents of information systems sourcing strategies in US hospitals: a longitudinal study. MIS Q. 2017;41(4):1129–52. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.4.06.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angeles S. Big data: an affordable approach | small business customer data. 2013 [accessed 2019 Feb 28]. https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/4499-big-data-tools-small-business.html.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma L. A systematic review of the concept of entrepreneurial alertness. J Entrepreneurship Emerg Econ. 2018;11(2):217–33. doi:10.1108/JEEE-05-2018-0049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringle CM, Wende S, Becker JM. SmartPLS 3, Boenningstedt: SmartPLS; 2015. [accessed 2020 Jan 30]. http://www.smartpls.com.
   Google Scholar
• Hair J, Anderson J,R, Black B, Babin B. Multivariate data analysis. New York City (NY): Pearson Education; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, New MA. Criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Acad Mark Sci Rev. 2015;43:115–35. doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzels O, Oppen V. Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Q. 2009;33(1):177–95. doi:10.2307/20650284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiva R, Ghauri P, Alegre J. Organizational learning, innovation and internationalization: a complex system model. Br J Manag. 2013;25(4):687–705. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeow A, Soh C, Hansen R. Aligning with new digital strategy: a dynamic capabilities approach. J. Strateg. Inf Syst. 2018;27(1):43–58. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2017.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar