Counteracting the Impact of Online Fake News on Brands

References

• Parsons DD. The impact of fake news on company value: evidence from tesla and galena biopharma. Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects; 2020 [accessed 2021 Nov 7]. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/2328.
   Google Scholar
• Tsfati Y, Boomgaarden HG, Strömbäck J, Vliegenthart R, Damstra A, Lindgren E. Causes and consequences of mainstream media dissemination of fake news: literature review and synthesis. Ann Int Commun Assoc. 2020;44(2):157–73. doi:10.1080/23808985.2020.1759443.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert B. The 10 most-viewed fake-news stories on Facebook in 2019 were just revealed in a new report. Insider Inc; 2019 [accessed 2021 Nov 5]. https://www.businessinsider.com/most-viewed-fake-news-stories-shared-on-facebook-2019-2019-11.
   Google Scholar
• Imamura T. Real events caused by fake news in the US. Marubeni; 2017 [accessed 2022 Feb 21]. https://www.marubeni.com/en/research/potomac/backnumber/19.html.
   Google Scholar
• Greenspan RE. A top YouTuber slammed Dasani over additive conspiracy theories. Experts say they don’t hold water. Insider Inc; 2020 [accessed 2021 Nov 3]. https://www.businessinsider.com/dasani-water-salt-controversy-shane-dawson-video-2020-4.
   Google Scholar
• AP News. AP FACT CHECK: Coca-Cola not recalling Dasani water. 2017 [accessed 2021 Dec 18]. https://apnews.com/article/ecfb398fa555456d99fe40e0a05dd1da.
   Google Scholar
• Watson A. Share of adults who trust news media most of the time in selected countries worldwide as of February 2021. Statistia; 2021 [accessed 2022 Feb 18]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/308468/importance-brand-journalist-creating-trust-news/.
   Google Scholar
• Watson A. Most popular platforms for daily news consumption in the United States as of February 2022, by age group. Statistia; 2022 [accessed 2022 Feb 18]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/717651/most-popular-news-platforms/.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Centre. Among millennials, Facebook far exceeds any other source for political news. 2015 [accessed 2022 Jan 16]. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2015/06/01/millennials-political-news/pj_15-06-01_millennialmedia08/.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson S. Fake news: a global epidemic vast majority (86%) of online global citizens have been exposed to it. Ipsos; 2019 [accessed 2021 Nov 7]. https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/cigi-fake-news-global-epidemic.
   Google Scholar
• Di Domenico G, Sit J, Ishizaka A, Nunan D. Fake news, social media and marketing: a systematic review. J Bus Res. 2021;124:329–41. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Talwar S, Krishnan S, Kaur P, Dhir A. Purchasing natural personal care products in the era of fake news? The moderation effect of brand trust. J Retailing Consum Serv. 2021;63(1):102668. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102668.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp A, Beitelspacher L, Grewal D, Hughes D. Understanding social media effects across seller, retailer, and consumer interactions. J Acad Mark Sci. 2013;41:547–66. doi:10.1007/s11747-013-0326-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham CD, Nelson M. The role of persuasion knowledge, assessment of benefit and harm, and third-person perception in coping with online behavioral advertising. Comput Human Behav. 2016;62:689–702. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayaburi EW, Treku DN. Effect of penitence on social media trust and privacy concerns: the case of Facebook. Int J Inf Manage. 2020;50:171–81. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visentin M, Pizzi G, Pichierri M. Fake news, real problems for brands: the impact of content truthfulness and source credibility on consumers’ behavioral intentions toward the advertised brands. J Interact Mark. 2019;45(1):99–112. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2018.09.001.
   Google Scholar
• Xu J. Does the medium matter? A meta-analysis on using social media vs. traditional media in crisis communication. Public Relat Rev. 2020;46(4):101947. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges-Tiago T, Tiago F, Silva O, Martínez JMG, Botella-Carrubi D. Online users’ attitudes toward fake news: implications for brand management. Psychol Mark. 2020;37(9):1171–84. doi:10.1002/mar.21349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahng MR. Is fake news the new social media crisis? Examining the public evaluation of crisis management for corporate organisations targeted in fake news. Int J Strategic Commun. 2021;15(1):18–36. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2020.1848842.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrabian A, Russell JA. An approach to environmental psychology. USA: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1974. p. 216–17.
   Google Scholar
• Eroglu SA, Machleit KA, Davis LM. Empirical testing of a model of online store atmospherics and shopper responses. Psychol Mark. 2003;20(2):139–50. doi:10.1002/mar.10064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou S, Blazquez M, McCormick H, Barnes L. How social media influencers’ narrative strategies benefit cultivating influencer marketing: tackling issues of cultural barriers, commercialised content, and sponsorship disclosure. J Bus Res. 2021;134:122–42. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal A, Rahul M. Impact of perceived usability and perceived information quality on Indian consumer purchase intentions in online shopping: implication of TAM and S-O-R theory. Int J Technol Transfer Commercialisation. 2017;15(2):160–83. doi:10.1504/IJTTC.2017.087683.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson J, Rahman M, Voola R, De Vries N. Customer engagement behaviours in social media: capturing innovation opportunities. J Serv Mark. 2018;32(1):83–94. doi:10.1108/JSM-02-2017-0059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao X, Sun J. Exploring the effect of overload on the discontinuous intention of social media users: an S-O-R perspective. Comput Human Behav. 2018;81:10–18. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewei T, Youngsook L. Factors affecting continuous purchase intention of fashion products on social E-commerce: sOR model and the mediating effect. Entertain Comput. 2022;41:100474. doi:10.1016/j.entcom.2021.100474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koay KY, Ong DLT, Khoo KL, Yeoh HJ. Perceived social media marketing activities and consumer-based brand equity: testing a moderated mediation model. Asia Pacific J Mark Logist. 2020;33(1):53–72. doi:10.1108/APJML-07-2019-0453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezbaruah S, Dhir A, Talwar S, Tan TM, Kaur P. Believing and acting on fake news related to natural food: the influential role of brand trust and system trust. Br Food J. 2022;124(9), 2937–62. DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-02-2021-0190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampat B, Raj S. Fake or real news? Understanding the gratifications and personality traits of individuals sharing fake news on social media platforms. 2022. Aslib J Inf Manage. 74(5), 840–76. DOI: 10.1108/AJIM-08-2021-0232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh B, Sharma DK. Predicting image credibility in fake news over social media using multi-modal approach. Neural Comput Appl. 2022;34(24):21503–17. doi:10.1007/s00521-021-06086-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandoc EC, Lim ZW, Ling R. Defining ‘fake news: ’ a typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism. 2018;5:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lazer DM, Baum MA, Benkler Y, Berinsky AJ, Greenhill KM, Menczer F, Metzger MJ, Nyhan B, Pennycook G, Rothschild D, et al. The science of fake news. Science (New York, NY). 2018;359(6380):1094–96. doi:10.1126/science.aao2998.
   Google Scholar
• Wu L, Morstatter F, Carley KM, Liu H. Misinformation in social media: definition, manipulation, and detection. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsl. 2019;21(2):80–90. doi:10.1145/3373464.3373475.
   Google Scholar
• Hadlington L, Harkin LJ, Kuss D, Newman K, Ryding FC. Perceptions of fake news, misinformation, and disinformation amid the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative exploration. Psychol Popular Media. 2023;12(1):40–49. doi:10.1037/ppm0000387.
   Google Scholar
• Mills AJ, Robson K. Brand management in the era of fake news: narrative response as a strategy to insulate brand value. J Prod Brand Manage. 2020;29(2):159–67. doi:10.1108/JPBM-12-2018-2150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisker ZL. The effect of fake news in marketing halal food: a moderating role of religiosity. J Islamic Mark. 2021;12(3):558–75. doi:10.1108/JIMA-09-2020-0276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fârte G, Obadă D. The effects of fake news on consumers’ brand trust. Romanian J Commun Public Relat. 2021;23(3):47–61. doi:10.21018/rjcpr.2021.3.333.
   Google Scholar
• de Regt A, Montecchi M, Lord Ferguson S. A false image of health: how fake news and pseudo-facts spread in the health and beauty industry. J Prod Brand Manage. 2020;29(2):168–79. doi:10.1108/JPBM-12-2018-2180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldwairi M, Alwahedi A. Detecting fake news in social media networks. Procedia Comput Sci. 2018;141:215–22. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.171.
   Google Scholar
• Cham TH, Lim YM, Sigala M. Marketing and social influences, hospital branding, and medical tourists’ behavioural intention: before-and after-service consumption perspective. Int J Tourism Res. 2022;24(1):140–57. doi:10.1002/jtr.2489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim A, Moravec PL, Dennis AR. Combating fake news on social media with source ratings: the effects of user and expert reputation ratings. J Manage Inf Syst. 2019;36(3):931–68. doi:10.1080/07421222.2019.1628921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flintham M, Karner C, Bachour K, Creswick H, Gupta N, Moran S. Falling for fake news: investigating the consumption of news via social media. In: CHI ’18. Vol. 376. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM); 2018. p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahim RS. The role of trust in understanding the impact of social media marketing on brand equity and brand loyalty. J Relat Mark. 2020;19(4):287–308. doi:10.1080/15332667.2019.1705742.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad S, Gupta IC, Totala NK. Social media usage, electronic word of mouth and purchase-decision involvement. Asia-Pacific J Bus Administration. 2017;9(2):134–45. doi:10.1108/APJBA-06-2016-0063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Benbasat I. Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2005;6(3):72–101. doi:10.17705/1jais.00065.
   Google Scholar
• Seo EJ, Park JW, Choi YJ. The effect of social media usage characteristics on e-WOM, trust, and brand equity: focusing on users of airline social media. Sustainability. 2020;12(4):1691. doi:10.3390/su12041691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heravi BR, Harrower N. Twitter journalism in Ireland: sourcing and trust in the age of social media. Inf Commun Soc. 2016;19(9):1194–213. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1187649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson P, Witmer H. Social media and trust: a systematic literature review. J Bus Econ. 2015;6(3):517–24. doi:10.15341/jbe(2155-7950)/03.06.2015/010.
   Google Scholar
• Yahia IB, Al-Neama N, Kerbache L. Investigating the drivers for social commerce in social media platforms: importance of trust, social support and the platform perceived usage. J Retailing Consum Serv. 2018;41:11–19. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.10.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao SH, Wang YY, Wang T, Kao TW. How social media shapes the fashion industry: the spillover effects between private labels and national brands. Ind Mark Manage. 2020;86:40–51. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.02.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornhill M, Xie K, Lee YJ. Social media advertising in a competitive market: effects of earned and owned exposures on brand purchase. J Hospitality and Tourism Technol. 2017;8(1):87–100. doi:10.1108/JHTT-10-2016-0068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aichner T, Wilken R, Coletti P. Country image at risk: spillover effects of product-harm crises and the role of trust. J Global Mark. 2021;34(2):73–89. doi:10.1080/08911762.2020.1786614.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S, Liang F, Hahn L, Lane DS, Weeks BE, Kwak N. The impact of social endorsement cues and manipulability concerns on perceptions of news credibility. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021;24(6):384–89. doi:10.1089/cyber.2020.0566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borah A, Tellis GJ. Halo (spillover) effects in social media: do product recalls of one brand hurt or help rival brands? J Mark Res. 2016;53(2):143–60. doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C, Kim J, Lim JS. Spillover effects of brand safety violations in social media. J Current Issues Res Advertising. 2021b;42(4):354–71. doi:10.1080/10641734.2021.1905572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga D, Weeks B, Ardèvol-Abreu A. Effects of the news-finds-me perception in communication: social media use implications for news seeking and learning about politics. J Comput-Mediated Commun. 2017;22(3):105–23. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song H, Gil de Zúñiga HG, Boomgaarden HG. Social media news use and political cynicism: differential pathways through “News finds me” perception. Mass Commun Soc. 2020;23(1):47–70. doi:10.1080/15205436.2019.1651867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park CS, Kaye BK. What’s this? Incidental exposure to news on social media, news-finds-me perception, news efficacy, and news consumption. Mass Commun Soc. 2020;23(2):157–80. doi:10.1080/15205436.2019.1702216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S. Probing the mechanisms through which social media erodes political knowledge: the role of the news-finds-me perception. Mass Commun Soc. 2020;23(6):810–32. doi:10.1080/15205436.2020.1821381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandoc EC, Jr. Tell me who your sources are. Journalism Pract. 2019;13(2):178–90. doi:10.1080/17512786.2017.1423237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyanes M, Ardèvol-Abreu A, Gil de Zúñiga H. Antecedents of news avoidance: competing effects of political interest, news overload, trust in news media, and “News finds me” perception. Digital Journalism. 2021;11(1):1–18. doi:10.1080/21670811.2021.1990097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segado-Boj F, Díaz-Campo J, Navarro-Asensio E, Remacha-González L. Influence of news-finds-me perception on accuracy, factuality and relevance assessment. Case study of news item on climate change. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación. Grupo de investigación “Comunicación y Públicos Específicos” (COMPUBES) de la Universidad de Alicante. 2020;11(2):85–103. doi:10.14198/MEDCOM2020.11.2.12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl T, Lee S. Testing the cognitive involvement hypothesis on social media: ‘News finds me’ perceptions, partisanship, and fake news credibility. Comput Human Behav. 2022;128:107121. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormond D, Warkentin M, Johnston AC, Thompson SC. Perceived deception: evaluating source credibility and self-efficacy. J Inf Privacy Secur. 2016;12(4):197–217. doi:10.1080/15536548.2016.1243857.
   Google Scholar
• Hopp T. Fake news self-efficacy, fake news identification, and content sharing on Facebook. J Inf Technol Polit. 2021;19(2):229–52. doi:10.1080/19331681.2021.1962778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apuke OD, Omar B. Fake news and COVID-19: modelling the predictors of fake news sharing among social media users. Telematics Inf. 2021;56:101475. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2020.101475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabbous A, Barakat KA, Navarro Bd Q. Fake news detection and social media trust: a cross-cultural perspective. Behav Inf Technol. 2021;41(14):2953–72. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2021.1963475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones-Jang SM, Mortensen T, Liu J. Does media literacy help identification of fake news? Information literacy helps, but other literacies don’t. Am Behav Sci. 2019;65(2):371–88. doi:10.1177/0002764219869406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, He Y, Xu J, Zhang H. Fake news or bad news? Toward an emotion-driven cognitive dissonance model of misinformation diffusion. Asian J Commun. 2020;30(5):317–42. doi:10.1080/01292986.2020.1811737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbu N, Opera DA, Negrea-Busuioc E, Radu L. ‘They can’t fool me, but they can fool the others!’ Third person effect and fake news detection. Eur J Commun. 2020;35(2):165–80. doi:10.1177/0267323120903686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang SM, Kim JK. Third person effects of fake news: fake news regulation and media literacy interventions. Comput Human Behav. 2018;80:295–302. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Tian Y. “Others are more vulnerable to fake news than I am”: third-person effect of COVID-19 fake news on social media users. Comput Human Behav. 2021;125:106950. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S, Fisher C, Flew T, Dulleck U. Global mistrust in news: the impact of social media on trust. Int J Media Manage. 2020;22(2):83–96. doi:10.1080/14241277.2020.1799794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang S, O’brien E, Villarreal A, Lee W, Mahood C. Immersive journalism and telepresence: does virtual reality news use affect news credibility? Digital Journalism. 2019;7(2):294–313. doi:10.1080/21670811.2018.1504624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalogeropoulos A, Suiter J, Udris L, Eisenegger M. News media trust and news consumption: factors related to trust in news in 35 countries. Int J Commun. 2019;13:3672–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo M, Hancock JT, Marcowitz DM. Credibility perceptions and detection accuracy of fake news headlines on social media: effects of truth-bias and endorsement cues. Communic Res. 2020;49(2):171–95. doi:10.1177/0093650220921321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson JL, Kim SJ. Improve trust, increase loyalty? analysing the relationship between news credibility and consumption. Journalism Pract. 2021;15(3):348–65. doi:10.1080/17512786.2020.1719874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterrett D, Malato D, Benz J, Kantor L, Tompson T, Rosenstiel T, Sonderman J, Loker K. Who shared it?: Deciding what news to trust on social media. Digital Journalism. 2019;7(6):783–801. doi:10.1080/21670811.2019.1623702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern D, Valenzuela S, Katz J, Miranda JP. From belief in conspiracy theories to trust in others: which factors influence exposure, believing and sharing fake news. In: Meiselwitz G, editor. Social computing and social media. Design, human behavior and analytics. HCII 2019. Lecture notes in computer science. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 11578.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin VL. Disinformation and misinformation triangle: a conceptual model for “fake news” epidemic, causal factors and interventions. J Doc. 2019;75(5):1013–34. doi:10.1108/JD-12-2018-0209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser J, Keller TR, Königslöw KK. Incidental news exposure on Facebook as a social experience: the influence of recommender and media cues on news selection. Communic Res. 2018;48(1):77–99. doi:10.1177/0093650218803529.
   Google Scholar
• Henke J, Leissner L, Möhring W. How can journalists promote news credibility? Effects of evidences on trust and credibility. Journalism Pract. 2020;14(3):409–26. doi:10.1080/17512786.2019.1605839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mor N, Reich Z. From “Trust me” to “Show me” journalism. Journalism Pract. 2018;12(9):1091–108. doi:10.1080/17512786.2017.1376593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri A, Holbrook MB. Product-class effects on brand commitment and brand outcomes: the role of brand trust and brand affect. J Brand Manage. 2022;10(1):33–58. doi:10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540100.
   Google Scholar
• Huang CC. The impacts of brand experiences on brand loyalty: mediators of brand love and trust. Manage Decis. 2017;55(5):915–34. doi:10.1108/MD-10-2015-0465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Xu P, Ye Y. Trust in social media brands and perceived media values: a survey study in China. Comput Human Behav. 2022;127:107024. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo HM, Liu R, Moritaka M, Fukuda S. Effects of industry-level factors, brand credibility and brand reputation on brand trust in safe food: evidence from the safe vegetable sector in vietnam. Br Food J. 2020;122(9):2993–3007. doi:10.1108/BFJ-03-2020-0167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cham TH, Cheng BL, Low MP, Cheok JBC. Brand image as the competitive edge for hospitals in medical tourism. Eur Bus Rev. 2020;31(1):31–59. doi:10.1108/EBR-10-2019-0269.
   Google Scholar
• Cham TH, Cheng BL, Ng CKY. Cruising down millennials’ fashion runway: a cross-functional study beyond pacific borders. Young Consumers. 2020;22(1):28–67. doi:10.1108/YC-05-2020-1140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan-Olmsted SM, Qin YS. The impact of fake news on its sponsor’s brand trust. J Brand Strategy. 2021;9:446–65.
   Google Scholar
• Chen ZF, Cheng Y. Consumer response to fake news about brands on social media: the effects of self-efficacy, media trust, and persuasion knowledge on brand trust. J Prod Brand Manage. 2020;29(2):188–98. doi:10.1108/JPBM-12-2018-2145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultoni MM, Haninda AR, Aprilia MP. Digital content by online media and its effects on brand trust, brand credibility, brand commitment, and brand advocacy (case on Instagram account Tirto.Id). In: 2019 IEEE 4th International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS); IEEE Press; 2019. p. 612–17.
   Google Scholar
• Xu X, Wu TY, Atkin DJ. Effects of Website Credibility and Brand Trust on Responses to Online Behavioral Advertising. J Commun Technol. 2021;4(2):32–57. doi:10.51548/joctec-2021-009.
   Google Scholar
• Alguacil M, González-Serrano MH, Gómez-Tafalla AM, González-García RJ, Aguado-Berenguer S. Credibility to attract, trust to stay: the mediating role of trust in improving brand congruence in sports services. Eur J Int Manage. 2021;15(2–3):231–46. doi:10.1504/EJIM.2021.113245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemeç U, Yüksel HF. The relationships among influencer credibility, brand trust, and purchase intention: the case of Instagram. Tüketici ve Tüketim Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2021;13:159–93.
   Google Scholar
• Lou C, Yuan S. Influencer marketing: how message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. J Interact Advertising. 2019;19(1):58–73. doi:10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501.
   Google Scholar
• Sharif A, Awan TM, Paracha OS. The fake news effect: what does it mean for consumer behavioral intentions towards brands? J Inf Commun Ethics Soc. ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). 2021;20(2):291–307. doi:10.1108/JICES-05-2021-0044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra A, Samu S. Impact of fake news on social image perceptions and consumers’ behavioral intentions. J Consum Mark. 2021;38(6):601–13. doi:10.1108/JCM-05-2020-3857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon M, Barone MJ. A world of mistrust: fake news, mistrust mind-sets, and product evaluations. J Assoc Consum Res. 2020;5(2):206–19. doi:10.1086/708035.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbert S, Smith A, Davies A, Ireland F. Guilt appeals: persuasion knowledge and charitable giving. Psychol Mark. 2007;24(8):723–42. doi:10.1002/mar.20181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham CD, Nelson MR, Das S. How to measure persuasion knowledge. Inte J Advertising. 2015;34(1):17–53. doi:10.1080/02650487.2014.994730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung AR, Heo J. Ad disclosure vs. ad recognition: how persuasion knowledge influences native advertising evaluation. J Interact Advertising. 2019;19(1):1–14. doi:10.1080/15252019.2018.1520661.
   Google Scholar
• Youn S, Shin W. Adolescents’ responses to social media newsfeed advertising: the interplay of persuasion knowledge, benefit-risk assessment, and ad scepticism in explaining information disclosure. Inte J Advertising. 2020;39(2):213–31. doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1585650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarouali B, Poels K, Walrave M, Ponnet K. ‘You talking to me?’ the influence of peer communication on adolescents’ persuasion knowledge and attitude towards social advertisements. Behav Inf Technol. 2018;37(5):502–16. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2018.1458903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breves P, Amrehn J, Heidenreich A, Liebers N, Schramm H. Blind trust? The importance and interplay of parasocial relationships and advertising disclosures in explaining influencers’ persuasive effects on their followers. Inte J Advertising. 2021;40(7):1209–29. doi:10.1080/02650487.2021.1881237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang K, Zhang Q. Influence of parasocial relationship between digital celebrities and their followers on followers’ purchase and electronic word-of-mouth intentions, and persuasion knowledge. Comput Human Behav. 2018;87:155–73. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low MP, Cham TH, Chang YS, Lim XJ. Advancing on weighted PLS-SEM in examining the trust-based recommendation system in pioneering product promotion effectiveness. Qual Quant. 2021:1–30. doi:10.1007/s11135-021-01147-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cham TH, Cheah JH, Cheng BL, Lim XJ. I am too old for this! Barriers contributing to the non-adoption of mobile payment. Int J Bank Mark. 2022;40(5):1017–50. doi:10.1108/IJBM-06-2021-0283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Y, Chen YRR, Hung-Baesecke CJF. Social media influencers in CSR endorsement: the effect of consumer mimicry on CSR behaviors and consumer relationships. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2021;39(4):744–61. doi:10.1177/0894439320987184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amazeen MA, Wojdynski BW. Reducing native advertising deception: revisiting the antecedents and consequences of persuasion knowledge in digital news contexts. Mass Commun Soc. 2019;22(2):222–47. doi:10.1080/15205436.2018.1530792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Youn S, Yoon D. Consumers’ responses to native vs. banner advertising: moderation of persuasion knowledge on interaction effects of ad type and placement type. Inte J Advertising. 2019;38(2):207–36. doi:10.1080/02650487.2018.1451208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschalk I. Consumer evaluation of ambient scent: the impact of pre-information, environment, and persuasion knowledge. Int J Retail Distrib Manage. 2018;46(6):530–44. doi:10.1108/IJRDM-04-2017-0085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuttavuthisit K, Thøgersen J. The importance of consumer trust for the emergence of a market for green products: the case of organic food. J Bus Ethics. 2017;140(2):323–37. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2690-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreen N, Yadav R, Kumar S, Gleim M. The impact of the institutional environment on green consumption in India. J Consum Mark. 2020;38(1):47–57. doi:10.1108/JCM-12-2019-3536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley K, Vu MK. Fighting fake news in the COVID-19 era: policy insights from an equilibrium model. Policy Sci. 2020;53(4):735–58. doi:10.1007/s11077-020-09405-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G, Chen Q, Xu Z, Leng X. Can the use of government apps shape citizen compliance? The mediating role of different perceptions of government. Comput Human Behav. 2020;108(3):106335. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106335.
   Google Scholar
• Mena P. Cleaning up social media: the effect of warning labels on likelihood of sharing false news on facebook. Policy Internet. 2019;12(2):165–83. doi:10.1002/poi3.214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A. Research methods for business students. 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, MI: Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G* power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149–60. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Patil A. Common method variance in is research: a comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Manage Sci. 2006;52(12):1865–83. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecx A, Chong HX. Understanding non-private label consumers’ switching intention in emerging market. Mark Intell Plann. 2019;37(6):689–705. doi:10.1108/MIP-11-2018-0514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabri MF, Aw ECX, Rahim HA, Burhan NAS, Othman MA, Simanjuntak M. Financial literacy, behavior and vulnerability among Malaysian households: does gender matter? Int J Econ Manage. 2021;15:241–56.
   Google Scholar
• Loh XM, Lee VH, Tan GWH, Ooi KB, Dwivedi YK. Switching from cash to mobile payment: what’s the hold-up? Internet Res. 2021;31(1):376–99. doi:10.1108/INTR-04-2020-0175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew JJ, Wong LW, Tan GWH, Ooi KB, Lin B. The blockchain-based halal traceability systems: a hype or reality? Supply Chain Manage. 2020;25(6):863–79. doi:10.1108/SCM-01-2020-0044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JFJ, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate data analysis a global perspective. New Jersey: Pearson Education International; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. J Mark Res. 1981;18(3):382–88. doi:10.1177/002224378101800313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Martin JD, Hassan F. News media credibility ratings and perceptions of online fake news exposure in five countries. Journalism Stud. 2020;21(16):2215–33. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2020.1827970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol N, Strycharz J, Helberger N, van de Valde B, de Vreese CH. Vulnerability in a tracked society: combining tracking and survey data to understand who gets targeted with what content. New Media Soc. 2020;22(11):1996–2017. doi:10.1177/1461444820924631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP. Principles of marketing management. Chicago: Science Research Associates; 1986.
   Google Scholar