Data Science with Semantic Technologies: Application to Information Systems Development

References

• Salazar-Reyna R, Gonzalez-Aleu F, Granda-Gutierrez EM, Diaz-Ramirez J, Garza-Reyes JA, Kumar A. A systematic literature review of data science, data analytics and machine learning applied to healthcare engineering systems. Manage Decis. 2020;60(2):300–19. doi:10.1108/md-01-2020-0035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker IH. Machine learning: algorithms, real-world applications and research directions. SN Comput Sci. 2021;2(3):1–21. doi:10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x.
   Google Scholar
• Alexopoulos P. Semantic modeling for data. CA (USA): O’Reilly Media, Inc; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge Semantics. Semantic web vs. semantic technologies. https://cambridgesemantics.com/blog/semantic-university/comparing-semantic-technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Dwivedi SK, Rawat B. Issues and requirements for successful integration of semantic knowledge in web usage mining for effective personalization. In: Smart Trends in Information Technology and Computer Communications: First International Conference, Smart- Com 2016, India. Springer; 2016. p. 97–103. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3433-6_12.
   Google Scholar
• Gorodetsky V, Tushkanova O. Semantic technologies for semantic applications. Part 1. Basic components of semantic technologies. Sci Tech Inf Process. 2019;46:306–13. doi:10.3103/S0147688219050022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandara M, Rabhi FA. Semantic modeling for engineering data analytics solutions. Semantic Web J. 2020;11(3):525–47. doi:10.3233/SW-190352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker IH. Smart city data science: towards data-driven smart cities with open research issues. Internet Things. 2022;19:100528. doi:10.1016/j.iot.2022.100528.
   Google Scholar
• Par´e G, Trudel MC, Jaana M, Kitsiou S. Synthesizing information systems knowledge: a typology of literature reviews. Inf Manage. 2015;52(2):183–99. doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mike K, Hazzan O. What is data science? Commun ACM. 2023 Jan;66(2):12–13. doi:10.1145/3575663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burk S, Miner GD. It’s all analytics!: the foundations of Al, big data and data science landscape for professionals in healthcare, business, and government. 1 ed. CRC Press; 2020. doi:10.4324/9780429343988-1.
   Google Scholar
• Cao L. Data science: a comprehensive overview. ACM Comput Surv. 2017;50(3):1–42. doi:10.1145/3076253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland WS. Data science: an action plan for expanding the technical areas of the field of statistics. Int Stat Rev. 2001;69(1):21–26. doi:10.1111/j.1751-5823.2001.tb00477.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loukides M. What is data science? CA (USA): O’Reilly Media, Inc; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Provost F, Fawcett T. Data science for business: what you need to know about data mining and data-analytic thinking. CA (USA): O’Reilly Media, Inc; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Dhar V. Data science and prediction. Commun ACM. 2013;56(12):64–73. doi:10.1145/2500499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banafa A. What is data science? 2014. http://works.bepress.com/ahmed-banafa/15.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham Shum S, Hawksey M, Baker RSJD, Jeffery N, Behrens JT, Pea R. Educational data scientists: a scarce breed. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, LAK ’13. New York, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2013. p. 278–81. doi:10.1145/2460296.2460355.
   Google Scholar
• Cielen D, Meysman ADB, Ali M. Introducing data science: big data, machine learning, and more, using Python tools. NY (USA): Manning; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Sarker I, Kayes A, Badsha S, Alqahtani H, Watters P, Ng A. Cybersecurity data science: an overview from machine learning perspective. Journal Big Data. 2020;7(41):1–29. doi:10.1186/s40537-020-00318-5.
   Google Scholar
• Ruehle F. Data science applications to string theory. Phys Rep. 2020;839:1–117. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.09.005.
   Google Scholar
• Sarker IH. Data science and analytics: an overview from data-driven smart computing, decision-making and applications perspective. SN Comput Sci. 2021;2(5):1–22. doi:10.1007/s42979-021-00765-8.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Ayala BR, Alsmadi D, Wang G. Fundamentals of data science for future data scientists. Taylor & Francis, Auerbach Publications. p. 167–94. 2018. doi:10.1201/9781315209555-6.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen OB. A comprehensive review of data governance literature. Assoc Inf Syst Selected Papers IRIS. 2017;8:120–33.
   Google Scholar
• Naik N, Rallapalli Y, Krishna M, Vellara AS, KShetty D, Patil V, Hameed BZ, Paul R, Prabhu N, Rai BP, et al. Demystifying the advancements of big data analytics in medical diagnosis: an overview. Eng Sci. 2022;19:42–58. doi:10.30919/es8d580.
   Google Scholar
• Chen X, Wang X, Zhang K, Fung KM, Thai TC, Moore K, Mannel RS, Liu H, Zheng B, Qiu Y. Recent advances and clinical applications of deep learning in medical image analy- sis. Med Image Anal. 2022;79:102444. 10.1016/j.media.2022.102444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali O, Abdelbaki W, Shrestha A, Elbasi E, Alryalat MAA, Dwivedi YK. A systematic literature review of artificial intelligence in the healthcare sector: benefits, challenges, methodologies, and functionalities. J Innov Knowl. 2023;8(1):100333. doi:10.1016/j.jik.2023.100333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montazeri M, Montazeri M, Bahaadinbeigy K, Montazeri M, Afraz A. Application of machine learning methods in predicting schizophrenia and bipolar dis- orders: a systematic review. Health Sci Rep. 2023;6(1):e962. doi:10.1002/hsr2.962.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chavan PV, Mahalle PN, Mangrulkar RS, William I. Data science techniques and intelligent applications. CRC Press; 2023. doi:10.1201/9781003283249.
   Google Scholar
• Ben Sassi S, Yanes N. Data science in healthcare: a systematic review. 2023. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.32836.19842.
   Google Scholar
• Sarlis V, Tjortjis C. Sports analytics—evaluation of basketball players and team perfor- mance. Inf Syst. 2020;93:101562. doi:10.1016/j.is.2020.101562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei J, Guo J. Research on the application of data mining technology in physical training. In: Application of big data, blockchain, and internet of things for education informatization. Springer; 2023. pp. 402–12. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-23944-1_44.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J. Application of big data in comprehensive management and service of sports training system under the background of informatization. In: Application of Big Data, Blockchain, and Internet of Things for Education Informatization: Second EAI Inter- national Conference, BigIoT-EDU 2022, Virtual Event, July 29–31, 2022, Proceedings, Part I. Springer; 2023. p. 131–39. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-23950-2_15.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen HP, Nguyen PQP, Bui VD. Applications of big data analytics in traffic management in intelligent transportation systems. Int J Inf Vis. 2022;6(1–2):177–87. doi:10.30630/joiv.6.1-2.882.
   Google Scholar
• Tu B, Zhao Y, Yin G, Jiang N, Li G, Zhang Y. Research on intelligent calculation method of intelligent traffic flow index based on big data mining. Int J Intell Syst. 2022;37(2):1186–203. doi:10.1002/int.22665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R°uˇziˇcka J, Tichy´ T, Hajˇciarov´a E. Big data application for urban transport solutions. In: 2022 Smart City Symposium Prague (SCSP). 2022. p. 1–7. doi:10.1109/SCSP54748.2022.9792538.
   Google Scholar
• Sohail A, Cheema MA, Ali ME, Toosi AN, Rakha HA. Data-driven approaches for road safety: a comprehensive systematic literature review. Saf Sci. 2023;158:105949. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicario G, Coleman S. A review of data science in business and industry and a future view. Appl Stochastic Models Bus Ind. 2020;36(1):6–18. doi:10.1002/asmb.2488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cybulski JL, Scheepers R. Data science in organizations: conceptualizing its break- throughs and blind spots. J Inf Technol. 2021;36(2):154–75. doi:10.1177/0268396220988539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo S. Big data analytics in manufacturing: a bibliometric analysis of research in the field of business management. Int J Prod Res. 2022;60(22):6793–821. doi:10.1080/00207543.2021.1919333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Xiu P, Sun L, Ying L, Muthu B. Social media data analytics for business decision making system to competitive analysis. Inf Process Manag. 2022;59(1):102751. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Sai ZA, Abualigah LM. Big data and e-government: a review. In: 2017 8th International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT). 2017. p. 580–87. doi: 10.1109/ICITECH.2017.8080062.
   Google Scholar
• Matheus R, Janssen M, Maheshwari D. Data science empowering the public: data-driven dashboards for transparent and accountable decision-making in smart cities. Gov Inf Q. 2020;37(3):101284. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saura JR, Ribeiro-Soriano D, Palacios-Marqu´es D. Assessing behavioral data science privacy issues in government artificial intelligence deployment. Gov Inf Q. 2022;39(4):101679. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2022.101679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oatley GC. Themes in data mining, big data, and crime analytics. WIREs Data Mining Knowl Discov. 2022;12(2):e1432. doi:10.1002/widm.1432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanes N, Mostafa AM, Ezz M, Almuayqil SN. A machine learning-based recommender system for improving students learning experiences. IEEE Access. 2020;8:201218–35. doi:10.1109/access.2020.3036336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haertel C, Pohl M, Nahhas A, Staegemann D, Turowski K. Toward a lifecycle for data science: a literature review of data science process models. In: Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems; Taipei, Taiwan; Sydney (Australia). 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Nandi G, Sharma RK. Data science fundamentals and practical approaches: under- stand why data science is the next. bpb, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Karthika N, Sheela J, Janet B. A brief introduction and importance of data science, chapter a brief introduction and importance of data science. Wiley; 2022pp. 1–30. doi:10.1002/9781119865339.ch1.
   Google Scholar
• Sarang P. Data science process. chapter Data Science Process. Springer; 2023. pp. 1–18. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-02363-7_1.
   Google Scholar
• Sayah Z, Kazar O, Ghenabzia A. Semantic integration in big data: state-of-the-art. J Mob Multimedia. 2019;191–238. doi:10.13052/jmm1550-4646.1533.
   Google Scholar
• ElDahshan K, Elsayed E, Mancy H. Semantic smart world framework. Appl Comput Intell Soft Comput. 2020;2020:1–12. doi:10.1155/2020/8081578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra S, Sonika M, Jain N, Sarika J. A realist framework for ontologies and the semantic web. Procedia Comput Sci. 2015;70:483–90. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.10.087.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra S, Sarika J. A unified approach for owl ontologies. Int J Comput Sci Inf Secur. 2016;14:747–54.
   Google Scholar
• Jain S. Understanding semantics-based decision support. Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2021. doi:10.1201/9781003008927.
   Google Scholar
• Patel A, Debnath NC, Bhushan B, Patel A, Debnath NC, Bhushan B, editors. Semantic web technologies. 1 ed. CRC Press; 2022. doi:10.1201/9781003309420.
   Google Scholar
• Tutcher J. Development of Semantic Data Models to Support Data Interoperability in the Rail Industry. PhD thesis, University of Birmingham, UK, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Diene B, Rodrigues JJ, Diallo O, Ndoye EHM, Korotaev VV. Data management techniques for internet of things. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2020;138:106564. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Bagheri E, Ensan F, Jovanovic J. The state of the art in semantic relatedness: a framework for comparison. Knowl Eng Rev. 2017;32:1–30. doi:10.1017/S0269888917000029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabeen S, Gao X, Andreae P. Semantic association computation: a comprehensive survey. Artif Intell Rev. 2020;53(6):3849–99. doi:10.1007/s10462-019-09781-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimiano P, Chiarcos C, McCrae JP, Gracia J. Linguistic linked data. Springer Cham; 2020. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30225-2.
   Google Scholar
• Sheu P. Semantic computing. In IFIP - The international federation for information processing. Vol. 288. Springer; 2008. pp. 1–2. doi:10.1002/9780470588222.ch1.
   Google Scholar
• Ghonge MM, Nijalingappa P, Ravi RV, Laddha S, Chavan PV, editors. Semantic intelligent computing and applications. Berlin (Germany): De Gruyter; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Chen X, Jia S, Xiang Y. A review: knowledge reasoning over knowledge graph. Expert Syst Appl. 2020;141:112948. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lastra-D´ıaz JJ, Goikoetxea J, Taieb MAH, Garc´ıa-Serrano A, Aouicha MB, Agirre E. A reproducible survey on word embeddings and ontology-based methods for word similarity: linear combinations outperform the state of the art. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2019;85:645–65. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2019.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turney PD, Pantel P. From frequency to meaning: vector space models of semantics. J Artif Intell Res. 2010 Jan;37(1):141–88. 2934. doi:10.1613/jair.2934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenci A, Sahlgren M, Jeuniaux P, Cuba Gyllensten A, Miliani M. A comparative eval- uation and analysis of three generations of distributional semantic models. Lang Res Eval. 2022;56(4):1269–313. doi:10.1007/s10579-021-09575-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L. Event prediction in the big data era: a systematic survey. ACM Comput Surv. 2021 May;54(5):1–37. doi:10.1145/3450287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheu P Semantic computing and cognitive computing/informatics. In: 2017 IEEE 16th International Conference on Cognitive Informatics Cognitive Computing. 2017. p. 4. doi:10.1109/ICCI-CC.2017.8109801.
   Google Scholar
• Salloum SA, Khan R, Shaalan K A survey of semantic analysis approaches. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision (AICV2020). Springer; 2020. p. 61–70. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44289-7_6.
   Google Scholar
• Sadouski M. Semantic-based design of an adaptive user interface. In: Golenkov V, Krasnoproshin V, Golovko V Shunkevich D, editors. Open semantic technologies for intelligent systems. Cham:Springer International Publishing; 2022. pp. 165–91. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-15882-7_10.
   Google Scholar
• Khurana D, Koli A, Khatter K, Singh S. Natural language processing: state of the art, current trends and challenges. Multimedia Tools Appl. 2023;82(3):3713–44. doi:10.1007/s11042-022-13428-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han J, Pei J, Tong H. Data mining concepts and techniques. 4th ed. MA (USA): Morgan Kaufmann-Elsevier; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Russell S, Norvig P. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. 4th ed. Pearson; 2020. doi:10.1093/oso/9780190905033.003.0012.
   Google Scholar
• Blokdyk G. Data classification a complete guide. 5STARCooks. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Cudre-Mauroux P. Semantic search. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp. 1–6. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63962-8_231-2.
   Google Scholar
• Rolland C. A comprehensive view of process engineering. In: Advanced information systems engineering. CAiSE. Vol. 1413. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1998. doi:10.1007/BFb0054216.
   Google Scholar
• Essafi M, Labed L, Ghezala HB. Towards a comprehensive view of secure software engineering. In: The International Conference on Emerging Security Information, Systems, and Technologies. 2007. p. 181–86. doi:10.1109/SECUREWARE.2007.4385331.
   Google Scholar
• Ouali S, Kraiem N, Ghezala HB. Framework for evolving software product line. Int J Software Eng Appl. 2011;2(2):34–51. doi:10.5121/ijsea.2011.2204.
   Google Scholar
• Abri A, Jamoussi Y, Kraiem N, Khanjari Z. Comprehensive classification of collaboration approaches in e-learning. Telemat Inform. 2016;34(6):878–93. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edded S, Ben Sassi S, Mazo R, Salinesi C, Ben Ghezala H. Collaborative configuration approaches in software product lines engineering: a systematic mapping study. J Syst Softw. 2019;158:110422. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2019.110422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao L. Data science thinking: the next scientific, technological and economic revolution. Springer International Publishing; 2018. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95092-1_3.
   Google Scholar
• Hitzler P, Kr¨otzsch M, Rudolph S. Foundations of semantic web technologies. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press; 2010. doi:10.1201/9781420090512.
   Google Scholar
• Furber C. Data quality management with semantic technologies. 1 ed. Gabler Verlag; 2016. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-12225-6.
   Google Scholar
• Embley DW. Semantic data model. Boston, M: Springer; 2009. pp. 2559–61. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_105.
   Google Scholar
• Dorr BJ, Greenberg CS, Fontana PC, Przybocki MA, Bras ML, Ploehn CA, Aulov O, Michel M, Golden EJ, Chang W. A new data science research program: evaluation, metrology, standards, and community outreach. Int J Data Sci Analyt. 2016;1(3–4):177–97. doi:10.1007/s41060-016-0016-z.
   Google Scholar
• EMC. Data science and big data analytics: discovering, analyzing, visualizing and presenting data. In: EMC Education Services, editor. NY (USA): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2015. doi:10.1002/9781119183686.
   Google Scholar
• Cunha M, Mendes R, Vilela JP. A survey of privacy-preserving mechanisms for heterogeneous data types. Comput Sci Rev. 2021;41:100403. doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadelmann T, Braschler MS. Introduction to applied data science. Springer International Publishing. pp. 3–16. 2019. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11821-1_1.
   Google Scholar
• Baviskar MR, Nagargoje PN, Deshmukh PA, Baviskar RR. A survey of data science techniques and available tools. Int Res J Eng Tech. 2021;8(4): 4258–63.
   Google Scholar
• Open Source Initiative. Open source definition. https://opensource.org/osd.
   Google Scholar
• Casey K. Some of the most essential data science tools. 2019. https://codersera.com/blog/essential-data-science-tools/
   Google Scholar
• Hornick M. A data science maturity model for enterprise assessment, version 2.0. https://www.oracle.com/devo/docs/data-science-maturity-model.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dewani R. 22 widely used data science and machine learning tools in 2020. https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2020/06/22-tools-data-science-machine-learning, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Conductscience. Basic tools and techniques for data science conduct science. 2020 [accessed 2021 Oct 23]. https://conductscience.com/basic-tools-and-techniques-of-data-science
   Google Scholar
• Fern´andez Del Carpio A, Angarita LB. Techniques based on data science for software processes: a systematic literature review. In: Software process improvement and capability determination. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 16–30. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00623-5_2.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchenham B, Charters S. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonell S, Shepperd M, Kitchenham B, Mendes E. How reliable are systematic reviews in empirical software engineering? IEEE Trans Softw Eng. 2010;36(5):676–87. doi:10.1109/tse.2010.28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder´on A, Ruiz M, O’Connor RV. A multivocal literature review on serious games for software process standards education. Comput Stand Interfaces. 2018;57:36–48. doi:10.1016/j.csi.2017.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Li YF, Xie M. An empirical analysis of data preprocessing for machine learning- based software cost estimation. Inf Software Technol. 2015;67:108–27. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2015.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idri A, Hosni M, Abran A. Improved estimation of software development effort using classical and fuzzy analogy ensembles. Appl Soft Comput. 2016;49:990–1019. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2016.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karna H, Gotovac S. Estimating software development effort using bayesian networks. In: 2015 23rd International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM). 2015. p. 229–33. doi:10.1109/SOFTCOM.2015.7314091.
   Google Scholar
• Kaushik A, Tayal DK, Yadav K, Kaur A. Integrating firefly algorithm in artificial neural network models for accurate software cost predictions. J Software. 2016;28(8):665–88. doi:10.1002/smr.1792.
   Google Scholar
• Mauˇsa G, Galinac Grbac T. Co-evolutionary multi-population genetic programming for classification in software defect prediction: an empirical case study. Appl Soft Comput. 2017;55:331–51. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2017.01.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han W, Lung CH, Ajila SA. Empirical investigation of code and process metrics for defect prediction. In: 2016 IEEE Second International Conference on Multimedia Big Data (BigMM). IEEE; 2016. p. 436–39. doi:10.1109/BigMM.2016.36.
   Google Scholar
• Madera M, Tomon´ R. A case study on machine learning model for code review expert system in software engineering. In: 2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS). IEEE; 2017. p. 1357–63. doi:10.15439/2017F536.
   Google Scholar
• Damevski K, Shepherd DC, Schneider J, Pollock L. Mining sequences of developer inter- actions in visual studio for usage smells. IEEE Trans Softw Eng. 2017;43(4):359–71. doi:10.1109/TSE.2016.2592905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licorish SA, MacDonell SG. Communication and personality profiles of global software developers. Inf Softw Technol. 2015;64:113–31. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2015.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misirli AT, Bener AB. Bayesian networks for evidence-based decision-making in software engineering. IEEE Trans Softw Eng. 2014;40(6):533–54. doi:10.1109/TSE.2014.2321179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez D, Sicilia M, Garcia E, Harrison R. Empirical findings on team size and productivity in software development. J Syst Softw. 2012;85(3):562–70. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2011.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi B, Russo B, Succi G. Analysis of open source software development iterations by means of burst detection techniques. In: IFIP International Conference on Open Source Systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. p. 83–93. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02032-2_9.
   Google Scholar
• Tantithamthavorn C, McIntosh S, Hassan AE, Matsumoto K. An empirical comparison of model validation techniques for defect prediction models. IEEE Trans Softw Eng. 2017;43(1):1–18. doi:10.1109/TSE.2016.2584050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andr´e M, Baldoqu´ın MG, Acun˜a ST. Formal model for assigning human resources to teams in software projects. Inf Softw Technol. 2011;53(3):259–75. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzies T, Brady A, Keung J, Hihn J, Williams S, El-Rawas O, Green P, Boehm B. Learning project management decisions: a case study with case-based reasoning versus data farming. IEEE Trans Softw Eng. 2013;39(12):1698–713. doi:10.1109/TSE.2013.43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Barcelos Tronto IF, da Silva JDS, Sant’anna N. An investigation of artificial neural networks based prediction systems in software project management. J Syst Softw. 2008;81(3):356–67. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2007.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson L, Borg M, Broman D, Sandahl K, Eldh S, Runeson P. Automated bug assignment: ensemble-based machine learning in large scale industrial contexts. Empir Softw Eng. 2016;21(4):1533–78. doi:10.1007/s10664-015-9401-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzies T, Butcher A, Cok D, Marcus A, Layman L, Shull F, Turhan B, Zimmermann T. Local versus global lessons for defect prediction and effort estimation. IEEE Trans Softw Eng. 2013;39(6):822–34. doi:10.1109/TSE.2012.83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arau´jo AA, Paixao M, Yeltsin I, Dantas A, Souza J. An architecture based on interactive optimization and machine learning applied to the next release problem. Autom Softw Eng. 2017;24(3):623–71. doi:10.1007/s10515-016-0200-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar