Management Emotion and Firm’s Strategic IT Investment Propensity

References

• Huy QN. Emotions in strategic organization: opportunities for impactful research. Strateg Organ. 2012;10(3):240–47. doi:10.1177/1476127012453107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Keyser B, Guiette A, Vandenbempt K. On the emotional dynamics of guided strategizing: an affective view on strategy-making directed by strategy consultants. Strateg Organ. 2021;1–30. doi:10.1177/14761270211032212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cline MK, Guynes CS. A study of the impact of information technology investment on firm performance. J Comput Inf Syst. 2021;41(3):15–19. doi:10.1080/08874417.2001.11647002.
   Google Scholar
• Dardan S, Stylianou A, Kumar R. The impact of customer-related IT investments on customer satisfaction and shareholder returns. J Comput Inf Syst. 2006;47(2):100–11. doi:10.1080/08874417.2007.11645958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daghouri A, Mansouri K, Qbadou M. The impact of IT investment on firm performance based on MCDM techniques. Int J Electr Comput Eng. 2019;9(5):4344. doi:10.11591/ijece.v9i5.pp4344-4354.
   Google Scholar
• Fang J, Liu X, Qu WG. The changing returns on IT investment. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2020;120(11):2025–39. doi:10.1108/IMDS-04-2020-0234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karhade P, Dong JQ. Innovation outcomes of digitally enabled collaborative problemistic search capability. MIS Q. 2021;45(2):693–718. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2021/12202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karhade P, Dong JQ. Information technology investment and commercialized innovation performance: dynamic adjustment costs and curvilinear impacts. MIS Q. 2021;45(3):1007–24. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2021/14368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohli R, Melville NP. Digital innovation: a review and synthesis. Inform Syst J. 2019;29(1):200–23. doi:10.1111/isj.12193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Rust RT. How information technology strategy and investments influence firm performance. MIS Q. 2016;40(1):223–46. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.1.10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravichandran T, Han S, Mithas S. Mitigating diminishing returns to R&D: the role of information technology in innovation. Inf Syst Res. 2017;28(4):812–27. doi:10.1287/isre.2017.0717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabherwal R, Jeyaraj A. Information technology impacts on firm performance. MIS Q. 2015;39(4):809–36. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.4.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldanha TJ, Mithas S, Krishnan MS. Leveraging customer involvement for fueling innovation. MIS Q. 2017;41(1):267–86. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trantopoulos K, von Krogh G, Wallin MW, Woerter M. External knowledge and information technology. MIS Q. 2017;41(1):287–300. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turedi S, Zhu H. How to generate more value from IT: the interplay of IT investment, decision making structure, and senior management involvement in IT governance. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 2019;44(1):511–36. doi:10.17705/1CAIS.04426.
   Google Scholar
• Li WWX, Leung ACM, Yue WT. Where is IT in information security? The interrelationship among IT investment, security awareness, and data breaches. MIS Q. 2023;47(1):317–42. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2022/15713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin M, Choudhary V. IT investment under competition: the role of implementation failure. Manage Sci. 2019;65(4):1909–25. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.3005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltman T, Tallon P, Sharma R, Queiroz M. Strategic IT alignment: twenty-five years on. J Inf Technol. 2015;30(2):91–100. doi:10.1057/jit.2014.35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldanha TJ, Lee D, Mithas S. Aligning information technology and business: the differential effects of alignment during investment planning, delivery, and change. Inf Syst Res. 2020;31(4):1260–81. doi:10.1287/isre.2020.0944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabherwal R, Sabherwal S, Havakhor T. How does strategic alignment affect firm performance? The roles of information technology investment and environmental uncertainty. MIS Q. 2019;43(2):453–74. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2019/13626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora B, Rahman Z. Information technology investment strategies: a review and synthesis of the literature. Technol Anal Strateg. 2016;28(9):1073–94. doi:10.1080/09537325.2016.1181742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turedi S. The interactive effect of board monitoring and chief information officer presence on information technology investment. Inform Syst Manage. 2020;37(2):113–23. doi:10.1080/10580530.2019.1696589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghout E, Tan CW. Understanding the impact of business cases on IT investment decisions: an analysis of municipal e-government projects. Inf Manage. 2013;50(7):489–506. doi:10.1016/j.im.2013.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Z, Rai A, Tian F, Xu SX. Social learning in information technology investment: the role of board interlocks. Manage Sci. 2021;67(1):547–76. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman RJ, Liu J, Ma D. Technology investment decision-making under uncertainty. Inf Technol Manage. 2015;16:153–72. doi:10.1007/s10799-014-0212-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgelman RA, Floyd SW, Laamanen T, Mantere S, Vaara E, Whittington R. Strategy processes and practices: dialogues and intersections. Strateg Manage J. 2018;39(3):531–58. doi:10.1002/smj.2741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huy QN, Zott C. Exploring the affective underpinnings of dynamic managerial capabilities: how managers’ emotion regulation behaviors mobilize resources for their firms. Strateg Manage J. 2019;40(1):28–54. doi:10.1002/smj.2971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuori TO. Emotions and attentional engagement in the attention-based view of the firm. Strateg Organ. 2023;1–22. doi:10.1177/14761270231165356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuori TO, Huy QN. Regulating top managers’ emotions during strategy making: Nokia’s socially distributed approach enabling radical change from mobile phones to networks in 2007–2013. Acad Manage J. 2022;65(1):331–61. doi:10.5465/amj.2019.0865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park EH, Ramesh B, Cao L. Emotion in IT investment decision making with a real options perspective: the intertwining of cognition and regret. J Manage Inf Syst. 2016;33(3):652–83. doi:10.1080/07421222.2016.1243893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raffaelli R, Glynn MA, Tushman M. Frame flexibility: the role of cognitive and emotional framing in innovation adoption by incumbent firms. Strateg Manage J. 2019;40(7):1013–39. doi:10.1002/smj.3011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artinger F, Petersen M, Gigerenzer G, Weibler J. Heuristics as adaptive decision strategies in management. J Organ Behav. 2015;36(S1):33–52. doi:10.1002/job.1950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brundin E, Liu F, Cyron T. Emotion in strategic management: a review and future research agenda. Long Range Plann. 2022;55(4):1–34. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristofaro M. The role of affect in management decisions: a systematic review. Eur Manage J. 2019;37(1):6–17. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2018.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Fisher G, Chen G. CEO attributes and firm performance: a sequential mediation process model. Acad Manage Ann. 2018;12(2):789–816. doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abatecola G, Cristofaro M. Hambrick and mason’s “upper echelons theory”: evolution and open avenues. J Manage Hist. 2018;26(1):116–36. doi:10.1108/JMH-02-2018-0016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brundin E, Liu F. Emotions and strategizing. In: Golsorkhi D, Rouleau L, Seidl D Vaara E, editors. Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice. 2015. p. 632–46. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139681032.037.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson GP, Healey MP. The psychological foundations of strategic management: beyond cold cognition. In: Ones D, Anderson N, Sinangil H Viswesvaran C, editors. The SAGE handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology - managerial psychology and organizational approaches. London: Sage; 2018. p. 275–310. doi:10.4135/9781473914964.n14
   Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Laamanen T, Vaara E. Communication and attention dynamics: an attention-based view of strategic change. Strateg Manage J. 2018;39(1):155–67. doi:10.1002/smj.2702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park KM, Gould AM. The overlooked influence of personality, idiosyncrasy and eccentricity in corporate mergers and acquisitions: 120 years and six distinct waves. J Manage Hist. 2017;23(1):7–31. doi:10.1108/JMH-09-2016-0056.
   Google Scholar
• Vuori TO, Huy QN. Distributed attention and shared emotions in the innovation process: how Nokia lost the smartphone battle. Adm Sci Q. 2016;61(1):9–51. doi:10.1177/0001839215606951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brielmaier C, Friesl M. The attention‐based view: review and conceptual extension towards situated attention. Int J Manage Rev. 2022;25(1):99–129. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan GH, Zietsma C. Constructing a shared governance logic: the role of emotions in enabling dually embedded agency. Acad Manage J. 2017;60(6):2321–51. doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momtaz PP. CEO emotions and firm valuation in initial coin offerings: an artificial emotional intelligence approach. Strateg Manage J. 2021;42(3):558–78. doi:10.1002/smj.3235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijda NH. The emotions. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Ashkanasy NM. Emotions in organizations: a multi-level perspective. In: Dansereau F, Yammarino FJ, editors. Multi-level issues in organizational behavior and strategy. Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2003. pp. 9–54
   Google Scholar
• Ashkanasy NM. Humphrey RH. Current emotion research in organizational behavior. Emot Rev. 2011;3(2):214–24. doi:10.1177/1754073910391684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin J, Knopoff K, Beckman C. An alternative to bureaucratic impersonality and emotional labor: bounded emotionality at the body shop. Adm Sci Q. 1998;43(2):429–69. doi:10.2307/2393858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akgün AE, Keskin H, Byrne J. Organizational emotional capability, product and process innovation, and firm performance: an empirical analysis. J Eng Technol Manage. 2009;26(3):103–30. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2009.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akgün AE, Byrne J, Keskin H. Organizational intelligence: a structuration view. J Organ Change Manage. 2007;20(3):272–89. doi:10.1108/09534810710740137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huy QN. Emotional capability, emotional intelligence, and radical change. Acad Manage Rev. 1999;24(2):325–45. doi:10.2307/259085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huy QN. Emotion management to facilitate strategic change and innovation: how emotional balancing and emotional capability work together. In: Hartel C, Ashkanasy NM, Zerbe W, editors. Emotions in organizational behavior. New York: Psychology Press; 2005. p. 302–23.
   Google Scholar
• De Rivera J. Emotional climate: social structure and emotional dynamics. In: Strongman KT, editor. International review of studies on emotion. Vol. 2. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 1992. p. 197–218.
   Google Scholar
• Parke MR, Seo MG. The role of affect climate in organizational effectiveness. Acad Manage Rev. 2017;42(2):334–60. doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashkanasy NM, Humphrey RH, Huy QN. Integrating emotions and affect in theories of management. Acad Manage Rev. 2017;42(2):175–89. doi:10.5465/amr.2016.0474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver C. Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: placing positive feelings within a general model of affect. Cogn Emot. 2003;17(2):241–61. doi:10.1080/02699930302294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isen AM, Patrick R. The effect of positive feelings on risk taking: when the chips are down. Organ Behav Hum Perf. 1983;31(2):194–202. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(83)90120-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kida TE, Moreno KK. Smith JF.The influence of affect on managers’ capital‐budgeting decisions. Contemp Account Res. 2001;18(3):477–94. doi:10.1506/CPKU-R1DW-VW7M-U158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 1974;185(4157):1124–31. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie DM, Worth LT. Feeling good, but not thinking straight: the impact of positive mood on persuasion. In: Forgas LP, editor. Emotion and social judgments. 2020. p. 201–19. doi:10.4324/9781003058731-14.
   Google Scholar
• Bless H, Clore GL, Schwarz N, Golisano V, Rabe C, Wölk M. Mood and the use of scripts: does a happy mood really lead to mindlessness? J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;71(4):665–79. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz N, Bless H . Constructing reality and its alternatives: an inclusion/exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment. In: Martin LL, and Tesser A, editors, The construction of social judgment. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1991. p. 217–45.
   Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD, Barr PS. The effects of mood on individuals’ use of structured decision protocols. Organ Sci. 1999;10(2):181–98. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.2.181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prechter RR Jr. Unconscious herding behavior as the psychological basis of financial market trends and patterns. J Psychol Financial Mark. 2001;2(3):120–25. doi:10.1207/s15327760jpfm0203_1.
   Google Scholar
• Abrahamson E. Managerial fads and fashions: the diffusion and rejection of innovations. Acad Manage Rev. 1991;16(3):586–612. doi:10.2307/258919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee N, Li S, Shin B, Kwon O. Social comparison, goal contagion, and adoption of innovative information technology. J Comput Inf Syst. 2016;56(2):127–36. doi:10.1080/08874417.2016.1117374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun H. A longitudinal study of herd behavior in the adoption and continued use of technology. MIS Q. 2013;37(4):1013–41. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.4.02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada CA, Isen AM, Young MJ. Positive affect facilitates integration of information and decreases anchoring in reasoning among physicians. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1997;72(1):117–35. doi:10.1006/obhd.1997.2734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isen AM. Positive affect and decision making. In: M. Lewis and JM Haviland-Jones editors. Handbook of Emotions. New York: The Guilford Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Davis M. Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: a meta-analysis. organizational behavior and human decision processes. MIS Q. 2009;25(1):43–70. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.04.001.
   Google Scholar
• Foo M, Uy M, Baron R. How do feelings influence effort? An empirical study of entrepreneurs’ affect and venture effort. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(4):1086–94. doi:10.1037/a0015599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grichnikc D, Smeja A, Welpe I. The importance of being emotional: how do emotions affect entrepreneurial opportunity evaluation and exploitation? J Econ Behav Organ. 2010;76(1):15–29. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2010.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron RA. The role of affect in the entrepreneurial process. Acad Manage Rev. 2008;33(2):328–40. doi:10.5465/amr.2008.31193166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong CP, Sambamurthy V. Information technology assimilation in firms: the influence of senior leadership and IT infrastructures. Inf Syst Res. 1999;10(4):304–27. doi:10.1287/isre.10.4.304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aral S, Weill P. IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: how resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organ Sci. 2007;18(5):763–80. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehning B, Richardson VJ, Zmud RW. The value relevance of announcements of transformational information technology investments. MIS Q. 2003;27(4):637–56. doi:10.2307/30036551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmud RW, Shaft T, Zheng W, Croes H. Systematic differences in firm’s information technology signaling: implications for research design. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2010;11(3):149–81. doi:10.17705/1jais.00223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettman JR, Weitz BA. Attributions in the board room: causal reasoning in corporate annual reports. Adm Sci Q. 1983;28(2):165–83. doi:10.2307/2392616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev B. Information disclosure strategy. Calif Manage Rev. 1992;34(4):9–32. doi:10.2307/41166701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arndt M, Bigelow B. Presenting structural innovation in an institutional environment: hospitals’ use of impression management. Adm Sci Q. 2000;45:494–522. doi:10.2307/2667107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD. Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: the construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Adm Sci Q. 1994;39(1):57–88. doi:10.2307/2393494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Bollen L, Hassink H, De Haes S, Van Grembergen W. Explaining IT governance disclosure through the constructs of IT governance maturity and IT strategic role. Inf Manage. 2018;55(3):368–80. doi:10.1016/j.im.2017.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos BL, Peffers K, Mauer DC. The impact of information technology investment announcements on the market value of the firm. Inf Syst Res. 1993;4(1):1–24. doi:10.1287/isre.4.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im KS, Dow KE, Grover V. Research report: a reexamination of IT investment and the market value of the firm—an event study methodology. Inf Syst Res. 2001;12(1):103–17. doi:10.1287/isre.12.1.103.9718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee D, Pacini C, Sambamurthy V. The shareholder-wealth and trading-volume effects of information-technology infrastructure investments. J Manage Inf Syst. 2002;19(2):7–42. doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughran T, McDonald B. Textual analysis in accounting and finance: a survey. J Account Res. 2016;54(4):1187–230. doi:10.1111/1475-679X.12123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney C, Liu S. Textual sentiment in finance: a survey of methods and models. Int Rev Financ Anal. 2014;33:171–85. doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2014.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F. Do stock market investors understand the risk sentiment of corporate annual reports? SSRN Electron J. 2006 April 21;2. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.898181.
   Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi H, Ruefli TW. The role of information technology in risk/return relations of firms. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2004;5(11–12):421–47. doi:10.17705/1jais.00061.
   Google Scholar
• Piccoli G, Ives B. IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: a review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Q. 2005;29(4):747–76. doi:10.2307/25148708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower GH. Mood congruity of social judgments. ood congruity of social judgment. In: Forgas J, editor. Emotion and social judgment. Oxford, England:Pergamon Press; 2020. p. 31–53. doi:10.4324/9781003058731-3
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Marques T, Mackie DM, Claypool HM, Garcia-Marques L. Positivity can cue familiarity. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004;30(5):585–93. doi:10.1177/0146167203262856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatraman N, Henderson J. Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst J. 1993;32(1):4–16. doi:10.1147/sj.382.0472.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes A, Morton MSS. The transforming power of complementary assets. Mit Sloan Manage Rev. 2006;47:50–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar K, Hillegersberg JV. ERP experiences and evolution. Commun ACM. 2000;43(4):22. doi:10.1145/332051.332063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobelsky KW, Richardson VJ, Smith RE, Zmud RW. Determinants and consequences of firm information technology budgets. Account Rev. 2008;83(4):957–95. doi:10.2308/accr.2008.83.4.957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galliers RD, Baets WR. Information technology and organizational transformation: innovation for the 21st century organization. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Labroo AA, Patrick VM. Psychological distancing: why happiness helps you see the big picture. J Consum Res. 2009;35(5):800–09. doi:10.1086/593683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld BM, Reyt JN, Brockner J, Trope Y. Construal level theory in organizational research. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2017;4:367–400. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113115.
   Google Scholar
• Chen JV, Hiele TM. The moderating effect of industry types on IT-Coordination costs relationship. J Comput Inf Syst. 2017;59(2):97–104. doi:10.1080/08874417.2017.1305877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson BL. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol. 2001;56(3):218. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson BL. The broaden–and–build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical transactions of the royal society of London. Series B Biol Sci. 2004;359(1449):1367–77. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson BL, Branigan C. Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought‐action repertoires. Cogn Emot. 2005;9(3):313–32. doi:10.1080/02699930441000238.
   Google Scholar
• Gasper K, Clore GL. Attending to the big picture: mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychol Sci. 2002;13(1):34–40. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayton JC, Cholakova M. The role of affect in the creation and intentional pursuit of entrepreneurial ideas. Entrep Theory Pract. 2012;36(1):41–67. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00458.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin NK. The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee D, Richardson VJ, Zmud RW. Examining the shareholder wealth effects of announcements of newly created CIO positions. MIS Q. 2001;25(1):43–70. doi:10.2307/3250958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro L, Mariano C, Skiena S. Lydia: a system for large-scale news analysis. In: Consens M Navarro G, editors. String processing and information retrieval. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2005. p. 161–66. doi:10.1007/11575832_18
   Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical Kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics. 1977;33(2):363–74. doi:10.2307/2529786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calantone RJ, Schatzel KE. Strategic foretelling: communication-based antecedents of a firm’s propensity to preannounce. J Mark. 2000;64(1):17–30. doi:10.1509/jmkg.64.1.17.17990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelder JA, Wedderburn RWM. Generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc. 1972;135(3):370–84. doi:10.2307/2344614.
   Google Scholar
• Chen X, Li S. Understanding continuance intention of mobile payment services: an empirical study. J Comput Inf Syst. 2017;57(4):287–98. doi:10.1080/08874417.2016.1180649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock N, Moqbel M. Social networking site use, positive emotions, and job performance. J Comput Inf Syst. 2021;61(2):163–73. doi:10.1080/08874417.2019.1571457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodger JA, Gonzalez SP. A study on emotion and memory in technology adoption. J Comput Inf Syst. 2014;54(4):31–41. doi:10.1080/08874417.2014.11645720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang P. The affective response model: a theoretical framework of affective concepts and their relationships in the ICT context. MIS Q. 2013;37(1):247–74. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng S, Huang ZJ, Sinha AP, Zhao H. The interaction between microblog sentiment and stock return: an empirical examination. MIS Q. 2018;42(3):895–918. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2018/14268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang NT. Managers’ noticing of new organizational IT and influences of IT attributes. Inf Manage. 2020;57(5):103232. doi:10.1016/j.im.2019.103232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thong JY, Yap CS, Raman K. Engagement of external expertise in information systems implementation. J Manage Inf Syst. 1994;11(2):209–31. doi:10.1080/07421222.1994.11518046.
   Google Scholar
• Ko D, Kirsch L, King W. Antecedents of knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in enterprise system implementations. MIS Q. 2005;29(1):59–85. doi:10.2307/25148668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixom BH, Watson HJ. An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS Q. 2001;25(1):17–32. doi:10.2307/3250957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper RB. Information technology development creativity: a case study of attempted radical change. MIS Q. 2000;24(2):245–76. doi:10.2307/3250938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar