Impact of Sensory Perceptions on the Urge to Buy Impulsively

References

• Lick E. “Multimodal sensory marketing” in retailing: the role of intra- and intermodality transductions. Consum Mark Cult [Internet]. 2022;25(3):252–71. doi:10.1080/10253866.2022.2046564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler P. Atmospherics as a marketing tool. J Retail. 1973;49:48–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna A, Cian L, Sokolova T. The power of sensory marketing in advertising. Curr Opin Psychol [Internet]. 2016;10:142–47. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit O, Velasco C, Spence C. Digital sensory marketing: integrating new technologies into multisensory online experience. J Interact Mark [Internet]. 2019;45:42–61. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2018.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultén B, Broweus N, van Dijk M. What is sensory marketing? Sens Mark [Internet]. 2009:1–23. doi:10.1057/9780230237049_1.
   Google Scholar
• Heller J, Chylinski M, de Ruyter K, Mahr D, Keeling DI. Touching the untouchable: exploring multi-sensory augmented reality in the context of online retailing. J Retail [Internet]. 2019;95(4):219–34. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2019.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal D, Gauri DK, Roggeveen AL, Sethuraman R. Strategizing retailing in the new technology era. J Retail [Internet]. 2021;97(1):6–12. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2021.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar H, Srivastava R. Exploring the role of augmented reality in online impulse behaviour. Int J Retail Distrib Manage [Internet]. 2022;50(10):1281–301. doi:10.1108/ijrdm-11-2021-0535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Market Research DB. Eyewear market analysis, segmentation, size, share, trend, future demand and is expected to reach USD 194.72 billion by 2029. GlobeNewswire News Room [Internet]; 2022. https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2022/07/19/2482006/0/en/Eyewear-Market-Analysis-Segmentation-Size-Share-Trend-Future-Demand-and-Is-Expected-To-Reach-USD-194-72-Billion-By-2029.html .
   Google Scholar
• Rauschnabel PA, Felix R, Hinsch C. Augmented reality marketing: how mobile AR-apps can improve brands through inspiration. J Retail Consum Serv [Internet]. 2019;49:43–53. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson A, Alexander B, Salavati L. The impact of experiential augmented reality applications on fashion purchase intention. Int J Retail Distrib Manage [Internet]. 2018;48(5):433–51. doi:10.1108/ijrdm-06-2017-0117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trivedi J, Kasilingam D, Arora P, Soni S. The effect of augmented reality in mobile applications on consumers’ online impulse purchase intention: the mediating role of perceived value. J Consum Behav [Internet]. 2022;21(4):896–908. doi:10.1002/cb.2047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JV, Ha Q-A, Vu MT. The influences of virtual reality shopping characteristics on consumers’ impulse buying behavior. Int J Hum–Comput Int [Internet]. 2022:1–19. doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2098566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel P, Parayitam S, Sharma A, Rana NP, Dwivedi YK. A moderated mediation model for e-impulse buying tendency, customer satisfaction and intention to continue e-shopping. J Bus Res [Internet]. 2022;142:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Men J, Yang F, Gong X. Understanding impulse buying in mobile commerce: an investigation into hedonic and utilitarian browsing. Int J Inf Manage [Internet]. 2019;48:151–60. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonkeman C, Verhagen T, van Dolen W. Role of local presence in online impulse buying. Inf Manage [Internet]. 2017;54(8):1038–48. doi:10.1016/j.im.2017.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JV, Ruangsri S, Ha Q-A, Widjaja AE. An experimental study of consumers’ impulse buying behaviour in augmented reality mobile shopping apps. Behav Inf Technol [Internet]. 2021;41(15):3360–81. doi:10.1080/0144929x.2021.1987523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yim M-C, Chu S-C, Sauer PL. Is augmented reality technology an effective tool for E-commerce? An interactivity and vividness perspective. J Interact Mark [Internet]. 2017;39:89–103. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2017.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinsch C, Felix R, Rauschnabel PA. Nostalgia beats the wow-effect: inspiration, awe and meaningful associations in augmented reality marketing. J Retail Consum Serv [Internet]. 2020;53:101987. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J-H, Kim M, Park M, Yoo J. Immersive interactive technologies and virtual shopping experiences: differences in consumer perceptions between augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR). Telemat Inform [Internet]. 2023;77:101936. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2022.101936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Eyewear Market to Reach $323.77 Billion by 2030 - ResearchAndMarkets.com. Global eyewear market to reach $32377 billion by 2030 - ResearchAndMarkets.com | business wire [Internet]; 2022. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220808005332/en/Global-Eyewear-Market-to-Reach-323.77-Billion-by-2030—ResearchAndMarkets.com.
   Google Scholar
• Liao C, To PL, Wong YC, Palvia P, Kakhki MD. The impact of presentation mode and product type on online impulse buying decisions. J Electron Commer Res [Internet]. 2016;17(2):253. http://www.jecr.org/sites/default/files/17_2Paper4.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyewear market in India. 2018. India: deloitte touche tohmatsu India LLP. [accessed 2023 Mar 15]. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/in/Documents/consumer-business/immersion/Eyewear%20market%20in%20India.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrabian A, Russell JA. 1974. An approach to environmental psychology. [ place unknown]. doi:10.1604/9780262130905.
   Google Scholar
• Chang S-H, Chih W-H, Liou D-K, Hwang L-R. The influence of web aesthetics on customers’ PAD. Comput Human Behav [Internet]. 2014;36:168–78. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamis SF, Handayani PW, Fitriani WR. Impulse buying during flash sales in the online marketplace. Cogent Bus Manag [Internet]. 2022;9(1). doi:10.1080/23311975.2022.2068402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning Shen K, Khalifa M. System design effects on online impulse buying. Internet Res [Internet]. 2012;22(4):396–425. doi:10.1108/10662241211250962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabian A, Russell JA. Environmental effects on affiliation among strangers. Humanitas [Internet]. 1975;11(2):219–30. https://philpapers.org/rec/MEHEEO.
   Google Scholar
• Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Mis Q Internet. 1989;13(3):319. doi:10.2307/249008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh M, Davis D. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Mis Q [Internet]. 2003;27(3):425. doi:10.2307/30036540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers EM, Cartano DG. Methods of measuring opinion leadership. Public Opin Q [Internet]. 1962;26(3):435. doi:10.1086/267118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eslami SP, Hassanein K. Understanding data analytics recommendation execution: the role of recommendation quality. J Comput Inf Syst [Internet]. 2022;62(6):1283–96. doi:10.1080/08874417.2021.2010150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty D. Purchase behavior of consumers toward GSAs: a longitudinal assessment. J Comput Inf Syst [Internet]. 2022:1–26. doi:10.1080/08874417.2022.2123065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Leng X, Liu S. Research on mobile impulse purchase intention in the perspective of system users during COVID-19. Pers Ubiquit Comput [Internet]. 2020;27(3):665–73. doi:10.1007/s00779-020-01460-w.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan TKH, Cheung CMK, Lee ZWY. The state of online impulse-buying research: a literature analysis. Inf Manage [Internet]. 2017;54(2):204–17. doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang H-J, Eckman M, Yan R-N. Application of the stimulus-organism-response model to the retail environment: the role of hedonic motivation in impulse buying behavior. Int Rev Retail Distrib Consum Res [Internet]. 2011;21(3):233–49. doi:10.1080/09593969.2011.578798.
   Google Scholar
• Dikčius V, Radavičienė I, Gerulytė Ž. The influence of the music genre on the emotional consumer response and intentions to purchase online. Trends Econ Manag [Internet]. 2019;13(33):71. doi:10.13164/trends.2019.33.71.
   Google Scholar
• Peck J, Childers TL. Individual differences in haptic information processing: the “need for touch” scale. J Consum Res [Internet]. 2003;30(3):430–42. doi:10.1086/378619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy RF, Riedel A. “Going on a sensory adventure, a touchy subject?”: investigating haptic technology and consumer adventure orientation. JSTP [Internet]. 2021;32(1):5–29. doi:10.1108/jstp-11-2020-0244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht D, Reiner M. Sensory dominance in combinations of audio, visual and haptic stimuli. Exp Brain Res [Internet]. 2008;193(2):307–14. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1626-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas D. Sensory aspects of retailing: theoretical and practical implications. J Retail [Internet]. 2019;95(4):111–15. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2019.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Ko E, Wang H. Augmented reality (AR) app use in the beauty product industry and consumer purchase intention. APJML [Internet]. 2021;34(1):110–31. doi:10.1108/apjml-11-2019-0684.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang AH, Oh J, Scheinbaum AC. Interactive music for multisensory e‐commerce: the moderating role of online consumer involvement in experiential value, cognitive value, and purchase intention. Psychol Mark [Internet]. 2020;37(8):1031–56. doi:10.1002/mar.21338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Wang Q, Cao Y. Understanding consumer online impulse buying in live streaming E-Commerce: a stimulus-organism-response framework. Int J Env Res Pub Health [Internet]. 2022;19(7):4378. doi:10.3390/ijerph19074378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Isa SM, Wu H, Thurasamy R, Fang X, Fan Y, Liu D. Effects of stores’ environmental components on Chinese consumers’ emotions and intentions to purchase luxury brands: integrating partial least squares-structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis approaches. Front Psychol [Internet]. 2022;13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J-S, Stoel LD. How background music affects consumer perception of waiting time?-A mediating role of emotions. J Fash Bus. 2018;22(3):16–29. doi:10.12940/jfb.2018.22.3.16.
   Google Scholar
• Akram U, Hui P, Kaleem Khan M, Tanveer Y, Mehmood K, Ahmad W. How website quality affects online impulse buying. APJML [Internet]. 2018;30(1):235–56. doi:10.1108/apjml-04-2017-0073.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty SE, Elizabeth Ferrell M. Impulse buying: modeling its precursors. J Retail [Internet]. 1998;74(2):169–91. doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(99)80092-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang L, Zheng X, Lee MKO, Zhao D. Exploring consumers’ impulse buying behavior on social commerce platform: the role of parasocial interaction. Int J Inf Manage [Internet]. 2016;36(3):333–47. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Li H, Hu F. Website attributes in urging online impulse purchase: an empirical investigation on consumer perceptions. Decis Support Syst [Internet]. 2013;55(3):829–37. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2013.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells J, Parboteeah V, Valacich J. Online impulse buying: understanding the interplay between consumer impulsiveness and website quality. J Assoc Inf Syst [Internet]. 2011;12(1):32–56. doi:10.17705/1jais.00254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin S-C, Tseng H-T, Shirazi F, Hajli N, Tsai P-T. Exploring factors influencing impulse buying in live streaming shopping: a stimulus-organism-response (SOR) perspective. APJML [Internet]. 2022;35(6):1383–403. doi:10.1108/apjml-12-2021-0903.
   Google Scholar
• Parboteeah DV, Valacich JS, Wells JD. The influence of website characteristics on a consumer’s urge to buy impulsively. Inf Syst Res [Internet]. 2009;20(1):60–78. doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haase J, Wiedmann K-P. The sensory perception item set (SPI): an exploratory effort to develop a holistic scale for sensory marketing. Psychol Mark [Internet]. 2018;35(10):727–39. doi:10.1002/mar.21130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M, Kim J-H, Park M, Yoo J. The roles of sensory perceptions and mental imagery in consumer decision-making. J Retail Consum Serv [Internet]. 2021;61:102517. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soars B. Driving sales through shoppers’ sense of sound, sight, smell and touch. Int J Retail Distrib Manage [Internet]. 2009;37(3):286–98. doi:10.1108/09590550910941535.
   Google Scholar
• Chen H-T, Lin Y-T. A study of the relationships among sensory experience, emotion, and buying behavior in coffeehouse chains. Serv Bus [Internet]. 2017;12(3):551–73. doi:10.1007/s11628-017-0354-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila AS, Wirtz J. Congruency of scent and music as a driver of in-store evaluations and behavior. J Retail [Internet]. 2001;77(2):273–89. doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(01)00042-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamacher K, Buchkremer R. Measuring online sensory consumer experience: introducing the online sensory marketing index (OSMI) as a structural modeling approach. JTAER [Internet]. 2022;17(2):751–72. doi:10.3390/jtaer17020039.
   Google Scholar
• Jang H-W, Lee S-B. Applying effective sensory marketing to sustainable coffee shop business management. Sustainability [Internet]. 2019;11(22):6430. doi:10.3390/su11226430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuppens P. Individual differences in the relationship between pleasure and arousal. J Res Pers [Internet]. 2008;42(4):1053–59. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Kim HM, Zimmerman J. Emotional branding on fashion brand websites: harnessing the pleasure-arousal-dominance (P-A-D) model. JFMM [Internet]. 2020;24(4):555–70. doi:10.1108/jfmm-03-2019-0055.
   Google Scholar
• Yani-de-Soriano M, Foxall GR, Newman AJ. The impact of the interaction of utilitarian and informational reinforcement and behavior setting scope on consumer response. Psychol Mark [Internet]. 2013;30(2):148–59. doi:10.1002/mar.20594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi S, Jai T. Impacts of consumers’ beliefs, desires and emotions on their impulse buying behavior: application of an integrated model of belief-desire theory of emotion. J Hosp Mark Manag [Internet]. 2019;29(6):662–81. doi:10.1080/19368623.2020.1692267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh J-K, Hsieh Y-C, Chiu H-C, Yang Y-R. Customer response to web site atmospherics: task-relevant cues, situational involvement and PAD. J Interact Mark [Internet]. 2014;28(3):225–36. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2014.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amos C, Holmes GR, Keneson WC. A meta-analysis of consumer impulse buying. J Retail Consum Serv [Internet]. 2014;21(2):86–97. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.11.004.
   Google Scholar
• Parsad C, Prashar S, Sahay V. Impact of impulsive personality traits and store environment on impulse buying behavior. J Bus Manag [Internet]. 2017;23(1/2):1–24. http://gebrc.nccu.edu.tw/JBM/pdf/volume/2312/JBM-2312-01-full.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Parsad C, Prashar S, Vijay TS, Sahay V. Role of in-store atmospherics and impulse buying tendency on post-purchase regret. J Bus Manage [Internet]. 2019;25(1):1–24. http://gebrc.nccu.edu.tw/JBM/pdf/volume/2501/JBM-2501-01-full.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gatter S, Hüttl‐Maack V, Rauschnabel PA. Can augmented reality satisfy consumers’ need for touch? Psychol Mark [Internet]. 2021;39(3):508–23. doi:10.1002/mar.21618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santini FDO, Ladeira WJ, Vieira VA, Araujo CF, Sampaio CH. Antecedents and consequences of impulse buying: a meta-analytic study. RAUSP Manag J [Internet]. 2019;54(2):178–204. doi:10.1108/rausp-07-2018-0037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adelaar T, Chang S, Lancendorfer KM, Lee B, Morimoto M. Effects of media formats on emotions and impulse buying intent. J Inf Technol [Internet]. 2003;18(4):247–66. doi:10.1080/0268396032000150799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhagen T, van Dolen W. The influence of online store beliefs on consumer online impulse buying: a model and empirical application. Inf Manage [Internet]. 2011;48(8):320–27. doi:10.1016/j.im.2011.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis L, Wang S, Lindridge A. Culture influences on emotional responses to on-line store atmospheric cues. J Bus Res [Internet]. 2008;61(8):806–12. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaichkowsky JL. Measuring the involvement construct. J Consum Res [Internet]. 1985;12(3):341. doi:10.1086/208520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee W-I, Cheng S-Y, Shih Y-T. Effects among product attributes, involvement, word-of-mouth, and purchase intention in online shopping. Asia Pac Manag Rev [Internet]. 2017;22(4):223–29. doi:10.1016/j.apmrv.2017.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh SH, Lee CT, Tseng TH. Branded app atmospherics: examining the effect of pleasure–arousal–dominance in brand relationship building. J Retail Consum Serv [Internet]. 2021;60:102482. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang M, Ali R, Liao J. The effect of user experience in online games on word of mouth: a pleasure-arousal-dominance (PAD) model perspective. Comput Human Behav [Internet]. 2017;75:329–38. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg A. Using augmented reality to drive real business! Medium [Internet]. 2021. https://blog.lenskart.com/using-augmented-reality-to-drive-real-business-edd3b0244503 .
   Google Scholar
• Jap SD, Anderson EM. Challenges and advances in marketing strategy field research. Assessing Mark Strategy Perform. Cambridge (MA): Marketing Science Institute; 2004. p. 269–92.
   Google Scholar
• Harman HH. 1976. Modern factor analysis. [ place unknown]. doi:10.1604/9780226316529.
   Google Scholar
• Siemsen E, Roth A, Oliveira P. Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organ Res Method [Internet]. 2009;13(3):456–76. doi:10.1177/1094428109351241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Ortinau DJ, Harrison DE. Essentials of marketing research. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ab Hamid MR, Sami W, Mohmad Sidek MH. Discriminant validity assessment: use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. J Phys Conf Ser [Internet]. 2017;890:012163. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: quantification, inference, and interpretation. Commun Monogr [Internet]. 2017;85(1):4–40. doi:10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Lynch JG, Chen Q. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. J Consum Res [Internet]. 2010;37(2):197–206. doi:10.1086/651257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy RF, Riedel AS. ‘Touch it, swipe it, shake it’: does the emergence of haptic touch in mobile retailing advertising improve its effectiveness? J Retail Consum Serv [Internet]. 2020;54:101613. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva SC, Rocha TV, De Cicco R, Galhanone RF, Manzini Ferreira Mattos LT. Need for touch and haptic imagery: an investigation in online fashion shopping. J Retail Consum Serv [Internet]. 2021;59:102378. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Canio F, Fuentes-Blasco M. I need to touch it to buy it! How haptic information influences consumer shopping behavior across channels. J Retail Consum Serv [Internet]. 2021;61:102569. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilken T, de Ruyter K, Chylinski M, Mahr D, Keeling DI. Augmenting the eye of the beholder: exploring the strategic potential of augmented reality to enhance online service experiences. J Acad Mark Sci [Internet]. 2017;45(6):884–905. doi:10.1007/s11747-017-0541-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng L, Zhang W, Wang X, Liang S. Moderating effects of time pressure on the relationship between perceived value and purchase intention in social E-commerce sales promotion: considering the impact of product involvement. Inf Manage [Internet]. 2019;56(2):317–28. doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C-C, Yao J-Y. What drives impulse buying behaviors in a mobile auction? The perspective of the stimulus-organism-response model. Telemat Inform [Internet]. 2018;35(5):1249–62. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ming J, Jianqiu Z, Bilal M, Akram U, Fan M. How social presence influences impulse buying behavior in live streaming commerce? The role of S-O-R theory. IJWIS [Internet]. 2021;17(4):300–20. doi:10.1108/ijwis-02-2021-0012.
   Google Scholar
• Retail Insider. 2022. https://retail-insider.com/articles/2022/01/online-sales-of-eyeglasses-have-spiked-in-2021/ .
   Google Scholar
• Chen C-F, Tsai M-H. Perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty of TV travel product shopping: involvement as a moderator. Tourism Manage [Internet]. 2008;29(6):1166–71. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2008.02.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fürst A, Pečornik N, Binder C. All or nothing in sensory marketing: must all or only some sensory attributes be congruent with a product’s primary function? J Retail [Internet]. 2021;97(3):439–58. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2020.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partners TI. $17.86Bn Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Retail Market (by 2028) Growth Forecast at 24.8% CAGR During 2021 to 2028 COVID Impact and Global Analysis by TheInsightPartners.com. GlobeNewswire News Room [Internet]. 2021. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/09/15/2297757/0/en/17-86Bn-Virtual-Reality-and-Augmented-Reality-in-Retail-Market-by-2028-Growth-Forecast-at-24-8-CAGR-During-2021-to-2028-COVID-Impact-and-Global-Analysis-by-TheInsightPartners-com.html
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Gabriel M, Patel V. AMOS covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM): guidelines on its application as a marketing research tool. AMOS Covariance-Based Structural Equation Modeling (CB-SEM): guidelines on Its Application as a Marketing Research Tool by Joseph F Hair, Marcelo Gabriel, Vijay Patel: SSRN [Internet]. 2015. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2676480
   Google Scholar