References
- Alvarez, M. E., & Anderson-Ketchmark, C. (2011). Danielson's framework for teaching. Children & Schools, 33(1), 61–63.
- Amrein-Beardsley, A. (2014, February 19). “Significant flaws” with New York's teacher evaluation data [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://vamboozled.com/?p=824
- Berliner, D. C. (2005). The near impossibility of testing for teacher quality. Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 205–213. doi:10.1177/0022487105275904
- Braun, H. (2005). Using student progress to evaluate teachers: A primer on value-added models. Educational Testing Service Policy Perspective. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/PICVAM.pdf
- Braun, H., Chudowsky, N., & Koenig, J. (Eds.). (2010). Getting value out of value-added: Report of a workshop, committee on value-added methodology for instructional improvement, program evaluation, and accountability. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
- Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2008). The standard of excellence in teacher preparation. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://caepnet.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/final_board_approved1.pdf
- Council of Chief State School Officers. (1992). Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) model standards for beginning teacher licensing, assessment and development: A resource for State dialogue. Washington, DC: Author.
- Council of Chief State School Officers. (2011). Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) model core teaching standards: A resource for State dialogue. Washington, DC: Author.
- Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Danielson, C. (2010). Evaluations that help teachers learn. Educational Leadership, 68(4), 35–39.
- Danielson, C. (2013). The framework for teaching: Evaluation instrument. Princeton, NJ: Danielson Group.
- Danielson Group. (2013). Correlation between the Danielson Framework for Teaching and the Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium standards. Retrieved from http://www.danielsongroup.org/ckeditor/ckfinder/userfiles/files/Danielson%20Framework%20correlation%20with%20InTASC.pdf
- Doherty, K. M., & Jacobs, S. (2013). State of the states 2013, connect the dots: Using evaluations of teacher effectiveness to inform policy and practice. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality.
- Freeberg, L. (2012). Pioneered in California, publishing teacher “effectiveness” rankings draws more criticism. Retrieved from http://edsource.org/2012/pioneered-in-california-publishing-teacher-effectiveness-rankings-draws-more-criticism/6732/6732#.VLbBzsb4XNA
- German, R. L., & Marchant, G. J. (2013, November). A review of Midwestern states' teacher evaluations systems. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Evanston, IL.
- Hull, J. (2013). Trends in teacher evaluation: How states are measuring teacher performance. Washington, DC: Center for Public Education.
- Learning Sciences International. (2011). The Marzano causal teacher evaluation model alignment to InTASC model core teaching standards. Blairsville, PA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.marzanoevaluation.com/files/Marzano_Causal_Model_Alignment_to_InTASC_Teaching_Standards.pdf
- Marzano, R. (2011). The Marzano teacher evaluation model. Englewood, CO: Marzano Research Laboratory. Retrieved from http://pages.solution-tree.com/rs/solutiontree/images/MarzanoTeacherEvaluationModel.pdf
- Marzano, R. (2013, April). Becoming a high reliability school: The next step in school reform. Lecture presented at Ball State University, Muncie, IN.
- McCaffrey, J. R., Lockwood, D. F., Koretz, D. M., & Hamilton, L. S. (2004). Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 29, 67–101. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/2005/RAND_RP1165.pdf
- Mead, S. (2012). Recent state action on teacher effectiveness: What's in state laws and regulations? Sudbury, MA: Bellwether Education Partners. Retrieved from http://bellwethereducation.org/recent-state-action-on-teacher-effectiveness/
- Morgan, G. B., Hodge, K. J., Trepinksi, T. M., & Anderson, L. W. (2014). The stability of teacher performance and effectiveness: Implications for policies concerning teacher evaluation. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(95). doi:10.14507/epaa.v22n95.2014
- National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2001). Professional standards for the accreditation of schools, colleges, and departments of education. Washington, DC: Author.
- Sandholtz, J. H., & Shea, L. M. (2012). Predicting performance: A comparison of university supervisors' predictions and teacher candidates' scores on a teaching performance assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 39–50.
- Taut, S., Santelices, M. V., & Stecher, B. (2012). Validation of a national teacher assessment and improvement system. Educational Assessment, 17(4), 163–199.
- U.S. Department of Education. (2014). U.S. Department of Education proposes plan to strengthen teacher preparation. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/us-department-education-proposes-plan-strengthen-teacher-preparation
- Yusko, B., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (2008). Embracing contraries: Combining assistance and assessment in new teacher induction. Teachers College Record, 110, 923–953. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/