Girl Talk: A Qualitative Study of Girls Talking About the Meaning of Their Lives in an Urban Single-Sex Elementary School

References

• Anfara, V. A., & Mertens, S. B. (2008). Do single-sex classes and schools make a difference? Middle School Journal, 40(2), 52–59.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (2006). A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior, Vol. 34 (pp. 39–89). San Diego: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bracey, G. W. (2006). Separate but superior? A review of issues and data bearing on single-sex education. Tempe: Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Buchmann, C., DiPrete, T. A., & McDaniel, A. (2008). Gender inequalities in education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 319–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, R. (Ed.). (1997). Sugar in the raw: Voices of young Black girls in America. New York, NY: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in the United States of America, 108(8), 3157–3162. doi:10.1073/pnas.1014871108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. S. (2009). “No boy left behind? Single-sex education and the essentialist myth of masculinity.” Indiana Law Journal, 84(1), 135–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. C. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deak, J. (2002). Girls will be girls: Raising confident and courageous daughters. New York, NY: Hyperion.
   Google Scholar
• Delpit, L. (1995). Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, A. E., Shapiro, J. P., & Brown, S. P. (2004). Gender in urban education: Strategies for student achievement. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Gurian, M., Stevens, K., & Daniels, P. (2009). Single-sex classrooms are succeeding. Educational Horizons, 87(4), 234–245.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, L., & Datnow, A. (2005). Do single-sex schools improve the education of low-income and minority students? An investigation of California's public single-gender academies. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 36(2), 115–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A., & Williams, C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Education Sciences. (2009). Achievement gaps: How Black and White students in public schools perform in mathematics and reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. (2010). “Dangerous presumptions”: How single-sex schooling reifies false notions of sex, gender, and sexuality. Gender and Education, 22(2), 227–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, K. (2006). Constitutional lessons for the next generation of public single-sex elementary and secondary schools. William & Mary Law Review, 47(6), 1953–2043.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, M. C. (2009). Coalescing: The development of girls' studies. NWSA Journal 21(1), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, S. S. (Ed.). (2007). Handbook for achieving gender equity through education (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, S., & Brown, L. M. (2006). Packaging girlhood: Rescuing our daughters from marketers' schemes. New York, NY: St. Martin's Griffin.
   Google Scholar
• Lemaster, T. W. (2007). A year of girls' studies. Feminist Collections, 28(3), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lipkin, E. (2009). Girls' studies. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. (1991). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvey, L. (2009). Visual and other pleasures (2nd ed). London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• National Women's Studies Association (NWSA). 2007 Annual Conference: Girls & Activism Institute (embedded conference). Retrieved from http://www.nwsaconference.org/2007/embedded.html
   Google Scholar
• Noguera, P. A. (2003). City schools and the American dream: Reclaiming the promise of public education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noguera, P. A. (2008). The trouble with Black boys … and other reflections on race, equity, and the future of public education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Noguera, P. A., & Wing, J. Y. (Eds.). (2006). Unfinished business: Closing the racial achievement gap in our schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Office for Civil Rights. (2006, October 25). Final regulations nondiscrimination on the basis of sex in education programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare/Office for Civil Rights. Federal Register/Vol. 71, No. 206/Wednesday, October 25, 2006 (pp. 62529–62543). Retrieved from www.ed.gov/legislation/FedRegister/finrule/2006-4/102506a.html
   Google Scholar
• Orenstein, P. (1994). School girls: Young women, self-esteem, and the confidence gap. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renold, E. (2000). “Coming out”: Gender, (hetero)sexuality and the primary school. Gender and Education, 12(3), 309–326,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridenour, C. S., & Newman, I. (2008). Mixed methods research: Exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How America's schools cheat girls. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Salomone, R. C. (2003). Same, different, equal: Rethinking single-sex schooling. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sax, L. (2005). Why gender matters: what parents and teachers need to know about the emerging science of sex differences. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Schmuck, P. (2005). Same, different, equal: Rethinking single-sex schooling by Rosemary Salomone. Book Review. American Journal of Education, 111(2), 271–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, B. D. (Ed.). (2009). Listening to and learning from students: Possibilities for teaching, learning, and curriculum. Charlotte NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, R. (2002). Odd girl out: The hidden culture of aggression in girls. New York, NY: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, S. D. (2011, May 30). Math anxiety starts young. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/researchers-say-math-anxiety-starts-young/2011/05/16/AG3YqxEH_story.html
   Google Scholar
• Spielhagen, F. R. (Ed.). (2008). Debating single-sex education: Separate and equal? Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, Janovich.
   Google Scholar
• Way, N. (1998). Everyday courage: The lives and stories of urban teenagers. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weis, L., & Fine, M. (2000). Construction sites: An introduction. In L. Weis & M. Fine (Eds.), Construction sites: Excavating race, class, and gender among urban youth (pp. xi–xiv). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, D. L. (1996). Situating feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. In D. L. Wolf (Ed.), Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp. 1–55). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar