Integrating Differentiation in English Education Methods Courses: Learning from the Perceptions and Experiences of Teacher Candidates

References

• Alvarez McHatton, P., & Daniel, P. L. (2008). Coteaching at the pre-service level: Special education majors collaborate with English education majors. Teacher Education and Special Education, 31(2), 118–131.
   Google Scholar
• Boger-Mehall, S. R. (1996). Cognitive flexibility theory: Implications for teaching and teacher education. In B. Robin, J. Price, J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 1996 (pp. 991–993). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Chesley, G. M., & Jordan, J. (2012). What's missing from teacher prep. Educational Leadership, 69(8), 41–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. E., Kurtts, S., Baber, C. R., & Vallecorsa, A. (2008). A model for examining teacher preparation curricula for inclusion. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(4), 155–176.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dee, A. L. (2011). Preservice teacher application of differentiated instruction. The Teacher Educator, 46, 53–70.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C., & Waring, M. (2011). How can an understanding of cognitive style enable trainee teachers to have a better understanding of differentiation in the classroom? Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 10(3), 149–169.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, G. E. (1997). An interactive multimedia program to enhance teacher problem-solving skills based on cognitive flexibility theory: Design and outcomes. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6(1), 47–76.
   Google Scholar
• Friend, M. P. (2005). Special education: Contemporary perspectives for school professionals. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Geake, J. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2008). Teachers' negative affect toward academically gifted students: An evolutionary psychology study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3), 217–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbort, G., Gunter, P. L., Hull, K., Brown, Q., Venn, M. L., Wiley, L. P., & Wiley, E. W. (2007). Behaviors of teachers in cotaught classes in a secondary school. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30(1), 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, V. J. (2009). Barriers to implementing differentiation: Lack of confidence, efficacy and perseverance. The New England Reading Association Journal, 44(2), 11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act 2004, Public Law No. 108-449. (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(4), 301–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., Dyer, D., Peters, K., Robinson, T., Harvey, D., King, M., & Loughner, P. (1997). Cognitive flexibility hypertexts on the Web: Engaging learners in meaning making. Web-Based Instruction, 119–133.
   Google Scholar
• Kroeger, S., & Laine, C. (2009). Preservice English teachers and special educators: Opportunities and barriers to collaboration. American Reading Forum Annual Yearbook, Vol. 29. Retrieved from http://www.americanreadingforum.org/yearbook/yearbooks/09_yearbook/Kroeger%20and%20Laine.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lowrey, W., & Kim, K. (2009). Online news media and advanced learning: A test of cognitive flexibility theory. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(4), 547–566. doi:10.1080/08838150903323388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2001). Promoting inclusion in secondary classrooms. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 24(4), 265–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McCray, E. D., & Alvarez McHatton, P. (2011). “Less afraid to have them in my classroom”: Understanding pre-service general educators' preceptions about inclusion. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(4), 135–155.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, S. C. (2009). Haven't we seen this before? Sustaining a vision in teacher education for progressive teaching practice. Teacher Education Quarterly, 36(4), 41–60.
   Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P. (2007). Teaching English by design: How to create and carry out instructional units. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., & Anderson, D. K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains (Technical report mo. 441; pp. 1–12). Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek and Newman.
   Google Scholar
• Spiro, R. J. Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domain. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 57–76). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Watts-Taffe, S. (2012). A curb cut does the trick: How a unique literacy methods course models collaboration. Reading Today, 30(1), 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, S. (2013). Trainee teachers' attitudes toward students with specific learning disabilities. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(8), 15–29.
   Google Scholar