The Pedagogical Content Knowledge of a Multiliteracies Survey Instrument for Preservice Teachers That Meets the Needs of Diverse Populations

References

• Achinstein, B., & Ogawa, R. T. (2006). (In) fidelity: What the resistance of new teachers reveals about professional principles and prescriptive educational policies. Harvard Educational Review, 76(1), 30–63. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.76.1.e14543458r811864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, C. (2016). Windows and mirrors: Addressing cultural diversity in our classrooms. Practical Literacy: The Early and Primary Years, 21(2), 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Au, K. H. (1998). Social constructivism and the school literacy learning of students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Literacy Research, 30(2), 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969809548000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2009). Privatising education, privatising education policy, privatising educational research: Network governance and the “competition state”. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930802419474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, J. A. (2008). An introduction to multicultural education. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. (2001). Genres of research in multicultural education. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 171–217. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071002171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobbitt, J. F. (1941). The curriculum of modern education. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Borrero, N. E., Flores, E., & De La Cruz, G. (2016). Developing and enacting culturally relevant pedagogy: Voices of new teachers of color. Equity & Excellence in Education, 49(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2015.1119914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovill, H., Harrison, N., Smith, H., Bennett, V., & McKenzie, L. (2021). Mature female learners activating agency after completion of an education foundation degree: Professional progression and the teacher shortage crisis. Research Papers in Education, 36(2), 196–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1633565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, A. H., Cabell, S. Q., Hamre, B. K., DeCoster, J., & Pianta, R. C. (2015). Relating prekindergarten teacher beliefs and knowledge to children’s language and literacy development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M. (2003). The multiple meanings of multicultural teacher education: A conceptual framework. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(2), 7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New Literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044
   Google Scholar
• Czop Assaf, L., O’Donnell Lussier, K., Furness, S., & Hoff, M. (2019). Exploring how a study abroad and international service-learning project shaped preservice teachers’ understanding of humanizing pedagogy. The Teacher Educator, 54(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2018.1520376
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Croom, M., Flores, T. T., & Kamberelis, G. (2020). Literacies of interrogation and vulnerability: Reimagining preservice teacher preparation designed to promote social justice in education. In R. Papa, (Ed.), Handbook on promoting social justice in education (pp. 1341–1381). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2006a). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2006b). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzman, D., Jin Gatlin, S., & Vasquez Heilig, J. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification. Teach for America and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v13n42.2005
   Google Scholar
• Depaepe, F., Verschaffel, L., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Pedagogical content knowledge: A systematic review of the way in which the concept has pervaded mathematics educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1903). Democracy in education. The Elementary School Teacher, 4(4), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1086/453309
   Google Scholar
• de Roock, R. S. (2021). On the material consequences of (digital) literacy: Digital writing with, for, and against racial capitalism. Theory into Practice, 60(2), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2020.1857128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Plessis, A. E., Cullinan, M., Gramotnev, G., Gramotnev, D. K., Hoang, N. T., Mertens, L., Roy, K., & Schmidt, A. (2020). The multilayered effects of initial teacher education programs on the beginning teacher workforce and workplace: Perceptions of beginning teachers and their school leaders. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 101488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edge, C. U. (2020). Access, opportunity, and curriculum making through multimodal meaning-making and technology integration in teacher education. In J. Keengwe, & G. Onchwari (Eds.), Handbook of research on literacy and digital technology integration in teacher education (pp. 188–213). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenbach, B. B. (2012). Teacher belief and practice in a scripted curriculum. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 85(4), 153–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2012.663816
   Google Scholar
• Emsheimer, P., & Ljunggren de Silva, N. (2011). Preservice teachers’ reflections on practice in relation to theories. In M. Mattsson, T. Eilertsen, & D. Rorrison (Eds.), A practicum turn in teacher education (pp. 1–e15). Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. (2020). Toward a linguistically informed, responsive and embedded pedagogy in secondary literacy instruction. Journal of World Languages, 6(1–2), 70–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/21698252.2020.1720161
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. (2014). Preparing content area teachers for disciplinary literacy instruction: The role of literacy teacher educators. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(6), 444–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., & Pace, B. G. (2013). Teaching with challenging texts in the disciplines: Text complexity and close reading. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(2), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). Chapter 1: The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. Review of Research in Education, 20(1), 3–56. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X020001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, C. J. (1996, April 2). Preservice elementary teachers: Their science content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and pedagogical content knowledge [Paper presentation]. The Annual Meeting of the National Asociation for Researching Science Teaching at Sr. Lous, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Gelfuso, A. (2017). Facilitating the development of preservice teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of literacy and agentic identities: Examining a teacher educator's intentional language choices during video-mediated reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Gelfuso, A., & Dennis, D. V. (2017). Reproducing figured worlds of literacy teaching and learning: Examining the “language-in-use” of an inservice and preservice teacher as they enact the practice of literacy planning. Action in Teacher Education, 39(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2016.1245635
   Google Scholar
• Gess‐Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1993). Preservice biology teachers’ knowledge structures as a function of professional teacher education: A year‐long assessment. Science Education, 77(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravett, S., & Ramsaroop, S. (2015). Bridging theory and practice in teacher education: Teaching schools-a bridge too far? Perspectives in Education, 33(1), 131–146. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC168536
   Google Scholar
• Großschedl, J., Mahler, D., & Harms, U. (2018). Construction and evaluation of an instrument to measure content knowledge in biology: The CK-IBI. Education Sciences, 8(3), 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Grossman, P., Rust, F., & Shulman, L. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 390–441). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, L. A., Castek, J., O'Byrne, W. I., & Zawilinski, L. (2012). Using peer collaboration to support online reading, writing, and communication: An empowerment model for struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 28(3), 279–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2012.676431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.39.4.0372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, T. C., & Aleman, G. R. (2008). Teacher capacity for diverse learners: What do teachers need to know?. In Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 157–174). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2008). Language education and multiliteracies. Encyclopedia of language and education, 1, 195–211.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2012). New learning: Elements of a science of education. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karkar Esperat, T. M. (2022a). Literacy instructional coaching for inservice teachers through a community-engaged partnership. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 11(1), 14–34.
   Google Scholar
• Karkar Esperat, T. M. (2022b). Compassionate love: Improving international student online learning through new literacies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 35(6), 630–654.
   Google Scholar
• Karkar Esperat, T. (2019). Assessing preservice teachers’ knowledge of new literacies, Doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University.
   Google Scholar
• Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2013). Teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: The role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112460398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Krepf, M., Plöger, W., Scholl, D., & Seifert, A. (2018). Pedagogical content knowledge of experts and novices—what knowledge do they activate when analyzing science lessons? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(1), 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukner, J., & Orr, A. (2015). Inquiring into pre-service content area teachers’ development of literacy practices and pedagogical content knowledge. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(5), 41–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, J., & Bain, A. (2019). Designing university courses to improve pre-service teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of evidence-based inclusive practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 44(2), 51–65.
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies: Everyday practices and social learning (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2013). A new literacies reader: Educational perspectives. Peter Lang International Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• la Velle, L. (2020). Teacher education: The transformation of transitions in learning to teach. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(2), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1737374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J. L., & Cammack, D. W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, 5(1), 1570–1613.
   Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2017). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. Journal of Education, 197(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741719700202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, A. (2005). Educating school leaders. The Education Schools Project.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, A. (2006). Educating school teachers. The Education Schools Project.
   Google Scholar
• Li, G. (2017). From absence to affordances: Integrating old and new literacies in school‐based instruction for English learners. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61(3), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D., Slegers, D. W., & Card, N. A. (2006). A non-arbitrary method of identifying and scaling latent variables in SEM and MACS models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1301_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, K. (2009). Literacy pedagogical content knowledge in secondary teacher education: Reflecting on oral language and learning across the disciplines. Language and Education, 23(6), 541–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780902822942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, C. (2000). New literacies in teacher education. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43(5), 424–435. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40017079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, A. (2012). Critical literacy: Foundational notes. Theory into Practice, 51(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2012.636324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Iver, M. A., Vaughn, E. S., & Katz, G. (2005). A teacher for every classroom: New teachers in the Baltimore City public schools, 1999–2004. Baltimore, MD: Abell Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education. Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. (1997). Analyzing genre: Functional parameters. Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, 3, 39.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, N., Hilaski, D., & Whelan-Kim, K. (2018). Enhancing teacher education through field-based literacy laboratories. The Reading Professor, 41(1), 23–29.
   Google Scholar
• McArdle, J. J., & McDonald, R. P. (1984). Some algebraic properties of the reticular action model for moment structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37(2), 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1984.tb00802.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (2013). Test theory: A unified treatment. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, R., & Knipe, S. (2018). “I sorta felt like I was out in the middle of the ocean”: Novice teachers’ transition to the classroom. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(6), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. M. (2015). Teacher learning for new times: Repurposing new multimodal literacies and digital-video composing for schools. In J. Flood, S. B. Heath, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (Vol. 2, 441–453). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. (2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(2), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
   Google Scholar
• Moss, B., & Lapp, D. (2010). Teaching new literacies in grades 4-6: Resources for 21st-century classrooms (Vol. 1). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). http://nces.ed.gov/
   Google Scholar
• New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Byrne, W. I., & Smith, S. A. (2015). Multicultural education and multiliteracies: Exploration and exposure of literacy practices with preservice teachers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 31(2), 168–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2014.968695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Reche, E. (2013). Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts effect on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy in pre-service teachers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(3), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.982l873k2ht16m77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, K. C., & Kalina, C. J. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom. Education, 130(2), 241–250.
   Google Scholar
• Pyke, C., Sikorski, T. R., Bray, R., & Popson, C. (2018). Pre-service teachers developing PCK in a natural history museum. In Pedagogical content knowledge in STEM (pp. 177–194). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Risko, V. J., & Vogt, M. E. (2016). Professional learning in action: An inquiry approach for teachers of literacy. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Risko, V. J., Roller, C. M., Cummins, C., Bean, R. M., Block, C. C., Anders, P. L., & Flood, J. (2008). A critical analysis of research on reading teacher education. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(3), 252–288. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.43.3.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romine, B., McKenna, M., & Robinson, R. (1996). Reading coursework requirements for middle and high school content area teachers: A U.S. survey. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 40, 194–198. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40012129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/ https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowsell, J., & Walsh, M. (2011). Rethinking literacy education in new times: Multimodality, multiliteracies & new literacies. Brock Education, 21(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.26522/BROCKED.V21I1.236
   Google Scholar
• Rust, F. O. (2010). Shaping new models for teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37(2), 5–18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23479586
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, S. K. (2010). What is diversity? An inquiry into preservice teacher beliefs. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 292–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210365096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. (1997). The implications of the “new literacy studies” for literacy education. English in Education, 31(3), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-8845.1997.tb00133.x
   Google Scholar
• Tamir, P. (1988). Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(88)90011-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, L. G. (2009). Compassionate love: A framework for research. In B. Fehr, S. Sprecher, & L. G. Underwood (Eds.), The science of compassionate love: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 3–25). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. K. (2017). Developing pre-service teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. The SAGE Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. California: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (2005). Interaction between learning and development. In M. Gauvain & M. Cole (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (4th ed., pp. 34–41). Worth Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, K. (2001). Teacher certification reconsidered: Stumbling for quality. Abell Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Wheaton, B., Muthén, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8, 84–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/270754
   Google Scholar
• Willis, A. I., Smith, P., Kim, J., & Hsieh, B. (2021). Racial justice in literacy research. Literacy Research Report. Literacy Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Wubbels, T. (1992). Taking account of student teachers’ preconceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(92)90004-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar