The Introduction of Word Processing Into a Grade 7/8 Writing Program

References

• Aumack, J. (1985). Computers for non-writers. Principal, 65, 46–48.
   Google Scholar
• Balajthy, E., McKeveny, R., & Lacitignola, L. (1986-87). Microcomputers and the improvement of revision skills. The Computing Teacher, 14, 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Calkins, L. M. (1986). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cantano, J. V. (1985). Computer-based writing: Navigating the fluid text. College Composition and Communication, 36, 309–316.
   Google Scholar
• Case, D. (1985). Processing and professorial words: Personal computers and the writing habits of university professors. College Composition and Communication, 36, 317–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G. (1986). Designing group work-strategies for the heterogeneous classroom. New York: Teachers College press.
   Google Scholar
• Daiute, C. (1986). Do 1 and 1 make 2? Patterns of influence by collaborative authors. Written Communication, 3, 382–408. (b)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daiute, C. (1985). Issues in using computers to socialize the writing process. Educational Communication and Technology, 33, 41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daiute, C. (1986). Physical and cognitive factors in revising: Insights from studies with computers. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 141–159. (a)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dees, S. C. (1985). Microcomputers in the English classroom. NAASP Bulletin, 69, 20–23.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, D. K. (1986). Cooperation, collaboration, and a computer: Integrating a computer into a 1st grade writing program. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 357–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley-Marling, C. C. (1985). Reading, writing, and microcomputers: Alternatives to drill and practice. The Reading Teacher, 38, 388–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engberg, R. (1983). I’ll write... Just lead me to my computer. Classroom Computer Learning, 4, 68–69. (b)
   Google Scholar
• Engberg, R. E. (1983). Word processors in the English classroom. Computers, Reading, and Language Arts, 1, 17–19. (a)
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, G. (1983). Word processing—Will it make all kids love to write? Instructor, 92, 87–88.
   Google Scholar
• Geoffrion, L. D. (1983). The feasibility of word processing for students with writing handicaps. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 11, 239–250.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, D. H. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, C., & Wilcox, L. (1984). Adapting microcomputers for use in college composition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Delaware Valley Writing Council, Villanova, PA (April). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 247 609)
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. (1985). Student writers and word processing: A preliminary evaluation. College Composition and Communication, 36, 323–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, J., Sheingold, K., Gearhart, M., & Berger, C. (1982). Microcomputers in schools: Impact on the social life of elementary classrooms, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 3, 361–373.
   Google Scholar
• Heap, J. L., & Moore, S. (1986). Collaboration and word processing. Education and technology series, Ontario Ministry of Education, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Lindemann, S., & Willert, J. (1985). Word processing in high school classes (pp. 47–53). In J. L. Collins & E. A. Summers (Eds.), Writing on-line. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1989). Microcomputers in classrooms: Educational technology or social practice? Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 20, 4–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, A. (1983). Computers in the classroom. Technology Illustrated, 3, 38–42.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, P. (1984). Using microcomputers in the writing class. The Computing Teacher, 11, 20–21.
   Google Scholar
• Rosengrant, T. (1985). Using the microcomputer as a tool for learning to read and write. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 113–115.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. (1982). Computers and the teaching of writing. Educational Technology, 22, 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Selfe, C. L. (1985). The electronic pen: computers and the composing process (pp. 55–66). In J. L. Collins & E. A. Summers (Eds.), Writing on-line. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. (1981). Demonstrations, engagement, and sensitivity: The choice between people and programs. Language Arts, 58, 634–642.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. (1986). Insult to intelligence: The bureaucratic invasion of our classrooms. New York: Arbor House.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. (1982). Writing and the writer. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, G. (1985). Writing with computers. Electronic Learning, 5, 39–43.
   Google Scholar
• Sommers, E. A. (1985). Integrating composing and computing (pp. 3–10). In J. L. Collins & E. A. Summers (Eds.), Writing on-line. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
   Google Scholar
• Womble, G. G. (1984). Process and pressor: Is there room for a machine in the English classroom? English Journal, 73, 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Womble, G. G. (1985). Revising and computing. In J. L. Collins & E. A. Summers (Eds.), Writing on-line. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
   Google Scholar
• Woodruff, E., Lindsay, P., Bryson, M., & Joram, E. (1986, April). Some cognitive effects of word processors on enriched and average 8th grade writers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar