The Portability of Computer-Related Educational Resources

References

• Ballini, D., & Poly, A. (1988). Working documents, The Summer University, Ecole Normale Superieure de Fontenay-St. Cloud, 3-14 July 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B. (1989, June). International perspectives on portability of educational software: The Scandinavian experience. Presentation at the National Educational Computing Conference, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Bork, A. (1976). Transferability of computer-based learning materials. Report with limited circulation, University of California, Irvine.
   Google Scholar
• Brauer, U. (1989). Educational software at the secondary level. IFIP Newsletter, 6(4), p. 9.
   Google Scholar
• Collis, B. A., & De Diana, I. (1990). International perspectives on the portability of educational software. In N. Estes, J Heene, & D. Leclercq (Eds.), Proceedings, The Seventh International Conference on Technology and Education (pp. 581–583). Edinburgh: CEP Consultants.
   Google Scholar
• Collis, B. A., & Moonen, J. (1990). Assessing the impact of computer-related technology in education: Methodological strategies, issues, and new directions. In C. Bell (Ed.), Innovations in assessing. London: Kogan Page (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Dahlstrand, I. (1984). Software portability and standards. Computers and their application, 27, 1–147.
   Google Scholar
• De Diana, I., & Collis, B. (1990a, March). Toward a model of educational software portability. Unpublished report, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• DeDiana, I., & Collis, B. (1990b). The impact of different portability factors during the life cycles of an educational software adaptation project. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23(2), 306–317.
   Google Scholar
• Ely, D. P. (1989). Protocols and processes for promoting interactive cross-cultural media transfer. Educational Media International, 26(1), 6–12.
   Google Scholar
• Feinstein, B. (1989, June). Software development and exchange: The Israeli experience. Presentation at the National Educational Computing Conference, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Fleer, M. (1989). Reflecting indigenous culture in educational software design. Journal of Reading, 32, 611–619.
   Google Scholar
• Friend, J., Galda, G., & Searle, A. (1986). From Nicaragua to Thailand: Adapting interactive radio instruction. Development Communication Report, No. 52. Arlington, VA: U.S. Office of Education, U.S. Agency for International Development.
   Google Scholar
• FUNDESCO. (1990). Opening report: Trends and issues in DELTA. Report submitted to the PRECISE Consortium, ECC, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Hackbarth, S. (1985). Instructional systems design: An appropriate technology for developing nations. Programmed learning and educational technology, 22(1), 35–38.
   Google Scholar
• IBM. (1987). National language information and design guide. Volume I: Designing enabled products, rules and guidelines. White Plains, NY: IBM.
   Google Scholar
• IFIP Working Conference. (1989). Notes. Reykjavik, Iceland: IFIP Working Group WG 3.5.
   Google Scholar
• International Standards Organization (1982). Draft International Standard, Information Processing Systems: Open Systems Interconnection—Basic reference model. ISO/DIS 7498 (ISO/TC97).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. (1989). CALL around the world. C.A.L.L. Digest, 5(1), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. (1986). Contributions of cross-cultural research to educational practice. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1049–1058.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLean, R. (Ed.). (1989). EASI software portability effort resumes. CALM Development Newsletter, 5(10), 1, 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education, The Netherlands. (1989). Use and valuing of the educational software coupon. Zoetermeer, The Netherlands: Ministry of Education and Science.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education, Ontario. (1987). Functional requirements for microcomputers for educational use in Ontario schools: Stage II. Toronto, Canada: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Murray-Lasso, M. (1988, April). Problems confronting the implementation of computers in Latin American educational systems: The case of Mexico. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Murray-Lasso, M. (1989, June). Portability of educational software: The needs and perspectives of developing countries. Presentation at the National Educational Computing Conference, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Murray-Lasso, M. (1990). Technology in education in Mexico. ISTE Update, 2(5), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Nicklin, P. (1990). PETE (Portable Educational Tools Environment): The concept of PETE and some preliminary user requirements. Paper prepared for the DELTA/EPOS Seminar, 22-23 January, Madrid. (Available from MARI Applied Technologies Ltd., Tower Street, Stockton-on-Tees, Cleveland TS18 3AQ, UK).
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (1986). A virtual protocol model for computer-human interaction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 24, 301–312.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, J. B. A. (1988). Computer education policies in developing countries: Facing the hard choices. Education and Computing, 4(3), 301–311.
   Google Scholar
• OTA. (1988). Power on! New tools for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: Congress of the United States, Office of Technology Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Oualid, A. (1989). Problems of software development in developing countries. In G. X. Ritter (Ed.), Information Processing 89 (pp. 1067–1071). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Parnas, D. L. (1983). Software engineering principles. Report DCS-29-IR. Department of Computer Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Sandford, N. (1989). Portability of interactive courseware. Interactive Learning International, 5, 125–130.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, F. (1989). Presentation level issues are important when changing program to another language. CALM Development Newsletter, 5(1), 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. M. (1987) Educational radio and television—Their development in advanced industrial societies. In R. M. Thomas & V. N. Kobayashi (Eds.), Educational technology: Its creation, development and cross-cultural transfer (pp. 125–142). Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Trollip, S. R., & Brown, G. (1987). Designing software for easy translation into other languages. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 14(3), 119–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraets, J. W. (1990). Software portability: The Ontario approach. In N. Estes, J. Heene, & D. Leclercq (Eds.), Proceedings, The Seventh International Conference on Technology and Education (pp. 578–580). Edinburgh: CEP Consultants.
   Google Scholar
• Weston, C. B. (1989). Critical factors for educational technology interventions in developing countries. Educational training and technology international, 26(2), 122–128.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. N., & McCrum, E. (1984). Use of modular design in the production of portable CAI software: A case study. Computing in Education, 8(2), 229–237.
   Google Scholar
• Wolansky, W. D., & Iyewarun, S. A. (1989). Effective transfer of technology in Third World countries: A systematic approach. A.C.F.P. Journal, 24(3), 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Wombi, B. (1988). Domination by “Cooperation.” IDRC Reports, 17(1), 24–25.
   Google Scholar
• Zhuang, J., & Thomas, R. M. (1987). Computer technology transfer to developing societies: A Chinese-languge case. In R. M. Thomas & V. N. Kobayashi (Eds.), Educational technology: Its creation, development and cross-cultural transfer (pp. 65–90). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar