Software Engineering for Portability

References

• Bevan, N., & Murray, D. (Eds.) (1985). Man/machine integration. State of the art report. Maidenhead, Berkshire, England: Pergamon Infotech Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bork, A. (1976). Transferability of computer based learning materials. Report with limited circulation, University of California, Irvine.
   Google Scholar
• Bork, A. (1984). Education and computers: The situation today and some possible futures. T.H.E. Journal, 12(3), 92–97.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, P. F. (1975). The mythical manmonth. Boston: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Bunderson, C. W. (1981). Courseware. In H. F. O’Neil, Jr. (Ed.), Computer based instruction: A state of the art assessment. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collis, B. A., & De Diana, I. (1990a). The impact of different portability factors during the life cycle of an educational software portability adaptation process. Journal for Research on Computing in Education, 23(2), 306–317.
   Google Scholar
• Collis, B. A., & De Diana, I. (1990b). International perspectives on the portability of educational software. In N. Ester, J. Heene, & D. Leclercq (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technology and Education, (pp. 581–583). Brussels: ICTE.
   Google Scholar
• Collis, B. A., & De Diana, I. (1990c). The portability of computer-related educational resources: An overview of issues and directions. Journal for Research on Computing in Education, 23(2), 147–159.
   Google Scholar
• COMSED. (1990). Plane geometry system. Sofia University, Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Sofia, Bulgaria.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, D. A. (1984, 1 April). An authoring system’s hardest test. Data Training, pp. 12–23.
   Google Scholar
• Criswell, E. L. (1989). The design of computer-based instruction. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, C., & Whitlock, Q. (1983). A handbook of computer based training. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• De Diana, I., & de Vries, S. (1990). Adaptable educational courseware: An antidote to several portability problems. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23(2), 225–241.
   Google Scholar
• Eberts, R., & Brock, J. F. (1984). Computer applications to instruction. In F.A. Muckler (Eds.), Human factors review, (pp. 262–284). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
   Google Scholar
• Heines, J. M. (1984). Screen design strategies for computer-assisted instruction. Bedford, MA: Bedford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hojsholt-Poulsen, L. (1989). Production of educational software: The situation in Denmark. Education & Computing, 5, (1), 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. L., Holland, J. D., & Norman, D. A. (1985). Direct manipulation interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 311–338.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, V.M. (1987). The evaluation of microcomputer programs: An area of debate. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 3, 40–50.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, H. (1971). Chief programmers, teams: Principles and procedures. IBM Internal Report FSC-71-5108. Gaithersburg, MD: IBM Federal Systems Division.
   Google Scholar
• Millwood, R., & Riley, D. (1988). Design guide for the procedure library. Computers in the Curriculum Project Report. London: Kings, College
   Google Scholar
• Moonen, J. (1987). Educational software development: The pedagogical design. In Tj. Plomp, K. van Deursen, & J. Moonen (Eds.), CAL for Europe (pp. 51–64). Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Moonen, J., & Plomp, T. (Eds.) (1987). EURIT ’86, Proceedings of the First European Conference on Education and Information Technology. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelissen, C., & Eisendrath, G. (1987). Criteria for educational software. In J. Moonen & Tj. Plomp (Eds.), Developments in educational software and courseware (pp. 457–462). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (1986). A virtual protocol model for computer-human interaction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 24, 301–312.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education. (1987). Functional requirements for microcomputers for educational use in Ontario schools-Stage II. Toronto: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, H. R., & Atwood, M. E. (1979). Human factors in computer systems. Science Applications Report No. 79-111-DEN. Englewood, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Rivlin, C., Lewis, R., & Davies-Cooper, R. (1990). Guidelines for screen design. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenmaker, J., Van der Mast, C., & Moonen, J. (1987). A methodology for the development of educational software. In J. Moonen & T. Plomp (Eds.), Developments in educational software and courseware (pp. 235–243). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanchev, I. (1989). Software engineering principles in the building of decision support systems. In A. Lewandowski, & I. Stanchev (Eds.) Proceedings of the International Workshop, Methodology and software for interactive decision support, (pp. 217–226). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Stanchev, I. (1990). Educational software portability evaluation. Internal project report. First stage. Research Center for Educational Informatics, Sofia, Bulgaria.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, R. (1989). Comparative study on criteria and procedures for the evaluation of educational software. In Proceedings of the UNESCO Congress, Education and Informatics (pp. 351–358). Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Vraets, J. W. (1990). Software portability: The Ontario approach. In N. Ester, J. Heene, & D. Leclercq (Eds.) Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technology and Education, (pp. 578–580). Brussels: ICTE.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, N. (1987). Designing user interfaces for educational software. In J. Moonen & T. Plomp (Eds.) Developments in Educational Software and Courseware (pp. 417–425). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar