Gender Effects of Graphics Presentation

References

• Benbasat, I., Dexter, A. S., & Todd, P. (1986). An experimental program investigating color-enhanced and graphical information presentation: An integration of findings. Communications ACM, 29(11), 1094–1105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbow, P., & Stanley, J. C. (1981). Mathematical ability: Is sex a factor? Science, 212(118), 121.
   Google Scholar
• Benbow, P., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts. Science, 222, 1029–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, S. L. (1985). The influence of sex-role stereotyping on women’s attitudes and achievement in mathematics. In S. F. Chapman, L. R. Brush, & D. M. Wilson (Eds.), Women in mathematics: Balancing the equation (pp. 175–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, K. F., & Wheatley, G. H. (1989). Ability and sex-related differences in cognitive strategies on spatial tasks. The Journal of General Psychology, 116(1), 43–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, J. M., & Serbin, L. A. (1985). Visual-spatial skill: Is it important for mathematics? Can it be taught? In S. F. Chapman, L. R. Brush, & D. M. Wilson (Eds.), Women in mathematics: Balancing the equation (pp. 151–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1989). Graphical presentation of accounting data for financial forecasting: An experimental investigation. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 14(5/6), 509–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, G. W., DeSanctis, G., & McBride, D. J. (1986). Understanding the effectiveness of computer graphics for decision support: A cumulative experimental approach. Communications ACM, 19(1), 40–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doolittle, A. E., & Cleary, T. A. (1987). Gender based differential item functioning in mathematics achievement items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(2), 157–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dossey, J. A., Mullis, I. V. S., Lindquist, M. M., & Chambers, D. L. (1988). The mathematics report card: Are we measuring up? Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Educational Testing Service (1989). The gender gap. ETS Policy Notes, 2(1), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Englehard, G., Jr. (1990). Gender differences in performance on mathematical items: Evidence from the United States and Thailand. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15(1), 13–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennema, E., & Peterson, P. (1985). Autonomous learning behavior: A possible explanation of sex-related differences in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16(3), 309–310.
   Google Scholar
• Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. (1977). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors. American Educational Research Journal, 14(1), 51–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, C. W., & Hoff, C. (1988). Gender differences in mathematical performance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19(3), 395–401.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, J. S. (1981). How large are cognitive gender differences? A meta-analysis using ε-square and “d”. American Psychologist, 36, 892–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarrett, I. M. (1983). Computer graphics and reporting financial data. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Dickson, G. W. (1988). Graphics and managerial decision making: Research based guidelines. Communication ACM, 31(6), 764–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., Dickson, G. W., & DeSanctis, G. (1985). Methodological issues in experimental IS research: Experiences and recommendations. MIS Quarterly, 9(2), 141–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, H. C. (1981). An experimental investigation of the use of computer graphics in decision making. Management Science, 27(7), 757–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, H. C., & Nielson, N. R. (1980). The impact of the mode of information presentation on learning and performance. Management Science, 26(10), 982–993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maccoby, E., & Jacklin, C. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. New York: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, S. P., & Smith, J. D. (1987). Sex differences in learning mathematics: A longitudinal study with item and error analyses. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 372–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montazemi, A. R., & Wang, S. (1988). The effects of modes of information presentation on decision-making: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 5(3), 101–127.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, J. L., & Ferguson, L. R. (1989). Gender differences in patterns of spatial ability, environmental cognition, and math and English achievement in late adolescence. Adolescence, 24(94), 421–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, C. L., & Benbow, C. P. (1986). Gender differences in mathematics: A function of parental support and student sex typing? Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 808–819.
   Google Scholar
• Scott-Morton, M. S. (1971). Management decision systems: Computer based support for decision making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Division of Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, J. (1983). Factors predicting girls’ and boys’ enrollment in college preparatory mathematics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 7(3), 272–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, J. A., & Fennema, E. (1978). Distribution of spatial visualization and mathematical problem solving scores: A test of Stafford’s x-linked hypotheses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15(3), 157–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar