65
Views
89
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Computers and Teachers

Factors Influencing Computer Use in the Classroom

Pages 220-237 | Published online: 25 Feb 2014

References

  • Andrews, D. H., & Goodson, L. A. (1980). A comparative analysis of models of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 3(4), 2–16.
  • Bailey, K. D. (1987). Methods of social research. New York: The Free Press.
  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.
  • Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184.
  • Becker, H. J. (1987). The impact of computer use in children’s learning: What research has shown and what it has not (Report No. 18). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools.
  • Becker, H. J. (1989). [U. S. administration of the 1989 IEA computers in education survey]. The Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools. Unpublished raw data.
  • Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change. Vol. II: Factors affecting implementation and continuation. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.
  • Bjerklie, D., & Hollis, R. W. (1991, May 20). The revolution that fizzled. Time, pp. 48–49.
  • Coovert, M. D., & Goldstein, M. (1980). Locus of control of users’ attitude toward computers, Psychological Reports, 47, 1167–1173.
  • Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
  • Dambrot, F. H., Watkins-Malek, M. A., Silling, S. M., Marshall, R. S., & Garver, J. A. (1985). Correlates of sex differences in attitudes toward and involvement with computers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 27, 71–86.
  • Dronka, P. (1985). Computer integration into instruction is stuck: Experts blame unclear optimal uses and three implementation problems. ASCD Update, 27(5), 1–8.
  • Ely, D. P., & Plomp, T. (1988). The promises of educational technology. In B. Branyan-Broadbent & R. K. Wood (Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook 1988 (pp. 5–18). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
  • Emery, F. E., & Oeser, O. A. (1958). Information, decision and action: A study of psychological determinants of changes in farming techniques. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance (2nd reissue). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Fosterling, F. (1985). Attributional retraining: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 48, 495–512.
  • Fullan, M. G. (1990). Staff development, innovation, and institutional development. In B. Joyce (Ed.), Changing school culture through staff development: The 1990 ASCD yearbook (pp. 3–25). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Gallo, D. D. (1986). Expectancy theory as a predictor of individual response to computer technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 2, 31–41.
  • Gilliland, K. (1990). Curriculum development for gender equity in computer education. In C. Warger (Ed.), Technology in today’s schools (pp. 129–141). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Goldman, R. D., Kaplan, R. M., & Platt, B. B. (1973). Sex differences in the relationship of attitudes toward technology to choice of field of study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 20, 412–418.
  • Harrell, F. E., Jr. (1982). The LOGIST procedure. In SUGI supplemental library user’s guide (pp. 269–292). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
  • Hurt, H. T., Joseph, K., & Cook, C. D. (1977). Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 58–65.
  • Jorde-Bloom, P., & Ford, M. (1988). Factors influencing early childhood administrators’ decisions regarding the adoption of computer technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(1), 31–47.
  • Manning, M. M., & Wright, T. L. (1983). Self-efficacy expectancies, outcome expectancies, and the persistence of pain control in childbirth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 421–431.
  • Marcinkiewicz, H. R. (1991). The relationships of selected personological variables to the use of available microcomputers by elementary school teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.
  • Marcinkiewicz, H. R., & Grabowski, B. L. (1992). The relationships of personological variables to the use of microcomputers by elementary school teachers: Report of phase one—Baseline data. Proceedings of Selected Research Paper Presentations. Washington, DC: AECT.
  • Morano, R. A. (1984). AV use enhances student perception of teaching effectiveness. Performance & Instruction Journal, 23(8), 23–24.
  • National Task Force on Educational Technology. (1986). Transforming American education: Reducing the risk to the nation. A report to the Secretary of Education, United States Department of Education. T.H.E. Journal, 14(1), 58–67.
  • Nickerson, R. S. (1981). Why interactive computer systems are sometimes not used by people who might benefit from them. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 15, 469–483.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1959). Tests and measurements: Assessment and prediction. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • O’Neill, J. (1990). Computer “revolution” on hold: Despite scattered progress, few signs of broad-based changes seen. ASCD Update. 32(9), 1–5.
  • Phares, E. J. (1976). Locus of control in personality. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
  • Rieber, L. P., & Welliver, P. W. (1989). Infusing educational technology into mainstream educational computing. International Journal of Instructional Media, 16(1), 21–32.
  • Roblyer, M. D. (1988). The effectiveness of microcomputers in education: A review of the research for 1980-1987. T. H. E. Journal, 16(2), 85–89.
  • Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
  • Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
  • Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach. New York: The Free Press.
  • Rose, J. S., & Medway, F. J. (1981). Measurement of teachers’ beliefs in their control over student outcome. Journal of Educational Research, 74(3), 185–190.
  • Rose, J. S., & Medway, F. J. (1982). Measurement of teachers’ beliefs in their control over student outcome [Erratum]. Journal of Educational Research, 75(3), 188–189.
  • Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Rotter., J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (1, Whole No. 609).
  • Shanker, A. (1990, September 23). Equipping teachers for productivity: From chalkboards to computers. The New York Times, Section E, p. 7.
  • Sheingold, K., & Hadley, M. (1990). Accomplished teachers: Integrating computers into classroom practice. New York: Bank Street College, Center for Technology in Education.
  • Suen, H. K. (1990). Principles of test theories. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Taylor, K. M., & Popma, J. (1990). An examination of the relationships among career decision-making self-efficacy, career salience, locus of control and vocational indecision. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37, 17–31.
  • Torgerson, W. S. (1958). Theory and methods of scaling. New York: John Wiley.
  • U. S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. [OTA] (1988, September). Power on! New tools for teaching and learning (OTA-SET-379). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley and Sons.
  • Welliver, P. (1990). Instructional transformation: A model for change. (A report of the Pennsylvania Regional Computer Resource Center at Penn State to the other state centers and member teachers). University Park, PA: Regional Computer Resource Center at The Pennsylvania State University.
  • Witteman, H. (1976). The relationship of communication apprehension to opinion leadership and innovativeness. Unpublished master’s thesis. Department of Speech Communication, West Virginia University, Morgantown.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.