Attitudes Toward Computers and Computer Use

References

• Arenz, B.W., & Lee, M. (1990, April). Gender differences in the attitude, interest and participation of secondary students in computer use. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. J. (1987, July). The impact of computer use on children’s learning: What research has shown and what it has not. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. J., & Sterling, C. (1987). Equity in school computer use: National data and neglected considerations. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3(3), 289–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridwell, L., & Ross, D. (1984). Integrating computers into a writing curriculum. In W. Wresch (Ed.), The computer in composition instruction: A writer’s tool (pp. 107–119). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Carmichael, H., Higginson, W., Burnett, D., Moore, B., & Pollard, P. (1986). Differential effects of male and female students. In Computers, children and classrooms (pp. 211–229). Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M. (1986). Gender and computers: The beneficial effects of experience on attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2(3), 265–282.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., Kahn, J., & Paris, C. (1988). When word processors come into the classroom. In J. Hoot & S. Silvern (Eds.), Writing with computers in the early grades (pp. 43–74). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, R. (1983). Writing processes and revising strategies: Study of effects of computer based text editors on revising strategies for independent writers. College Composition and Communication 34, 149–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daiute, C. (1984). Can the computer stimulate writers’ inner dialogues? In W. Wresch (Ed.), The computer in composition instruction: A writer’s tool (pp. 131–139). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Fann, G. L., Lynch, D. H., & Murranka, P. (1988-89). Integrating technology: Attitudes as a determinant of the use of microcomputers. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 17(4), 307–317.
   Google Scholar
• Fetler, M. (1985). Sex differences on the California Statewide Assessment of Computer Literacy. Sex Roles, 13(3/4), 181–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, A. (1987). Ethnographic study of a high school writing class using computers: Marginal, technically proficient and productive learners. In T. Gerrard (Ed.), New directions in teaching and research: Writing at century’s end: Essays on CAI (pp. 169–180). New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, J. (1983). Computers for composing (Tech. Rep. No. 21). New York: Bank Street College of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kurland, D. M., & Pea, R. D. (1983). On the cognitive prerequisites of learning computer programming (Tech. Rep. No. 18). New York: Bank Street College of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C. (1985). Gender equity in computer learning environments. Computers and the Social Sciences, 1(1), 19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Lipinski, J., Nida, R., Shade, D., & Watson, J. (1986). The effects of microcomputers on young children: An examination of free-play choices, sex differences, and social interactions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2(2), 147–168.
   Google Scholar
• Lockheed, M., Nielsen, A., and Stone, M. (1983, April). Sex differences in microcomputer literacy. Paper presented at the National Educational Computer Conference, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Loyd, B.H., & Gressard, C. (1984). Reliability and factorial validity of computer attitude scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 501–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loyd, B.H., & Loyd, D.E. (1988, March). Computer attitudes: Differences by gender and amount of computer experience. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, H., & Wilkinson, A. (1986). The use of the word processor in assisting children’s writing development. Educational Review, 38, 169–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pufahl, J.P. (1986). Alone on the word processor: Writing and rewriting. Teaching English in the Two Year College, 13, 25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, J. S. (1984, April). The computer: Male, female or androgynous. The Computing Teacher, 11(8), 32–34.
   Google Scholar
• Sheingold, K. (1981, July). Issues related to the implementation of computer technology in schools: A cross-sectional study. Paper presented at the NIE Conference on Issues Related to the Implementation of Computer Technology in Schools, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Sheingold, K., Kane, J., & Endreweit, M. (1983). Microcomputer use in schools: Developing a research agenda. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 412–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siann, G., Macleod, H., Glissov, P., & Durndell, A. (1990). The effect of computer use on gender differences in attitudes to computers. Computers and Education, 14, 183–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siann, G., & Durndell, A. (1988). Stereotyping in relation to the gender gap in participation in computing. Educational Research, 30(2), 98–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar