References
- Bank Street Writer III [Computer Software]. (1986). New York: Bankstreet College of Education, Scholastic Publishing Company.
- Barlow, D H., & Hayes, S.C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 199–210.
- Cooper, J.O., Heron, T.E., & Heward, W.L. (1987). Applied behavior analysis. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
- Graham, S., & MacArthur, C. (1988). Improving learning disabled students’ skills at revising essays produced on a work processor: Self-instructional strategy training. Journal of Special Education, 22, 133–152.
- Hasselbring, T., & Goin, L.I. (1989). Enhancing learning through microcomputer technology. In E.A. Polloway, J.R. Patton, J.S. Payne, & R.A. Payne (Eds.), Strategies for teaching learning with special needs (4th ed., pp.147–164). Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Co.
- Hersen, M., & Barlow, D.H. (1976). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press.
- Hodges, J.C., & Whitten, M.E. (1986). Harbrace college handbook (10th ed.). San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- Jacobi, C. (1986). Word processing for special needs students: Is there really a gain? Educational Technology, 26, 36–39.
- Kazdin, A.E. (1982). Single-case research design: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
- MacArthur, C. (1988). The impact of computers on the writing process. Exceptional Children, 54, 536–542.
- MacArthur, C., & Graham, S. (1987). Learning disabled students’ composing under three methods of text production: Handwriting, word processing, and dictation. Journal of Special Education, 19, 248–253.
- McGregor, G., Drossner, D., & Axelrod, S. (1990). Increasing instructional efficiency: A comparison of voice plus vs. text alone on the error rate of students with mild disabilities during CAI. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10(4), 192–197.
- O’Brien, F. (1968). Sequential contrast effects with human subjects. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 537–542.
- Panyan, M.V., Hummel, J., & Jackson, L.B. (1988). The integration of technology in the curriculum. Journal of Special Education Technology, 9(2), 109–119.
- Sindelar, P.T., Rosenberg, M.S., & Wilson, R.J. (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for instructional research. Education and Treatment of Children, 8(1), 67–76.
- Stevens, K.B., Blackhurst, A.E., & Slaton, D.B. (1991). Teaching memorized spelling with a microcomputer: Time delay and computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(1), 153–160.
- Tawny, J.W., & Gast, D.L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
- Troyka, L.Q. (1987). Simon & Schuster handbook for writers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Vacc, N. (1987). Word processor versus handwriting: A comparative study of writing samples produced by mildly handicapped students. Exceptional Children, 54, 156–165.