8
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Implications of Learning Strategy Research for Designing Computer-Assisted Instruction

Pages 435-456 | Published online: 25 Feb 2014

References

  • Andre, T. (1979). Does answering higher level questions while reading facilitate productive learning? Review of Educational Research, 49, 280–319.
  • Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Ostertag, J. (1987). Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text? Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 331–346.
  • Ashcraft, M. H. (1989). Human memory and cognition. Glenview, IL: Foresman.
  • Atkinson, R. C. (1975). Mnemotechnics in second-language learning. American Psychologist, 30, 821–828.
  • Ausubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 267–272.
  • Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Ausubel, D. P., & Fizgerald, D. (1961). The role of discriminability in meaningful verbal learning and retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 266–274.
  • Ausubel, D. P., & Fizgerald, D. (1962). Organizer, general background, and antecedent learning variables in sequential verbal learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 243–247.
  • Ausubel, D. P., & Youssef, M. (1963). The role of discriminability in meaningful parallel learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 331–336.
  • Barnes, B. R., & Clawson, E. U. (1975). Do advance organizers facilitate learning? Recommendations for further research based on an analysis of 32 studies. Review of Educational Research, 45, 637–659.
  • Bean, T. W., & Steenwyk, F. L. (1984). The effect of three forms of summarization instruction on sixth graders’ summary writing and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 297–307.
  • Broadbent, D. E., Cooper, P. J., & Broadbent, M. H. P. (1978). A comparison of hierarchical and matrix retrieval schemes in recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 486–497.
  • Carnine, D., Silbert, J., & Kameenui, E. J. (1990). Direct instruction reading (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
  • Carter, J. F., & Van Matre, N. H. (1975). Note taking versus note having, Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 900–904.
  • Cashen, V. M., & Leicht, K. L. (1970). Role of the isolated effect in a formal educational setting. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 484–486.
  • Clark, C., & Bean, T. (1982). Improving advance organizer research: Persistent problems and future directions. Reading World, 22, 2–10.
  • Di Vesta, F. J., & Gray, G. S. (1972). Listening and note taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 8–14.
  • Hamaker, C. (1986). The effects of adjunct questions on prose learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 212–242.
  • Hamilton, R. J. (1985). A framework for the evaluation of the effectiveness of adjunct questions and objectives. Review of Educational Research, 55, 47–85.
  • Harris K. R., & Pressley, M. (1991). The nature of cognitive strategy instruction: Interactive strategy construction. Exceptional Children, 57, 392–404.
  • Hartley, J., Bartlett, S., & Branthwaite, A. (1980). Underlining can make a difference—sometimes. Journal of Educational Research, 73, 218–224.
  • Hartley, J., & Davies, I. K. (1978). Note taking: A critical review. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 15, 207–224.
  • Houston, J. P., Hammen, C., Padilla, A., & Bee, H. (1989). Invitation to psychology (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Harcourt.
  • Jacobowitz, T. (1990). AIM: A metacognitive strategy for constructing the main idea of text. Journal of Reading, 33, 620–624.
  • Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Investigating note taking and review: A depth of processing alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20, 23–32.
  • Kiewra, K. A., & Frank, B. M. (1988). Encoding and external-storage effects of personal lecture notes, skeletal notes, and detailed notes for field-independent and field-dependent learners. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 143–148.
  • King, A. (1989). Verbal interaction and problem solving within computer-assisted cooperative learning groups. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 1–15.
  • King, A. (1991). Effects of training in strategic questioning on children’s problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 307–317.
  • Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
  • Kliegl, R., Smith, J., & Baltes, P. B. (1990) On the locus and process of magnification of age differences during mnemonic training. Developmental Psychology, 6, 894–904.
  • Ladas, H. (1980). Summarizing research: A case study. Review of Educational Research, 50, 597–624.
  • Lehman, J. D., Carter. C., & Kahle, J. B. (1985). Concept mapping, Vee mapping, and achievement: Results of a field study with black high school students: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 663–973.
  • Levin, J. R., & Pressley, M. (1985). Mnemonic vocabulary instruction: What’s fact, what’s fiction. In R. F. Dillon (Ed.), Individual differences in cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 145–172). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Loman, N. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1983). Signaling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 402–412.
  • Luiten, J., Ames, W., & Ackerson, G. (1980). A meta-analysis of the effects of advance organizers on learning and retention. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 211–218.
  • Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Levin, J. R. (1986). Direct vs. mnemonic instruction: Relative benefits for exceptional learners. The Journal of Special Education, 20, 299–308.
  • Mayer, R. E. (1979). Twenty years of research on advance organizers: Assimilation theory is still the best predictor of results. Instructional Science, 8, 133–167.
  • McEneany, J. E. (1990). Do advance organizers facilitate learning? A review of subsumption theory, Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23, 89–96.
  • Meyer, B. J. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  • Meyer, B. J. F. (1979). Organizational patterns in prose and their use in reading. In M. L. Kamil & A. J. Moe (Eds.), Reading research: Studies and applications. Clemson, SC: National Reading Conference.
  • Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M., & Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72–103.
  • Novak, J. D. (1990). Concepts maps and Vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 19, 29–52.
  • Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Okebukola, P. A., & Jegede, O. J. (1988). Cognitive preference and learning mode as determinants of meaningful learning through concept mapping. Science Education, 72, 489–500.
  • Pankratius, W. J. (1990). Building an organized knowledge base: Concept mapping and achievement in secondary school physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 315–333.
  • Pressley, M., Burkell, J., Cariglia-Bull, T., Lysynchuk, L., McGoldrick, J. A., Schneider, B., Snyder, B. L., Symons, S., & Woloshyn, V. E. (1990). Cognitive strategy instruction. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
  • Pressley, M., Levin, J. R., & Delaney, H. D. (1982). The mnemonic keyword method. Review of Educational Research, 52, 61–92.
  • Rickards, J. P. (1979). Adjunct postquestions in text: A critical review of methods and processes. Review of Educational Research, 49, 181–196.
  • Rickards, J. P., & Denner, P. R. (1978). Depressive effects of underlining and adjunct questions on children’s recall of text. Instructional Science, 8, 81–90.
  • Rickards, J. P., & Friedman, F. (1978). The encoding versus the external storage hypothesis in notetaking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3, 136–143.
  • Rinehart, S. K., Stahl, S. A., & Erickson, L. G. (1986). Some effects of summarization training on reading and studying. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 422–436.
  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem-solving. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Spires, H. A., & Stone, P. D. (1989). The directed note taking activity: A self-questioning approach. Journal of Reading, 33, 36–39.
  • Spring C., Sassenrath, J., & Ketellapper, H. (1986). Ecological validity of adjunct questions in a college biology course. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 79–89.
  • Stone, C. L. (1983). A meta-analysis of advance organizer studies. Journal of Experimental Education, 51, 194–199.
  • Taylor, M. R. (1985). Changing the meaning of experience: Empowering learners through the use of concept maps, Vee diagrams, and principles of educating in a biology lab course. Dissertation Abstract International, 46, 2255A. (Order Number DA8516993).
  • Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed, pp. 315–327). New York: Macmillan.
  • West, C. K., Farmer, J. A., & Wolff, P. M. (1991). Instructional design: Implications from cognitive science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Winne, P. M. (1979). Experiments relating teachers’ use of higher cognitive questions to student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 49, 13–50.
  • Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.). (1986). Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
  • Wood, L. E., & Pratt, J. D. (1987). Peg-word mnemonic as an aid to memory in the elderly: A comparison of four age groups. Educational Gerontology, 13, 325–339.
  • Zeitz, L. (1992). The effects of using computer-based formative concept mapping as a learning strategy for high school biology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
  • Zeitz, L., & Anderson-Inman, L. (1992, April). The effects of computer-based formative concept mapping on learning high school science. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.