Exploring Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Reasons for Not Using Computers in Their Teaching

References

• Alexander, P. A. (1996). The past, present, and future of knowledge research: A reexamination of the role of the role of knowledge in learning and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 89–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atweh, B., & Cooper, T. (1995). The construction of gender, social class and mathematics in the classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 28, 293–310.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers. (1996). Statement on the use of calculators and computers for mathematics in Australian schools. Adelaide, South Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. (1993). Investigating change: An introduction to calculus for Australian schools. Carlton, Victoria: Curriculum Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M., Clarke, D., & Stephens, M. (1996). The impact of external assessment on teaching practice: Constraints on change in the classroom. In P. C. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology in Mathematics Education (pp. 64–71). Melbourne, Victoria: The University of Melbourne and Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. (1994). How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3), 429–32.
   Google Scholar
• Board of Senior Secondary School Studies. (1992). Senior syllabus in Mathematics B. Brisbane, Queensland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, P. J. (1995). Presenting teachers with a model for technological innovation. In D. A. Wills (Ed.), Technology and teacher education annual (pp. 855–858). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, D., Farrands, P. & Kennedy, M. (1996). Capgraph [Computer software]. Rockhampton: Queensland University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Wood, T, Yackel, E., & McNeal, B. (1992). A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(1), 2–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, K. (1996). Vygotskian approaches in human development in the information era. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(1), 63–93.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (1984). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890–1980. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Part V: The art of interpretation, evaluation, and presentation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 479–483). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ernest, P. (1989). What’s the use of Logo? In P. Ernest (Ed.), Mathematics teaching: The state of the art (pp. 33–44). London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ernest, P. (1996). The nature of mathematics and teaching [Online document]. Exeter, United Kingdom: Author. Available: www.ex.ac.uk/~PErnest/pome/pompart7.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Excel [Computer software]. (1985-1999). Redmond, WA: Microsoft.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, P. L., & Chant, D. (1990). Factors shaping community attitudes to school mathematics: Implications for future curriculum change. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(4), 299–318.
   Google Scholar
• Gentile, K., Clements, D., & Battista, M. (1994). Effects of computer environments on students’ conceptualization of geometric motions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11(2), 121–140.
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, J. (1995). The tensions and contradictions of the school mathematics tradition. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(5), 442–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield, M., & Bitter, G. (1994). A multimedia approach to professional de-velopment of teachers: A virtual classroom. In D. B. Aichele & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics (pp. 102–115). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, A., Ormiston, M., & Hyde, P. (1994). Building professional development into the culture of schools. In D. B. Aichele & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics (pp. 49–54). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs Henry, J., & Clements, D. H. (1999). Challenges for teachers attempting to integrate a mathematics innovation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(3), 240–32.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, B. (1989). The “enterprising mathematics” project. In P. Ernest (Ed.), Mathematics teaching: The state of the art (pp. 167–175). London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaput, J., & Roschelle, J. (1997). Deepening the impact of technology beyond assistance with traditional formalisms in order to democratize access to ideas underlying calculus. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st Conference. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 105–112). Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhs, T., & Ball, D. (1986). Approaches to teaching mathematics: Mapping the domains of knowledge, skills, and dispositions. East Lansing. Michigan Stats University, Center of Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, I., Willis. S., Kissane, B., & Grace, N. (1994). Access to algebra. Carlton, Victoria: Curriculum Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Marcinkiewicz, H. R. (1994). Computers and teachers: Factors influencing computer use in the classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(2), 220–32.
   Google Scholar
• Neyknd, J. (1996). Teachers knowledge: The starting point for a critical analysis of mathematics teaching [Online document]. Wellington, New Zealand: Author. Available: www.ex.ac.uk/~PErnes/pome/pompart4.html.
   Google Scholar
• Niederhauser, D. S., & Stoddart, T. (1994, February). Teachers’ perspective on computer-assisted instruction: Transmission versus construction of knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (1992). Professionalization and mathematics teachings. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 197–208). New York: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, S. J. (1999). Exploring secondary mathematics teachers’ reasons for avoiding the use of computers in their teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology, Red Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Riel, M. (1994). Educational change in a technology-rich environment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(4), 452–473.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, L. D., & Weil, M. M. (1995). Computer availability, computer experience and technophobia among public school teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 11(1), 9–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarama, J., Clements, D. H., & Jacobs Henry, J. (1998). Network of influences in an implementation of a mathematics curriculum innovation. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 3, 113–148.
   Google Scholar
• Skemp, R. (1978). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• State of Queensland Department of Education. (1995). Guidelines for the use of computers in learning. Brisbane, Queensland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. (1990). Case study methods. In H. J. Walberg & G. D. Haertel (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of educational evaluation (pp. 644–649). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127–146). New York: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A., Phillip, R., Thompson, P., & Boyd, B. (1994). Calculational and conceptual orientations in teaching mathematics. In D. Aichele & A. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics (pp. 79–92). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, B. A. (1997). Maths helper [Computer software]. Goodna, Queensland: Teachers’ Choice Software.
   Google Scholar
• Word [Computer software]. (1983-1999). Redmond, WA: Microsoft.
   Google Scholar