References
- Paulhus D. Two-component models of socially desirable responding. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984;46(3):598–609.
- Paulhus D. Measurement and control of response bias. In: Robinson J, Shaver P, Wrightsmen L, eds. Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1991:17–59.
- Gnambs T, Kaspar K. Socially desirable responding in web-based questionnaires: A meta-analytic review of the candor hypothesis. Assessment 2017;24(6):746–762.
- Becker G, Cherny S. Gender-controlled measures of socially desirable responding. J Clin Psychol. 1994;50(5):746–752.
- Davis C, Thake J, Vilhena N. Social desirability biases in self-reported alcohol consumption and harms. Addict Behav. 2010;35(4):302–311.
- Bornstein R, Rossner S, Hill E, Stepanian M. Face validity and fakability of objective and projective measures of dependence. J Pers Assess. 1994;63(2):363–386.
- Kuentzel J, Henderson M, Melville C. The impact of social desirability biases on self-report among college student and problem gamblers. J Gambl Stud. 2008;24(3):307–319.
- Tourangeau R, Yan T. Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(5):859–883.
- Zaldivar F, Molina A, Rios FL, Montes JG. Evaluation of alcohol and other drug use and the influence of social desirability. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2009;25(4):244–251.
- Latkin C, Edwards C, Davey-Rothwell M, Tobin K. The relationship between social desirabilty bias and self-reports of health, substance use, and social network factors among urban substance users in Baltimore, Maryland. Addict Behav. 2017;73:133–136.
- Cunningham J, Godinho A, Kushnir V. Can Amazon’s mechanical Turk be used to recruit participants for internet intervention trials? A pilot study involving a randomized control trial of a brief online intervention for hazardous alcohol use. Internet Interv. 2017;10:12–16.
- Cunningham J, Godinho A, Kushnir V. Using Mechanical Turk to recruit participants for internet intervention research: Experience from recruitment for four trials targeting hazardous alcohol consumption. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17(1):156–163.
- Bertholet N, Godinho A, Cunningham J. Smartphone application for unhealthy alcohol use: Pilot randomized controlled trial in the general population. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019;195:101–105.
- Cunningham J, Godinho A, Bertholet N. Outcomes of two randomized controlled trials, employing participants recruited through Mecanical Turk, of Internet interventions targeting unhealthy alcohol use. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):1–9.
- Stöber J, Dette D, Musch J. Comparing continuous and dichotomous scoring of the balanced inventory of desirable responding. J Pers Assess. 2002;78(2):370–389.
- Wechsler H, Davenport A, Dowdall G, Moeykens B, Castillo S. Health and behavioral consequences of binge drinking in college: a national survey of students at 140 campuses. JAMA 1994;272(21):1672–1677.
- Kim H, Hodgins D. Reliability and validity of data obtained from alcohol, canabis, and gambling populations on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Psychol Addicti Behav. 2017;31(1):85–94.
- Welte J, Russell M. Influence of socially desirable responding in a study of stress and substance abuse. Alcoholism Clin Exp Res. 1993;17(4):758–761.
- Krumpal I. Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review. Qual Quant. 2013;47(4):2025–2047.
- Paulhus D. Paulhus Deception Scales (PDS) user’s manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems; 1998.