Cauliflower Mosaic Viral Promoter - A Recipe for Disaster?

References

• Ho MW, Traavik T, Olsvik R, Tappeser B, Howard V, von Weizsacker C, McGavin G.Gene Technology and Gene Ecology of Infectious DiseasesMicrobial Ecology in Health and Disease1998; 1033–59
   Google Scholar
• Traavik, T. (1999). Too Early May Be Too Late. Ecological Risks Associated with the Use of Naked DNA as a Biological Tool for Research, Production and Therapy (Norwegian), , Report for the Directorate for Nature Research Tungasletta 2, 7005 Trondheim.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli A, Griffiths S, Palacios N, Twyman RM, Vain P, Laurie DA, Christou P.Molecular characterization of transforming plasmid rearrangements in transgenic rice reveals a recombination hotspot in the CaMV 35S promoter and confirms the predominance of microhomology mediated recombinationThe Plant Journal1999; 17591–601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner DS, McCallum DG, Covey SN.Roles of the 35S promoter and multiple overlapping domains in the pathogenicity of the pararetrovirus cauliflower mosaic virusJ. Virol.1996; 705414–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cann A.J.Principles of Molecular Virology2nd edAcademic Press, London. 1997
   Google Scholar
• Xiong Y, Eickbush TH.Origin and evolution of retroelements based upon their reverse transcriptase sequencesEMBO J.1990; 93353–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benfy PN, Chua N-H.The cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter: combinatorial regulation of transcription in plantsScience1990; 250959–66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohn T, Fütterer J. Transcriptional and translational control of gene expression in cauliflower mosaic virus Curr. Op. Genet. Develop. 1992; 2: 90–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noad RJ, Turner DS, Covey SN.Expression of functional elements inserted into the 35S promoter region of infectious cauliflower mosaic virus repliconsNucleic Acid Res1997; 251123–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang R-X, Nagy F, Sivabramaniam S, Chua N-H.Multiple cis regulatory elements for maximal expression of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter in transgenic plantsPlant Cell1989; 1141–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fütterer, J. (1992) unpublished result, cited in [7].
   Google Scholar
• Comai I, Moran P, Maslyar D.Novel and useful properties of a chimeric plant promoter combining CaMV 35S and MAS elementsPlant Mol. Biol1990; 15373–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Last DI, Brettell DA, Chamberlain AM, Chaudhury AM, Larkin PJ, Marsh EL, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES.pEmu: an improved promoter for gene expression in cereal cellsTheor. Appl. Genet1991; 81581–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battraw MH, Hall TC.Histochemical analysis of CaMV 35S promoter-(-glucuronidase gene expression in transgenic rice plantsPlant Mol. Biol1990; 15527–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekkaoui F, Datla RSS, Pilon M.The effects of promoters on transient expression in conifer cell linesTheor. Appl. Genet1990; 79353–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvia EE and Brown LM, (1991). Transient expression of firefly luciferase in protoplasts of the green alga Chlorella
   Google Scholar
• Hirt H, Kogl M, Murbacher T, Heberle-Bors E.Evolutionary conservation of transcriptional machinery between yeast and plants as shown by the efficient expression from CaMV 35S promoter and 35S terminatorCurr. Genet1990; 17473–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assad F, Signer ER.Cauliflower mosaic virus P35S promoter activity in E. coliMol. Gen. Genet1990; 223517–20
   Google Scholar
• Vaden VR, Melcher U.Recombination sites in cauliflower mosaic virus DNAs: implications for mechanisms of recombinationVirology1990; 177717–26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal S, Pisan B, Hohn T, Grimsley N, Hohn B.Genomic homologous recombination in plantaEMBO J1991; 101571–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wintermantel WM, Schoelz JE.Isolation of recombinant viruses between cauliflower mosaic virus and a viral gene in transgenic plants under conditions of moderate selection pressureVirology1996; 223156–64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheysen G, Villarroel R, van Montagu M.Illegitimate recombination in plants: a model for T-DNA integrationGenes Dev.1991; 5287–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon S, Puchta H.Capture of genomic and T-DNA sequences during double-stranded break repair in somatic plant cellsEMBO J.1998; 176086–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deroles SC, Gardner RC.Analysis of the T-DNA structure in a large number of transgenic petunias generated by Agrobacterium-mediated transformationPlant Mol. Biol.1988; 11365–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Register JC, Peterson DJ, Bell PJ, et alStructure and function of selectable and non-selectable transgenes in maize after introduction by particle bombardmentPlant Mol. Biol.1994; 25951–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot MJ, Offringa R, Groet J, Does MJ, Van Hooykaas PJ, Danelzen PJ.Non-recombinant background in gene targetting. Illegitimate recombination between htp gene and defective 5'-deleted nptll gene can restore a Kmr phenotype in tobaccoPlant Mol. Biol.1994; 25721–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorbunov V, Levy AA.Non-homologous DNA and joining in plants cells is associated with deletions and filler DNA insertionsNucl. Acid Res.1997; 254650–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puchta H and Meyer P. (1994). Substrate specificity of plant recombinases determined in extrachromosomal recombination systems. In Homologous Recombination and Gene Silencing in Plants (Paszkowski, J.,), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dorcrecht, pp. 123–155.
   Google Scholar
• Stary A, Sarasin A.Molecular analysis of DNA junctions produced by illegitimate recombination in human cellsNucl. Acids Res.1992; 204269–74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho MW, Steinbrecher R.Fatal flaws in food safety assessmentEnvironmental and Nutritional Interactions1998; 251–84
   Google Scholar
• Ewen SWB, Pusztai A.Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestineThe Lancet1999; 3541353–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar