The Future of Economics in a Lakatos–Bourdieu Framework

References

• Abel, A.B., and B.S. Bernanke. 2005. Macroeconomics. Boston: Pearson Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Allington, N.F.B.; J.S.L. McCombie; and M. Pike. 2011. “The Failure of the New Macroeconomic Consensus: From Non-ergodicity to the Efficient Markets Hypothesis and Back.” International Journal of Public Policy 7, nos. 1/2/3: 4–21.
   Google Scholar
• Aslanbeigui, N., and G. Oakes. 2007. “The Editor as Scientific Revolutionary: Keynes, the Economic Journal, and the Pigou Affair, 1936–1938.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 29, no. l: 15–48.
   Google Scholar
• Bean, C. 2010. “Joseph Schumpeter Lecture ‘The Great Moderation, the Great Panic, and the Great Contraction.’” Journal of the European Economic Association 8:289–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernanke, B.S. 2010. “On the Implications of the Financial Crisis for Economics.” Remarks delivered at a conference at Princeton University. www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20100924a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2012. “The Great Moderation.” In The Taylor Rule and the Transformation of Monetary Policy, ed. E.F. Koenig R. Leeson and G.A. Kahn 145–62. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Besley, T., and P. Hennesey. 2009. Letter to HM Queen Elisabeth, The British Academy. http://memex.naughtons.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/economists_letter_to_hmq.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blanchflower, D. 2009. “The Future of Monetary Policy.” Open Lecture at Cardiff University, March 24, 2009. http://194.61.178.65/publications/Documents/speeches/2009/speech382.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, O. 2006. Macroeconomics, New York: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2008. “The State of Macro.” NBER Working Paper 14259 (August).
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, O.; G. Dell’Ariccia; P. Mauro. 2010. “Rethinking Macroeconomic Policy.” IMF Staff Position Note 10/03, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1990. Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1991. Zur Soziologie Symbolischer Formen (Toward the Sociology of Symbolic Forms). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Caballero, R.J. 2010. “Macroeconomics After the Crisis: Time to Deal with the Pretense-of-Knowledge Syndrome.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24, no. 4: 85–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, E. 2011. Behavioral Economics. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H.-J. 2001. “Commentary.” In Joseph Stiglitz and the World Bank: The Rebel Within, ed. Chang 1–16. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clower, R. 1965. “The Keynesian Counter-Revolution: A Theoretical Appraisal.” In The Theory of Interest Rates, ed. F.H. Hahn and F.P.R. Brechling 103–25. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R.H. 1994. Essays on Economics and Economists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, J.H. 2011. “How Did Paul Krugman Get It So Wrong?” Economic Affairs 31, no. 2: 36–40.
   Google Scholar
• Colander, D. 2007. The Making of an Economist, Redux. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2010. “Moving Beyond the Rhetoric of Pluralism: Suggestions for an ‘Inside-the-Mainstream’ Heterodoxy.” In Economic Pluralism, ed. R. Garnett E.K. Olsen and M. Starr 36–47. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Colander, D., and A. Klamer. 1987. “The Making of an Economist.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1, no. 2: 95–111.
   Google Scholar
• Colander, D.C.; R.C.F. Holt; and J.B. Rosser, Jr. 2009. “Introduction.” In Changing Face of Economics: Conversations with Cutting Edge Economists, ed. Colander, Holt and Rosser 1–25. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2010. “How to Win Friends and (Possibly) Influence Mainstream Economists.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 32, no. 3: 397–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. 2011. The Soulful Science: What Economists Really Do and Why It Matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, B. 2010. “The Diffusion of Heterodox Economics.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 69, no. 5: 1475–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, R. 1982. “The Duhem–Quine Thesis, Lakatos and the Appraisal of Theories in Macroeconomics.” Economic Journal 92: 320–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, P. 1984. “Reviving Keynes’s Revolution.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 6, no. 4: 561–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 1992. “Would Keynes Be a New Keynesian?” Eastern Economic Review 18, no. 4: 449–63.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2005. “Responses to Lavoie, King, and Dow on What Post Keynesianism Is and Who Is a Post Keynesian.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 27, no. 3: 393–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J.B. 2006. “The Turn in Economics: Neoclassical Dominance to Mainstream Pluralism?” Journal of Institutional Economics 2, no.1: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, K.W.; J. Platt; D. Senghaas. 1971. “Conditions Favoring Major Advances in Social Science.” Science 171, no. 3970: 450–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggertsson, G.B., and P. Krugman. 2012. “Debt, Deleveraging, and the Liquidity Trap: A Fisher-Minsky-Koo Approach.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 127, no. 3: 1469–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. 1970. “Consolations for the Specialist.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, ed. I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave 197–230. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1975. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: New Left Books.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J.K. 2013. “The Third Crisis in Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 47, no. 2: 311–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodfriend, M. 2004. “Monetary Policy in the New Neoclassical Synthesis: A Primer.” Economic Quarterly Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (Summer): 21–45.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, H.D., and N. Diamond. 1997. The Rise of American Research Universities: Elites and Challengers in the Postwar Era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haering, N. 2014. “George Soros’ INET: An Institute to Improve the World or a Trojan Horse of the Financial Oligarchy?” Real-World Economics Review no. 67: 90–96.
   Google Scholar
• Hickel, R. ed. 1986. Radikale Neoklassik. Ein Neues Paradigma zur Erklärung der Massenarbeitslosigkeit—die Vogt-Kontroverse (The Radical Neoclassical Period: A New Paradigm to Explain the Mass Unemployment—The Steward’s Controversy). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, W. 1986. The Revolution that Never Was: An Assessment of Keynesian Economics. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Katzner, D.W. 2011. At the Edge of Camelot: Debating Economics in Turbulent Times. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kazmierski, U. 1993. “Grundlagenkrise in der Volkswirtschaftslehre” (Fundamental Crisis in National Economy). Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften (Ethics and Social Sciences) 4, no. 2: 283–95.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J.M. 1919. The Economic Consequences of the Peace. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1925. “The Economic Consequences of Mr. Churchill.” Nation and Athenaeum (May 2).
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1930. A Treatise on Money. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1935. “Letter to George Bernard Shaw of January 1st 1935.” Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. 13, ed. D. Moggridge, 492–493 London: Macmillan, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• King, J. 2002. A History of Post Keynesian Economics Since 1936. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
   Google Scholar
• Kirman, A. 2010. “The Economic Crisis Is a Crisis for Economic Theory.” CESIfo Economic Studies 56, no. 4: 498–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klamer, A. 2007. “Does This Have to Be Our Future?” In The Making of an Economist, Redux, ed. D. Colander 227–33. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, L.R. 1947. The Keynesian Revolution. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Koppl, R., and W.J. Luther. 2012. “Hayek, Keynes, and Modern Macroeconomics.” Review of Austrian Economics 25, no. 3: 223–41.
   Google Scholar
• Kromphardt, J. 2013. Die größten Ökonomen: John Maynard Keynes (The Greatest Economists: John Maynard Keynes). Stuttgart: UTB GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 1995. Peddling Prosperity: Sense and Nonsense in an Age of Diminished Expectations. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1998a. The Accidental Theorist and Other Dispatches from the Dismal Science. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1998b. “Two Cheers for Formalism.” Economic Journal 108, no. 6: 1829–36
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1999. The Return of Depression Economics. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2009. “How Did Economists Get It So Wrong?” New York Times, September 6). www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06Economic-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0/
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2012. End This Depression Now! New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2013. “Wynne Godley and the Hydraulics.” New York Times, September 13.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T.S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. 1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, ed. I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave 91–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2006. “The Nature of Heterodox Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 30, no. 4: 483–507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebaron, F. 2006. “‘Nobel’ Economists as Public Intellectuals: The Circulation of Symbolic Capital.” International Journal of Contemporary Sociology 43, no.1: 87–101.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, F.S. 2000. “The Organizational History of Post Keynesian Economics in America, 1971–1995.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 23, no. 1: 141–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2004. “History and Identity: The Case of Radical Economics and Radical Economists, 1945–70.” Review of Radical Political Economics 36, no. 2: 177–95.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2009. A History of Heterodox Economics: Challenging the Mainstream in the Twentieth Century. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, R.E.Jr., 2003. “Macroeconomic Priorities.” American Economic Review 93, no. 1: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2009. “In Defence of the Dismal Science.” Economist, August 6.
   Google Scholar
• Mata, T. 2009. “Migrations and Boundary Work: Harvard, Radical Economists and the Committee on Political Discrimination.” Science in Context 22, no. 1: 115–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearman, A. 2012. “Heterodox Economics and the Problem of Classification.” Journal of Economic Methodology 19, no. 4: 407–24.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, R. 1998. Charlatans or Saviours? Economists and the British Economy from Marshall to Meade. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Minford, P. 2010. “The Banking Crisis as Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium.” CESIfo Economic Studies 56, no. 4: 554–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minsky, H.P. 1986. Stabilizing an Unstable Economy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mishan, E.J. 1963. “Say’s Law and Walras’ Law Once More.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 77, no. 4: 617–25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moggridge, D. 1990. “Keynes as Editor.” In A Century of Economics: 100 Years of the Royal Economic Society and the Economic Journal, ed. J.D. Hey and D. Winch 143–57. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Palley, T.I. 2013. “Gattopardo Economics: The Crisis and the Mainstream Response to Change.” IMK Working Paper no. 112, Düsseldorf.
   Google Scholar
• Peabody, G.E. 1971. “Scientific Paradigms and Economics: An Introduction.” Review of Radical Political Economics 3:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M.H., and R.P. Smith. 2011. “Beyond the DSGE Straitjacket.” Manchester School 79:5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Pigou, A.C. 1941. Employment and Equilibrium. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, S. 1999. Fifty Major Economists. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, M. 1993. “Radical Economics in Historical Perspective.” Review of Radical Political Economics 25, no. 3: 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Rezende, F.C. 2009. “Keynes’s Relevance and Krugman’s Economics.” Blog “New Economic Perspectives.” http://neweconomicperspectives.org/2009/08/keyness-relevance-and-krugmans.html
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. 1976. “Michal Kalecki: A Neglected Prophet.” New York Review of Books, March 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosser, J.B.; R.P.F. Holt; and D. Colander. 2010. “European Economics at Crossroads.” In European Economics at Crossroads, ed. Rosser, Holt and Colander 3–28. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Schlefer, J. 2013. “Embracing Wynne Godley, an Economist Who Modeled the Crisis.” New York Times, September 10.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, C.M., and N. aus dem Moore. 2010. “Die Methodendiskussion in den Wirtschafstwissenschaften vor dem Hintergrund der Finanzkrise” (The Methodological Discussion in Economics Against the Background of Financial Crisis). In Methodenpluralismus in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften ( Methodological Pluralism in Economics), ed. U. Jens and H. Romahn 143–82. Marburg: Metropolis.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, J. 1988. “Kritische Neoklassik: Ergebnisse und Perspektiven” (Critical Neoclassical School: Results and Perspectives). In Politische Ökonomie Heute ( Political Economy Today), ed. W. Vogt 183–220. Regensburg: Transfer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schultze, C.L. 1996. “The CEA: An Inside Voice of Mainstream Economics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 10:23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, V.L. 2003. “Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics.” In The Nobel Prizes 2002, ed. F. Frängsmayr 502–61. Stockholm: The Nobel Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Snowdon, B., and H. R. Vane. 1997. “The Development of Modern Macroeconomics: A Rough Guide.” In A Macroeconomic Reader, ed. B. Snowdon and H.R. Vane 1–26. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J.E. 2002a. Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2002b. “Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics.” In The Nobel Prizes 2001, ed. F. Frängsmayr 472–540. Stockholm: The Nobel Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2002c. “Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics.” American Economic Review 92, no. 3: 460–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2003. The Roaring Nineties. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2006. Making Globalization Work. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2008a. “The End of Neoliberalism.” Project Syndicate, July.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2008b. “It Doesn’t Take Nostradamus.” Economist’s Voice, November.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2008c. “Markets Can’t Rule Themselves.” Newsweek, December 31.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2009a. “Moving Beyond Market Fundamentalism to A More Balanced Economy.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 80, no. 3: 345–60.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2009b. “The Current Economic Crisis and Lessons for Economic Theory.” Eastern Economic Journal 35, no. 3: 281–96.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2010. “Needed: A New Economic Paradigm.” Financial Times, August 19. www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/d5108f90-abc2-11df-9f02-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3FWNU6aDc/
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2011. “Rethinking Macroeconomics: What Failed and How to Repair It.” Journal of the European Economic Association 9, no. 4: 591–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2014. “The Lessons of the North Atlantic Crisis for Economic Theory and Policy.” In What Have We Learned? Macroeconomic Policy after the Crisis, ed. G. Akerlof O. Blanchard D. Romer and J.E. Stiglitz 335–47. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, P.M. 2005. “What Caused the Great Moderation? Some Cross-Country Evidence.” Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review 90, no. 3: 5–32.
   Google Scholar
• Vernengo, M. 2010. “Conversation or Monologue? On Advising Heterodox Economists.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 32, no. 3: 389–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt, W. 1986. Theorie der kapitalistischen und einer laboristischen Ökonomie (Theory of a Capitalist and Laborist Economy). Frankfurt: Campus-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. 1997. “Comments.” In The Post-1945 Internationalization of Economics, ed. A.W. Coats Durham, 364–368. NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodford, M. 2010. “Financial Intermediation and Macroeconomic Analysis.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24, no. 4: 21–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worland, S.T. 1972. “Radical Political Economy as a ‘Scientific Revolution.’” Southern Economic Journal 39, no. 2: 274–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonay, Y. 1998. The Struggle over the Soul of Economics: lnstitutionalist and Neoclassical Economists in America Between the Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar