Using information in taxonomists’ heads to resolve hagfish and lamprey relationships and recapitulate craniate–vertebrate phylogenetic history

References

• AdamsDC, RohlfFJ, SliceDE. 2004. Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’. Ital J Zool. 71:5–16.
   Google Scholar
• AgassizJLR. 1857. Classification of fishes. Proc Am Acad Arts Sci. 4:8–9.
   Google Scholar
• BooksteinFL. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data. Geometry and biology. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• BooksteinFL, ChernoffB, ElderR, HumphriesJ, SmithG, StraussR. 1985. Morphometrics in evolutionary biology: the geometry of size and shape change, with examples from fishes. Philadelphia, PA: Academy of Natural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• BuddGE, JensenS. 2000. A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla. Biol Rev. 75:253–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChenJ-Y, HuangD-Y, LiC-W. 1999. An early Cambrian craniate-like chordate. Nature. 402:518–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ConelJL. 1942. The origin of the neural crest. J Comp Neurol. 76(2):191–215.
   Google Scholar
• CopeED. 1889. Synopsis of the families of Vertebrata. Am Nat. 23:1–29.
   Google Scholar
• DaltonR. 2000. Biologists flock to ‘evo-devo’ in a quest to read the recipe for life. Nature. 403:125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DamasH. 1944. Recherches sur le développement de Lampetra fluviatilis. Contributions à l'étude de la céphalogenèse des vertébrés. Arch Biol.55(3):3–82.
   Google Scholar
• DeanB. 1899. On the embryology of Bdellostomata stouti. A general account of myxinoid development from the egg and segmentation to hatching. Jena: G. Fischer. p. 221–277.
   Google Scholar
• DelarbreC, EscrivaH, GallutC, BarrielV, KourilskyP, JanvierP, LaudetV. 2000. The complete nucleotide sequence of the mitochondrial DNA of the agnathan Lampetrafluviatilis: bearings on the phylogeny of cyclostomes. Mol Biol Evol. 17:519–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DelarbreC, GallutC, BarrielC, JanvierP, GachelinG. 2002. Complete mitochondrial CAN of the hagfish, Eptatretus burger: the comparative analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences strongly supports the cyclostome monophyly. Mol Phyl Evol. 22:184–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DonoghuePCJ. 2009. Origin of vertebrates. In: Evolution: the first four billion years. Cambridge: Belknap. p. 788–792.
   Google Scholar
• DumérilAMC. 1806. Zoologie Analytique, Ou Méthode Naturelle de Classification des Animaux. Paris: Didot.
   Google Scholar
• DürerA. 1613. Les quatres livres d'Albert Durer de la proportion des parties et pourtraicts des corps humains. Paris: Charles Perier.
   Google Scholar
• DysonFW, EddingtonAS, DavidsonC. 1920. A determination of the deflection of light by the Sun's gravitational field, from observations made at the total eclipse of May 29, 191. Phil Trans R Soc Lond Ser A. 332:291–333.
   Google Scholar
• EscrivaH, ManzonL, YousonJ, LaudetV. 2002. Analysis of lamprey and hagfish genes reveals a complex history of gene duplications during early vertebrate evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 19:1440–1450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FieldKG, OlsenGJ, LaneDJ, GiovannoniSJ, GhiselinMT, RaffEC, PaceNR, RaffRA. 1988. Molecular phylogeny of the animal kingdom. Science. 239:748–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ForeyPL, JanvierP. 1994. Evolution of the early vertebrates. Am Sci. 82:554–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FurlongR, HollandPWH. 2002. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis supports monophyly of Ambulacraria and Cyclostomes. Zool Sci. 19:593–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GagnierPY. 1993. Sacabambaspis janvieri, Vertébré ordovicien de Bolivie. 2. Analyse phylogénétique. Ann Paléontol. 79:119–166.
   Google Scholar
• GleickJ. 1987. Chaos: making a new science. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• GoodmanCS, CoughlinBC. 2000. The evolution of evo-devo biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:4424–4425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoodrichES. 1930. Studies on the structure and development of vertebrates. London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• GorbmanA. 1997. Hagfish development. Zool Sci. 14:375–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HallBK. 1999. The neural crest in development and evolution. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• HallBK. 2009. The neural crest and neural crest cells in vertebrate development and evolution. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• HeimbergAM, Cowper-SallariR, SémonM, DonoghuePCJ, PetersonKJ. 2010. MicroRNAs reveal the interrelationships of hagfish, lampreys, and gnathostomes and the nature of the ancestral vertebrate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107:19379–19383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HenigRM. 2009. The monk in the garden: the lost and found genius of Gregor Mendel, the father of modern genetics. Boston (MA): Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• HolmgrenN. 1946. On two embryos of Myxine glutinosa. Acta Zool.27(1):1–90.
   Google Scholar
• HullD. 1988. Science as a process: an evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• HulsenbeckJP. 1991. When are fossils better than extant taxa in phylogenetic analysis?Syst Zool. 40:458–469.
   Google Scholar
• HuxleyTH. 1858. The Croonian lecture. On the theory of the vertebrate skull. Proc R Soc Lond. 9:381–457.
   Google Scholar
• JanvierP. 1978. Les nageoires paires des osteostracés et la position systématique des céphalaspidomorphes. Ann Paléontol.64:113–142.
   Google Scholar
• JanvierP. 1996. Early vertebrates. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Janvier P. 1997. Craniata. Animals with skulls [Internet]. Version 01 January 1997. Available from: The Tree of Life Web Project.http://tolweb.org/tree?group = Craniata.
   Google Scholar
• JanvierP. 2008. Early jawless vertebrates and cyclostome origins. Zool Sci. 25(10):1045–1056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JanvierP. 2013. Developmental biology: led by the nose. Nature. 493:169–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KurakuS, HoshiyamaD, KatohK, SugaH, MiyataT. 1999. Monophyly of lampreys and hagfishes supported by nuclear DNA-coded genes. J Mol Evol. 49:729–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LankesterER. 1864. On the discovery of the scales of pteraspis, with some remarks on the cephalic shield of that fish. Quart J Geol Soc. 20:194–197.
   Google Scholar
• LøvtrupS. 1977. The phylogeny of vertebrata. New York (NY): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• MallatJ, SullivanJ. 1998. 28S and 28S rDNA sequences support the monophyly of lampreys and hagfishes. Mol Biol Evol. 15(12):1706–1718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MallatJ, SullivanJ, WinchellCJ. 2001. Major events in early vertebrate evolution: palaeontology, phylogeny, and development. London: Taylor and Francis. Chapter 7, The relationship of lampreys to hagfishes: a spectral analysis of ribosomal DNA sequences; p. 106–118.
   Google Scholar
• MarcusLF, BelloE, García-ValdecasasA. 1993. Contributions to morphometrics. Madrid: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales; p. 106–118.
   Google Scholar
• MedawarPB. 1945. Essays on growth and form presented to D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson. Oxford: Clarendon. Chapter 5, Size, shape, and age; p. 157–187.
   Google Scholar
• NelsonGJ. 1969. Gill arches and the phylogeny of fishes, with notes on the classification of vertebrates. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. 141:475–552.
   Google Scholar
• NelsonGJ. 1989. The hierarchy of life. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica. Chapter 15, Phylogeny of major fish groups; p. 325–336.
   Google Scholar
• NielsenC. 2012. The authorship of higher chordate taxa. Zool Scripta. 41:435–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NikaidoM, RooneyAP, OkadaN. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among cetartiodactyls based on insertions of short and long interpersed elements: hippopotamuses are the closest extant relatives of whales. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:10261–10266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NikitinaN, Bronner-FraserM, Sauka-SpenglerT. 2009. Emerging Model Organisms: A Laboratory Manual, Vol. 1. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Chapter 16, The sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus; p. 405–429.
   Google Scholar
• OisiY, OtaKG, KurakuS, FujimotoS, KurataniS. 2013. Craniofacial development of hagfishes and the evolution of vertebrates. Nature. 493:175–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OtaKG, FujimotoS, OisiY, KurataniS. 2011. Identification of vertebra-like elements and their possible differentiation from sclerotomes in the hagfish. Nat Commun. 2:373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OtaKG, KurakuS, KurataniS. 2007. Hagfish embryology with reference to the evolution of the neural crest. Nature. 446:672–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OtaKG, KurataniS. 2008. Developmental biology of hagfishes, with a report on newly obtained embryos of the Japanese inshore hagfish, Eptatretusburgeri. Zool Sci. 25:999–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PiavisGW. 1971. The biology of lampreys, Vol. 1. New York: Academic. Chapter 15, Embryology.
   Google Scholar
• RaffR. 2000. Evo-devo: the evolution of a new discipline. Nat Rev Gen. 1:74–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RaffR, LoveA. 2004. Kowalevsky, comparative evolutionary embryology, and the intellectual lineage of evo-devo. J Exp Zool Mol Dev Evol. 302B(1):19–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RasmussenAS, JankeA, ArnasonA. 1998. The mitochondrial DNA molecule of the hagfish (Myxineglutinosa) and vertebrate phylogeny. J Mol Evol. 46:382–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohlf FJ. 2004a. tpsSpline, thin-plate spline, version 1.20. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook.
   Google Scholar
• RohlfFJ. 2004b. tpsRelw, relative warp analysis, version 1.42. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook.
   Google Scholar
• RohlfFJ, BooksteinFL. 1990. Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop. Special Publication No. 2Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan Museum of Zoology.
   Google Scholar
• RohlfFJ, MarcusL. 1993. A revolution in morphometrics. TREE. 8:129–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchaefferB, ThomsonKS. 1980. Aspects of vertebrate history. Flagstaff: Museum of Northern Arizona. Chapter 2, Reflections on agnathan–cyclostome relationships.
   Google Scholar
• ShimeldMS, DonoghuePCJ. 2012. Evolutionary crossroads in developmental biology: cyclostomes (lamprey and hagfish). Development. 139:2091–2099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShuD-G, LuoH-L, MorrisSC, ZhangX-L, HuS-X, ChenL, HanJ, ZhuM, LiM, ChenL-Z. 1999. Lower Cambrian vertebrates from south China. Nature. 402:42–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StensiöE. 1958. Les cyclostomes fossils. Grasse Traite de Zoologie. Paris: Masson.
   Google Scholar
• StensiöEA. 1927. The Devonian and Downtonian vertebrates of Spitsbergen. 1. Family Cephalaspidae. Skr Sval Isha. 12:1–391.
   Google Scholar
• StensiöEA. 1968. Current problems of lower vertebrate phylogeny: Proceedings of the Fourth Nobel Symposium. Stockholm: Interscience. Chapter 2, The cyclostomes with special reference to the diphyletic origin of the Petromyzontidae and Myxinoidea; p. 13–71.
   Google Scholar
• StrahanR. 1958. Proceedings of the centenary and bicentenary congress of biology. Singapore: University of Malaya. Chapter 5, Speculations on the evolution of the agnathan head; p. 83–94.
   Google Scholar
• StrahanR, BranaganDF. 1977. Rare and curious specimens: an illustrated history of the Australian Museum, 1827–1979. Sydney: National government publication.
   Google Scholar
• TaharaY. 1988. Normal stages of development in the lamprey, Lampetra reissner (Dybowski). Zool Sci. 5:109–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TakezakiN, FigueroaF, Zaleska-RutczynskaZ, KleinJ. 2003. Molecular phylogeny of early vertebrates: monophyly of the agnathans as revealed by sequences of 35 genes. Mol Biol Evol. 20:287–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TelfordMJ. 2013. Field et al. redux. Evo Devo. 4:5–10.
   Google Scholar
• ThompsonDW. 1917. On growth and form. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• WichtH, NorthcuttRG. 1995. Ontogeny of the head of the Pacific hagfish (Eptatretusstouti, Myxinoidea): development of the lateral line system. Phil Trans R Soc Lond Ser B. 349:119–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WichtH, TuschU. 1998. The biology of hagfishes. London: Chapman and Hall. Chapter 20, Ontogeny of the head of nervous system of myxinoids; p. 431–451.
   Google Scholar
• ZardoyaR, MeyerA. 2001. Major events in early vertebrate evolution. London: Taylor and Francis. Chapter 7, Vertebrate phylogeny: limits of inference of mitochondrial genome and nuclear rDNA sequence data due to an adverse phylogenetic signal/noise ratio; p. 135–155.
   Google Scholar
• ZardoyaR, MeyerA. 2003. Recent advances in the (molecular) phylogeny of vertebrates. Ann Rev Eco Evol Syst. 34:311–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar