Unexpected microanatomical variation among Eocene Antarctic stem penguins (Aves: Sphenisciformes)

References

• AbramoffMD, MagalhaesPJ, RamSJ. 2004. Image processing with ImageJ.Biophot Int.11:36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Acosta HospitalecheC. 2004. Los pingüinos (Aves, Sphenisciformes) fósiles de Argentina. Sistemática, biogeografía y evolución [PhD thesis]. La Plata: Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
   Google Scholar
• AdamsNJ, BrownCR. 1990. Energetics of molt in penguins. In: DavisLS, DarbyJT, editors. Penguin biology. San Diego: Academic Press; p. 297–315.
   Google Scholar
• BaumelJJ, KingAS, BreazileJE, EvansHE, BergeVanden. 1993. Handbook of avian anatomy: nomina anatomica avium. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Publications of Nuttall Ornithological Club; p. 779.
   Google Scholar
• BoersmaPD, RebstockGA, StokesDL. 2004. Why penguin eggshells are thick. Auk. 121:148–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CanovilleA, LaurinM. 2010. Evolution of humeral microanatomy and lifestyle in amniotes, and some comments on palaeobiological inferences. Biol J Linn Soc. 100:384–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChinsamyA, MartinLD, DodsonP. 1998. Bone microstructure of the diving Hesperornis and the volant Ichthyornis from the Niobrara Chalk of western Kansas. Cret Res. 19:225–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChinsamyA, RaathMA. 1992. Preparation of fossil bone for histological examination. Palaeont Af. 29:39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Chinsamy TuranA. 2005. The microstructure of dinosaur bone: deciphering biology with fine-sacale techniques. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; p. 195.
   Google Scholar
• de BuffrénilV, Francillon-VieillotH. 2001. Ontogenetic changes in bone compactness in male and female Nile monitors (Varanus niloticus). J Zool Lond. 254:539–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de MargerieE, de RobinJP, VerrierD, CuboJ, CastanetJ. 2004. Assessing a relationship between bone microstructure and growth rate: a fluorescent labelling study in the king penguin chick (Aptenodytes patagonicus). J Exp Biol. 207:869–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de RicqlèsA, de BuffrénilV. 2001. Bone histology, heterochronies and the return of the tetrapods to life in water. where are we? In: MazinJ, de BuffrénilV, editors. Secondary adaptation of tetrapods to life in water. Friedrich Pfeil, Munchen: Verlag Dr; p. 367.
   Google Scholar
• Francillon-VieillotH, de BuffrénilV, CastanetJ, GéraudieJ, MeunierFJ, SireJY, ZylberbergL, de RicqlèsA. 1990. Microstructure and mineralization of vertebrate skeletal tisssues. In: CarterJG, editor. Skeletal biomineralization: patterns, processes and evolutionary trends. Vol. 1. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; p. 471–548.
   Google Scholar
• HabibMB, RuffCB. 2008. The effects of locomotion on the structural characteristics of avian limb bones. Zool J Linn Soc. 153:601–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HayashiS, HoussayeA, NakajimaY, ChibaK, AndoT, SawamuraH, InuzukaN, KanekoN, OsakiT. 2013. Bone inner structure suggests increasing aquatic adaptations in Desmostylia (Mammalia, Afrotheria). PLoS ONE. 8(4):e59146. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HémeryG. 2001. Biodiversity and adaptations of extant marine birds. In: MazinJM, de BuffrénilV, editors. Secondary adaptations of tetrapods to life in water. Munchen: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil; p. 119–139.
   Google Scholar
• HoussayeA. 2009. “Pachyostosis” in aquatic amniotes: a review. Integ Zool. 4:325–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoussayeA. 2013. Bone histology of aquatic reptiles: what does it tell us about secondary adaptation to an aquatic life?Biol J Linn Soc. 108:3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JadwiszczakP. 2001. Body size of Eocene Antarctic penguins. Pol Polar Res. 22:147–158.
   Google Scholar
• JadwiszczakP. 2006. Eocene penguins of Seymour Island, Antarctica: taxonomy. Pol Polar Res. 27:3–62.
   Google Scholar
• JadwiszczakP. 2012. Partial limb skeleton of a “giant penguin” Anthropornis from the Eocene of Antarctic Peninsula. Pol Polar Res. 33:259–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JadwiszczakP. 2013. Taxonomic diversity of Eocene Antarctic penguins: a changing picture. In: HambreyMJ, BarkerPF, BarrettPJ, BowmanV, DaviesB, SmellieJL, TranterM, editors. Antarctic palaeoenvironments and Earth-surface processes. Special Publications 381. London: Geological Society; p. 129–138.
   Google Scholar
• JadwiszczakP, Acosta HospitalecheC. 2013. Distinguishing between two Antarctic species of Eocene Palaeeudyptes penguins: a statistical approach using tarsometatarsi. Pol Polar Res. 34:237–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JadwiszczakP, MörsT. 2011. Aspects of diversity in early Antarctic penguins. Acta Pal Pol. 56:269–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KokubunN, TakahashiA, MoriY, WatanabeS, ShinHC. 2010. Comparison of diving behavior and foraging habitat use between chinstrap and gentoo penguins breeding in the South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Mar Biol. 157:811–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KriloffA, GermanD, CanovilleA, VincentP, SacheM, LaurinM. 2008. Evolution of bone microanatomy of the tetrapod tibia and its use in palaeobiological inference. J Evol Biol. 21:807–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KsepkaDT. 2007. Phylogeny, histology and functional morphology of fossil penguins (Aves: Sphenisciformes) [PhD thesis]. Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• MarenssiSA, SantillanaSN, RinaldiCA. 1998. Stratigraphy of the La Meseta Formation (Eocene), Marambio (Seymour) Island, Antarctica. In: CasadioS, editor. Paleógeno de América del Sur y de la Península Antártica. Publicación Especial 5. Argentina: Asociación Paleontológica; p. 137–146.
   Google Scholar
• MarplesBJ. 1953. Fossil penguins from the mid-Tertiary of Seymour Island. Falkland Is Dep Surv Sci Rep. 5:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• MeisterW. 1951. Changes in histological structure of the long bones of birds during the molt. Anat Rec. 111:1–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MeisterW. 1962. Histological structure of the long bone of penguins. Anat Rec. 143:377–386.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MyrchaA, TaturA, Del ValleR. 1990. A new species of fossil penguin from Seymour Island, West Antarctica. Alcheringa. 14:195–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MyrchaA, JadwiszczakP, TambussiCP, NoriegaJI, GaździckiA, TaturA, Del ValleR. 2002. Taxonomic revision of Eocene Antarctic penguins based on tarsometatarsal morphology. Pol Polar Res. 23:5–46.
   Google Scholar
• PrincePA, HarrisMP. 1988. Food and feeding ecology of breeding Atlantic alcidae and penguins. Proc Int Ornith Cong. 19:1205–1217.
   Google Scholar
• PycraftP. 1899. On the Osteology of the Impennes. Contributions to the Osteology of birds. Part II. Impennes. Auk. 16:1–363.
   Google Scholar
• RegueroMA, GoinFJ, Acosta HospitalecheC, MarenssiS, DutraT. 2012. Late Cretaceous/Paleogene west Antarctica terrestrial biota and its intercontinental affinities. Dordrecht: Springer Brief in Earth System Sciences; p. 120.
   Google Scholar
• SchweitzerMH, ElseyRM, DackeCG, HornerJR, LammET. 2007. Do egg-laying crocodilian (Alligator mississippiensis) archosaur form medullary bone?Bone. 40:1152–1158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SclafaniM, KsepkaD, SmithA. 2013. Evolutionary patterns in bone thickness and compactness in diving birds. 73rd meeting of The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, Los Angeles (J Vert Pal Supl).
   Google Scholar
• ShufeldtW. 1901. Osteology of the penguins. J Anat Physiol. 35:390–404.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SimpsonGG. 1946. Fossil penguins. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. 87:7–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StarckJM, ChinsamyA. 2002. Bone microstructure and developmental plasticity in birds and others dinosaurs. J Morph. 245:232–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TaleviM, FernándezMS, CerdaIA. 2011. Osteohistología en mosasaurios (Squamata; Mosasauridae) del Cretácico Tardío de la Cuenca James Ross (Península Antártica). Ameghiniana. 48:668–673.
   Google Scholar
• TambussiCP, Acosta HospitalecheCI, RegueroMA, MarenssiSA. 2006. Late Eocene penguins from West Antarctica: systematics and biostratigraphy. In: FrancisJE, PirrieD, CrameJA, editors. Cretaceous–Tertiary high-latitude palaeoenvironments, James Ross Basin, Antarctica, Special Publications 258. London: Geological Society; p. 145–161.
   Google Scholar
• TaylorMA. 2000. Functional significance of bone ballast in the evolution of buoyancy control strategies by aquatic tetrapods. Hist Biol. 14:15–31.
   Google Scholar
• TricheN. 2007. Systematics, biogeography, and evolutionary history of fossil and extant penguins (Aves: Sphenisciformes). [PhD thesis]. Austin: University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• WilsonRP, CulikB, SpairaniHJ, CoriaNR, AdelungD. 1991. Depth utilization by penguins and gentoo penguin dive patterns. J Ornith. 132:47–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WilsonS, ThorpBH. 1998. Estrogen and cancellous bone loss in the fowl. Calcif Tissue Int. 62:506–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WimanC. 1905. die alttertiären Vertebraten der Seymourinsel. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse Schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903. 3:1–37.
   Google Scholar