Can social and sexual selection explain the bizarre snout of proterosuchid archosauriforms?

References

• Andersson M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton (NJ): Princeton Univeristy Press; p. 599.
   Google Scholar
• Baczko MB von, Ezcurra MD. 2013. Ornithosuchidae. In: Nesbitt SJ, Desojo JB, Irmis RB, editors. Anatomy, phylogeny and palaeobiology of early archosaurs and their kin, vol. 379. London: Geological Society Special Publications; p. 187–202.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman AJ. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity. 2:349–368.10.1038/hdy.1948.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkovic B, Russell A. 2014. Sexual selection according to Darwin: a response to Padian and Horner’s interpretation. C R Palevol. 13:701–707.10.1016/j.crpv.2014.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botha-Brink J, Smith RMH. 2011. Osteohistology of the Triassic archosauromorphs Prolacerta, Proterosuchus, Euparkeria, and Erythrosuchus from the Karoo Basin of South Africa. J Vert Paleontol. 31:1238–1254.10.1080/02724634.2011.621797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broili F, Schröder J. 1934. Beobachtungen an Wirbeltieren der Karroo Formation. V. Über Chasmatosaurus vanhoepeni Haughton [Observations on vertebrates of the Karoo Formation. V. About Chasmatosaurus van Hoepen Haughton]. Sitz Bayer Akad Wiss Math-Nat Abt. 3:225–264 (in German).
   Google Scholar
• Brown CM, Vavrek MJ. 2015. Small sample sizes in the study of ontogenetic allometry; implications for palaeobiology. PeerJ. 3:e818.10.7717/peerj.818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bubien-Waluszewska A. 1981. The cranial nerves. In: King AS, McLelland J, editors. Form and function in birds, vol. 2. New York (NY): Academic Press; p. 385–438.
   Google Scholar
• Charig AJ, Reig OA. 1970. The classification of the Proterosuchia. Biol J Linn Soc. 2:125–171.10.1111/j.1095-8312.1970.tb01708.x
   Google Scholar
• Charig AJ, Sues H-D. 1976. Proterosuchia. In: Kuhn O, editor. Handbuch der Paläoherpetologie 13 [Handbook of Palaeoherpetology 13]. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer; p. 11–39.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S. 1974. A rhynchosaur from the Upper Triassic Maleri Formation of India. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B. 267:209–261.10.1098/rstb.1974.0001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clutton-Brock TH. 2007. Sexual selection in males and females. Science. 318:1882–1885.10.1126/science.1133311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clutton-Brock TH. 2009. Sexual selection in females. Anim Behav. 77:3–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper JS, Poole DFG, Lawson R. 1970. The dentition of agamid lizards with special reference to tooth replacement. J Zool. 162:85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruickshank ARI. 1972. The proterosuchian thecodonts. In: Joysey KA, Kemp TS, editors. Studies in vertebrate evolution. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd; p. 89–119.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin C. 1859. The origin of species by means of natural selection. London: John Murray; p. 502.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin C. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray; p. 828.10.5962/bhl.title.110063
   Google Scholar
• Dixson A, Dixson B, Anderson M. 2005. Sexual selection and the evolution of visually conspicuous sexually dimorphic traits in male monkeys, apes, and human beings. Annu Rev Sex Res. 16:1–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edmund AG. 1960. Tooth replacement phenomena in the lower vertebrates. Cont R Ontario Mus Life Sci Div. 52:1–190.
   Google Scholar
• Ezcurra MD. 2014. The osteology of the basal archosauromorph Tasmaniosaurus triassicus from the Lower Triassic of Tasmania, Australia. PLoS ONE. 9:e86864.10.1371/journal.pone.0086864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezcurra MD. 2015. Systematics and evolutionary history of proterosuchian archosauriforms [ PhD thesis]. Birmingham (AL): University of Birmingham; p. 576.
   Google Scholar
• Ezcurra MD, Butler RJ. 2015a. Taxonomy of the proterosuchid archosauriforms (Diapsida: Archosauromorpha) from the earliest Triassic of South Africa, and implications for the early archosauriform radiation. Palaeontology. 58:141–170.10.1111/pala.12130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezcurra MD, Butler RJ. 2015b. Post-hatchling cranial ontogeny in the Early Triassic diapsid reptile Proterosuchus fergusi. J Anat. 226:387–402.10.1111/joa.2015.226.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezcurra MD, Butler RJ, Gower DJ. 2013. ‘Proterosuchia’: the origin and early history of archosauriformes. In: Nesbitt SJ, JB Desojo, RB Irmis, editors. Anatomy, phylogeny and palaeobiology of early archosaurs and their kin. London: Geological Society Special Publications. 379; p. 9–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ezcurra MD, Lecuona A, Martinelli AG. 2010. A new basal archosauriform diapsid from the Lower Triassic of Argentina. J Vert Paleontol. 30:1433–1450.10.1080/02724634.2010.501446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezcurra MD, Scheyer TM, Butler RJ. 2014. The Origin and early evolution of Sauria: reassessing the permian saurian fossil record and the timing of the crocodile-lizard divergence. PLoS One. 9:e89165.10.1371/journal.pone.0089165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezcurra MD, Velozo P, Meneghel M, Piñeiro G. 2015. Early archosauromorph remains from the Permo-Triassic Buena Vista Formation of north-eastern Uruguay. PeerJ. 3:e776.10.7717/peerj.776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming IA, Gross MR. 1994. Breeding competition in a Pacific Salmon (Coho: Oncorhynchus kisutch): measures of natural and sexual selection. Evolution. 48:637–657.10.2307/2410475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami A, Polly PD, Mock OB, Sánchez-Villagra MR. 2012. Shape, variance and integration during craniogenesis: contrasting marsupial and placental mammals. J Evol Biol. 25:862–872.10.1111/jeb.2012.25.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould SJ. 1966. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol Rev. 41:587–638.10.1111/brv.1966.41.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gower DJ, Sennikov AG. 1997. Sarmatosuchus and the early history of the archosauria. J Vert Paleontol. 17:60–73.10.1080/02724634.1997.10010954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross MR. 1984. Sunfish, salmon, and the evolution of alternative reproductive strategies and tactics in fishes. In: Potts G, Wootton R, editors. Fish reproduction: strategies and tactics. London: Academic Press; p. 55–75.
   Google Scholar
• Gross MR. 1985. Disruptive selection for alternative life histories in salmon. Nature. 313:47–48.10.1038/313047a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross MR. 1987. Evolution of diadromy in fishes. Am Fish Soc Symp. 1:14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Gross MR. 1991. Salmon breeding behavior and life history evolution in changing environments. Ecology. 72:1180–1186.10.2307/1941091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday CM, Witmer LM. 2007. Archosaur adductor chamber evolution: integration of musculoskeletal and topological criteria in jaw muscle homology. J Morph. 268:457–484.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hone DWE, Faulkes CG. 2014. A proposed framework for establishing and evaluating hypotheses about the behaviour of extinct organisms. J Zool. 292:260–267.10.1111/jzo.12114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hone DWE, Naish D. 2013. The ‘species recognition hypothesis’ does not explain the presence and evolution of exaggerated structures in non-avialan dinosaurs. J Zool. 290:172–180.10.1111/jzo.2013.290.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hone DWE, Naish D, Cuthill IC. 2012. Does mutual sexual selection explain the evolution of head crests in pterosaurs and dinosaurs? Lethaia. 45:139–156.10.1111/let.2012.45.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hone DWE, Wood D, Knell RJ. 2016. Positive allometry for exaggerated structures in the ceratopsian dinosaur Protoceratops andrewsi supports socio-sexual signaling. Palaeontol Electron. 19.1.5A:1−13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosken DJ, House CM. 2011. Sexual selection. Curr Biol. 21:62–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim N, Sereno PC, Dal Sasso C, Maganuco S, Fabbri M, Martill DM, Zouhri S, Myhrvold N, Iurino DA. 2014. Semiaquatic adaptations in a giant predatory dinosaur. Science. 345:1613–1616.10.1126/science.1258750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones JL, Hunter FM. 1993. Mutual sexual selection in a monogamous seabird. Nature. 362:238–239.10.1038/362238a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick M, Price T, Arnold SJ. 1990. The Darwin–Fisher theory of sexual selection in monogamous birds. Evolution. 44:180–193.10.2307/2409533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knell RJ, Sampson S. 2011. Bizarre structures in dinosaurs: species recognition or sexual selection? A response to Padian and Horner. J Zool. 283:18–22.10.1111/jzo.2010.283.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knell RJ, Naish D, Tomkins JL, Hone DWE. 2013a. Sexual selection in prehistoric animals: detection and implications. TREE. 28:38–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knell RJ, Naish D, Tomkins JL, Hone DWE. 2013b. Is sexual selection defined by dimorphism alone? A reply to Padian and Horner. TREE. 28:250–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokko H, Brooks R. 2003. Sexy to die for? Sexual selection and the risk of extinction. Ann Zool Fenn. 40:207–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraaijeveld K. 2003. Degree of mutual ornamentation in birds is related to divorce rate. Proc R Soc Lond B. 270:1785–1791.10.1098/rspb.2003.2450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard Smith J, Harper D. 2003. Animal signals. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 396.
   Google Scholar
• Miller KM, Withler RE, Beacham TR. 1996. Stock identification of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) using minisatellite DNA variation. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 53:181–195.10.1139/f95-165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modesto SP, Sues H-D. 2004. The skull of the Early Triassic archosauromorph reptile Prolacerta broomi and its phylogenetic significance. Zool J Linn Soc. 140:335–351.10.1111/zoj.2004.140.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesbitt SJ. 2011. The early evolution of archosaurs: relationships and the origin of major clades. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. 352:1–292.10.1206/352.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochev VG. 1961. New thecodont from the Triassic of the Orenburg region of the Cis-Urals. Paleontol J. 1961:161–162 (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Padian K, Horner JR. 2011a. The evolution of ‘bizarre structures’ in dinosaurs: biomechanics, sexual selection, social selection or species recognition? J Zool. 283:3–17.10.1111/jzo.2010.283.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padian K, Horner JR. 2011b. The definition of sexual selection and its implications for dinosaurian biology. J Zool. 283:23–27.10.1111/jzo.2010.283.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padian K, Horner JR. 2013. Misconceptions of sexual selection and species recognition: a response to Knell et al and to Mendelson and Shaw. TREE. 28:249–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padian K, Horner JR. 2014. The species recognition hypothesis explains exaggerated structures in non-avialan dinosaurs better than sexual selection does. C R Palevol. 13:97–107.10.1016/j.crpv.2013.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie M, Halliday T, Sanders C. 1991. Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains. Anim Behav. 41:323–331.10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80484-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitman ETG. 1939. A note on normal correlation. Biometrika. 31:9–12.10.1093/biomet/31.1-2.9
   Google Scholar
• Quinn TP, Dittman AH. 1990. Pacific salmon migrations and homing: mechanisms and adaptive significance. TREE. 5:174–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Reig OA. 1970. The Proterosuchia and the early evolution of the archosaurs; an essay about the origin of a major taxon. Bull Mus Comp Zool. 139:229–292.
   Google Scholar
• Sanvito S, Galimberti F, Miller EH. 2007. Vocal signalling of male southern elephant seals is honest but imprecise. Anim Behav. 73:287–299.10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargent RC, Gross MR, van den Berghe EP. 1986. Male mate choice in fishes. Anim Behav. 34:545–550.10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80123-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroder SL. 1982. The influence of intrasexual competition on the distribution of chum salmon in an experimental stream. In: Brannon EL, Salo EO, editors. Salmon and trout migratory behavior symposium. Seattle (WA): University of Washington Press; p. 275–285.
   Google Scholar
• Sedlmayr JC. 2002. Anatomy, evolution, and functional significance of cephalic vasculature in archosauria [ PhD thesis]. Athens (OH): Ohio University; p. 398.
   Google Scholar
• Sennikov AG. 1994. The first Middle Triassic proterosuchid from eastern Europe. Dokl Akad Nauk. 336:659–661 (in Russian).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennikov AG. 1996. Evolution of the Permian and Triassic tetrapod communities of Eastern Europe. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 120:331–351.10.1016/0031-0182(95)00041-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small BJ. 1997. A new procolophonid from the Upper Triassic of Texas, with a description of tooth replacement and implantation. J Vert Paleontol. 17:674–678.10.1080/02724634.1997.10011016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RJ. 2009. Use and misuse of the reduced major axis for line-fitting. Am J Phys Anthropol. 140:476–486.10.1002/ajpa.v140:3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RMH, Botha J. 2005. The recovery of terrestrial vertebrate diversity in the South African Karoo Basin after the end-Permian extinction. C R Palevol. 4:623–636.10.1016/j.crpv.2005.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatarinov LP. 1961. Pseudosuchians of the USSR. Paleontol J. 1961:117–132 (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Thulborn RA. 1980. The ankle joints of archosaurs. Alcheringa. 4:241–261.10.1080/03115518008558970
   Google Scholar
• Tobias JA, Montgomerie R, Lyon BE. 2012. The evolution of female ornaments and weaponry: social selection, sexual selection and ecological competition. Phil Trans R Soc B. 367:2274–2293.10.1098/rstb.2011.0280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trivers RL. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B, editor. Sexual selection and the descent of man. Chicago (IL): Aldine; p. 136–179.
   Google Scholar
• Warton DI, Wright IJ, Falster DS, Westoby M. 2006. Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biol Rev. 81:259–291.10.1017/S1464793106007007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warton DI, Duursma RA, Falster DS, Taskinen S. 2012. SMATR 3 – an R package for estimation and inference about allometric lines. Methods Ecol Evol. 3:257–259.10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00153.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West-Eberhard MJ. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q Rev Biol. 58:155–183.10.1086/413215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witmer LM. 1995. Homology of facial structures in extant archosaurs (birds and crocodilians), with special reference to paranasal pneumaticity and nasal conchae. J Morphol. 225:269–327.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahavi A. 1975. Mate selection – a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol. 53:205–214.10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahavi A, Zahavi A. 1999. The handicap principle: a missing piece of Darwins puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 304.
   Google Scholar