Ungual phalanges analysis in Pleistocene ground sloths (Xenarthra, Folivora)

References

• Alexander, RMcN. 1983. On the massive legs of a moa (Pachyornis elephantopus, Dinornithes). J Zool. 201(3):363–376.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander R McN. 1985. Body size and limb design in Primates and other mammals. In: Jungers WL, editor. Size and scaling in primate biology. New York (NY): Plenum Press; p. 337–343.10.1007/978-1-4899-3647-9
   Google Scholar
• Aramayo S. 1988. Nuevos restos de Proscelidodon sp. (Edentata, Mylodontidae) del yacimiento de Monte Hermoso (Plioceno Inferior a Medio) Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina Estudio morfológico funcional’ – Actas Segundas Jornadas Geológicas Bonaerenses [New remains of Proselidodon sp. (Edentata, Mylodontidae) from the Monte Hermoso deposit (Lower to Middle Pliocene) Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina Morphological and functional study] 2:99–107.
   Google Scholar
• Bargo MS, Vizcaíno SF, Archuby FM, Blanco RE. 2000. Limb bone proportions, strength and digging in some lujanian (late pleistocene-early holocene) mylodontidgound sloths (Mammalia, Xenarthra). J Vertebr Paleontol. 20:601–610.10.1671/0272-4634(2000)020[0601:LBPSAD]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birn-Jeffery AV, Miller CE, Naish D, Rayfield EJ, Hone DWE. 2012. Pedal claw curvature in birds, lizards and mesozoic dinosaurs – complicated categories and compensating for mass-specific and phylogenetic control. PLoS One. 7(12):e50555. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco RE, Rinderknecht A. 2008. Estimation of hearing capabilities of Pleistocene ground sloths (Mammalia, Xenarthra) from middle-ear anatomy. J Vertebr Paleontol. 28:274–276.10.1671/0272-4634(2008)28[274:EOHCOP]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen P, Fariña RA. 2003. Mass estimation of two fossil ground sloths (Mammalia, Xenarthra, Mylodontidae). Senckenbergianabiologica. 83:95–101.
   Google Scholar
• Coombs MC. 1983. Large mammalian clawed herbivores: a comparative study. Trans Am Philos Soc. 73:1–96.10.2307/3137420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuenca Anaya J. 1995. El aparato locomotor de los escelidoterios (Edentata, Mammalia) y su paleobiologfa. Adjuntament de Valen-cia, Colecci6n “Estudis”, 6; p. 452.
   Google Scholar
• Dececchi TA, Larsson HCE. 2011. Assessing arboreal adaptations of bird antecedents: testing the ecological setting of the origin of the avian flight stroke. PLoS One. 6:e22292.10.1371/journal.pone.0022292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deligne J, Quennedey A, Blum MS. 1981. The enemies and defense mechanisms of termites. Social insects. 2:1–76.
   Google Scholar
• Dondas A, Isla FI, Carballido JL. 2009. Paleocaves exhumed from the Miramar Formation (Ensenadan Stage-age, Pleistocene), Mar del Plata, Argentina. Quat Int. 210:44–50.10.1016/j.quaint.2009.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubost G. 1968. Les mammifères souterrains. Revue d’Écologie et de Biologie du Sol. 5:135–197.
   Google Scholar
• Emmons LH, Feer F. 1999. Mamíferos de los Bosques Húmedos de América Tropical. Una guía de campo. In: Based on revised English second edition. Santa Cruz, Bolivia: Editorial FAN; p. 175–177.
   Google Scholar
• Fariña RA. 1995. Limb bone strength and habits in large glyptodonts. Lethaia. 28(3):189–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fariña RA. 1996. Trophic relationships among Lujanian mammals. Evol Theory. 11:125–134.
   Google Scholar
• Fariña RA, Blanco RE. 1996. Megatherium, the Stabber. Proc R Soc Lond B. 263:1725–1729.10.1098/rspb.1996.0252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fariña RA, Vizcaı́no SF, Blanco RE. 1997. Scaling of the indicator of athletic capability in fossil and extant land tetrapods. Journal of theoretical Biology. 185:441–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fariña RA, Vizcaíno SF, De Iuliis G. 2013. Megafauna: Giant beasts of Pleistocene South America. Bloomington (IN): primera edición; p. 182–183.
   Google Scholar
• Feduccia A. 1993. Evidence from claw geometry indicating arboreal habits of Archaeopteryx. Science. 259:790–793.10.1126/science.259.5096.790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frechkop S. 1949. Notes sur les Mammifères XXXVI. Explication biologique, fournie par les tatous, d’un des caracteÁres distinctifs analogues chez les pangolins. Bull Inst R Sci Nat Belg. 25:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Frechkop S. 1950. La locomotion et la structure des tatous et des pangolins. An Soc R Zool Belg. 80:5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gambarayan PP. 1974. How mammals run. New York (NY): Wiley; p. 367.
   Google Scholar
• Grzimek B. 2003. Grzimek’s animal life encyclopedia mammals. Detroit (MI): Thomson Gale.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrand M. 1974. Analysis of vertebrate structure. New York (NY): Wiley; p. 701.
   Google Scholar
• Lessertisseur J, Saban R. 1967. Squelette appendiculaire. Traité de Zoologie. 16:709–1078.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod N, Rose KD. 1993. Inferring locomotor behavior in Paleogene mammals via eigenshape analysis. Am J Sci 293: 300–355.10.2475/ajs.293.A.300
   Google Scholar
• McDonald HG, De Iullis G. 2008. Fossils history of sloths. Vizcaíno SF, Loughry WJ, editors. The biology of Xenarthra. Gainesville (FL): University Press of Florida; p. 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Medri IM, Miranda Mourao G, Guimarães Rodríguez FH. 2006. Orden Xenathra. In: Reis NR, Peracchi AL, Pedro WA, Passos de Lima I, editors. En: Mamíferos do Brasil. Londrina: Editorial Londrina; p. 437.
   Google Scholar
• Nevo E. 1979. Adaptive convergence and divergence of subterranean mammals. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 10:269–308.10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.001413
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, J. 2004. “Cabassous tatouay” (On-line). Armadillos Online. Se accedió el 20 de Noviembre de 2013 a. Available from: http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/accounts/Cabassous_tatouay/
   Google Scholar
• Nowak R. 1999. Walker’s mammals of the world. 6th ed. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom JH. 1985. The meaning of Archaeopteryx. In: Hecht MK, Ostrom JH, Viohl G, Wellnhofer P, editors. Procceedings of the International Archaeopteryx Conference; Eichstatt; p. 161–176.
   Google Scholar
• Owen R. 1842. Description of the skeleton of an extinct gigantic sloth, Mylodon robustus, Owen, with observations on the osteology, natural affinities, and probable habits of the megatherioid quadruped in general. London: R. & J. E. Taylor; p. 176.
   Google Scholar
• Owen R. 1851. On the Megatherium (Megatherium americanum, BLUMENBACH).I.Preliminary observations on the exogenous processes of vertebrae. Philos Trans R Soc. 141:719–764.10.1098/rstl.1851.0035
   Google Scholar
• Pike AVL, Maitland DP. 2004. Scaling of bird claws. J Zool. 262:73–81.10.1017/S0952836903004382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pujos F, De Iuliis G, Argot C, Werdelin L. 2007. A peculiar climbing Megalonychidae from the Pleistocene of Peru and its implication for sloth history. Zool J Linn Soc. 149:179–235.10.1111/zoj.2007.149.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pujos F, Gaudin TJ, De Iuliis G, Cartelle C. 2012. Recent advances on variability, morpho-functional adaptations, dental terminology, and evolution of sloths. J Mamm Evol. 19:159–169.10.1007/s10914-012-9189-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintana CA. 1992. Estructura interna de una paleocueva, posiblemente de un Dasypodidae (Mammalia, Edentata), del Pleistoceno de Mar del Plata (Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina). Amegh-iniana. 29:87–91.
   Google Scholar
• Uicker JJ Jr, Pennock GR, Shigley JE. 2003. Theory of machines and mechanisms. 3rd ed. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Valkenburgh B. 1985. Locomotor diversity within past and present guilds of large predatory mammals. Paleobiology. 11:406–428.10.1017/S0094837300011702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vizcaíno SF. 1990. Sistemática y Evolución de los Dasypodinae Bonaparte, 1838 (Mammalia, Dasypodidae) [ PhD dissertation]. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
   Google Scholar
• Vizcaíno SF, Bargo MS. 1998. The masticatory apparatus of the armadillo Eutatus (Mammalia, Cingulata) and some allied genera. Paleobiol Evol Paleobiol. 24:371–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vizcaíno SF, Fariña RA. 1997. Diet and locomotion of the armadillo Peltephilus: a new view. Lethaia. 30:79–86. Oslo. ISSN 0024-1164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vizcaíno SF, Fariña RA, Mazzetta GV. 1999. Ulnar dimensions and fossoriality in armadillos. Theriologica. 44:309–320.10.4098/0001-7051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vizcaíno SF, Milne N. 2002. Structure and function in armadillo limbs (Mammalia: Xenarthra: Dasypodidae). J Zool. 257:117–127.10.1017/S0952836902000717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vizcaíno SF, Milne N, Bargo MS. 2003. Limb reconstruction of Eutatus seguini (Mammalia: Xenarthra: Dasypodidae). Paleobiological implications. Ameghiniana (Rev Asoc Paleontol Argent). 40:89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Vizcaíno SF, Zárate M, Bargo MS, Dondas A. 2001. Pleistocene burrows in the Mar del Plata area (Argentina) and their probable builders. Acta Palaeontol Polonica. 46:289–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzel RM. 1985. Taxonomy and distribution of armadillos, Dasypodidae. In: Ontgomery GG, editor. en: The evolution and ecology of armadillos, sloths and vermilinguas. Washington: Smithsonian Institution; p. 23–46.
   Google Scholar
• Winge H. 1941. Edentates (Edentata); pp. In: Jensen S, Sparck R, Volsoe H, editors. The Interrelationships of the Mammalia Genera. Copenhagen: Reitzels Forlag; p. 319–341.
   Google Scholar
• Yalden DW. 1985. Forelimb function in Archaeopteryx. In: Hecht MK, Ostrom JH, Viohl G, Wellnhofer P, editors. The beginnings of birds. Eichstätt: Eichstätt Freunde des Jura-Museums; p. 91–97.
   Google Scholar
• Zarate MA, Bargo MS, Vizcaino SE, Dondas A, Scaglia O. 1998. Estructuras biogénicas en el Cenozoico tardío de Mar del Plata (Argentina) atribuibles a grandes mamíferos. Revista de la Sociedad Argentina de Sedimentología. 5:95–103.
   Google Scholar