Publication Cover
Historical Biology
An International Journal of Paleobiology
Volume 33, 2021 - Issue 6
162
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Geometric morphometrics of large South American camelids and their potential for the taxonomical identification in archaeological sites of the northern Argentina

&
Pages 823-836 | Received 11 Jul 2019, Accepted 02 Sep 2019, Published online: 25 Sep 2019

References

  • Ackermann R. 2002. Patterns of covariation in the hominoid craniofacial skeleton: implications for paleoanthropological models. J Hum Evol. 42:167–187.
  • Adams DC, Rohlf FJ, Slice DE. 2004. Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’. Ital J Zool. 71:5–16.
  • Adams DC, Rohlf FJ, Slice DE. 2013. A field comes of age: geometric morphometrics in the 21st century. Hystrix Ital J Mammal. 24(1):7–14.
  • Aiello G, Barattolo F, Barra D, Fiorito G, Mazzarella A, Raia P, Raffaele V. 2007. Fractal analysis of ostracod shell variability: a comparison with geometric and classic morphometrics. Acta Palaeontol Pol. 52(3):563–573.
  • Allowen E, Cucchi T, Cardini A, Strand Vidarsdottirf U, Larsong G, Dobney K. 2013. The long and winding road: identifying pig domestication through molar size and shape. J Archaeol Sci. 40:735–743.
  • Balasse M, Evin A, Tornero C, Radu V, Fiorillo D, Popovici D, Andreescu R, Dobney K, Cucchi T, Ba˘la˘sescu A. 2016. Wild, domestic and feral? Investigating the status of suids in the Romanian Gumelniţa (5th mil. cal BC) with biogeochemistry and geometric morphometrics. J Anthropol Archaeol. 42:27–36.
  • Basílico S. 1992. Pueblo Viejo de la Cueva (Dpto. de Humahuaca, Jujuy). Resultados de las excavaciones en un sector del asentamiento [Pueblo Viejo de la Cueva (Department of Humahuaca, Jujuy) excavations results from a sector of the settlement]. Cuadernos FHYCS-UNJU. 3:108–127. Spanish.
  • Bastir M, Rosas A, Sheets HD. 2005. The morphological integration of the hominoid skull: a partial least squares and PC analysis with implications for European Middle Pleistocene mandibular variation. In: Slice D, editor. Modern morphometrics in physical anthropology. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; p. 265–284.
  • Bergman C. 1847. Ueber die verhaltnisse der warmeokonomie der thierezuihrer grosse. Gott Studien 3:595–708.
  • Behrensmeyer AK. 1978. Taphonomic and ecologic information from bone weathering. Paleobiology. 4:150–162.
  • Benavente MA. 1997–1998. Determinación de especies animales en la Arqueología. Un enfoque zooarqueológico [Animal species determination in Archaeology. A zooarchaeology approach]. Rev Chilena Antropol. 14:105–112. Spanish.
  • Bignon-Lau O, Eisenmann V. 2006. Western European late glacial horse diversity and its ecological implications. In: Mashkour M, editor. Equids in Time and Space. Chippenham: Oxbow Books; p. 161–171.
  • Bookstein FL. 1996. Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis. Bull Math Biol. 58:313–365.
  • Buchanan B, Collard M, Hamilton M, O’Brien M. 2011. Points and prey: a quantitative test of the hypothesis that prey sizes influences early Paleoindian projectile point form. J Archaeol Sci. 38:852–864.
  • Buchanan B, O’Brien M, Collard M. 2014. Continent-wide or region-specific? A geometric morphometrics-based assessment of variation in Clovis point shape. J Archaeol Sci. 6:145–162.
  • Buchanan B, O’Brien M, Kilby J, Huckelly B, Collard M. 2012. An assessment of the impact of hafting on paleoindian point variability. PLoS One. 7(5):e36364.
  • Cardillo M. 2010. Some applications of geometric morphometrics to archaeology. In: Elewa A, editor. Morphometrics for nonmorphometricians. Verlag-Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer; p. 325–355.
  • Cartajena I. 2009. Explorando la variabilidad morfométrica del conjunto de camélidos pequeños durante el Arcaico Tardío y el Formativo Temprano en Quebrada Tulán, norte de Chile [Exploring the morphometric variability of lesser camelids from Quebrada Tulán (northern Chile) during the Late Archaic and Early Formative]. Rev Mus Antr. 2:199–214. Spanish.
  • Cartajena I, Nuñez L, Grosjean M. 2007. Camelid domestication on the western slope of the Puna de Atacama, northern Chile. Anthropozoologica. 42:155–173.
  • Charlin J, Cardillo M, Borrazzo K. 2014. Spatial patterns in late holocene lithic projectile point technology of Tierra del Fuego (Southern South America): assessing size and shape changes. World Archaeol. 46(1):78–100.
  • Charlin J, Hernández Llosas MI. 2016. Morfometría geométrica y representaciones rupestres: explorando las aplicaciones de los métodos basados en landmarks [Geometric morphometrics and rock art: exploring landmark-based methods]. Arqueología/Buenos Aires. 22(1):103–125. Spanish.
  • Conte B, Izeta A 2019. Aplicación de morfometría 3D en primeras falanges de camélidos arqueológicos del sitio Alero Deodoro Roca (Ongamira, Córdoba, Argentina). Proceedings of the V National Congress of Argentine Zooarchaeology; Apr 23–27; San Fernando del Valle de Catamarca: National University of Catamarca. p. 98–99.
  • Curram SC. 2012. Expanding ecomorphological methods: geometric morphometric analysis of Cervidae post-crania. J Archaeol Sci. 39:1172–1182.
  • Dantas M. 2012. Identificación interespecífica de camélidos en el valle de Ambato (Catamarca, Argentina): una aproximación a la problemática de distintas líneas de análisis [Interspecific identification of camelids in Ambato valley (Catamarca, Argentina): an approach to the issue from different analytical frameworks]. Rev Mus Antr. 5:259–268. Spanish.
  • Elkin D. 1995. Volume density of South American camelid skeletal parts. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 5:29–37.
  • Elkin D, Rosenfeld S. 2000. Análisis faunístico de Pintoscayoc 1 (Jujuy) [Faunal analysis of Pintoscayoc 1 (Jujuy)]. In: Mengoni Goñalons G, Olivera D, Yacobaccio HD, editors. El uso de los camélidos a través del tiempo [The use of camelids through time]. Buenos Aires: Del Tridente edition; p. 29–64.
  • Fernández Blanco MV, Cassini GH, Bona P. 2014. Variación Morfológica Craneana en Caiman (Alligatoridae, Caimaninae): estudio morfogeométrico de la ontogenia de las especies Caiman latirostris y Caiman yacare [Cranial morphological variation in caiman (Alligatoridae, Caimaninae): a geometric morphometrics study of the ontogeny in the species Caiman latirostris and Caiman yacare]. Cs Morfol. 16(1):16–30. Spanish.
  • Gasco A, Cardillo M 2014. Caracterización morfométrica de la categoría “guanaco andino” (Lama guanicoe) en el Centro-Oeste Argentino. Un estudio actual osteométrico como base para análisis zooarqueológicos [Morphometric characterization of the “Andean guanaco” category (Lama guanicoe) in the Argentina west-center. A current osteometric study as a basis for zooarchaeological analysis]. In: Izeta A, Giardina M, Gil A, Gutierrez M, Neme G, Otaola C, Zangrando A compilers eds. Proceedings of the 12th ICAZ International Conference of Archaeozoology; Sep 22–27; San Rafael, Córdoba: National University of Córdoba. p. 63–64. Spanish.
  • González-José R, Cátira Bortolini M, Santos FR, Bonatto SL. 2008. The PEOPLING of America: craniofacial shape variation on a continental scale and its interpretation from an interdisciplinary view. Am J Phys Ant. 137:175–187.
  • González-José R, González-Martín A, Hernández M, Pucciarelli H, Sardi M, Rosales A, Van der Molen S. 2003. Craniometric evidence for Palaeoamerican survival in Baja California. Nature. 425:62–65.
  • González-José R, Martínez-Abadías N, González-Martín A, Bautista-Martínez J, Gómez-Valdés J, Quinto M, Hernández M. 2007. Detection of a population replacement at the classic–postclassic transition in Mexico. Proc Roy Soc B-Biol Sc. 274:681–688.
  • Gould FDH. 2017. Testing the role of cursorial specializations as adaptive key innovations in paleocene-eocene ungulates of North America. J Mammal Evol. 24:453–463.
  • Grant J. 2010. Aportes de distintas técnicas osteométricas para la identificación interespecífica de camélidos sudamericanos [Contributions of different osteometric techniques for the interspecific identification of South American camelids]. In: Gutiérrez M, de Nigris M, Fernández P, Giardina M, Gil A, Izeta A, Neme G, Yacobacci HD, editors. Zooarqueología a principios del siglo XXI. Aportes teóricos, metodológicos y casos de estudio [Zooarchaeology at the beginning of the 21st century. Theoretical and methodological contributions and study cases]. Buenos Aires: del Espinillo editions; p. 17–28. Spanish.
  • Grant J 2014. Manejo económico de camélidos en Antofagasta de la Sierra (Puna Meridional Argentina): una aproximación zooarqueológica e isotópica [Economic management of camelids in Antofagasta de la Sierra (Argentina Meridional Puna): a zooarchaeological and isotopic approach] [Unpublished PhD thesis]. Buenos Aires: University of Buenos Aires.
  • Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electrónica. 4(1):9.
  • Hernández A 2016. Un enfoque morfogeométrico para el estudio de la diversidad taxonómica de los camélidos sudamericanos de gran porte (Lama glama, Lama guanicoe). Proceedings of the XIX Argentine National Archeology Congress; Aug. 8–12; San Miguel de Tucumán: National University of Tucuman, Serie Monog Didáctica. vol. 54, p. 94–98. Spanish.
  • Hernández A 2019. Caza y pastoreo en el sector norte y nacientes de la Quebrada de Humahuaca durante el Holoceno Tardío [Hunting and herding in the northern sector and origin of the Humahuaca Quebrada during the Late Holocene] [Unpublished PhD thesis]. Rosario: National University of Rosario.
  • Ibañez AL, Cowx IG, O’Higgins P. 2007. Geometric morphometric analysis of fish scales for identifying genera, species, and local populations within the Mugilidae. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 6:1091–1100.
  • Izeta A, Otaola C, Gasco A. 2009. Osteometría de falanges proximales de camélidos sudamericanos modernos. Variabilidad, estándares métricos y su importancia como conjunto comparativo para la interpretación de restos hallados en contextos arqueológicos [South American camelids proximal phalanges osteometry. Variability, metric standards and its importance as a comparative set for the interpretation of remains from archaeological contexts]. Rev Mus Antr. 2(1):169–180. Spanish.
  • Kaufmann C. 2009. Estructura de Edad y Sexo en Lama guanicoe (Guanaco). Estudios actualísticos y arqueológicos en Pampa y Patagonia [Age and sex structure in Lama guanicoe (Guanaco). Actualistics and archaeological studies in Pampa and Patagonia]. Buenos Aires: Argentine Society of Anthropology.
  • Kaufmann C, L’Heureux GL. 2009. El dimorfismo sexual en guanacos (Lama guanicoe). Una evaluación osteométrica de elementos poscraneales [Sexual dimorphism in guanacos (Lama guanicoe). An osteometric evaluation of postcranial elements]. Rev Mus Antr. 2:181–198. Spanish.
  • Kent JK 1982. The domestication and exploitation of the South American camelids: methods of analysis and their application to circum-lacustrine archaeological sites in Bolivia and Peru [Unpublished PhD thesis]. St. Louis: Washington University.
  • Klingenberg CP. 2010. Evolution and development of shape: integrating quantitative approaches. Nat Rev Genet. 11:623–635.
  • Klingenberg CP. 2011. MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol Ecol Resour. 11:353–357.
  • Kovarovic K, Aiello L, Cardini A, Lockwood C. 2011. Discriminant function analyses in archaeology: are classification rates too good to be true? J Archaeol Sci. 38:3006–3018.
  • L’Heureux GL 2008. El estudio arqueológico del proceso coevolutivo entre las poblaciones humanas y las poblaciones de guanaco en Patagonia Meridional y norte de Tierra del Fuego [The archaeological study of the coevolutionary process between human and guanaco population in meridional Patagonia and nothern of Tierra del Fuego]. Oxford: Brit Archaeol Rep Int. Series 1751. Spanish.
  • L’Heureux GL. 2009. Pautas metodológicas para el análisis osteométrico de Lama guanicoe [Methodological guidelines for the osteometric analysis of Lama guanicoe]. In: Palacios MP, Vázquez C, Palacios T, Cabanillas E, editors. Latin American archeometry: second Argentine congress and first latin American congress. Buenos Aires: Graphic Workshops of Constituyentes Atomic Center-National Atomic Energy Commission of Argentina; p. 314–320. Spanish.
  • L’Heureux GL. 2010a. Morfometría de camélidos sudamericanos modernos. La variabilidad morfológica y la diversidad taxonómica [Morphometric of modern South American camelids. The morphological variation and the taxonomic diversity]. In: Gutiérrez M, de Nigris M, Fernández P, Giardina M, Gil A, Izeta A, Neme G, Yacobaccio HD, editors. Zooarqueología a principios del siglo XXI. Aportes teóricos, metodológicos y casos de studio [Zooarchaeology at the beginning of the 21st century. Theoretical and methodological contributions and study cases]. Buenos Aires: del Espinillo edition. p. 39–49. Spanish.
  • L’Heureux GL. 2010b. Estudio biométrico de las primeras falanges de camélidos modernos. Sus implicancias en el análisis de muestras arqueológicas [Biometric study of the first phalanx of modern camelids and its implication in the analysis of archaeological samples]. Werkén. 12:109–121. Spanish.
  • L’Heureux GL, Cornaglia Fernández J. 2015. Lama Guanicoe (Müller, 1776) body size in continental Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego. Geobios. 48(3):239–248.
  • L’Heureux GL, Hernández A 2015. Diversidad taxonómica y variabilidad morfológica de los grandes camélidos sudamericanos (Lama guanicoe; Lama glama). Proceedings of the III Meeting of Morphometry; Sep 24–25; Santa Fe. Santa Fe (AR): National Institute of Limology, Association of Natural Sciences of the Litoral.
  • L’Heureux GL, Hernández A 2016a. El uso de la Morfometría Geométrica en la identificación arqueológica de camélidos sudamericanos de sitios del sector norte de la quebrada de Humahuaca [The use of geometrics morphometrics for the archaeological identification of South American camelids from sites of the nothern sector of Huahuaca quebrada]. In: Salemme M, Santiago F, Tivoli A, Vázquez M, Zangrando AF compilers eds. Proceedings of IV National Congress of Argentine Zooarchaeology; Oct 3–7; Ushuaia: National University of Tierra del Fuego. p. 115.
  • L’Heureux GL, Hernández A. 2016b. Estudio morfogeométrico de las primeras falanges delanteras de los grandes camélidos sudamericanos [A geometric morphometric study of the first front phalanges of the South American Camelids]. Cs Morfol. 18(2):17–26. Spanish.
  • L’Heureux GL, Kaufmann C 2012. Estimación sexual de individuos juveniles de Lama guanicoe (Müller 1776) a partir del análisis morfológico de las pelvis no fusionadas. Proceedings of the II Latin American mastozoology congress and XXV Argentine mastozoology conference; Nov 6–9; Buenos Aires.
  • L’Heureux GL, Kaufmann C 2013. Ontogenia y dimorfismo sexual en pelvis de Lama guanicoe: evaluación morfológica de una colección de pelvis modernas. Proceedings of the II meeting of morphometry and ontogenetic studies; Jun 7; Rev Mus La Plata, Zoology 21 (179). p. 19R.; La Plata.
  • Lavallée D, Julien M, Karlin C, García L, Pozzi-Escot D, Fontugne M. 1997. Entre desierto y quebrada. Primeros resultados de las excavaciones realizadas en el abrigo de Tomayoc (Puna de Jujuy, Argentina) [Preliminary results of the excavation at the Tomayoc rockshelters (Jujuy Puna, Argentina)]. Bol Inst Francés Estud Andinos. 2:141–175. Spanish.
  • Leoni JB. 2007. Investigaciones arqueológicas en Antumpa y la Quebrada de Chaupi Rodeo (depto. Humahuaca, Jujuy): contribuciones al estudio del periodo temprano en el sector norte de la quebrada de Humahuaca [Archaeological investigations in Antumpa and Chaupi Rodeo quebrada (Humahuaca, Jujuy): contributions to the study of early period in the nothern sector of Humahuaca quebrada]. Rev Esc Antropol. XIII:183–196. Spanish.
  • Leoni JB, Fabron G, Tamburini D, Hernández A, Brancatelli C. 2014. Cóndor 2, un sitio del período de Desarrollo Regionales 1 en el sector norte de la Quebrada de Humahuaca, Jujuy [Condor 2, a local development 1 period site in the northern sector of the Humahuaca Quebrada, Jujuy]. Estud Soc NOA. 13:125–146. Spanish.
  • Leoni JB, Sartori J, Fabron G, Hernández A, Scarafia G. 2012. Aportes al conocimiento de las sociedades aldeanas del Período Temprano en la Quebrada de Humahuaca: una visión desde Antumpa [Contributions to the characterization of early ceramic period village societies in the quebrada de Humahuaca: a view from Antumpa]. Intersecciones Antropol. 13:117–131. Spanish.
  • Leoni JB, Tamburini D, Fabron G, Hernández A, Brancatelli C. 2015. Análisis de un conjunto material del primer milenio D.C. del sitio Antumpa (Dpto. Humahuaca, Jujuy). El caso del sector Terraza [Analysis of a material set from the first millennium DC from Antumpa site (Department of Humahuaca, Jujuy).The case of terrace sector]. Anu Arqueol. 7:111–130. Spanish.
  • López G. 2003. Pastoreo y caza de camélidos en el Temprano de la Puna de Salta: datos osteométricos del sitio Matancillas 2 [Grazing and hunting of camelids in the early of salta puna: osteometrics data from Matancillas 2 site]. Intersecciones Antropol. 4:17–27. Spanish.
  • López Mendoza PG, Gómez P 2016. Perspectivas en el uso del espacio durante el Formativo temprano en la transecta Tulán (Región de Antofagasta, Chile) a partir del análisis de isótopos estables y de morfometría geométrica en camélidos. Proceedings of the XIX Argentine National Archeology Congress; Aug. 8–12; San Miguel de Tucumán: National University of Tucuman. Serie Monog Didáctica. 54:1105–1108.
  • Lynch JM, Wood CG, Luboga SA. 1996. Geometric morphometrics in primatology: craniofacial variation in homo sapiens and Pan troglodytes. Folia Primatol. 67:15–39.
  • Macholán M. 2006. A geometric morphometric analysis of the shape of the first upper molar in mice of the genus Mus (Muridae, Rodentia). J Zool. 270:672–681.
  • Marcus LF 1990. Traditional morphometrics. In: Rohlf FJ, Bookstein FL, editors. Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop. Special Publication 2; May 16–28 1988; Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Museum of Zoology. p. 77–122.
  • Menegaz A, Salemme M, Ortiz Jaureguizar E. 1988. Una propuesta de sistematización de los caracteres morfométricos de los metapodios y falanges de Camelidae [A proposal of systematization of the morphometric characters of the metapodia and phalanges of Camelidae]. In: Ratto N, Haber A, editors. De procesos, contextos y otros huesos [About process, context and another bones]. Buenos Aires: Institute of Anthropological Sciences, University of Buenos Aires; p. 53–64. Spanish.
  • Mengoni Goñalons G. 2007. Camelid management during Inca times in N.W. Argentina: models and archaeozoological indicators. Anthropozoologica. 42(2):129–141.
  • Mengoni Goñalons G, Yacobaccio HD. 2006. The domestication of South America Camelids: a view from south-Central Andes. In: Zeder MA, Bradley D, Emshwiller E, Smith BD, editors. Documenting domestication: bringing together plants, animals, archaeology, and genetics. Berkeley: University of California Press; p. 228–243.
  • Mercolli P. 2010. Estrategias de subsistencia en la Quebrada de Humahuaca, provincia de Jujuy. Dos casos de estudio relacionados al manejo ganadero y la trascendencia de la caza a través del tiempo en las sociedades humanas [Subsistence strategies in the Humahuaca quebrada, Jujuy province. Two study cases related to livestock management and the transcendence of hunting through time in human societies]. In: Gutiérrez M, de Nigris M, Fernández P, Giardina M, Gil A, Izeta A, Neme G, Yacobaccio HD, editors. Zooarqueología a principios del siglo XXI. Aportes teóricos, metodológicos y casos de studio [Zooarchaeology at the beginning of the 21st century. Theoretical and methodological contributions and study cases]. Buenos Aires: del Espinillo edition; p. 273–284. Spanish.
  • Mercolli P. 2016. El consumo de camélidos silvestres por parte de las poblaciones humanas de la Quebrada de Humahuaca, Pcia. de Jujuy, Argentina [Wild camelid consumption by local comunities in Quebrada de Humahuaca, Jujuy, Argentina]. Arqueología/Buenos Aires. 22:37–55. Spanish.
  • Miller GR 1979. An introduction to the Ethnoarchaeology of the Andean Camelids [Unpublished PhD thesis]. California: University of Berkeley.
  • Miller GR, Burger RL. 1995. Our father the Cayman, our dinner the llama: animal utilization at Chavín de Huantar, Peru. Am Antiq. 60(3):421–458.
  • Mitteroecker P, Bookstein F. 2008. The evolutionary role of modularity and integration in the hominoid cranium. Evolution. 62(4):943–958.
  • Mondini M, Muñoz AS. 2017. Osteometrics of South-Central Andean wild camelids: new standards. In: Mondini M, Muñoz AS, Fernández PM, editors. Zooarchaeology in the neotropics: environmental diversity and human-animal interactions. Cham: Springer; p. 177–188.
  • Olivera DE. 2001. Perfil etario y rendimiento económico de Lama glama [Age profile and economic yield of Lama glama]. In: Mengoni Goñalons GL, Olivera DE, Yacobaccio HD, editors. El uso de los camélidos a través del tiempo [The use of camelids through time]. Buenos Aires: Del Tridente editions; p. 179–202. Spanish.
  • Olivera DE, Grant J. 2008. Economía y ambiente durante el Holoceno Tardío (ca. 4500-400) de Antofagasta de la Sierra (Puna Meridional Argentina) [Economy and environment during the late Holocene (ca. 4500-400) in Antofagasta de la Sierra (Meridional Argentina Puna)]. In: Acosta A, Loponte D, Mucciolo L, editors. Temas de Arqueología: estudios Tafonómicos y Zooarqueológicos I [Topics of archaeology: taphonomic and zooarchaeological studies I]. Buenos Aires: National Institute of Latin American Anthropology and Thought; p. 99–131. Spanish.
  • Olivera DE, Palma J. 1997. Cronología y registro arqueológico en el Formativo Temprano en la región de Humahuaca [Chronology and archaeological record in the early formative in Humahuaca region]. Avances Arqueol. 3:77–99. Spanish.
  • Owen J, Dobney K, Evin A, Cucchi T, Larson G, Strand Vidarsdottir U. 2014. The zooarchaeological application of quantifying cranial shape differences in wild boar and domestic pigs (Sus scrofa) using 3D geometric morphometrics. J Archaeol Sci. 43:59–167.
  • Parés-Casanova PM, Martínez S. 2013. Geometric morphometrics for the study of hemicoxae sexual dimorphism in a local domestic equine breed. Int J Morphol. 31(2):623–628.
  • Pérez SI, Bernal V, González P. 2006. Differences between sliding semi-landmark methods in geometric morphometrics, with an application to human craniofacial and dental variation. J Anat. 208(6):769–784.
  • Pérez SI, Bernal V, González P, Sardi M, Politis G. 2009a. Discrepancy between Cranial and DNA data of early Americans: implications for American peopling. PLoS One. 4(5):e5746.
  • Pérez SI, Cardillo M, González P. 2009b. Artificial cranial deformations in South America: a quantitative approach to cultural variation. In: López G, Cardillo M, editors. Arqueología y Evolución. Teoría, metodología y casos de estudio [Archaeology and Evolution.Theory, methodology and case estudies]. Buenos Aires: Sb editions; p. 87–108. Spanish.
  • Pionnier-Capitan M, Tresset A, Cornette R, Bălăşescu A, Sablin M, Arbogast RM, Brehard S, Mashkour M, Valla F, Hänni C, et al. 2010. Geometric morphometrics: a new approach to understand processes of dog domestications. San Francisco: Bone Commons. [Accessed 2018 Mar 30]. http://alexandriaarchive.org/bonecommons/exhibits/show/icaz2010paris/session1_7/item/1453
  • Rohlf FJ. 2004. TpsUtil version 1.26. New York: Ecology and Evolution, State University, Stony Brook. http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph
  • Rohlf FJ. 2007. Relative warps, version 1.45 (TpsRelw). New York: Ecology and Evolution, State University, Stony Brook. http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph
  • Rohlf FJ. 2008. TpsDig, Version 2.12. New York: Ecology and Evolution, State University, Stony Brook. http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph
  • Schwarzfeld MD, Sperling FAH. 2014. Species delimitation using morphology, morphometrics, and molecules: definition of the Ophions cutellaris Thomson species group, with descriptions of six new species (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). ZooKeys. 462:59–114.
  • Seetah K, Cucchi T. 2010. Biogeography of modern horse populations: a geometric approach with applications for archaeological samples. San Francisco: Bone Commons. [Accessed 2018 Mar 30]. http://alexandriaarchive.org/bonecommons/exhibits/show/icaz2010paris/session1_7/item/1531.
  • Seetah K, Cucchi T, Dobney K, Barker G. 2014. A geometric morphometric re-evaluation of the use of dental form to explore differences in horse (Equus caballus) populations and its potential zooarchaeological application. J Archaeol Sci. 41:904–910.
  • Von Den Driesch A. 1976. A guide to the measurement of animal bones from archaeological sites. USA: Peabody museum of archaeology and ethnology, bulletin I. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University.
  • Wing E. 1972. Utilization of animal resources in the Peruvian Andes. In: Seiichi I, Terada K, editors. Andes 4, excavations at Kotosh, Peru, 1963 and 1964. Tokio: University of Tokyo Press; p; p. 327–351.
  • Yacobaccio HD. 2001. La domesticación de camélidos en el Noroeste Argentino [The camelid domestication in the Argentina Northwest]. In: Berberián E, Nielsen A, editors. Historia Argentina Prehispánica [Prehispanic Argentina History]. Córdoba: Brujas editorial; p. 7–40. Spanish.
  • Yacobaccio HD. 2003. Procesos de intensificación y de domesticación de camélidos en los andes centro-sur. Proceedings of the III World Congress on Camelids/I International Workshop of DECAMA; Oct 15–18; Potosí: CIF, FCAy P- UMSS. p. 211–217.
  • Yacobaccio HD. 2010. Osteometría de llamas (Lama glama L.) y sus consecuencias arqueológicas [Osteometry of llamas (Lama glama L.) and its archaeological consequences]. In: Gutiérrez M, de Nigris M, Fernández P, Giardina M, Gil A, Izeta A, Neme G, Yacobaccio HD, editors. Zooarqueología a principios del siglo XXI. Aportes teóricos, metodológicos y casos de studio [Zooarchaeology at the beginning of the 21st century. Theoretical and methodological contributions and study cases]. Buenos Aires: del Espinillo editions; p. 65–75. Spanish.
  • Yacobaccio HD, Madero CM, Malmierca MP, Reigadas MC. 1997–1998. Caza, domesticación y pastoreo de camélidos en la Puna Argentina [Hunting, domestication and grazing of camelids in Argentina puna]. Relac Soc Argent Antropol. XXII-XXIII:389–418. Spanish.
  • Zelditch M, Swiderski D, Sheets D, Fink W. 2004. Geometric morphometrics for biologists. London: Elsevier Academic Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.