How did amber get its aquatic insects? Water-seeking polarotactic insects trapped by tree resin

References

• Andrikovics S. 1991. On the long-term changes of the invertebrate macrofauna in the creeks of the Pilis-Visegrádi mountains (Hungary). Verhandlungen der Internationalen Verein für Limnologie. 24:1969–1972.
   Google Scholar
• Bechly G, Wichard W. 2008. Damselfly and dragonfly nymphs in Eocene Baltic amber (Insecta: odonata), with aspects of their palaeobiology. Palaeodiversity. 1:37–73.
   Google Scholar
• Core Team R 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Egri Á, Pereszlényi Á, Farkas A, Horváth G, Penksza K, Kriska G. 2017. How can asphalt roads extend the range of in situ polarized light pollution? A complex ecological trap of Ephemera danica and a possible remedy. J Insect Behav. 30:374–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaldi DA. 1996. Amber: window to the past. New York: Abrams.
   Google Scholar
• Henwood A. 1993. Recent plant resins and the taphonomy of organisms in amber: a review. Mod Geol. 19:35–59.
   Google Scholar
• Horváth G, Kriska G. 2008. Polarization vision in aquatic insects and ecological traps for polarotactic insects. In: Lancaster J, Briers RA, editors. Aquatic insects: challenges to populations (Vol. Chapter 11). Wallingford (Oxon, UK): CAB International Publishing; p. 204–229.
   Google Scholar
• Horváth G, Kriska G, Robertson B. 2014. Anthropogenic polarization and polarized light pollution inducing polarized ecological traps. In: Horváth G, editor. Polarized light and polarization vision in animal sciences. Heidelberg: Springer; p. 443–513.
   Google Scholar
• Horváth G, Csabai Z. 2014. Polarization vision of aquatic insects. In: Horváth G, editor. Polarized light and polarization vision in animal sciences. Heidelberg: Springer; p. 113–145.
   Google Scholar
• Horváth G. ed. 2014. Polarized light and polarization vision in animal sciences. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Horváth G, Kriska G, Malik P, Robertson B. 2009. Polarized light pollution: a new kind of ecological photopollution. Front Ecol Environ. 7:317–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horváth G, Móra A, Bernáth B, Kriska G. 2011. Polarotaxis in non-biting midges: female chironomids are attracted to horizontally polarized light. Physiol Behav. 104:1010–1015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horváth G, Varjú D. 1997. Polarization pattern of freshwater habitats recorded by video polarimetry in red, green and blue spectral ranges and its relevance for water detection by aquatic insects. J Exp Biol. 200:1155–1163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horváth G, Varjú D. 2004. Polarized light in animal vision - polarization patterns in nature. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jazdzewski K, Kulicka R. 2000. A note on amphipod crustaceans in a piece of Baltic amber. Ann Zool Fennici. 50:99–100.
   Google Scholar
• Kaddumi HF. 2007. Amber of Jordan. Amman: Eternal River Museum of Natural History.
   Google Scholar
• Keyser D, Weitschat W. 2005. First record of ostracods (Crustacea) in Baltic amber. Hydrobiologia. 538:107–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer MMS. 2007. Systematic, palaeoecology, and palaeobiogeography of the insect fauna from Mexican amber. Palaeontographica Abt A. 282:1–133.
   Google Scholar
• Kraemer MMS. 2010. Mexican amber. In: Penney D, editor. Biodiversity of fossils in amber from the major world deposits. Manchester: Siri Scientific Press; p. 43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Kriska G, Bernáth B, Farkas R, Horváth G. 2009. Degrees of polarization of reflected light eliciting polarotaxis in dragonflies (Odonata), mayflies (Ephemeroptera) and tabanid flies (Tabanidae). J Insect Physiol. 55:1167–1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriska G, Horváth G, Andrikovics S. 1998. Why do mayflies lay their eggs en masse on dry asphalt roads? Water-imitating polarized light reflected from asphalt attracts Ephemeroptera. J Exp Biol. 201:2273–2286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner A, Meltser N, Sapir N, Erlick C, Shashar N, Broza M. 2008. Reflected polarization guides chironomid females to oviposition sites. J Exp Biol. 211:3536–3543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller KB. 2003. The unusual occurrence of aquatic beetles in amber, Copelatus aphroditae Balke, n. sp., and C. predaveterus Miller, n. sp. (Coleoptera: dytiscidae: copelatinae). Proc Entomol Soc Washington. 105:809–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkovsky EE, Zosimovich VY, Vlaskin AP. 2010. Rovno amber. In: Penney D, editor. Biodiversity of fossils in amber from the major world deposits. Manchester: Siri Scientific Press; p. 116–136.
   Google Scholar
• Perkovsky EE, Rasnitsyn AP, Vlaskin AP, Taraschuk MV. 2007. A comparative analysis of the Baltic and Rovno amber arthropod faunas: representative samples. Afr Invertebr. 48:229–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkovsky EE, Zosimovich VY, Vlaskin AY. 2003. Rovno amber insects: first results of analysis. Russ Entomol J. 12:119–126.
   Google Scholar
• Poinar GO Jr. 1992. Life in Amber. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poinar GO Jr. 1993. Insects in amber. Annu Rev Entomol. 38:145–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poinar GO Jr, Milki R. 2001. Lebanese amber: the oldest insect ecosystem in fossilized resin. Corvallis: Oregon State Univ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poinar GO Jr, Poinar R. 1999. The amber forest: a reconstruction of a vanished world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poinar GO Jr, Waggoner BM, Bauer UC. 1993. Terrestrial soft-bodied protists and other microorganisms in Triassic amber. Science. 259:222–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro A, Bernardo-Gil GG. 1990. Densities and refractive indices of components of pine resin. J Chem Eng Data. 35:204–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt AR, Dilcher DL. 2007. Aquatic organisms as amber inclusions and examples from a modern swamp forest. Proc National Acad Sci USA. 104:16581–16585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöborn W, Dörfelt H, Foissner W, Krienitz L, Schäfer U. 1999. A fossilized microcenosis in Triassic amber. J Eukaryotic Microbiol. 46:571–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwind R. 1991. Polarization vision in water insects and insects living on a moist substrate. J Comp Physiol A. 169:531–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umow N. 1905. Chromatische Depolarisation durch Lichtzerstreuung. Physikalische Zeitschrift. 6:674–676.
   Google Scholar
• Weitschat W, Wichard W. 2010. Baltic amber. In: Penney D, editor. Biodiversity of fossils in amber from the major world deposits. Manchester: Siri Scientific Press; p. 80–115.
   Google Scholar
• Weitschat W, Wichard W. 2002. Atlas of plants and animals in Baltic amber. München: Dr. Friedrich Pfeil Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wichard W, Gröhn C, Seredszus F. 2009. Aquatic insects in Baltic amber. Kessel: Remagen Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wichard W, Weitschat W. 1996. Wasserinsekten in Bernstein - eine paläobiologische Studie. Entomologische Mitteilungen von Löbbecke-Museum + Aquazoo (Düsseldorf). 4(Supplement):1–122.
   Google Scholar