The size of the megatooth shark, Otodus megalodon (Lamniformes: Otodontidae), revisited

References

• Aguilera OA, García L, Cozzuol MA. 2008. Giant-toothed white sharks and cetacean trophic interaction from the pliocene caribbean paraguaná formation. Paläont Z. 82:204–208.
   Google Scholar
• Alten S. 2015. Meg: special anniversary edition. Austin (Texas): Rebel Press (Next Centurey Publishing); p. 366.
   Google Scholar
• Alten S. 2018. Meg: generations. West Palm Beack. Florida: A & M Publishing; p. 394.
   Google Scholar
• Applegate SP, Espinosa-Arrubarrena L. 1996. The fossil history of Carcharodon and its possible ancestor, Cretolamna: a study in tooth identification. In: Klimley AP, Ainley DG, editors. Great white sharks: the biology of Carcharodon carcharias. San Diego: Academic Press; p. 19–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bendix-Almgreen SE. 1983. Carcharodon megalodon from the Upper Miocene of Denmark, with comments on elasmobranch tooth enameloid: coronoi’n. Bull Geol Soc Denmark. 32:1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann C. 1847. Über die Verhältnisse der Wärmeökonomie der Thiere zu ihrer Grösse. Gött Stud. 3:595–708.
   Google Scholar
• Boessenecker RW, Ehret DJ, Long DJ, Churchill M, Martin E, Boessenecker SJ. 2019. The early Pliocene extinction of the mega-toothed shark Otodus megalodon: a view from the eastern North Pacific. PeerJ. 7:e6088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JH, Sibly RM. 2006. Life-history evolution under a production constraint. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 103:17595–17599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budker P. 1971. the life of sharks. London (UK): Weidenfeld and Nicolson; p. 222.
   Google Scholar
• Cappetta H. 2012. Chondrichthyes. Mesozoic and cenozoic elasmobranchii: teeth. In: Schultze H-P, editor. Handbook of paleoichthyology. Vol. 3E. München: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil; p. 512.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler R, editor. 2015. The Fossils of North Carolina, Volume III, Fish. Raleigh (North Carolina): North Carolina Fossil Club; p. 376.
   Google Scholar
• Chavez S, Zufan S, Kim SH, Shimada K. 2012. Tooth sizes as a proxy for estimating body lengths in porbeagle shark, Lamna nasus. J Fossil Res. 45:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen JE, Pimm SL, Yodzis P, Saldaña J. 1993. Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs. J Anim Ecol. 1:67–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collareta A, Lambert O, Landini W, Di Celma C, Malinverno E, Varas-Malca R, Urbina M, Bianucci G. 2017. Did the giant extinct shark Carcharocles megalodon target small prey? Bite marks on marine mammal remains from the late Miocene of Peru. Palaeogeog Palaeoclimat Palaeoecol. 469:84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compagno LJV. 1984. Sharks of the world: an annotated and illustrated catalague of shark species known to date. FAO Fish Synop. 4(125):1–655.
   Google Scholar
• Compagno LJV. 2002. Sharks of the world: an annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. Volume 2: bullhead, mackerel and carpet sharks (Heterodontiformes, Lamniformes and Orectolobiformes). FAO Sp Cat Fish Purp. 1(2):1–269.
   Google Scholar
• Dean B. 1909. The giant of ancient shark. Am Mus J. 9(8):233–234.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrón H. 2017. Regional endothermy as a trigger for gigantism in some extinct macropredatory sharks. PLoS One. 12:e0185185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrón HG, Martínez-Perez C, Botella H. 2017. The evolution of gigantism in active marine predators. Hist Biol. 30:712–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey SJ, Ellwood M, Groff S, Verdin MS. 2018. Carcharocles-bitten odontocete caudal vertebrae from the coastal eastern United States. Acta Palaeont Polo. 63:463–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goto M. 1989. A restoration of the jaws of the giant extinct shark Carcharocles (Carcharodon) megalodon. J Fossil Res. 22:7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Goto M, Kobayashi F, Osawa S. 1983. On a dentition of giant extinct shark, Carcharodon megalodon, from Annaka City, Gumma Prefecture, Japan (preliminary report). J Geol (Chishitsugaku-Zashi). 89:597–598.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfried MD, Compagno LJV, Bowman SC. 1996. Size and skeletal anatomy of the giant “megatooth” shark Carcharodon megalodon. In: Klimley AP, Ainley DG, editors. Great white sharks: the biology of Carcharodon carcharias. San Diego: Academic Press; p. 55–66.
   Google Scholar
• Grant C, MacFadden B, Antonenko P, Perez V. 2017. 3-D fossils for K-12 education: a case example using the giant extinct shark Carcharocles megalodon. Paleontol Soc Papers. 22:197–209.
   Google Scholar
• Günther A. 1870. Catalogue of the fishes in the British Museum. Volume 8, Catalogue of the physostomi, containing the families Gymnotidae, Symbranchidae, Muraenidae, Pegasidae, and of the Lophobranchii, Plectognathi, Dipnoi, Ganoidei, Chondropterygii, Cyclostomata, Leptocardii, in the Collection of the British Museum. London (UK): Taylor and Francis; p. 549.
   Google Scholar
• Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Anim Behav. 86:685–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hone DW, Benton MJ. 2005. The evolution of large size: how does Cope’s rule work? Trends Ecol Evol. 20:4–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussakof L. 1912. An extinct giant-shark. Sci Am Suppl. 1893:225.
   Google Scholar
• Huston MA, Wolverton S. 2011. Regulation of animal body size by eNPP, Bergmann’s rule, and related phenomena. Ecol Monog. 81:349–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan DS. 1922. Some sharks’ teeth from the California Pliocene. Am J Sci (Ser 5). 3:338–342.
   Google Scholar
• Kram R, Taylor C. 1990. Energetics of running: a new perspective. Nature. 346(6281):265–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCosker JE. 1985. White shark attack behavior: observations of and speculations about predator and prey strategies. Mem So Calif Acad Sci. 9:123–135.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson JS, Grande TC, Wilson MVH. 2016. Fishes of the world. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley and Sons; p. 752.
   Google Scholar
• Olden JD, Hogan ZS, Vander Zanden MJ. 2007. Small fish, big fish, red fish, blue fish: size biased extinction risk of the world’s freshwater and marine fishes. Global Ecol Biogeog. 16:694–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papson S. 1992. Cross the fin line of terror. J Am Culture. 15:67–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez V, Godfrey SJ, Kent B, Weems R, Nance J. 2019. The transition between Carcharocles chubutensis and Carcharocles megalodon (Otodontidae, Chondrichthyes): lateral cusplet loss through time. J Vert Paleont. e1546732. doi:10.1080/02724634.2018.1546732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters RH. 1986. The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge Univ Press; p. 329.
   Google Scholar
• Pimiento C, Balk MA. 2015. Body-size trends of the extinct giant shark Carcharocles megalodon: a deep-time perspective on marine apex predators. Paleobiol. 41:479‒490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimiento C, Cantalapiedra JL, Shimada K, Field DJ, Smaers JB. 2019. Evolutionary pathways towards shark gigantism. Evolution. 73:588–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimiento C, Clements CF. 2014. When did Carcharocles megalodon become extinct? A new analysis of the fossil record. PLoS One. 9(10):e111086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimiento C, Ehret DJ, MacFadden BJ, Hubbell G. 2010. Ancient nursery area for the extinct giant shark Megalodon from the Miocene of Panama. PLoS One. 5(5):e10552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimiento C, MacFadden BJ, Clements CF, Varela S, Jaramillo C, Velez-Juarbe J, Silliman BR. 2016. Geographical distribution patterns of Carcharocles megalodon over time reveal clues about extinction mechanisms. J Biogeog. doi:10.1111/jbi.12754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy R. 1996. Paleoecology of fossil white sharks. In: Klimley AP, Ainley DG, editors. Great white sharks: the biology of Carcharodon carcharias. San Diego: Academic Press; p. 67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Purdy RW, Schneider VP, Applegate SP, McLellan JH, Meyer RL, Slaughter BH. 2001. The Neogene sharks, rays, and bony fishes from Lee Creek Mine, Aurora, North Carolina. Smithsonian Contrib Paleobiol. 90:71–202.
   Google Scholar
• Randall JE. 1973. Size of the great white shark (Carcharodon). Science. 181:169–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razak H, Kocsis L. 2018. Late Miocene Otodus (Megaselachus) megalodon from Brunei Darussalam: body length estimation and habitat reconstruction. N Jb Geol Paläont Abh. 288:299–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renz M. 2002. Megalodon: hunting the Hunter. Lehigh Acres (Florida): PaleoPress; p. 161.
   Google Scholar
• Renz M. 2009. Desert sharks. Lehigh Acres (Florida): PaleoPress; p. 197.
   Google Scholar
• Reolid M, Molina JM. 2015. Record of Carcharocles megalodon in the eastern Guadalquivir Basin (Upper Miocene, South Spain). Estudios Geol. 71(2):e032. doi:10.3989/egeol.41828.342.
   Google Scholar
• Romer AS. 1959. The vertebrate story. Chicago (Illinois): Univ Chicago Press; p. 437.
   Google Scholar
• Shimada K. 1997. Paleoecological relationships of the Late Cretaceous lamniform shark, Cretoxyrhina mantelli (Agassiz). J Paleont. 71:926–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimada K. 2002a. Dental homologies in lamniform sharks (Chondrichthyes: elasmobranchii). J Morphol. 251:38–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimada K. 2002b. The relationship between the tooth size and total body length in the shortfin mako, Isurus oxyrinchus (Lamniformes: lamnidae). J Fossil Res. 35:6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Shimada K. 2003 ( date of imprint 2002). The relationship between the tooth size and total body length in the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias (Lamniformes: lamnidae). J Fossil Res. 35:28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Shimada K. 2005 ( date of imprint 2004). The relationship between the tooth size and total body length in the sandtiger shark, Carcharias taurus (Lamniformes: odontaspididae). J Fossil Res. 37:76–81.
   Google Scholar
• Shimada K. 2006a ( date of imprint 2005). Types of tooth sets in the fossil record of sharks, and comments on reconstructing dentitions of extinct sharks. J Fossil Res. 38:141–145.
   Google Scholar
• Shimada K. 2006b. The relationship between the tooth size and total body length in the common thresher shark, Alopias vulpinus (Lamniformes: alopiidae). J Fossil Res. 39:7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Shimada K, Chandler RE, Lam OLT, Tanaka T, Ward DJ. 2017. A new elusive otodontid shark (Lamniformes: otodontidae) from the lower Miocene, and comments on the taxonomy of otodontid genera, including the ‘megatoothed’ clade. Hist Biol. 29:704–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimada K, Seigel JF. 2005. The relationship between the tooth size and total body length in the goblin shark, Mitsukurina owstoni (Lamniformes: mitsukurinidae). J Fossil Res. 38:49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Speakman JR. 2005. Body size, energy metabolism and lifespan. J Exp Biol. 208:1717–1730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricas TC. 1985. Feeding ethology of the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias. Mem So Calif Acad Sci. 9:81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Tricas TC, McCosker JE. 1984. Predatory behavior of the white shark (Carcharodon carcharias), with notes on its biology. Proc Calif Acad Sci. 43:221–238.
   Google Scholar
• Uyeno T, Sakamoto O, Sekine H. 1989. The description of an almost compete tooth set of Carcharodon megalodon from a Middle Miocene bed in Saitama Prefecture, Japan. Bull Saitama Mus Nat Hist. 7:73–85.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson C. 1997. Extinct. New York (NY): S. Martin’s Press; p. 310.
   Google Scholar
• Zar JH. 1996. Biostatistical analysis.3rd ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall; p. 662.
   Google Scholar