Modelling crushing crab predation on bivalve prey using finite element analysis

References

• Anderson LC. 2014. Ultra-elongate freshwater pearly mussels (Unionida): roles for function and constraint in multiple morphologic convergences with Marine Taxa. In: Hembree DI, Platt BF, Smith JJ, editors. Experimental approaches to understanding fossil organisms: lessons from the living. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business; p. 21–47.
   Google Scholar
• Beadman H, Caldow R, Kaiser M, Willows R. 2003. How to toughen up your mussels: using mussel shell morphological plasticity to reduce predation losses. Mar Biol. 142(3):487–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beal BF, Parker MR, Vencile KW. 2001. Seasonal effects of intraspecific density and predator exclusion along a shore-level gradient on survival and growth of juveniles of the soft-shell clam, Mya arenaria L., in Maine, USA. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 264(2):133–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bignardi C, Petraroli M, Pugno NM. 2010. Nanoindentations on conch shells of Gastropoda and Bivalvia molluscs reveal anisotropic evolution against external attacks. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 10(10):6453–6460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundon JA. 1988. Morphology and muscle stress of chelae of temperate and tropical stone crabs Menippe mercenaria. J Zool. 215(4):663–673.
   Google Scholar
• Blundon JA, Kennedy VS. 1982. Mechanical and behavioral aspects of blue crab, Callinectes sapidus (Rathbun), predation on Chesapeake Bay bivalves. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 65(1):47–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulding EG. 1984. Crab-resistant features of shells of burrowing bivalves: decreasing vulnerability by increasing handling time. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 76(3):201–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett CE, Walker SE. 2002. Predators and predation in Paleozoic marine environments. Paleontol Soc Pap. 8:93–118.
   Google Scholar
• Bright JA. 2014. A review of paleontological finite element models and their validity. J Paleontol. 88(4):760–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caro AU, Escobar J, Bozinovic F, Navarrete SA, Castilla JC. 2008. Phenotypic variability in byssus thread production of intertidal mussels induced by predators with different feeding strategies. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 372:127–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalfoun A, McClelland J, Valiela I. 1994. The effect of nutrient loading on the growth rate of two species of bivalves, Mercenaria mercenaria and Mya arenaria, in estuaries of Waquoit Bay, Massachusetts. Biol Bull. 187(2):281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen LD. 1985. Shear resistance in two bivalve molluscs: role of hinges and interdigitating margins. J Zool. 205(4):479–487.
   Google Scholar
• Cox PG, Fagan MJ, Rayfield EJ, Jeffery N. 2011. Finite element modelling of squirrel, guinea pig and rat skulls: using geometric morphometrics to assess sensitivity. J Anat. 219(6):696–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currey JD, Taylor JD. 1974. The mechanical behaviour of some molluscan hard tissues. J Zool. 173(3):395–406.
   Google Scholar
• Czarnoleski M, Müller T, Kierat J, Gryczkowski L, Chybowski Ł. 2011. Anchor down or hunker down: an experimental study on zebra mussels’ response to predation risk from crayfish. Anim Behav. 82(3):543–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVol RT, Sun CY, Marcus MA, Coppersmith SN, Myneni SC, Gilbert PU. 2015. Nanoscale transforming mineral phases in fresh nacre. J Am Chem Soc. 137(41):13325–13333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietl GP, Alexander RR, Bien WF. 2000. Escalation in late cretaceous–early paleocene oysters (Gryphaeidae) from the Atlantic Coastal Plain. Paleobiology. 26(2):215–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumont ER, Grosse IR, Slater GJ. 2009. Requirements for comparing the performance of finite element models of biological structures. J Theor Biol. 256(1):96–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitton LC, Prôa M, Rowland C, Toro‐Ibacache V, O’Higgins P. 2015. The impact of simplifications on the performance of a finite element model of a Macaca fascicularis cranium. Anat Rec. 298(1):107–121.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn AM, Smee DL. 2010. Behavioral plasticity of the soft-shell clam, Mya arenaria (L.), in the presence of predators increases survival in the field. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol. 383(1):32–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortuny J, Marcé-Nogué J, Heiss E, Sanchez M, Gil L, Galobart À. 2015. 3D bite modeling and feeding mechanics of the largest living amphibian, the Chinese giant salamander Andrias davidianus (Amphibia: urodela). PLoS One. 10(4):e0121885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman AS. 2007. Specificity of induced defenses in Mytilus edulis and asymmetrical predator deterrence. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 334:145–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gercek H. 2007. Poisson’s ratio values for rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 44(1):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germann DP, Carbajal JP. 2013. Burrowing behaviour of robotic bivalves with synthetic morphologies. Bioinspiration Biomimetics. 8(4):046009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil L, Marcé Nogué J, Sánchez M. 2015. Insights into the controversy over materials data for the comparison of biomechanical performance in vertebrates. Palaeontol Electronica. 18(1.10A):1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grefsrud ES, Strand Ø. 2006. Comparison of shell strength in wild and cultured scallops (Pecten maximus). Aquaculture. 251(2):306–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griesshaber E, Schmahl WW, Ubhi HS, Huber J, Nindiyasari F, Maier B, Ziegler A. 2013. Homoepitaxial meso-and microscale crystal co-orientation and organic matrix network structure in Mytilus edulis nacre and calcite. Acta Biomater. 9(12):9492–9502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths CL, Seiderer JL. 1980. Rock-lobsters and mussels—limitations and preferences in a predator-prey interaction. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 44(1):95–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper EM. 2006. Dissecting post-Palaeozoic arms races. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 232(2):322–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper EM, Skelton PW. 1993. The Mesozoic marine revolution and epifaunal bivalves. Scr Geologica Spec Issue. 2:127–153.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes RN, Seed R. 1981. Size selection of mussels by the blue crab Callinectes sapidus: energy maximizer or time minimizer? Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 6(1):83–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes TJ. 2012. The finite element method: linear static and dynamic finite element analysis. Mineola (NY): Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt HL. 2004. Effects of epibenthic predators in flow: transport and mortality of juveniles of the soft shell clam Mya arenaria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 279:151–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntley JW, Kowalewski M. 2007. Strong coupling of predation intensity and diversity in the Phanerozoic fossil record. PNAS. 104(38):15006–15010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman EG. 1969. Form, function and evolution. In: Moore RC, Teichert C, editors. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology: pt. N, Mollusca 6, Bivalvia 1. Boulder, CO: Geol. Soc. America; and Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas; p. N129–N205.
   Google Scholar
• Kolmann MA, Crofts SB, Dean MN, Summers AP, Lovejoy NR. 2015. Morphology does not predict performance: jaw curvature and prey crushing in durophagous stingrays. J Exp Biol. 218(24):3941–3949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labonte D, Lenz AK, Oyen ML. 2017. On the relationship between indentation hardness and modulus, and the damage resistance of biological materials. Acta Biomater. 57:373–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau CJ. 1987. Feeding behavior of the Hawaiian slipper lobster, Scyllarides squammosus, with a review of decapod crustacean feeding tactics on molluscan prey. Bull Mar Sci. 41(2):378–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard GH, Bertness MD, Yund PO. 1999. Crab predation, waterborne cues, and inducible defenses in the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis. Ecology. 80(1):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XW, Ji HM, Yang W, Zhang GP, Chen DL. 2017. Mechanical properties of crossed-lamellar structures in biological shells: A review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 74:54–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowen JB, Innes DJ, Thompson RJ. 2013. Predator-induced defenses differ between sympatric Mytilus edulis and M. trossulus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 475:135–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger KA, Daniel WJ, Ross CF. 2005. Comparison of beam theory and finite‐element analysis with in vivo bone strain data from the alligator cranium. Anat Rec. 283A:331–348.
   Google Scholar
• Mott PH, Roland CM. 2013. Limits to Poisson’s ratio in isotropic materials—general result for arbitrary deformation. Phys Scr. 87(5):055404(6pp).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakaoka M. 2000. Nonlethal effects of predators on prey populations: predator‐mediated change in bivalve growth. Ecology. 81(4):1031–1045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naleway SE, Taylor JR, Porter MM, Meyers MA, McKittrick J. 2016. Structure and mechanical properties of selected protective systems in marine organisms. Mater Sci Eng C. 59:1143–1167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Higgins P, Cobb SN, Fitton LC, Gröning F, Phillips R, Liu J, Fagan MJ. 2011. Combining geometric morphometrics and functional simulation: an emerging toolkit for virtual functional analyses. J Anat. 218(1):3–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer AR. 1992. Calcification in marine molluscs: how costly is it? PNAS. 89(4):1379–1382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng L, Bai J, Zeng X, Zhou Y. 2006. Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions. Med Eng Phys. 28(3):227–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington BJ, Currey JD. 1984. A mathematical model for the mechanical properties of scallop shells. J Zool. 202(2):239–263.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-González A, Iserte-Vilar JL, González-Lluch C. 2011. Interpreting finite element results for brittle materials in endodontic restorations. Biomed Eng Online. 10(1):1–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pharr GM, Oliver WC. 1992. Measurement of thin film mechanical properties using nanoindentation. MRS Bull. 17(7):28–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preuschoft H, Fritz M, Kramer T. 1975. Beziehungen zwischen mechanischer Beanspruchung und Gestalt bei Wirbellosen: spannungsanalyse an Muschel-Klappen. Neues Jahrb Geol Palaeontol Abh. 150:161–181.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman IA, Lautenschlager S. 2016. Applications of three-dimensional box modeling to paleontological functional analysis. Paleontol Soc Pap. 22:119–132.
   Google Scholar
• Rayfield EJ. 2007. Finite element analysis and understanding the biomechanics and evolution of living and fossil organisms. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci. 35:541–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy JN. 2013. An introduction to continuum mechanics. Cambridge (MA): Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reif WE. 1978. Plicae and cardinal crurae in pectinids: protective devices against starfish predation. Neues Jahrb Geol Palaeontol Abh. 157:115–118.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer O, Tedengren M. 1996. Phenotypical improvement of morphological defences in the mussel Mytilus edulis induced by exposure to the predator Asterias rubens. Oikos. 75(3):383–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond BG, Wright BW, Grosse I, Dechow PC, Ros CF, Spencer MA, Strait DS. 2005. Finite element analysis in functional morphology. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 283(2):259–274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seed R, Hughes RN. 1995. Criteria for prey size-selection in molluscivorous crabs with contrasting claw morphologies. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 193(1–2):177–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seilacher A. 1985. Bivalve morphology and function. Notes for a Short Course: Studies in Geology. 13:88–101.
   Google Scholar
• Silva MJ, Brodt MD, Hucker WJ. 2005. Finite element analysis of the mouse tibia: estimating endocortical strain during three‐point bending in SAMP6 osteoporotic mice. Anat Rec. 283A:380–390.
   Google Scholar
• Smallegange IM, Van Der Meer J. 2003. Why do shore crabs not prefer the most profitable mussels? J Anim Ecol. 72(4):599–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith LD, Jennings JA. 2000. Induced defensive responses by the bivalve Mytilus edulis to predators with different attack modes. Mar Biol. 136(3):461–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley SM. 1970. Relation of shell form to life habits of the Bivalvia (Mollusca). Geological Society of America Memoir 125. Boulder (CO): The Geological Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley SM. 1972. Functional morphology and evolution of byssally attached bivalve mollusks. J Paleontol. 46:165–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng HH. 2004. Controls by saturation state on etch pit formation during calcite dissolution. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 68(2):253–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas RDK. 2013. Arch and beam: deployment of microstructural fabrics in relation to loads exerted on the shells of bivalved molluscs in different functional regimes. Hist Biol. 25(2):193–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timoshenko SP. 1934. Stability of the webs of plate girders. Engineering. 138:1–207.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwary CS, Kishore S, Sarkar S, Mahapatra DR, Ajayan PM, Chattopadhyay K. 2015. Morphogenesis and mechanostabilization of complex natural and 3D printed shapes. Sci Adv. 1(4):e1400052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugural AC, Fenster SK. 2003. Advanced strength and applied elasticity. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice-Hall Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeij GJ. 1977. The Mesozoic marine revolution: evidence from snails, predators and grazers. Paleobiology. 3(3):245–258.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeij GJ. 1983. Shell-breaking predation through time. In: Tevesz MJ, McCall PL, editors. Biotic interactions in recent and fossil benthic communities. Boston (MA): Springer; p. 649–669.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeij GJ. 1993. Evolution and escalation: an ecological history of life. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeij GJ. 2013. Molluscan marginalia: hidden morphological diversity at the bivalve shell edge. J Molluscan Stud. 79(4):283–295.
   Google Scholar
• Walker SE, Brett CE. 2002. Post-Paleozoic patterns in marine predation: was there a Mesozoic and Cenozoic marine predatory revolution? Paleontol Soc Pap. 8:119–194.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss ET, Carmichael RH, Valiela I. 2002. The effect of nitrogen loading on the growth rates of quahogs (Mercenaria mercenaria) and soft-shell clams (Mya arenaria) through changes in food supply. Aquaculture. 211(1–4):275–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yourdkhani M, Pasini D, Barthelat F. 2010. The hierarchical structure of seashells optimized to resist mechanical threats. In: CA B, Carpi A, editors. Design & Nature V: Comparing Design in Nature with Science and Engineering. Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 138. Southampton, UK: WIT Press; p. 141–153.
   Google Scholar
• Zaklan SD, Ydenberg R. 1997. The body size–burial depth relationship in the infaunal clam Mya arenaria. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol. 215(1):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipser E, Vermeij GJ. 1978. Crushing behavior of tropical and temperate crabs. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 31(2):155–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuschin M, Stachowitsch M, Stanton RJ. 2003. Patterns and processes of shell fragmentation in modern and ancient marine environments. Earth Sci Rev. 63(1):33–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar