Structural pattern in the tusks of the Miocene mammutid Zygolophodon turicensis and its utility in the taxonomy of elephantimorph proboscideans

References

• Ábelová M. 2003. Mastodonty Anancus arvernensis a Mammut borsoni (Proboscidea) z lokality Hajnáčka. Morfológia a metrika zubov a postkraniálneho skeletu [Master’s thesis]. Komenius University in Bratislava. 199 pp. (in Slovak).
   Google Scholar
• Ábelová M. 2008. Schreger pattern analysis of Mammuthus primigenius tusk: analytical approach and utility. Bull Geosci. 83:225–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agiadi K, Theodorou G. 2005. Tusk Paleohistology as a tool in the discrimination of fossil tusks from Greece. In: Alcover JA, Bover P, editors. Proceedings of the International Symposium “Insular Vertebrate Evolution: the Palaeontological Approach”. Mallorca, Spain: Monografies de la Societat d’Història Natural de les Balears. 12:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Albéric M, Dean MN, Gourrier A, Wagermaier W, Dunlop JWC, Staude A, Fratzl P, Reiche I. 2017. Relation between the macroscopic pattern of elephant ivory and its three-dimensional micro-tubular network. PLoS One. 12(1):e0166671. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166671.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Albéric M, Gourrier A, Wagermaier W, Fratzl P, Reiche I. 2018. The three-dimensional arrangement of the mineralized collagen fibers in elephant ivory and its relation to mechanical and optical properties. Acta Biomater. 72:342–351. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.02.016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Antoine P-O, Welcomme J-L, Marivaux L, Baloch I, Benammi M, Tassy P. 2003. First record of paleogene elephantoidea (Mammalia, Proboscidea) from the Bugti Hills of Pakistan. J Vertebr Paleontol. 23:977−980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Březina J. 2014. Osteologické zpracování savců z lokality Czujanova pískovna (Mikulov) se zvláštním zaměřením na stadium chobotnatců [MSc thesis]. Brno: Department of Geological Sciences, Faculty of Science at Masaryk University. 64 pp. (in Czech).
   Google Scholar
• Březina J. 2019. Neogenní savci z okolí Mikulova. Acta Mus Morav Sci Geol. 104:217–239.
   Google Scholar
• Březina J, ÁH L, Ivanov M 2017. Middle Miocene mammals from the Czujan’s Sandpit (Mikulov, Czech Republic). In: 15th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Vertebrate Palaeontologists; Munich: Zitteliana 91, GeoBio-Center LMU. p. 25.
   Google Scholar
• Cui FZ, Wen HB, Zhang HB, Li HD, Liu DC. 1994b. Anisotropic indentation morphology and hardness of natural ivory. Mater Sci Eng C. 2(1–2):87–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0928-4931(94)90035-3.
   Google Scholar
• Cui FZ, Wen HB, Zhang HB, Ma CL, Li HD. 1994a. Nanophase hydroxyapatite-like crystallites in natural ivory. J Mater Sci Lett. 13:1042−1044.
   Google Scholar
• Daubenton LJM. 1764. Description de l’Eléphant. Histoire Générale et Particulière, Avec la Description du Cabinet du Roi. 11:94–142.
   Google Scholar
• Espinoza EO, Mann M-J. 1992. Identification guide for ivory and ivory substitutes. Baltimore: World Wildlife Fund and Conservation Foundation. 38 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Espinoza EO, Mann M-J. 1993. The history and significance of the Schreger pattern in proboscidean ivory characterization. J Am Inst Conserv. 32(3):241–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1179/019713693806124866.
   Google Scholar
• Espinoza EO, Mann M-J, LeMay JP, Oakes KA. 1990. A method for differentiating modern from ancient proboscidean ivory in worked objects. Curr Res Pleistocene. 7:81–83.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher DC. 1996. Extinction of proboscideans in North America. In Shoshani J, Tassy P, editors. The Proboscidea. Evolution and paleoecology of elephants and their relatives. 2nd, 1997. New York: Oxford University Press; p. 296–315.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher DC. 2008. Taphonomy and paleobiology of the Hyde Park Mastodon. In: DA W, LN P, editors. Mastodon paleobiology, taphonomy, and paleoenvironment in the Late Pleistocene of New York State: studies on the Hyde Park, Chemung, and North Java Sites, Vol. 61. Kansas, USA: Palaeontographica Americana:197–289.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher DC, Beld SG, Rountrey AN. 2008. Tusk record of the North Java Mastodon. In: DA W, LN P, editors. Mastodon paleobiology, taphonomy, and paleoenvironment in the Late Pleistocene of New York State: studies on the Hyde Park, Chemung, and North Java Sites, Vol. 61. Kansas, USA: Palaeontographica Americana:197–289.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher DC. 2018. Paleobiology of Pleistocene Proboscideans. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci. 46(1):229–260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-060115-012437.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher DC, Trapani J, Shoshani J, Woodford M. 1998. The Schreger pattern in mastodon and mammoth tusk dentin. Curr Res Pleistocene. 15:105−107.
   Google Scholar
• Fox DL. 2000. Growth increments in Gomphotherium tusk and implications for late Miocene climate change in North America. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 156(3–4):327−348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-0182(99)00148-0
   Google Scholar
• Fox DL, Fisher DC. 2001. Stable isotope ecology of a late Miocene population of Gomphotherium productus (Mammalia, Proboscidea) from Port of Entry Pit, Oklahoma, USA. Palaios. 16(3):279−293. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1669/0883-1351(2001)016<0279:SIEOAL>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Fox DL, Fisher DC. 2004. Dietary reconstruction of Miocene Gomphotherium (Mammalia, Proboscidea) from the Great Plains region, USA, based on the carbon isotope composition of tusk and molar enamel. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 206(3–4):311–335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2004.01.010.
   Google Scholar
• Gheerbrant E, Tassy P. 2009. L’origine et l’évolution des éléphants. Comptes Rendus Palevol. 8(2–3):281−294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2008.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Hanausek TF. 1907. The microscopy of technical products. New York; London: John Wiley and Sons; Chapman and Hall Ltd; p. 425.
   Google Scholar
• Höhnel V. 1892. Beitrag zur kenntniss der technisch verwendet enelfenbein arten. Zeitschrift für Nahrungsmittel-Untersuchung, Hygiene und Waarenkunde. 7:183–188.
   Google Scholar
• Holec P. 1985. Finds of mastodon/Proboscidea, Mammalia/relics in Neogene and Quaternary sediments of Slovakia/ČSSR. Západn. Karp. sér. Paleontol. 10:13–53.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe KA, Koch PL. 2007. Reconstructing the migration patterns of late Pleistocene mammals from northern Florida, USA. Quaternary Research. 68(3):347–352. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yqres.2007.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe KA, Koch PL, Carlson RW, Web SD. 1999. Tracking mammoths and mastodons: reconstruction of migratory behavior using strontium isotope ratios. Geology. 27(5):439–442. doi:https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0439:TMAMRO>2.3.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jantou V, Turmaine M, Wes GD, Horton MA, McComb DW. 2009. Focused ion beam milling and ultramicrotomy of mineralised ivory dentine for analytical transmission electron microscopy. Micron. 40:495–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jantou-Morris V, Horton MA, McComb DW. 2010. The nano-morphological relationships between apatite crystals and collagen fibrils in ivory dentine. Biomaterials. 31(19):5275–5286. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.025.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lambert WD. 2005. The microstructure of proboscidean ivory and its application to the subordinal identification of isolated ivory specimens. Bull Fla Mus Nat Hist. 45:521–530.
   Google Scholar
• Locke M. 2008. Structure of ivory. J Morph. 269(4):423–450. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10585.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miles AEW, White JW. 1960. Ivory. Proc R Soc Med. 53:775–780.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Owen R. 1854. The principal forms of the skeleton and of the teeth. Philadelphia: Blanchard and Lea; p. 304.
   Google Scholar
• Palombo MR, Villa P 2001. Schreger lines as support in the Elephantinae identification. In: Cavarretta G, Giolia F, Mussi M, Palombo MR, editors. La Terra degli Elefanti/The World of Elephants. Attidel 1 Congresso Internazionale/Proceedings of the 1st International Congress; Rome: Consiglio Nazionaledelle Ricerche. p. 656–660.
   Google Scholar
• Penniman TK. 1952. Pictures of ivory and other animal teeth, bone and antler. Occas Pap Technol. 5:4–40.
   Google Scholar
• Raubenheimer EJ, Bosman MC, Vorster R, Noffke CE. 1998. Histogenesis of the chequered pattern of ivory of the African elephant (Loxodonta africana). Arch Oral Biol. 43(12):969–977. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9969(98)00077-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanford EC. 1973. The identification and working of ivory [Master’s thesis]. Institute of Archaeology, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders JJ. 1979. A close look at ivory. Living Mus. 41:56–59.
   Google Scholar
• Schreger BNG. 1800. Beitragzur geschichte der zähne. Beitragefür die Zergliederungskunst. 1: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Seitl L. 1985. Fauna mastodontů (Proboscidea, Mammalia) moravské části vídeňské pánve. Čas. Morav. Muz. 70:71–94.
   Google Scholar
• Shoshani J. 1996. Skeletal and other basic anatomical features of elephants. In: Shoshani J, Tassy P, Proboscidea T, editors. Evolution and paleoecology of elephants and their relatives. 2nd. 1997. New York: Oxford University Press; p. 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Shoshani J. 1996b. Para- or monophyly of the gomphotheres and their position within Proboscidea. In: Shoshani J, Tassy P, editors. The Proboscidea. Evolution and Paleoecology of Elephants and Their Relatives (2nd edition 1997), Oxford University Press, New York, 149–177.
   Google Scholar
• Shoshani J, Golenberg GM, Yang H. 1998. Elephantidae phylogeny: morphological versus molecular results. Acta Theriol (Warsz). 43(Suppl. 5):89–122. Erratum: on p. 99, subfamily Elephantinae should include Primelephas as shown in table 1, p. 93. doi:https://doi.org/10.4098/AT.arch.98-37.
   Google Scholar
• Singh RR, Goyal SP, Khanna PP, Mukherjee PK, Sukumar R. 2006. Using morphometric and analytical techniques to characterize elephant ivory. Forensic Sci Int. 162(1–3):144–151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.028.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Su XW, Cui FZ. 1997. Direct observations on apatite crystals in ivory. J Mater Sci Lett. 16(14):1198–1200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765409.
   Google Scholar
• Su XW, Cui FZ. 1999. Hierarchical structure of ivory: from nanometer to centimeter. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 7(1):19–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-4931(98)00067-8.
   Google Scholar
• Tabuce R, Delmer C, Gheerbrant E. 2007. Evolution of the tooth enamel microstructure in the earliest proboscideans (Mammalia). Zool J Linn Soc. 149(4):611–628. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00272.x.
   Google Scholar
• Tassy P. 1977. Découverte de Zygolophodon turicensis (Schinz) (Proboscidea, Mammalia) au lieu-dit Malartic a Simorre, Gers (Vindobonien moyen); Implications paléoécologiques et biostratigraphiques. Geobios. 10(5):655–669. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-6995(77)80045-4.
   Google Scholar
• Tassy P. 1996. Growth and sexual dimorphism among Miocene elephantoids: the example of Gomphotherium angustidens. In: Shoshani J, Tassy P, editors. The Proboscidea. evolution and paleoecology of elephants and their relatives. 2nd edn, 1997. New York: Oxford University Press; p. 92–100.
   Google Scholar
• Tassy P. 2013. L’anatomie cranio-mandibulaire de Gomphotherium angustidens (Cuvier, 1817) (Proboscidea, Mammalia) : données issues du gisement d’En Péjouan (Miocène moyen du Gers, France). Geodiversitas. 35(2):377–445. doi:https://doi.org/10.5252/g2013n2a6.
   Google Scholar
• Tassy P. 2014. L’odontologie de Gomphotherium angustidens (Cuvier, 1817) (Proboscidea, Mammalia) : données issues du gisement d’En Péjouan (Miocène moyen du Gers, France). Geodiversitas. 36(1):35–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.5252/g2014n1a2.
   Google Scholar
• Theodorou G, Agiadi K 2001. Observations on the microstructure of fossil tusks from the Charkadio Cave (Tilos, Dodekanese, Greece). In: Cavarretta G, Giolia F, Mussi M, Palombo MR, editors. La Terra degli Elefanti/The World of Elephants. Attidel 1 Congresso Internazionale/Proceedings of the 1st International Congress. Rome: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche. p. 563–567.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton JI. 1980. Forensic identification of ivory species. Final Report on Contract No. 14-16-0009-031. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
   Google Scholar
• Tobien H. 1973. On the evolution of mastodonts (Proboscidea, Mammalia). Part 1: the bunodont trilophodont groups. Hess Landes Amt Bodenforsch. 101:202–276.
   Google Scholar
• Trapani J, Fisher DC. 2003. Discriminating proboscidean taxa using features of the Schreger pattern in tusk dentin. J Archaeol Sci. 30(4):429–438. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.2002.0852.
   Google Scholar
• Virág A. 2012. Histogenesis of the unique morphology of proboscidean ivory. J Morph. 273(12):1406–1423. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.20069.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang S-Q, Deng T, Tang T, Xie G, Zhang Y, Wang D. 2015. Evolution of Protanancus (Proboscidea, Mammalia) in East Asia. J Vertebr Paleontol. 35(1):e881830. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2014.881830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S-Q, Deng T, Ye J, He W, Chen S-Q. 2017. Morphological and ecological diversity of Amebelodontidae (Proboscidea, Mammalia) revealed by a Miocene fossil accumulation of an upper-tuskless proboscidean. J Syst Palaeontol. 15:601–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar