A comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of coelacanth fishes (Sarcopterygii, Actinistia) with comments on the composition of the Mawsoniidae and Latimeriidae: evaluating old and new methodological challenges and constraints

References

• Agassiz L. 1835. Recherches Sur Les Poissons Fossiles. Neuchâtel: Imprimerie de Petitpierre. Vol. 4; p. 35–64. Livraison (Feuilleton).
   Google Scholar
• Arratia G, Schultze H-P. 1999. Mesozoic fishes from Chile. In: Arratia G, Schultze H-P, editors. Mesozoic fishes, Vol. 2, Systematics and Fossil Record. München: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil; p. 565–594.
   Google Scholar
• Arratia G, Schultze H-P. 2015. A new fossil actinistian from the Early Jurassic of Chile and its bearing on the phylogeny of Actinistia. J Vertebr Paleontol. 35(5):e983524. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2015.983524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bapst DW. 2012. paleotree: an R package for paleontological and phylogenetic analyses of evolution. Methods Ecol Evol. 3(5):803–807. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00223.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bapst DW. 2013. A stochastic rate-calibrated method for time-scaling phylogenies of fossil taxa. Methods Ecol Evol. 4(8):724–733. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12081.
   Google Scholar
• Bapst DW. 2014. Preparing paleontological datasets for phylogenetic comparative methods. In: LZ G, editor. Modern phylogenetic comparative methods and their application in evolutionary biology. Concepts and Practice. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; p. 515–544.
   Google Scholar
• Bell MA, Lloyd GT. 2014. strap: an R package for plotting phylogenies against stratigraphy and assessing their stratigraphic congruence. Palaeontology. 58(2):379–389. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellotti C. 1857. Descrizione di alcune nuove specie di pesci fossili di Perledo e di altre località Lombarde. In: Stoppani A, editor. Studii Geologici e Paleontologici sulla Lombardia. Milano: Presso Carlo Turati; p. 419–438.
   Google Scholar
• Bemis WE. 2016. Species and the fossil record of fishes. In: Allmon WD, Yacobucci MM, editors. Species and speciation in the fossil record. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago press; p. 312–339.
   Google Scholar
• Benton MJ, Storrs GW. 1994. Testing the quality of the fossil record: paleontological knowledge is improving. Geology. 22(2):111–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1994)022<0111:TTQOTF>2.3.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg LS 1940. Classification of fishes, both recent and fossil. Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Leningrad. 5:1–431.
   Google Scholar
• Berg LS. 1955. Classification of fishes and fish-like vertebrates. Vol. 20, Second ed. Leningrad: Trudy Zoologischekogo Instituta. p. 1–286
   Google Scholar
• Brusatte SL, Benton MJ, Ruta M, Lloyd GT. 2008. Superiority, competition, and opportunism in the evolutionary radiation of dinosaurs. Science. 321(5895):1485–1488. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1161833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho MSS, Maisey JG. 2008. New occurrence of Mawsonia (Sarcopterygii: Actinistia) from the Early Cretaceous of the Sanfranciscana Basin, Minas Gerais, Southeastern Brazil. In: Cavin L, Longbottom A, Richter M, editors. Fishes and the break-up of Pangaea (Vol. 295). London: Geological Society. Special Publications; p. 109–144.
   Google Scholar
• Casane D, Laurenti P. 2013. Why coelacanths are not “living fossils”. Bioessays. 35(4):332–338. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201200145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cavin L. 2019. Cœlacanthe: un poisson énigmatique. Paris: Le Cavalier Bleu.
   Google Scholar
• Cavin L, Buffetaut E, Dutour Y, Garcia G, Le Loeuff J, Méchin A, Méchin P, Tong H, Tortosa T, Turini E, et al. 2020. The last known freshwater coelacanths: new Late Cretaceous mawsoniid remains (Osteichthyes: Actinistia) from Southern France. PLoS ONE. 15(6):e0234183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavin L, Cupello C, Yabumoto Y, Fragoso L, Deesri U, Brito PM 2019a. Phylogeny and evolutionary history of mawsoniid coelacanths. Bull Kitakyushu Mus Nat Hist Hum Hist, Series A, Natural History. 17:3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Cavin L, Ferrante C, Grădinaru E 2019b. European Triassic coelacanths: new occurrence and the impact on the evolutionary history of the group. The 12th Romanian Symposium of Palaeontology: 18. Cluj-Napaca.
   Google Scholar
• Cavin L, Forey PL. 2007. Using ghost lineages to identify diversification events in the fossil record. Biol Lett-Uk. 3(2):201–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2006.0602.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cavin L, Furrer H, Obrist C. 2013. New coelacanth material from the Middle Triassic of Eastern Switzerland, and comments on the taxic diversity of actinistans. Swiss J Geosci. 106(2):161–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00015-013-0143-7.
   Google Scholar
• Cavin L, Grădinaru E. 2014. Dobrogeria aegyssensis, a new early Spathian (Early Triassic) coelacanth from North Dobrogea (Romania). Acta Geol Pol. 64(2):161–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavin L, Guinot G. 2014. Coelacanths as “almost living fossils”. Front Ecol Evol. 2(49):1–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2014.00049.
   Google Scholar
• Cavin L, Mennecart B, Obrist C, Costeur L, Furrer H. 2017. Heterochronic evolution explains novel body shape in a Triassic coelacanth from Switzerland. Sci Rep-Uk. 7(13695):1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cavin L, Valentin X, Garcia G. 2016. A new mawsoniid coelacanth (Actinistia) from the Upper Cretaceous of Southern France. Cretaceous Res. 62:65–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2016.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choo B. 2011. Revision of the actinopterygian genus Mimipiscis (=Mimia) from the Upper Devonian Gogo Formation of Western Australia and the interrelationships of the early Actinopterygii. Earth Env Sci T R So. 102:77–104.
   Google Scholar
• Clément A, King B, Lu J, Dutel H, Trinajstic K, Cloutier R, Long J 2018. Rates of evolution in actinistians (Osteichthyes: Sarcopterygii) and an exceptional new 3D coelacanth the Devonian of Australia. 5th International Paleontological Congress. Abstract book. p. 514. Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Clément G. 2005. A new coelacanth (Actinistia, Sarcopterygii) from the Jurassic of France, and the question of the closest relative fossil to Latimeria. J Vertebr Paleontol. 25(3):481–491. doi:https://doi.org/10.1671/0272-4634(2005)025[0481:ANCASF]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clément G. 2006. Swenzia, n. nov., a replacement name for the preoccupied coelacanth genus Wenzia Clément, 2005. J Vertebr Paleontol. 26(2):461. doi:https://doi.org/10.1671/0272-4634(2006)26[461:SNNARN]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloutier R. 1991a. Interrelationships of Paleozoic actinistians: patterns and trends. In: Chang MM, YL L, GM Z, editors. Early vertebrate studies and related problems of evolutionary Biology. Beijing: Science Press; p. 379–428.
   Google Scholar
• Cloutier R. 1991b. Patterns, trends, and rates of evolution within the Actinistia. Environ Biol Fish. 32(1–4):23–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00007444.
   Google Scholar
• Cloutier R. 1996. The primitive actinistian Miguashaia bureaui schultze (Sarcopterygii). In: Schultze H-P, Cloutier R, editors. Devonian fishes and plants of Miguasha. Quebec (Canada. München): Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil; p. 227–247.
   Google Scholar
• Cloutier R, Forey PL. 1991. Diversity of extinct and living actinistian fishes (Sarcopterygii). Environ Biol Fish. 32(1–4):59–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00007445.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen KM, Harper DAT, Gibbard PL, Fan JX 2020. ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart 2020/01. International Commission on Stratigraphy, IUGS. [accessed 2020 Aug 01]. https://stratigraphy.org/icschart/ChronostratChart2020-01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Congreve CR, Lamsdell JC. 2016. Implied weighting and its utility in palaeontological datasets: a study using modelled phylogenetic matrices. Palaeontology. 59(3):447–462. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope ED. 1894. New and little known Paleozoic and Mesozoic fishes. J Acad Nat Sci Philadelphia. IX(4):427–448. 2nd series.
   Google Scholar
• Core Team R. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [accessed 2020 Jul 01]. http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Dutel H, Herbin M, Clément G. 2015. First occurrence of a mawsoniid coelacanth in the Early Jurassic of Europe. J Vertebr Paleontol. 35(3):e929581. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2014.929581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutel H, Maisey JG, Schwimmer DR, Janvier P, Herbin M, Clément G. 2012. The giant cretaceous coelacanth (Actinistia, Sarcopterygii) Megalocoelacanthus dobiei Schwimmer, Stewart & Williams, 1994, and its bearing on latimerioidei interrelationships. PLoS ONE. 7(11):1–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egerton P. 1861. Holophagus gulo. In: Huxley TH, editor. Preliminary essay upon the systematic arrangement of the fishes of the Devonian epoch. London: Decade X; p. 1–40. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of the United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Erdmann M 2008. Latimeria menadoensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008: e.T135484A4129545.
   Google Scholar
• Evans WH. 1953. A catalogue of the American Hesperiidae indicating the classification and nomenclature adopted in the British Museum. Part III. , editors. Cat. amer. Hesp. Brit. Mus. 3. London: British Museum (Natural History). p. 1–246.
   Google Scholar
• Farris JS. 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Syst Zool. 18(4):374–385. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2412182.
   Google Scholar
• Forey PL. 1981. The coelacanth Rhabdoderma in the Carboniferous of the British Isles. Palaeontology. 24(1):203–229.
   Google Scholar
• Forey PL. 1984. The coelacanth as a living fossil. In: Eldredge N, Stanley SM, editors. Living Fossils. New York: Springer Verlag; p. 166–169.
   Google Scholar
• Forey PL. 1988. Golden jubilee for the coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae. Nature. 336(6201):727–732. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/336727a0.
   Google Scholar
• Forey PL. 1991. Latimeria chalumnae and its pedigree. Environ Biol Fish. 32(1–4):75–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00007446.
   Google Scholar
• Forey PL. 1998. History of the coelacanth fishes. London: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Forey PL. 2009. Coelacanth: portrait of a living fossil. London: Forrest Text.
   Google Scholar
• Fragoso LGC 2014. Revisão do ramo gondwánico da familia Mawsoniidae (Sarcopterygii, Actinistia, Coelacanthiformes) [dissertation]. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade do Estado de Rio de Janeiro.
   Google Scholar
• Fragoso LGC, Brito P, Yabumoto Y. 2018. Axelrodichthys araripensis Maisey, 1986 revisited. Hist Biol. 31(10):1350–1372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricke H, Hissmann K, Froese R, Schauer J, Plante R, Fricke S. 2011. The population biology of the living coelacanth studied over 21 years. Mar Biol. 158(7):1511–1522. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-011-1667-x.
   Google Scholar
• Fricke H, Hissmann K, Schauer J, Reinicke O, Kasang L, Plante R. 1991. Habitat and population size of the coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae at grand comoro. Environ Biol Fish. 32(1–4):287–300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00007462.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman M. 2007. Styloichthys as the oldest coelacanth: implications for early osteichthyan interrelationships. J Syst Palaeontol. 5(3):289–343. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1477201907002052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman M, Coates MI. 2006. A newly recognized fossil coelacanth highlights the early morphological diversification of the clade. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci, B. 273:245–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo V, Miguel R. 2014. Discussion on the systematic position of the only known coelacanth from Chile. Geologia:Boletim do Museu Nacional. Vol. 77 p.1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gallo V, Miguel R, Wu F 2014. The validity of Changxingia aspratalis as a Mawsoniidae (Sarcopterygii: Actinistia). PALEO 2014 RJ/ES. Livro de Resumos. p. 15.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner BG, Bartram AWH. 1977. The homologies of ventral cranial fissures in osteichthyans. In: Andrews SM, Miles RS, Walker AD, editors. Problems in vertebrate evolution. London: Academic Press; p. 227–245.
   Google Scholar
• Geng BH, Zhu M, Jin F. 2009. A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Guizhoucoelacanthus (Sarcopterygii, Actinistia) from the Triassic of China. Vert Palas. 47:311–329.
   Google Scholar
• Gess RW, Coates MI. 2015. Fossil juvenile coelacanths from the Devonian of South Africa shed light on the order of character acquisition in actinistians. Zool J Linn Soc-Lond. 175(2):360–383. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12276.
   Google Scholar
• Goloboff PA. 1993. Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics. 9(1):83–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1993.tb00209.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goloboff PA, Carpenter JM, Salvador Arias J, Miranda Esquivel DR. 2008b. Weighting against homoplasy improves phylogenetic analysis of morphological data sets. Cladistics. 24(5):1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00209.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goloboff PA, Catalano SA. 2016. TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics. Cladistics. 32(3):221–238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goloboff PA, Farris JS, Nixon KC. 2008a. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics. 24(5):1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00217.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf J. 2012. A new Early Cretaceous coelacanth from Texas. Historical Biology. 24(4):441–452. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2012.696636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grande L. 2004. Categorizing various classes of morphological variation, and the importance of this to vertebrate paleontology. In: Arratia G, Tintori A, editors. Mesozoic Fishes, Vol. 3, Systematics, Paleoenvironments and Biodiversity. München: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil; p. 123–136.
   Google Scholar
• Grande L 2010. An empirical synthetic pattern study of gars (Lepisosteiformes) and closely related species, based mostly on skeletal anatomy. The Resurrection of Holostei. Amer. Soc. Ichthyol. Herpetol, Spec. Publ. 6 (Suppl. to Copeia 10 (2A)):1–871.
   Google Scholar
• Grande L, Bemis WE. 1998. A comprehensive phylogenetic study of amiid fishes (Amiidae) based on comparative skeletal anatomy. An empirical search for interconnected patterns of natural history. J Vertebr Paleontol. 18(sup1):1–696. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.1998.10011114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennig E 1951. Trachymetopon liassicum, Ald., ein Riesen-Crossopterygier aus Schwäbischem Ober-Lias. Neues Jahrb Geol Paläont. 94:67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck JP. 1994. Comparing the stratigraphic record to estimates of phylogeny. Paleobiology. 20(4):470–483. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S009483730001294X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley TH 1861. Preliminary essay upon the systematic arrangement of the fishes of the Devonian epoch. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of the United Kingdom. 10:1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Jaekel O 1927. Der Kopf der Wirbeltiere. Ergebnisse der Anatomie und Entwicklungsgesch, Z Anat Entwicklungs. 27:815–974.
   Google Scholar
• Jain SL. 1974. Indocoelacanthus robustus n.gen., n.sp. (Coelacanthidae, Lower Jurassic), the first fossil coelacanth from India. J Paleontol. 48(1):49–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessen H. 1973. Weitere Fischreste aus dem Oberen Plattenkalk der Bergisch-Gladbach—Paffrather Mulde Rheinisches (Oberdevon, Rheinesches Schiefergebirge). Palaeontogr Abt A Palaeozool-stratigr. 143:159–187.
   Google Scholar
• Johanson J, Long JA, Talent JA, Janvier P, Warren JW. 2006. Oldest coelacanth, from the Early Devonian of Australia. Biology Lett. 2(3):443–446. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2006.0470.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kadarusman K, Sugeha HY, Pouyaud L, Hocdé R, Hismayasari IB, Gunaisah E, Widiarto SB, Arafat G, Widyasari F, Mouillot D. 2020. A thirteen-million-year divergence between two lineages of Indonesian coelacanths. Sci Rep-Uk. 10(1):192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57042-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King B. 2019. Which morphological characters are influential in a Bayesian phylogenetic analysis? Examples from the earliest osteichthyans. Biology Lett. 15(7):20190288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2019.0288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King B, Qiao T, Lee MSY, Zhu M, Long JA. 2017. Bayesian morphological clock methods resurrect placoderm monophyly and reveal rapid early evolution in jawed vertebrates. Syst Biol. 66(4):499–516. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syw107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laurin M. 2004. The evolution of body size, Cope’s rule and the origin of Amniotes. Syst Biol. 53(4):594–622. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150490445706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman JP 1952. Étude complementaire des poissons de l’Eotrias de Madagascar. Kungliga Svenska VetAkad. Handlingar. 2:1–201.
   Google Scholar
• Lehman JP. 1966. Crossopterygii. In: Piveteau J, editor. Traité de Palaéontologie (Vol. IV(3)). Paris: Masson et Cie; p. 301–412.
   Google Scholar
• Liu GB, Yin GZ, Luo YM, Wang XH, Wang SY. 2006. Preliminary examination of fish fossils from Upper Triassic Wayao Member of Falang Formation in Guanling of Guizhou. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica. 1:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lu J, Zhu M. 2009. An onychodont fish (Osteichthyes, Sarcopterygii) from the Early Devonian of China, and the evolution of the Onychodontiformes. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio. 277(1679):293–299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0708.
   Google Scholar
• Lund R, Lund W. 1984. New genera and species of coelacanths from the Bear Gulch Limestone (Lower Carboniferous) of Montana (U.S.A.). Geobios. 17(2):237–244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-6995(84)80145-X.
   Google Scholar
• Maisey JG. 1986. Coelacanths from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil. Am Mus Novit. 2866:1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Maisey JG. 1991a. Axelrodichthys Maisey, 1986. In: Maisey JG, editor. Santana fossils: an illustrated atlas. Neptune City: TFH Publications; p. 303–315.
   Google Scholar
• Maisey JG. 1991b. Mawsonia Woodward, 1907. In: Maisey JG, editor. Santana fossils: an illustrated atlas. Neptune City: TFH Publications; p. 316–323.
   Google Scholar
• Martin M, Wenz S. 1984. Découverte d’un nouveau Coelacanthidé, Garnbergia ommata n. g., n. sp., dans le Muschelkalk supérieur du Baden-Württemberg. Stuttgarter Beitr: Naturk. Ser. B(105); p. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Mawson J, Woodward AS. 1907. On the Cretaceous formation of Bahia (Brazil), and on vertebrate fossils collected therein. Quart J Geol Soc London. 63(1–4):128–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.JGS.1907.063.01-04.11.
   Google Scholar
• Melton WG. 1969. A new dorypterid fish from central Montana. Northwest Sci Cheney. 43:196–206.
   Google Scholar
• Miguel R, Gallo V, Morrone JJ. 2014. Distributional patterns of †Mawsoniidae (Sarcopterygii: Actinistia). An Acad Bras Cienc. 86(1):159–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201420130035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millot J, Anthony J. 1958. Anatomie de Latimeria chalumnae. Tome I. Squelette, Muscles et Formations de soutien. Paris: Éditions du CNRS.
   Google Scholar
• Mondéjar-Fernández J. 2018. On cosmine: its origins, biology and implications for sarcopterygian interrelationships. Cybium. 42(1):41–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondéjar-Fernández J. 2019. A new onychodont (Osteichthyes; Sarcopterygii) from the Middle Devonian of Morocco and its bearing on early osteichthyan evolution. J Syst Palaeontol. 18(7):573–606. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2019.1655495.
   Google Scholar
• Münster G 1834. Mittheilungen an Professor Bronn gerichtet. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und Petrefaktenkunde. 1834:538–541.
   Google Scholar
• Münster G 1842. Beitrag zur Kenntniss einiger neuen seltenen Versteinerungen aus den lithographischen Schiefern in Baiern. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und Petrefakten-Kunde, 1842:35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Newberry JS. 1879. Descriptions of new fossil fishes from the Trias. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1(1):127–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1879.tb55116.x.
   Google Scholar
• Norell MA. 1992. Taxic origin and temporal diversity: the effect of phylogeny. In: Novacek MJ, Wheeler QD, editors. Extinction and phylogeny. New York: Columbia University Press; p. 89–118.
   Google Scholar
• Page RDM 2001. Nexus Data Editor (NDE) for Windows. Version 0.5.0. [accessed 2020 Sep 01]. http://www.softpedia.com/get/Science-CAD/NEXUS-Data-Editor.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Pol D, Escapa IH. 2009. Unstable taxa in cladistic analysis: identification and the assessment of relevant characters. Cladistics. 25(5):515–527. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00258.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pol D, Norell MA. 2001. Comments on the Manhattan Stratigraphic Measure. Cladistics. 17(3):285–289. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/clad.2001.0166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pol D, Norell MA. 2006. Uncertainty in the age of fossils and the stratigraphic fit to phylogenies. Syst Biol. 55(3):512–521. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150600755446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouyaud L, Wirjoatmodjo S, Rachmatika I, Tjakrawidjaja A, Hadiaty R, Hadie W. 1999. Une nouvelle espèce de cœlacanthe. Preuves génétiques et morphologiques. Cr Acad Sci III. 322(4):261–267. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0764-4469(99)80061-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qiao T, King B, Long JA, Ahlberg PE, Zhu M. 2016. Early gnathostome phylogeny revisited: multiple method consensus. PLoS One. 11(9):e0163157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quenstedt FA. 1858. Der Jura. Tübingen: Verlag H. Laupp’schen.
   Google Scholar
• Renesto S, Stockar R. 2018. First record of a coelacanth fish from the Middle Triassic Meride Limestone of Monte San Giorgio (Canton Ticino, Switzerland). Riv Ital Paleontol S. 124(3):639–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieppel O. 1980. A new coelacanth from the Middle Triassic of Monte San Giorgio, Switzerland. Eclogae Geol Helv. 73(3):921–939.
   Google Scholar
• Ruta M, Wagner PJ, Coates MI. 2006. Evolutionary patterns in early tetrapods. I. Rapid initial diversification followed by decrease in rates of character change. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio. 273:2107–2111.
   Google Scholar
• Saint-Seine P 1955. Poissons fossiles de l’étage de Stanleyville (Congo Belge). Annales du Musée Royal du Congo Belge. Sciences géologiques. 14:1–126.
   Google Scholar
• Saruwatari T, Iwata M, Yabumoto Y, Hukom FD, Peristiwady T, Abe Y 2019. A detailed morphological measurement of the seventh specimen of the Indonesian coelacanth, Latimeria menadoensis, with a compilation of current morphological data of the species. Bull Kitakyushu Mus Nat Hist Hum Hist, Series A, Natural History. 17:67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Schaeffer B. 1941. A revision of Coelacanthus newarki and notes on the evolution of the girdles and basal plates of the median fins in the Coelacanthini. Am Mus Novit. 1110:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Schaeffer B. 1952. The Triassic coelacanth fish Diplurus, with observations on the evolution of the Coelacanthini. B Am Mus Nat Hist. 99:25–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaeffer B. 1967. Late Triassic fishes from the Western United States. B Am Mus Nat Hist. 135(6):285–342.
   Google Scholar
• Schultze H-P. 1973. Crossopterygier mit heterozerker Schwanzflose aus dem Oberdevon Kanadas, Nebst einer Beschreibung von Onychodontida-Resten aus dem Mitteldevon Spaniens und dem Karbon der USA. Palaeontographica. 143A:188–208.
   Google Scholar
• Schultze H-P. 1993. Osteichthyes: Sarcopterygii. In: Benton MJ, editor. The fossil record (Vol. 2). London: Chapman & Hal; p. 657–663.
   Google Scholar
• Schultze H-P. 2004. Mesozoic sarcopterygians. In: Arratia G, Tintori A, editors. Mesozoic fishes 3. Systematics, Paleoenvironments and Biodiversity. München: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil; p. 463–492.
   Google Scholar
• Schultze H-P. 2018. Hard tissues in fish evolution: history and current issues. Cybium. 42(1):29–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwimmer DR, Stewart JD, Williams GD. 1994. Giant fossil coelacanths of the Late Cretaceous in the Eastern United States. Geology. 22(6):503–506. doi:https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1994)022<0503:GFCOTL>2.3.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddall ME. 1998. Stratigraphic fit to phylogenies: a proposed solution. Cladistics. 14:201–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon E. 1889. Voyage de M. E. Simon au Venezuela (décembre 1887 – avril 1888). 4e Mémoire. Arachnides. Ann Soc Entomol Fr. 6(9):169–220.
   Google Scholar
• Smith AB. 1994. Systematics and the fossil record: documenting evolutionary patterns. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Smith JLB. 1939. A living fish of Mesozoic type. Nature. 143(3620):455–456. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/143455a0.
   Google Scholar
• Smith JLB. 1940. A living coelacanthid fish from South Africa. T Roy Soc S Afr. 28(1):1–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00359194009519797.
   Google Scholar
• Smith JLB. 1953. The second coelacanth. Nature. 171(4342):99–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/171099a0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stensiö E. A:son. 1921. Triassic fishes from Spitzbergen, part 1. Vienna: Adolf Holzhausen.
   Google Scholar
• Stensiö E. A:son. 1922. Über zwei Coelacanthiden aus dem Oberdevon von Wildungen. Palaontol Z. 4(2–3):167–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03041548.
   Google Scholar
• Stensiö E. A:son. 1932. Triassic fishes from East Greenland. Meddelelser Grønland. 83(3):1–305.
   Google Scholar
• Tabaste N 1963. Étude de restes de poissons du Crétacé Saharien. Mélanges Ichthyologiques á la mémoire d’Achille Valenciennes. Mémoire de l’Institut Fondamental d’Afrique Noire, Mélanges Ichthyologiques. 68:437–485.
   Google Scholar
• Toriño P 2018. El género Mawsonia (Actinistia, Latimerioidei) en la ictiofauna de la Formación Tacuarembó (Jurásico Tardío - Cretácico Temprano, Uruguay): sistemática, osteología y anatomía comparada [master’s thesis]. Montevideo: Universidad de la República. Abstract available in: http://www.bib.fcien.edu.uy/files/etd/resumen/uy24-19347R.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Toriño P, Soto M, Perea D, Carvalho MSS. 2020. New findings of the coelacanth Mawsonia Woodward (Actinistia, Latimerioidei) from the Late Jurassic - Early Cretaceous of Uruguay: novel anatomical and taxonomic considerations and an emended diagnosis for the genus. J S Am Earth Sci. 103054. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2020.103054
   Google Scholar
• Wang N, Liu H. 1981. Coelacanth fishes from the marine Permian of Zhejiang, South China. Vert Palas. 19(4):305–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen W, Zhang QY, Hu SX, Benton MJ, Zhou CY, Tao X, Huang JY, Chen ZQ. 2013. Coelacanths from the Middle Triassic Luoping Biota, Yunnan, South China, with the earliest evidence of ovoviviparity. Acta Palaeontol Pol. 58(1):175–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendruff AJ 2011. Lower Triassic Coelacanths of the Sulphur Mountain Formation (Wapiti Lake) in British Columbia, Canada [master’s thesis]. Alberta: University of Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Wendruff AJ, Wilson MVH. 2012. A fork-tailed coelacanth, Rebellatrix divaricerca, gen. et sp. nov. (Actinistia, Rebellatricidae, fam. nov.), from the Lower Triassic of Western Canada. J Vertebr Paleontol. 32(3):499–511. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2012.657317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenz S. 1975. Un nouveau coelacanthidé du Crétacé inférieur du Niger, remarques sur la fusion des os dermiques. Colloq Int CNRS. 218(1):175–190.
   Google Scholar
• Wills MA. 1999. Congruence between phylogeny and stratigraphy: randomization tests and the Gap Excess Ratio. Syst Biol. 48(3):559–580. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/106351599260148.
   Google Scholar
• Wills MA, Barrett PM, Heathcote JF. 2008. The modified Gap Excess Ratio (GER*) and the stratigraphic congruence of dinosaur phylogenies. Syst Biol. 57(6):891–904. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150802570809.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woodward AS. 1891b. The Devonian fish-fauna of Spitzbergen. Ann Mag Nat Hist. Sixth Series(43):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Yabumoto Y. 2002. A new coelacanth from the Early Cretaceous of Brazil (Sarcopterygii, Actinistia). Paleontol Res. 6(4):343–350.
   Google Scholar
• Yabumoto Y. 2008. A new Mesozoic coelacanth from Brazil (Sarcopterygii, Actinistia). Paleontol Res. 12(4):329–343. doi:https://doi.org/10.2517/prpsj.12.329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu M, Yu X. 2002. A primitive fish close to the common ancestor of tetrapods and lungfish. Nature. 418(6899):767–770. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00871.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhu M, Yu X, Lu XL, Qiao T, Zhao W, Jia L. 2012. Earliest known coelacanth skull extends the range of anatomically modern coelacanths to the Early Devonian. Nat Commun. 3(772):1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1764.
   Google Scholar