New records of fossil leaves from Abunã Basin, Upper Pleistocene, Rondônia, Brazil

Reference

• Absy ML, Van Der Hammen. 1976- Alguns dados paleoecológicos de Rondônia, parte sul da Bacia Amazônica. Acta Amazônica. 6:293–299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-43921976063293.
   Google Scholar
• Adamy A (Org.). 2010. Geodiversidade do estado de Rondônia. Porto Velho: CPRM- Serviço Geológico do Brasil;337p.
   Google Scholar
• Adamy A, Pereira LAC. 1991. Projeto Ouro e Gemas: frente Rondônia. Relatório anual da Companhia de Pesquisa de Recursos Minerais. Porto Velho: CPRM, 8-35 p. 8–35.
   Google Scholar
• Adamy A, Dantas ME. 2004. Complexo Hidrelétrico Rio Madeira – Geomorfologia Setor Jirau. Porto Velho: CPRM-SGB Residência de Porto Velho; p. 80.
   Google Scholar
• Adamy A, Romanini SJ. 1990. Geologia da região Porto Velho-Abunã. Folhas Porto Velho (SC. 20-VBV), Mutumparaná (SC. 20-VC-VI), Jaciparaná (SC. 20-VDI), Abunã (SC. 20-VCV), Estados de Rondônia e Amazonas. Programa de Levantamento Geológicos Básicos do Brasil. Brasília: DNPM/CPRM.
   Google Scholar
• Agardh JG. 1858. Theoria systematis plantarum. C.W.K. Gleerup: Lundae. 99p.
   Google Scholar
• Ambwani K. 1992. Leaf impressions belonging to the Tertiary Age of North-East India. Phytomorphology.
   Google Scholar
• Amorim LDM, Sousa LDOF, Oliveira FFM, Camacho RGV, Melo JIM. 2016- Fabaceae na Floresta Nacional (FLONA) de Assú, semiárido potiguar, nordeste do Brasil Rodriguésia-Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio De Janeiro. 67(1):105–123.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade ALP, Miotto STS, Santos EP. 2009. A subfamília Faboideae (Fabaceae Lindl.) no Parque Estadual do Guartelá, Estado do Paraná, Brasil. Hoehnea. 36(4):737–768. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/S2236-89062009000400012.
   Google Scholar
• Anzótegui LM, Horn MY, Herbst R. 2007b. Paleoflora (Fabaceae y Anacardiaceae) de la Formación Andalhuala (Plioceno Inferior), provincia de Catamarca, Argentina. Ameghiniana. 44(3): 525–535.
   Google Scholar
• Anzótegui LM, Herbst R. 2004. Megaflora (hojas y frutos) de la Formación San José (Mioceno Medio) en río Seco, departamento Santa María, provincia de Catamarca, Argentina. Ameghiniana. 41(3):423–436.
   Google Scholar
• Anzótegui LM, Garralla SS, Herbst R. 2007a. Fabaceae de la Formación El Morterito (Mioceno superior) del valle del Cajón, provincia de Catamarca, Argentina. Ameghiniana. 44(1):183–196.
   Google Scholar
• Anhuf D, Ledru, Behling H, Da Cruz JrFW, Cordeiro RC, Van der Hammen T, Karmann I, Marengo JA, De Oliveira PE, Pessenda L,Siffedine A, Albuquerque AL, Da Silva Dias PL. 2006. Mudança paleoambiental na floresta amazônica e africana no LGM. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 239:510–527. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.01.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antal JS, Awasthi. 1993. Fossil flora from the Himalayan foot-hills of Darjeeling District, West Bengal and its palaeoecological and phytogeographical significance. Palaeobotanist. Paleobotânico.
   Google Scholar
• APG II. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants:. Bot JLinn Soc. 141(4):399–436.doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.t01-1-00158.x.
   Google Scholar
• APG III. 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants. Bot JLinn Soc. 161:122–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APG IV. 2016. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants. Bot JLinn Soc. 181:1-20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash A, Ellis B, Hickey LJ, Johnsan K, Wilf P, Wing S. 1999. Manual de arquitetura de folhas:-descrição morfológica e categorização de angiosperms monocotyledonous dicotyledonous dicotyledonous. Washington (DC): Instituto Smithsonian; p. 67. + CD-ROM.
   Google Scholar
• Aublet JBCF. 1775. Histoire des plantes de la Guiane françoise. Didot London & Paris. 976:392.
   Google Scholar
• Awasthi N, Srivastava R. 1992. Fossils leaves and a fruit from Warkalli Beds, Kerala Coast, India. Geophytology, 21:53–57.
   Google Scholar
• Awasthi N, Prasad M. 1990. Siwalik plant fossils from Surai Khola area, western Nepal. Paleobotanist. 38:298–318.
   Google Scholar
• Awasthi N, Mehrotra RC. 1995. Oligocene flora from Makum Coalfield Assam, Índia. Paleobotânico. 44:157–188.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardes-De-Oliveira MEC, Garcia MJ, Castro-Fernandes MC, Pereira KG. 2014. Fabáceas Paleógenas da Região Sudeste de Minas Gerais, Formação Entre-Córregos, Bacia de Aiuruoca, Brasil. Rev Bras Paleontol. 17(3):343–362. doi:https://doi.org/10.4072/rbp.2014.3.06.
   Google Scholar
• BFG. 2015. Growing knowledge: an overview of seed plant diversity in Brazil. Rodriguésia. 66:1085–1113.
   Google Scholar
• Brazil, Sustainable Energy of Jirau Hydroelectric Power Plant. 2017. [accessed 2017 July 15]. http://www.energiasustentaveldobrasil.com.br/a-usina.
   Google Scholar
• Bromhead EF. 1838. An attempt to ascertain characters of the botanical alliances. Edinburgh New Philos J. 25:123–134.
   Google Scholar
• Berry EW. 1916. The lower Eocene floras of southeastern North America. US Geol Surv Prof Pap. 91:1–481.
   Google Scholar
• Berry EW. 1936. Tertiary plants from Venezuela. Proc US Natl Mus. 83:335–360. doi:https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.83-2988.335.
   Google Scholar
• Berry EW. 1945. Late tertiary fossil plants from eastern Colombia. Johns Hopkins Univ Stud Geol. 14:171–186.
   Google Scholar
• Bardon L, Chamagne J., Dexter KG, Sothers CA, Prance GT, Chave J. 2012. Origem e evolução da Chrysobalanaceae: insights sobre a evolução das plantas nos neotrópicos. Bot JLinn Soc. 171:19–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01289.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bittrich V, Trad RJ, Cabral FN, Nascimento-Jr JE, Souza VC. 2015. Calophyllaceae in Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro;[accessed 2020]. http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/jabot/floradobrasil/FB6827.
   Google Scholar
• Bush MB, De Oliveira PE, Colinvaux PA, Miller MC, Moreno JE. 2004. Amazonian paleoecological histories: one hill, three watersheds. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 214:359–393. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-0182(04)00401-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham RJ, Johnson KR. 2004. South American palaeobotany and the origins of neotropical rainforests. Philos Trans RSoc BBiol Sci. 359:1595–1610. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakey R. 2020. NAU geology. Arizona: Northern Arizona University; [accessed 2020 Sep 14]. http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~rcb7/mollglobe.html.
   Google Scholar
• Borges MS, Pires EF, Boelter CR, Meneses MENS, Da-Rosa AAS, Martello AR, Boelter RA. 2014. Impressões foliares Pleistocenas de Malvaceae na área de abrangência do aproveitamento hidroelétrico Jirau, Rondônia, Brasil. Pesquisas em Geociências. 41:243–255. doi:https://doi.org/10.22456/1807-9806.78101.
   Google Scholar
• Castro B, Biondo E, Miotto STS. 2003. O gênero Senna Mill (Leguminosae-caesalpinioideae-cassieae) no sul do Brasil: estimativa da viabilidade emedidas de grãos de pólen. In: Livro de resumos 15:413. XV Salão de Iniciação Científica, Nov 24-28; Porto Alegre: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
   Google Scholar
• Calvillo-Canadell L, Cevallos-Ferriz SRS. 2005. Diverse assemblage of Eocene and Oligocene leguminosae from Mexico. International Journal Plant Sciences. 166(4):671–692. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/430096.
   Google Scholar
• Correa MM, Scudeller VV, Araujo MGP. 2015. Comparative leaf morphological analysis of 20 species of Chrysobalanaceae. Acta Amazonica Manaus. 45(1):13–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392201400983.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen KM, Finney SC, Gibbard PL, Fan JX. 2017. The ICS international chronostratigraphic chart (2013; updated). International Commission on Stratigraphy, IUGS. Epsodes 36(3):199–204.
   Google Scholar
• Colinvaux P, De Oliveira PE. 2001. Amazon plant diversity and climate through the Cenozoic. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 166:51–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-0182(00)00201-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colinvaux PA. 1996. Quaternary environmental history and forest diversity in the neotropics. In: Jackson JBC, Budd AF, Coates AG. (eds). Evolution and environment in tropical america. Chicago: University Chicago Press; p. 359–425.
   Google Scholar
• Colinvaux PA, De Oliveira PE. 2000. Palaeoecology and climate of the Amazon basin during the last glacial cycle. JQuat Sci. 15:56–347. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1417(200005)15:4<347::AID-JQS537>3.0.CO;2-A.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen MCL, Rossetti DF, Pessenda LCR, Friaes YS, Oliveira PE. 2014. Late Pleistocene glacial forest of Humaitá—Western Amazonia. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 415:37–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.12.025.
   Google Scholar
• Cozzuol MA, Latrubesse EM, Silva SAF. 2004. Estudo de viabilidade para implementação de usinas hidrelétricas no Rio Madeira. Porto Velho: UNIR/RIOMAR/FURNAS; p. 56.
   Google Scholar
• Davis CC, Webb CO, Wurdack KJ, Jaramillo CA, Donoghue MJ. 2005. Explosive radiation of malpighiales supports a mid-cretaceous origin of tropical rain forests. Amer Nat. 165:E36–E65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/428296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly DC, Prance GT. 1989. Brazilian Amazon. In: Campbell DG, Hammond HD (eds). Floristic inventory of tropical countries. NewYork: NewYork Botanical Garden; p. 401–426.
   Google Scholar
• De Candolle AP. 1825. Leguminosae. Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis. 2:93.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte L. 2004. Paleoflórula. Cap. 6. In: Rossetti DF, Góes AM. (Eds.) O Neógeno da Amazônia Oriental. Belém, PA: Museu Emílio Goeldi. Coleção Friedrich Katzer; p. 169–198.
   Google Scholar
• Dutra TL, Boardman DR. 2004. Folhas das angiospermas: taxonomia, preservação esua aplicação na reconstituição das floras edos climas do passado. In: TimmLL, CademartoriCV, editors. Métodos de Estudo em Biologia. Canoas: Caderno La Salle XI; p. 280.
   Google Scholar
• Ettingshusen CV. 1870. Beitrage zur Kenntniss der fossilen Flora von Radoboj. Wien: Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse. 61:829–906.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis B, Daly DC, Hickey LJ, Johnson KR, Mitchell JD, Wilf P, Wing SL. 2009. Manual of leaf architecture. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press; p. 200.
   Google Scholar
• Feitosa YO, Absy ML, Latrubesse EM, Stevaux JC. 2015. Late Quaternary vegetation dynamics from central parts of the Madeira river in Brazil. Acta Bot Brasilica. 29:120–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062014abb3711.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes JM, Garcia FCP. 2008. Leguminosae em dois fragmentos de floresta estacional semidecidual em Araponga, Minas Gerais, Brasil: arbustos, subarbustos e trepadeiras. Rodriguésia. 525–546. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860200859309.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry AH. 1993. Four neotropical rainforests. New Haven (Connecticut): Yale University Press; p. 627.
   Google Scholar
• Giraud B, Lejal-Nicol A. 1989. Cassinium dongolense n.sp. bois fossile de Caesalpiniaceae du Nubien du Soudan septentrional. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 59(1–4):37–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-6667(89)90004-3.
   Google Scholar
• Geyler HT. 1887. Über fossil Pflanzen von Labuan. Vega Expeditionens. Vertenskaper Arbor. Stockholm Bd. 4:475–507.
   Google Scholar
• Gobo WV, Iannuzzi R, Erthal F, Robrahn-González EM. 2019. Primeiro registro de macroflora do Pleistoceno final nas margens do rio Teles Pires, MT, Brasil. Rev Bras Paleontol. 22(2):131–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.4072/rbp.2019.2.05.
   Google Scholar
• Haffer J. 1969. Speciation in Amazonian forest birds. Science. 165:131–137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.165.3889.131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herendeen PS, Crepet WL, Dilcher DL. 1992. The fossil history of the Leguminosae: phylogenetic and biogeographic implications. In: Herendeen PS, Dilcher DL, editors. Advances in legume systematics: part 4. The fossil record. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens; p. 303–316.
   Google Scholar
• Herendeen PS, Jacobs BF. 2000. Fossil legumes from the middle Eocene (46.0 Ma) Mahenge flora of Singida, Tanzania. Am JBot. 87(9):1358–1366. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2656727.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hickey LJ. 1973. Classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. Am JBot. 60:17–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1973.tb10192.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey LJ, Wolfe JA. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: vegetative morphology. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 62:538–589. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2395267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holanda EC, Cozzuol MA. 2006. New records of Tapirus from the late Pleistocene of southwestern Amazonia, Brazil. Rev Bras Paleontol. 9:193–200. doi:https://doi.org/10.4072/rbp.2006.2.03.
   Google Scholar
• Hoorn C, Wesselingh FP, Ter Steege H, Mora A, Sevink J, Sanmartín I, Sanchez-Mesegue A, Anderson CL, Figueiredo JP, Jaramillo C, et al. 2010. Amazonia through time: andean uplift, climate change, landscape evolution, and biodiversity. Science. 330:927–931. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn SP, Sanford JrRL, Dilcher D, Lott TA, Renne PR,Wiemann MC,Cozadd D,Vargas O. 2003. Pleistocene Plant Fossils in and near La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica: Biotropica, 35(3):434–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn SP, Sanford RL, Dilcher D, Lott TA, Renne PR, Wiemann MC, Cozadd D, Vargas O. 2003. Pleistocene plant fossils in and near La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica. Biotropica. 35:434–441. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2003.tb00598.x.
   Google Scholar
• Iannuzzi R, Vieira CEL. 2005. Paleobotânica. Porto Alegre (RS): UFRGS; p. 167.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin HS, Barneby RC. 1982. The American Cassinae, a synoptical revision of Leguminosae, Tribe Cassieae, subtribe Cassinae in the New World. Mem NewYork Bot Gard. 35(1–2):1–918.
   Google Scholar
• Jacques FMB, Shi GL, Su T, Zhou ZK. 2015. A tropical forest of the middle Miocene of Fujian (SE China) reveals Sino-Indian biogeographic affinities. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 216:76–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2015.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jud NA, Nelson CW, Herrera F. 2016. Fruits and wood of Parinari from the early Miocene of Panama and the fossil record of Chrysobalanaceae. Am JBot. 103:277–289. doi:https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1500425.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joshi A, Mehrotra RC. 2007. Megaremains from the Siwalik sediments of west and east Kameng districts, Arunachal Pradesh. Geol Soc India. 69:1256–1266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MA, De B, Bera S. 2009. Leaf-impressions of Calophyllum L.from the Middle Siwalik sediments of Arunachal Sub-Himalaya, India. Pleione. 3:101–106.
   Google Scholar
• Khan MA, Ghosh R, Bera S, Spicer RA, Spicer TEV. 2011. Floral diversity during Plio-Pleistocene Siwalik sedimentation (Kimin formation) in Arunachal Pradesh, India, and its palaeoclimatic significance. Palaeobiodivers Palaeoenviron. 91:237–255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12549-011-0059-z.
   Google Scholar
• Khan MA, Spicer RA, Spicer TEV, Bera S. 2017. Evidence for diversification of Calophyllum L.(Calophyllaceae) in the Neogene Siwalik forests of eastern Himalaya. Plant Syst Evol. 3:371–386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-016-1376-5.
   Google Scholar
• Khan MA, Bera S, Ghosh R, Spicer RA, Spicer TEV. 2015. Leaf cuticular morphology of some angiosperm taxa from the Siwalik sediments (middle Miocene to lower Pleistocene) of Arunachal Pradesh, eastern Himalaya: systematic and palaeoclimatic implications. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 214:9–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2014.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowlton FH. 1900. Fossil plants of the Esmerelda formation. General geology, economic geology Alaska, Government Printing Center, Washington D.C., USA: U.S. Geological Survey 21st Annual Report, pt. II. p. 209–220.
   Google Scholar
• Knowlton FH. 1930. The flora of the Denver and associated formations of Colorado. US Geol Surv Prof Pap. 155:1–142.
   Google Scholar
• Konomatsu M, Awasthi N. 1996. Some plant fossils of the Churia (Siwalik) Group from Tinau Khola and Binai Khola west-central Nepal. In: Proceeding of symposium Himalayan geology Shimane University, Shimane, Japan. p. 78–94.
   Google Scholar
• Krausel R. 1929. Fossile Pflanzen aus den Tertiar von Sud-Sumatra. Verhand Geol Mijnb Genootsch Neder Kolon Geol Ser. 9:1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Krasser F. 1903. Konstantin von Ettingshusen’s Studien uber die fossile Flora von Ouricanga in Brasilien. Sitzungs-Ber Kaiserlichen Akad Wiss Math Naturwiss Kl. 112:852–860.
   Google Scholar
• Lavin M, Herendeen PS, Wojciechowski MF. 2005. Evolutionary rates analysis of Leguminosae implicates arapid diversification of lineages during the tertiary. Syst Biol. 54(4):575–594. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150590947131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LPWG (Legume Phylogeny Working Group). 2013. Legume phylogeny and classification in the 21st century: progress, prospects and lessons for other species-rich clades. Taxon. 62(2):217–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.12705/622.8.
   Google Scholar
• Leite CF. 2017. Folhas fósseis da região de Planaltina de Goiás, Pleistoceno, Brasil [Trabalho de Conclusão do Curso (Licenciatura do Curso de Ciências Naturais)]. Planaltina-DF: Faculdade UnB Planaltina; 34p.
   Google Scholar
• Lima HC, Queiroz LP, Morim MP, Souza VC, Dutra VF, Bortoluzzi RLC, Iganci JRV, Fortunato RH, Vaz AMSF, Souza, et al. 2015. Fabaceae in Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro; [accessed 2020 July 16]. http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/jabot/floradobrasil/FB115.
   Google Scholar
• Lindley J. 1836. A natural system of botany, or, a systematic view of the organization, natural affinities, and geographical distribution, of the whole vegetable kingdom: together with the uses of the most important species in medicine, the arts, and rural or domestic economy. 2nd ed. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Linnaeus C. 1753. Species Plantarum 1. Imprensis Laurentii Salvii. Holmiae, Sweden. 560p.
   Google Scholar
• Lott TA, Dilcher DL, Horn SP, Vargas O, Sanford RL. 2011. Pleistocene flora of Rio Puerto Viejo, Costa Rica. Palaeontol Electronica. 14:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marazzi B, Sanderson MJ. 2010. Large-scale patterns of diversification in the widespread legume genus Senna and the evolutionary role of extrafloral nectaries. Evolution. 64(12):3570–3592. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01086.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marinho LC, Amorim AM. 2016. Floras das cangas da Serra dos Carajás, Pará, Brasil: calophyllaceae. Rodriguésia. 67:1277–1280. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860201667526.
   Google Scholar
• Meneses MENS, Pires EF, Da-RosaAAS, Leal LA, Mendes LAS, De Paula MJ, Souza FEF, Benício JRW, Campos LS. 2012a. Registro palinológico de depósitos sedimentares do Rio Madeira na região de abrangência do AHE Jirau, Rondônia, norte do Brasil. Santos, SP: Boletim do Congresso Brasileiro de Geologia (46th). p.43.
   Google Scholar
• Meneses MENS, Pires EF, Da-Rosa AAS, Leal LA, Mendes LAS, De Paula MJ, Souza FEF, Benício JRW, Campos LS. 2012b. Registro palinológico de depósitos sedimentares neopleistocênicos do Rio Madeira, Rondônia, Amazônia Brasileira. Rev Inst Geol. 33:41–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.5935/0100-929X.20120009.
   Google Scholar
• Meneses MENS, Pires EF, Da-Rosa AAS, Mendes LAS, De Paula M, Silva FEF, Benício JRW. 2012c. Fossil and modern pollen from Madeira River basin in the area of influence of the AHE Jirau, Rondonia State, Brazil. Bonito, MS: Annual Meeting of Association of Tropical Biology and Conservation. 49:325.
   Google Scholar
• Miller P. 1754. The gardeners dictionary (Abridged). John James Rimingon. 3:999–1582.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura C. 2011. Folhas fósseis do Ribeirão da Mata: uma abordagem florística eanatômica para caracterização do paleoambiente do Holoceno Médio de Lagoa Santa, MG [Dissertação (mestrado Ciências Biológicas - Botânica)]. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto Biociências, Departamento de Botânica; 107p.
   Google Scholar
• Prance GT. 1972. Chrysobalanaceae. Flora Neotrop. 9:1–409.
   Google Scholar
• Prance GT. 1989. Chrysobalanaceae. Flora Neotrop. 9:1–267.
   Google Scholar
• Prance GT, Sothers CA. 2003. Chrysobalanaceae 1, Chrysobalanus to Parinari. In: Species plantarum: flora of the world. Canberra (Australia): Australian Biological Resources Study; 9:1–319.
   Google Scholar
• Prance GT, White F. 1988. The genera of Chrysobalanaceae: a study in practical and theoretical taxonomy and its relevance to evolutionary biology. Transactions Royal Society of London. 320:1–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad M, Ghosh R, Tripathi PP. 2004. Floristics and climate during Siwalik (Middle Miocene) near Kathgodam in the Himalayan foot-hills of Uttranchal, India. JPaleaontol Soc India. 49:35–93.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez JLM, Castillo-Campos G. 2015. Flora Vera Cruz. México: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones sobre recursos bióticos Xalapa. 24:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Quadros MLES, Rizzotto GJ. 2007. Geologia erecursos minerais do estado de Rondônia. Porto Velho: CPRM; p. 153.
   Google Scholar
• Quadros MLES, Rizzotto GJ, Oliveira JGF, Castro JMR. 2006. Depósitos fluviais da Formação Rio Madeira, pleistoceno superior da Bacia do Abunã, Rondônia. Belém, PA: Simpósio de Geologia da Amazônia, 9: CD-ROM.
   Google Scholar
• Radambrasil. 1978. Projeto. Levantamento de Recursos Naturais, Folha SC. Rio de Janeiro: DNPM/Projeto RADAMBRASIL, 20-Porto Velho; p. 16.
   Google Scholar
• Ramji MV. 1967. Morphology and ontogeny of the foliar venation of Calophylum inophyllum L. Austr JBot. 15(3):437–443. doi:https://doi.org/10.1071/BT9670437.
   Google Scholar
• Rinnert CH. 2010. Análise estrutural de folha de Senna multijuga subsp. lindleyana (gardner) hs Irwin & Barneby (leguminosae, caesalpinoideae) elocalização insitu de compostos com ação biológica de interesse farmacológico [Tese (Doutorado biodiversidade vegetal emeio ambiente)]. São Paulo (SP): Instituto de Botânica da Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente; p. 99.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro JELS, Hopkins MJG, Vicentini A, Sothers CA, Costa MAS, Brito JM, Souza MAD, Martins LGP, Lohmann LG, Assunção PACL, etal. 1999. Flora da Reserva Ducke: guia de identificação das plantas vasculares de uma floresta de terra-firme na Amazônia Central. Manaus: DFID, INPA; p. 800.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzotto GJ. 2005. Projeto Rio Madeira. Levantamento de informações para subsidiar o estudo de viabilidade do aproveitamento hidrelétrico (AHE) do Rio Madeira. AHE Jirau: relatório final. Porto Velho: CPRM - Serviço Geológico do Brasil; p. 213.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzotto GJ, Da Cruz NM, De Oliveira JG, Quadros MLES, CastroJM. 2006. Paleoambiente e o registro fossilífero pleistocênico dos sedimentos da Formação Rio Madeira. Belém, PA: IX Simpósio de Geologia da Amazônia, 1: CD-ROM.
   Google Scholar
• Santos JP. 2013. O gênero Senna Mill. (leguminosae, caesalpinioideae, cassieae) na região centro-oeste do Brasil, com ênfase nas espécies ocorrentes no estado de Goiás [Dissertação (mestrado em Biodiversidade Vegetal)]. Goiânia-GO: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Vegetal da Universidade Federal de Goiás; p. 148f.
   Google Scholar
• Schrire BD, Lavin M, Lewis GP. 2005. Global distribution patterns of the Leguminosae: insights from recent phylogenies. In: I. Friis & H. Balslev (eds.) Plant diversity and complexity patterns: local, regional and global dimensions. Proceedings of an internacional symposium held at the Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, May 25-28. Copenhagen DK: Biologiske Skrifter. p. 375-422.
   Google Scholar
• Silva SCS. 2013. Flora pleistocênica do Paleolago Cemitério, Catalão, GO: taxonomia efitofisionomia [Tese (Doutorado em Geociências)]. Porto Alegre-RS: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Instituto Geociências. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geociências; p. 325f.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson MG. 2006. Plant systematics. 1st ed. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press; p. 590.
   Google Scholar
• Sioli H. 1985. Amazônia: fundamentos da ecologia da maior região de florestas tropicais. Petrópolis: Vozes Ltda; p. 69.
   Google Scholar
• Sothers CA, Alves FM, Prance GT. 2015. Chrysobalanaceae. In: Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro; [accessed 2020 Apr 5]. http://reflora.jbrj.gov.br/jabot/floradobrasil/FB85.
   Google Scholar
• Souza VC, Bortoluzzi RLC. 2015. Senna in Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro; [accessed 2020 Aug 23]. http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/jabot/floradobrasil/FB23149.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens PF. 1974. Areview of Calophyllum L.(Gutifferae) in Papuasia. Austr JBot. 22:349–411. doi:https://doi.org/10.1071/BT9740349.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens PF. 1980. Arevision of the old world species of Calophyllum (Guttiferae). JArnold Arboretum. 61:117–699. doi:https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.8541.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens PF. 2001. Angiosperm phylogeny website. Version 9 [and more or less continuously updated since]. Missouri: Missouri Botanical Garden; [accessed 2019 Nov 2]. http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens PF. 2006. Clusiaceae-Guttiferae. In: Kubitzki K, editor. The families and genera of vascular plants, flowering plants. Berlin: Springer; p. 48–66.
   Google Scholar
• Tobler A. 1923. Unsere paläontologische Kenntnis von Sumatra.Eclogae Geologae Helvetica, 18:313–342.r A. 1923. Unsere paläontologische Kenntnis von Sumatra. Eclogae Geologae Helvetica, 18:313–342.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Hammen T. 2001. Paleoecology of Amazonia: diversidade biológica ecultural da Amazônia. Belém (PA): Editora do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi; p. 19–44.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Hammen T, Hooghiemstra H. 2000. Neogene and Quaternary history of vegetation, climate, and plant diversity in Amazonia. Quat Sci Rev. 19:725–742. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(99)00024-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidotto E, Pessenda LCR, Ribeiro AS, Freitas HA, Bendassolli JA. 2007. Dinâmica do ecótono floresta-campo no sul do estado do amazonas no holoceno, através de estudos isotópicos e fitossociológicos. Acta Amazônica. 37:385–400. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/S0044-59672007000300010.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe JAA. 1993. Method of obtaining climatic parameters from leaf assemblages. US Gov Print Office. 71:5.
   Google Scholar
• Wurdack KJ, Davis CC. 2009. Malpighiales phylogenetics: gaining ground on one of the most recalcitrant clades in the angiosperm tree of life. Am JBot. 96:1551–1570. doi:https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0800207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojciechowski MF, Johanna M, Fabaceae BJ. 2006. The tree of life web project. [accessed 2018 Aug 16]. http://tolweb.org/Fabaceae/21093/2006.06.14.
   Google Scholar
• Wing SL, Herrera F, Jaramillo CA, Gómez-Navarro C, Wilf P, Labandeira CC. 2009. Late Paleocene fossils from the Cerrejón formation, Colombia, are the earliest record of Neotropical rainforest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106(44):18627–18632. pnas–0905130106.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Sun F, Wang J, Dong J, Xie S, Sun M, Sun B. 2019. The diversity and paleoenvironmental significance of Calophyllum (Clusiaceae) from the Miocene of southeastern China. Hist Biol. 31(10):1379–1393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakandawala D, Morton CM, Prance GT. 2010. Phylogenetic relationships of the Chrysobalanaceae inferred from chloroplast, nuclear, and morphological data. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 97:259–281. doi:https://doi.org/10.3417/2007175.
   Google Scholar
• Zappi DC, Filardi FLR, Leitman P, Souza VC, Walter BM, Pirani JR, Forzza RC. 2015. Growing knowledge: an overview of seed plant diversity in Brazil. Rodriguésia. 66(4):1085–1113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860201566411.
   Google Scholar