A new Late Miocene hystricognath rodent assemblage (Caviidae, Dinomyidae, and Neoepiblemidae) from northern Brazil and its biostratigraphic relevance

References

• Agassiz L, Agassiz E. 1868. A Journey in Brazil. University Press. Boston: Bigelow, & Co., Cambridge.; p. 316. Welch.
   Google Scholar
• Alston ER 1876. On the classification of the order Glires. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 67–98.
   Google Scholar
• Ameghino F. 1883. Sobre una colección de mamíferos fósiles del Piso Mesopotámico de la formación Patagónica recogidos en las barrancas del Paraná por el Profesor Pedro Scalabrini. Bol de la Acad Nac Cienc Córdoba. V(1):101–116.
   Google Scholar
• Ameghino F. 1889. Contribución al conocimiento de los mamíferos fósiles de la República Argentina. Actas Acad Nac Cien Córdoba. 1:1–1027.
   Google Scholar
• Ameghino F. 1891. Mamíferos y Aves fósiles argentinos. Especies nuevas, adiciones y correcciones. Rev Chil de Hist Nat. 4:240–259.
   Google Scholar
• Arnal M, Pérez ME, Medina LMT, Campbell KE. 2022. The high taxonomic diversity of the Palaeogene hystricognath rodents (Caviomorpha) from Santa Rosa (Peru, South America) framed within a new geochronological context. Hist Biol. 1–24. doi:10.1080/08912963.2021.2017916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennet ET. 1833. On the Chinchillidae, a family of herbivorous Rodentia, and on a new genus referrable to it. Trans Zool Soc London. 1(1):35–64. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1835.tb00602.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bissaro-Júnior MC, Kerber L, Crowley JL, Ribeiro AM, Ghilardi RP, Guilherme E, Negri FR, Souza Filho JP, Hsiou AS. 2019. Detrital zircon U–Pb geochronology constrains the age of Brazilian Neogene deposits from Western Amazonia. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 16:64–70. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.11.032.
   Google Scholar
• Bowdich TE. 1821. An analysis of the natural classifications of Mammalia: for the use of students and travellers. J Smith. 115.
   Google Scholar
• Burmeister GH. 1885. Examen crítico de los mamíferos y reptiles fósiles denominados por D. Augusto Bravard y mencionados en su obra precedente. Anales Mus Nac Hist Nat Buenos Aires. 3:93–174.
   Google Scholar
• Carrillo-Briceño JD, Reyes-Cespedes AE, Salas-Gismondi R, Sánchez R. 2019. A new vertebrate continental assemblage from the Tortonian of Venezuela. Swiss J Palaeontol. 138(2):237–248. doi:10.1007/s13358-018-0180-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrillo JD, Sánchez-Villagra MR. 2015. Giant rodents from the Neotropics: diversity and dental variation of late Miocene neoepiblemid remains from Urumaco, Venezuela. Paläontologische Zeitschrift. 89(4):1057–1071. doi:10.1007/s12542-015-0267-3.
   Google Scholar
• Cerdeño E, Pérez ME, Deschamps CM, Contreras VH. 2019. A new capybara from the late Miocene of San Juan Province, Argentina, and its phylogenetic implications. Acta Palaeontol Pol. 64(1):199–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozzuol MA. 2006. The Acre vertebrate fauna: age, diversity, and geography. J S Am Earth Sci. 21(3):185–203. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2006.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Elía G, Fabre P-H, Lessa EP. 2019. Rodent systematics in an age of discovery: recent advances and prospects. J Mammal. 100(3):852–871. doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyy179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabre P-H, Hautier L, Douzery EJP. 2015. A synopsis of rodent molecular phylogenetics, systematics and biogeography. In: Hautier L, Cox PG, editors. Evolution of the Rodents: advances in Phylogeny, Functional Morphology and Development. Cambridge: University Press; p. 19–69.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer GW. 1817. Adversaria zoologica. Nouv mém Soc imp nat Mosc. 5:357–472.
   Google Scholar
• Frailey CD. 1986. Late Miocene and Holocene mammals, exclusive of the Notoungulata, of the Rio Acre region, western Amazonia. Contrib Sci Mus Nat His Los Angeles. 374:1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Francis JC, Mones A. 1965. Sobre el hallazgo de Kiyutherium orientalis n.g., n. sp. (Rodentia: Hydrochoeridae) en la Formación Kiyú, de Barrancas de San Gregorio. Departamento de San José, República Oriental del Uruguay Kragleviana. 1:45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Gill T. 1872. Arrangement of the Families of Mammals. Smithsonian Misc Coll. 11(230):1–98.
   Google Scholar
• Gray JE. 1825. An outline of an attempt at the disposition of the Mammalia into tribes and families with a list of the genera appertaining to each tribe. Ann Philos. 10:337–344.
   Google Scholar
• Hautier L, Cox PG. 2015. Evolution of the Rodents: advances in Phylogeny, Functional Morphology and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 608.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiou AS, Bissaro-Júnior MC, Muniz FP, Negri FR, Ribeiro AM, Kerber L. 2022. Paleontologia do Brasil: paleoecologia e Paleoambientes. Rio de Janeiro: Interciência. 29–64.
   Google Scholar
• Kerber L. 2017. Imigrantes em um continente perdido: o registro fossilífero de roedores Caviomorpha (Mammalia: Rodentia: Ctenohystrica) do Cenozoico do Brasil. Terrae Didática. 13(3).
   Google Scholar
• Kerber L, Bissaro-Júnior MC, Negri FR, Souza-Filho JP, Guilherme E, Hsiou AS. 2018. A new rodent (Caviomorpha: Dinomyidae) from the upper Miocene of southwestern Brazilian Amazonia. Hist Biol. 30(7):985–993. doi:10.1080/08912963.2017.1327529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerber L, Candela AM, Ferreira JD, Pretto FA, Bubadué J, Negri FR. 2022. Postcranial Morphology of the extinct rodent Neoepiblema (Rodentia: Chinchilloidea): insights into the paleobiology of neoepiblemids. J Mamm Evol. 29(1):207–235. doi:10.1007/s10914-021-09567-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerber L, Ferreira JD, Negri FR. 2019b. A reassessment of the cranial morphology of Neoepiblema acreensis (Rodentia: Chinchilloidea), a Miocene rodent from South America. J Morphol. 280(12):1821–1838. doi:10.1002/jmor.21067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerber L, Negri FR, Ferigolo J, Mayer EL, Ribeiro AM. 2017b. Modifications on fossils of neoepiblemids and other South American rodents. Lethaia. 50(1):149–161. doi:10.1111/let.12183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerber L, Negri FR, Ribeiro AM, Nasif N, Souza-Filho JP, Ferigolo J. 2017a. Tropical Fossil Caviomorph Rodents from the Southwestern Brazilian Amazonia in the Context of the South American Faunas: systematics, Biochronology, and Paleobiogeography. J Mamm Evol. 24(1):57–70. doi:10.1007/s10914-016-9340-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerber L, Negri FR, Ribeiro AM, Vucetich MG, Souza-Filho JP. 2016. Late Miocene Potamarchine Rodents from Southwestern Amazonia, Brazil - With Description of New Taxa. Acta Palaeontol Pol. 61(1):191–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerber L, Negri FR, Sanfelice D. 2019a. Morphology of cheek teeth and dental replacement in the extinct rodent Neoepiblema Ameghino, 1889 (Caviomorpha, Chinchilloidea, Neoepiblemidae). J Vertebr Paleontol. 38(6):e1549061. doi:10.1080/02724634.2018.1549061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraglievich L. 1926. Los grandes roedores terciarios de la Argentina y sus relaciones con ciertos géneros Pleistocenos de las Antillas. Anales Mus Nac Hist Nat. 34:122–135.
   Google Scholar
• Kraglievich L. 1930. La Formación Friaseana del Río Frías, Río Fénix, Laguna Blanca, etc., y su fauna de mamíferos. Physis. 10:127–161.
   Google Scholar
• Latrubesse EM, Cozzuol M, da Silva-Caminha Saf, Rigsby CA, Absy ML, Jaramillo C. 2010. The Late Miocene paleogeography of the Amazon Basin and the evolution of the Amazon River system. Earth-Sci Rev. 99(3–4):99–124. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latrubesse EM, da Silva Saf, Cozzuol M, Absy ML, da Silva SAF. 2007. Late Miocene continental sedimentation in southwestern Amazonia and its regional significance: biotic and geological evidence. J S Am Earth Sci. 23(1):61–80. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2006.09.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linares OJ. 2004. Bioestratigrafia de la fauna de mamíferos de las Formaciones Socorro, Urumaco y Codore (Mioceno medio-Plioceno temprano) de la región de Urumaco, Falcón, Venezuela. Paleobiología Neotropical. 1:1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Mones A. 1991. Monografía de la Familia Hydrochoeridae (Mammalia, Rodentia). Sistemática–Paleontología–Bibliografía. Courier Forschungs - institut Senckenberg. 134:1–235.
   Google Scholar
• Mones A, Ojasti J. 1986. Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris. Mamm Species. 264(264):1–7. doi:10.2307/3503784.
   Google Scholar
• Nasif N, Candela AM, Rasia L, Madozzo Jaén MC, Bonini R. 2013. Atualización del conocimento de los roedores de la Mesopotamia Argentina: aspectos sistemáticos, evolutivos y paleobiogeográficos. In: Brandoni D, Noriega JI, editors. El Neógeno de la Mesopotamia Argentina. Vol. 14, Buenos Aires: Publicación Especial Asociación Paleontológica Argentina; p. 153–169.
   Google Scholar
• Negri FR, Bocquentin-Villanueva J, Ferigolo J, Antoine P-O. 2010. A Review of Tertiary Mammal Faunas and Birds from Western Amazonia. In: Hoorn C, Wesselingh FP, editors. Amazonia: landscape and Species Evolution. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. p. 243–258, 9781405181136.
   Google Scholar
• Negri FR, Ferigolo J. 1999. Anatomia craniana de Neoepiblema ambrosettianus (Ameghino, 1889) (Rodentia, Caviomorpha, Neoepiblemidae) do Mioceno superior-Plioceno, Estado do Acre, Brasil, e revisão das espécies do gênero. Bol Mus Para Emílio Goeldi. 10:1–80.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary MA, Bloch JI, Flynn JJ, Gaudin TJ, Giallombardo A, Giannini NP, Goldberg SL, Kraatz BP, Luo ZX, Meng J, et al. 2013. The placental mammal ancestor and the Post-K-Pg radiation of placentals. Sci. 339(662):662–667. doi:10.1126/science.1229237.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ortiz Jaureguizar E, Cladera GA. 2006. Paleoenvironmental evolution of Southern South America during the Cenozoic. J Arid Environ. 66(3):498–532. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton JL, Pardiñas UF, D’Elía G. 2015. Mammals of South America. Chicago and London:Rodents. University of Chicago Press. Vol. 2 p.1336.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez ME, Deschamps CM, Vucetich MG, Hautier L. 2017. Diversity, phylogeny and biogeography of the South American “cardiomyine” rodents (Hystricognathi, Cavioidea) with a description of two new species. Pap Palaeontol. 4(1):1–19. doi:10.1002/spp2.1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasia LL, Candela AM. 2018. Reappraisal of the giant caviomorph rodent Phoberomys burmeisteri (Ameghino, 1886) from the late Miocene of northeastern Argentina, and the phylogeny and diversity of Neoepiblemidae. Hist Biol. 30(4):486–495. doi:10.1080/08912963.2017.1294168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinderknecht A, Bolstemann E, Ubilla M. 2010. New records of fossil dinomyids (Rodentia, Caviomorpha) from the San José Department, Southwestern Uruguay. In: Abstracts of the 1th Congreso Uruguayo de Zoología y 10th Jornada de Zoología del Uruguay. Montevideo: Universidad de la Republica; p. 120–123.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues KA, Negri FR, Haag NA. 2016. Biocronoestratigrafia e paleoecologia com base no potencial fossilífero do Cretáceo - Neógeno da Bacia do Acre, Vale do Juruá. Amazônia Sul Ocidental. Relatório Universidade Federal do Acre, Cruzeiro do Sul.
   Google Scholar
• Sant’Anna-Filho, M. 1994. Roedores do Neógeno do Alto Juruá, Estado do Acre, Brasil. Porto Alegre: Pós-Grad. Geoc. UFRGS; p. 167. Dissert. Mestrado
   Google Scholar
• Silva MN, Negri FR. 2016. Sítio Fossilífero Morro do Careca (Formação Solimões), Tarauacá, Acre: sistemática e diversidade. 68ª Reunião Anual da SBPC.
   Google Scholar
• Tejada-Lara J, Salas-Gismondi R, Pujos F, Baby M, Benammi M, Brusset S, De Franceschi D, Espurt N, Urbina M, Antoine P-O. 2015. Life in proto-Amazonia: middle Miocene mammals from the Fitzcarrald Arch (Peruvian Amazonia). Palaeontology. 58(2):341–378. doi:10.1111/pala.12147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tullberg T. 1899. Ueber das System der Nagethiere: eine phylogenetische Studie. Berling: Akademische Buchdruckerei.
   Google Scholar
• Upham NS, Patterson BD. 2015. Evolution of the caviomorph rodents: a complete phylogeny and timetree of living genera. In: Vassallo AI, Antenucci D, editors. Biology of caviomorph rodents: diversity and evolution. A Buenos Aires: SAREM. p. 63–120.
   Google Scholar
• Vucetich MG, Arnal M, Deschamps CM, Pérez ME, Vieytes EC. 2015a. A brief history of caviomorph rodents as told by the fossil record. In Vassallo A, Antonucci D, Eds.Biology of caviomorph rodents: diversity and evolution. 1 A Argentina: SAREM, 11–62. 9789879849736
   Google Scholar
• Vucetich MG, Carlini AA, Aguilera O, Sánchez-Villagra MR. 2010. The tropics as reservoir of otherwise extinct mammals: the case of rodents from a new Pliocene faunal assemblage from northern Venezuela. J Mamm Evol. 17(4):27–65. doi:10.1007/s10914-010-9142-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vucetich MG, Deschamps CM, Morgan CC, Forasiepi A. 2011. A new species of Cardiomyinae (Rodentia, Hydrochoeridae) from western Argentina. Its age and considerations on ontogeny and diversity of the subfamily. Ameghiniana. 48(4):605–620. doi:10.5710/AMGH.v48i4(459).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vucetich MG, Deschamps CM, Olivares AI, Dozo MT. 2005. Capybaras, shape, size and time: a model kit. Acta Palaeontol Pol. 50:259–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vucetich MG, Deschamps CM, Pérez ME. 2012. Palaeontology, evolution and systematics of capybaras. In: Moreira JR, de Barros Ferraz KMPM, Herrera EA, Macdonald DW, editors. Capybara: biology, Use and Conservation of an Exceptional Neotropical Species. New York: Springer; p. 39–59.
   Google Scholar
• Vucetich MG, Deschamps CM, Pérez ME. 2015. The first capybaras (Rodentia, Caviidae, Hydrochoerinae) involved in the Great American Biotic Interchange. Ameghiniana. 52(3):324–333. doi:10.5710/AMGH.05.02.2015.2874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vucetich MG, Deschamps CM, Vieytes EC, Montalvo CI. 2014. Late Miocene capybaras from Argentina: skull anatomy, taxonomy, evolution, and biochronology. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 59(3):517–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vucetich MG, Pérez ME. 2011. The putative cardiomyines (Rodentia, Cavioidea) of the middle Miocene of Patagonia (Argentina) and the differentiation of the Family Hydrochoeridae. J Vertebr Paleontol. 31(6):1382–1386. doi:10.1080/02724634.2011.618194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterhouse GE. 1839. Observations on the Rodentia, with a view to point out the groups, as indicated by the structure of the crania in this order of mammals. Magazine Nat Hist. 3:90–96.
   Google Scholar
• Wood AE. 1955. A Revised Classification of the Rodents. J Mamm. 36(2):165. doi:10.2307/1375874.
   Google Scholar
• Wu S, Wu W, Zhang F, Ye J, Ni X, Sun J, Edwards SV, Meng J, Organ CL. 2012. Molecular and paleontological evidence for a post-cretaceous origin of rodents. PLoS ONE. 7(10):e46445. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar