The “Mirage” of Social Justice: Hayek Against (and For) Rawls

REFERENCES

• Anderson, Elizabeth. 2005. “So You Want to Live in a Free Society (1): What Hayek Saw.” Left2Right blog, May 27. http://left2right.typepad.com/main/2005/05/so_you_want_to_.html.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, Don. 2008. “Hayek & Rawls: An Unlikely Fusion.” Evatt Foundation. http://evatt.org.au/papers/hayek-rawls.html.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, Jason. 2007. “Rawls’ Paradox.” Constitutional Political Economy 18: 287–99. 10.1007/s10602-007-9024-2
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. 1995. Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. 2000. If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're So Rich? Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connin, Lawrence J. 1985. “On Diquattro, ‘Rawls and Left Criticism.’” Political Theory 13(1): 138–41. 10.1177/0090591785013001008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feser, Edward. 1997. “Hayek on Social Justice: Reply to Lukes and Johnston.” Critical Review 11(4): 581–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, Samuel, ed. 1999. John Rawls: Collected Papers. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamel, Claude. 2008. “Hayek et Rawls sur La Jusice Sociale: Les Différences Sont-Elles Plus Verbales Que Substantielles?” Cahiers d'economie politique 54: 85–120.
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, Gerald F. 2007. “On Justifying the Moral Rights of the Moderns: A Case of Old Wine in New Bottles.” Social Philosophy and Policy 24(1): 84–119. 10.1017/S0265052507070045
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, Gerald F. 2010. The Order of Public Reason: A Theory of Freedom and Morality in a Diverse and Bounded World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, John. 1982. “F. A. Hayek and the Rebirth of Classical Liberalism: A Bibliographical Essay.” Literature of Liberty: A Review of Contemporary Liberal Thought 5(4): 19–101.
   Google Scholar
• Hamowy, Ronald. 1961. “Hayek's Concept of Freedom: A Critique.” New Individualist Review 1(1): 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Harsanyi, John C. 1953. “Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk-Taking.” Journal of Political Economy 61(5): 434–35. 10.1086/257416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. 1961. “Freedom and Coercion: Some Comments and Mr. Hamowy's Criticism.” New Individualist Review 1(2): 28–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. 1973. Rules and Order. Vol. 1 of Law, Legislation and Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. 1976. The Mirage of Social Justice. Vol. 2 of Law, Legislation and Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. 1979a. Social Justice, Socialism, and Democracy. Sydney: The Centre for Independent Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. 1979b. The Political Order of a Free People. Vol. 3 of Law, Legislation and Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. 1983. “Nobel Prize-Winning Economist Friedrich A. von Hayek.” Interviewed by Earlen Craver, Axel Leijonhufvud, Leo Rosten, Jack High, James Buchanan, Robert Bork, Thomas Hazlett, Armen A. Alchian, and Robert Chitester. University of California, Los Angeles, Library Center for Oral History Research. http://archive.org/details/nobelprizewinnin00haye.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. 1988. The Fatal Conceit: Errors of Socialism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, David. 1997. “Is the Idea of Social Justice Meaningful?” Critical Review 11(4): 607–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, Will. 1990. Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey, Brink. 2006. “Liberaltarians.” New Republic, December 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, Roderick T. 2005. “Praxeology: Who Needs It.” Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 6(2): 299–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukes, Steven. 1997. “Social Justice: The Hayekian Challenge.” Critical Review 11(1): 65–80. 10.1080/08913819708443444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, Eric. 1983. “Hayek on Justice and the Market: A Reply to Macleod.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13(4): 569–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandle, Jon. Forthcoming. “Utility.” In The Rawls Lexicon, ed. Jon Mandle and David Reidy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, John Stuart. 1859 [ 1977]. “On Liberty.” In Essays on Politics and Society. Vol. 18 of The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, David. 1976. Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, David. 1999. Principles of Social Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, Thomas. 1979. Mortal Questions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Van Parjis, Philippe. 2003. “Difference Principles.” In The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, ed. Samuel Freeman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plant, Raymond. 1991. Modern Political Thought. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 1958 [ 1999]. ‘‘Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical.’’ In Freeman 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 1963. “Constitutional Liberty and the Concept of Justice.” In Freeman 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice, rev. ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1762 [ 1913]. The Social Contract & Discourses. London: J. M. Dent & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Cheyney C. 1977. “Yours, Mine, and Ours: Property Rights and Individual Liberty.” Ethics 87(2): 126–41. 10.1086/292024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tebble, Adam James. 2009. “Hayek and Social Justice: A Critique.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12(4): 581–604. 10.1080/13698230903471343
   Google Scholar
• Tomasi, John. 2012. Free Market Fairness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, Will. 2006. “Is Rawlsekianism the Future?” Cato at Liberty blog, December 4. http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/is-rawlsekianism-the-future/.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, Will. 2008. “The Rawls in Rawlsekianism.” Blog post, April 8. http://willwilkinson.wordpress.com/2008/04/08/the-rawls-in-rawlsekianism/.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, Jonathan. 1991. Robert Nozick: Property, Justice, and the Minimal State. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar