Introduction: Symposium on Robust Political Economy

REFERENCES

• Acemoglu, Daron, and Simon Johnson. 2005. “Unbundling Institutions.” Journal of Political Economy 113(5): 949–95. doi: 10.1086/432166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson. 2001. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation.” American Economic Review 91(5): 1369–1401. doi: 10.1257/aer.91.5.1369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Ubaydli, Omar, et al. 2013. “The Causal Effect of Market Priming on Trust: An Experimental Investigation Using Randomized Control.” PLoS ONE 8(3): e55968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055968
   Google Scholar
• Alves, André Azevedo, and John Meadowcroft. 2013. “Hayek’s Slippery Slope, the Stability of the Mixed Economy, and the Dynamics of Rent Seeking: The Mixed Economy and Rent Seeking.” Political Studies 62(4): 843–61. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berggren, Niclas, and Henrik Jordahl. 2006. “Free to Trust: Economic Freedom and Social Capital.” Kyklos 59(2): 141–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00324.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boettke, Peter J. 1997. “Where Did Economics Go Wrong? Modern Economics as a Flight from Reality.” Critical Review 11(1): 11–64. doi: 10.1080/08913819708443443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boettke, Peter J., and Peter T. Leeson. 2004. “Liberalism, Socialism, and Robust Political Economy.” Journal of Markets and Morality 7(1): 99–111.
   Google Scholar
• Brosig-Koch, Jeannette, Christoph Helbach, Axel Ockenfels, and Joachim Weimann. 2011. “Still Different after All These Years: Solidarity Behavior in East and West Germany.” Journal of Public Economics 95(11–12): 1373–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, James M. [1977] 2001. “Criteria for a Free Society.” In idem, Federalism, Liberty, and the Law. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, James M. 2008. “Same Players, Different Game: How Better Rules Make Better Politics.” Constitutional Political Economy 19(3): 171–79. doi: 10.1007/s10602-008-9046-4
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, James M., and Roger D. Congleton. 2003. Politics by Principle, Not Interest: Toward Nondiscriminatory Democracy. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, James M., and Gordon Tullock. [1962] 1999. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Jeffrey. 1997. “What’s Wrong with Libertarianism.” Critical Review 11(3): 407–67. doi: 10.1080/08913819708443469
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A., ed. 1935. Collectivist Economic Planning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. 1937. “Economics and Knowledge.” Economica 4(13): 33–54. doi: 10.2307/2548786
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. 1940. “Socialist Calculation: The Competitive ‘Solution.’” Economica 7(26): 125–49. doi: 10.2307/2548692
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review 35(4): 519–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. [1968] 1978. “Competition as a Discovery Procedure.” In idem, New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hazledine, Tim, and John Quiggin. 2006. “No More Free Beer Tomorrow? Economic Policy and Outcomes in Australia and New Zealand since 1984.” Australian Journal of Political Science 41(2): 145–59. doi: 10.1080/10361140600672402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirzner, Israel M. 1997. “Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach.” Journal of Economic Literature 35(1): 60–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirzner, Israel M. [1963] 2013. Competition and Entrepreneurship, ed. Peter J. Boettke and Frédéric E. Sautet. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, Jack, and James Johnson. 2007. “The Priority of Democracy: A Pragmatist Approach to Political-Economic Institutions and the Burden of Justification.” American Political Science Review 101(1): 47–61. doi: 10.1017/S0003055407070062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavoie, Don. 1986. “The Market as a Procedure for Discovery and Conveyance of Inarticulate Knowledge.” Comparative Economic Studies 28(1): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Leeson, Peter T., and J. Robert Subrick. 2006. “Robust Political Economy.” Review of Austrian Economics 19(2–3): 107–11. doi: 10.1007/s11138-006-7342-7
   Google Scholar
• Levy, David M. 2002. “Robust Institutions.” Review of Austrian Economics 15(2–3): 131–42. doi: 10.1023/A:1015706419076
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, John. 2005. The Ethics of the Market. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, John. 2014. “Exchange, Unanimity, and Consent: A Defense of the Public Choice Account of Power.” Public Choice 158(1–2): 85–100. doi: 10.1007/s11127-012-9925-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, John, and Mark Pennington. 2007. Rescuing Social Capital from Social Democracy. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• von Mises, Ludwig. 1920. “Die Wirschaftsrechnung im sozialistischen Gemeinwesen.” Archiv fur Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 47: 86–121. Trans. as “Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth” in Hayek 1935.
   Google Scholar
• von Mises, Ludwig. 1963. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, 3rd rev. ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, Dennis C. 2011. “The Importance of Self-Interest and Public Interest in Politics.” Critical Review 23(3): 321–38. doi: 10.1080/08913811.2011.635870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munger, Michael C. 2011. “Self-Interest and Public Interest: The Motivations of Political Actors.” Critical Review 23(3): 339–58. doi: 10.1080/08913811.2011.635871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ockenfels, Axel, and Joachim Weimann. 1999. “Types and Patterns: An Experimental East-West-German Comparison of Cooperation and Solidarity.” Journal of Public Economics 71(2): 275–87. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00072-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Vincent, and Elinor Ostrom. 1971. “Public Choice: A Different Approach to the Study of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 31(2): 203–216. doi: 10.2307/974676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, Mark. 1997. “Budgets, Bureaucrats and the Containment of Urban England.” Environmental Politics 6(4): 76–107. doi: 10.1080/09644019708414359
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, Mark. 2000. “Public Choice Theory and the Politics of Urban Containment: Voter-Centred versus Special-Interest Explanations.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 18(2): 145–62. doi: 10.1068/c9804j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, Mark. 2003. “Hayekian Political Economy and the Limits of Deliberative Democracy.” Political Studies 51(4): 722–39. doi: 10.1111/j.0032-3217.2003.00455.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, Mark. 2010. “Democracy and the Deliberative Conceit.” Critical Review 22(2–3): 159–84. doi: 10.1080/08913811.2010.508632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, Mark. 2011. Robust Political Economy: Classical Liberalism and the Future of Public Policy. Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, Mark. 2013. “Elinor Ostrom and the Robust Political Economy of Common-Pool Resources.” Journal of Institutional Economics 9(4): 449–68. doi: 10.1017/S1744137413000258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, Mark. 2015. “Constitutional Political Economy and Austrian Economics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Austrian Economics, ed. Peter J. Boettke and Christopher J. Coyne. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shleifer, Andrei. 2009. “The Age of Milton Friedman.” Journal of Economic Literature 47(1): 123–35. doi: 10.1257/jel.47.1.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Fred M. 1929. “The Guidance of Production in a Socialist State.” American Economic Review 19(1): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Weingast, Barry R. 1995. “The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 11(1): 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar